logo
Vehicle loses control on Pacific Coast Highway, drives into waters near Bolsa Chica Conservancy

Vehicle loses control on Pacific Coast Highway, drives into waters near Bolsa Chica Conservancy

Huntington Beach police's rapid deployment unit was called to the wetlands near the Bolsa Chica Conservancy early Thursday, where a vehicle was submerged under water after driving off Pacific Coast Highway, officials reported.
The crash happened shortly before 6 a.m., when a vehicle traveling northbound on the highway, just south of Warner Avenue, lost control and careened into the wetlands, Huntington Beach police spokeswoman Jessica Cuchilla said.
The driver, an unnamed man, was able to exit the vehicle as a marine safety specialist equipped with SCUBA gear conducted an underwater clearance to ensure no additional occupants were trapped inside the vehicle.
It was determined the driver was the sole occupant of the vehicle. He sustained no injuries from the crash, and impairment does not appear to have been a factor in the incident, Cuchilla said Thursday.
The vehicle, the make and model of which were not immediately reported by responding officers working the night shift, was successfully removed from the waters.
The 1,445-acre Bolsa Chica Ecological Preserve, one of the largest and last remaining coastal wetlands in California, is home to more than 1,000 documented species of wildlife and is stewarded by the nonprofit conservancy, which offers classes, exhibits, displays and tours in the Interpretive Center located near the scene of Thursday's incident.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lululemon sues Costco for allegedly selling dupes of its popular products

time01-07-2025

Lululemon sues Costco for allegedly selling dupes of its popular products

Lululemon is suing Costco, alleging the wholesale retailer knowingly sold knockoff versions or dupes of its popular products and allegedly acted in bad faith. The Vancouver-based athleisure company filed its lawsuit on June 27 in California. The suit alleges Costco "imported into the U.S., distributed, advertised, marketed, offered for sale and/or sold" products that were dupes of its "innovative, unique and high-performing apparel," including its line of ABC pants, Define jackets and Scuba hoodies and sweatshirts, all of which retail between $118 and $128 at full price on Lululemon's website. The lawsuit noted specific products sold by Costco, including Danskin's Half-Zip Pullover, Jockey's Ladies Yoga Jacket, Spyder's Women's Yoga Jacket, Hi-Tec's Men's Scuba Full Zip, and a 5 Pocket Performance Pant sold under Costco's in-house brand label Kirkland, all of which are significantly cheaper than allegedly similar versions sold by Lululemon. On Costco's website, the Spyder Women's Yoga Jacket, for example, is listed for $21.99. By selling the specified products, Lululemon claimed Costco "caused" and is "likely to continue to cause confusion, mistake, and deception among consumers." In a statement to "Good Morning America," a Lululemon company spokesperson said, "As an innovation-led company that invests significantly in the research, development, and design of our products, we take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary." Lululemon is seeking unspecified damages "in the form of lost profits" or other "adequate" compensation for patent infringement. Lululemon's lawsuit follows the rise of the so-called "dupe economy," fueled by social media influencers who popularize affordable duplicates of high-end or brand-name goods. "Saving money on items is now becoming something that's a little bit in vogue. It's cool to be wearing something that is less expensive but looks like the expensive brand," retail analyst Hitha Herzog told "GMA" previously in 2024. Costco has 21 days to respond to Lululemon's complaint.

Costco accused of selling ‘knockoffs' of popular athleisure brand's clothes: lawsuit
Costco accused of selling ‘knockoffs' of popular athleisure brand's clothes: lawsuit

The Hill

time30-06-2025

  • The Hill

Costco accused of selling ‘knockoffs' of popular athleisure brand's clothes: lawsuit

(NEXSTAR) – Lululemon is almost literally looking to sue the pants off Costco. In a lawsuit filed Friday, the Canada-based athleisurewear company claimed Costco was violating its patents by selling 'knockoff' versions of its pants, as well as its hoodies and jackets. 'Costco has unlawfully traded upon Plaintiffs' reputation, goodwill and sweat equity by selling unauthorized and unlicensed apparel employing knockoff, infringing versions of Plaintiffs' well-known trade dress and design patents (the 'Infringing Products') and to recover fully for the monetary damages and significant harm to lululemon's brands and reputation caused by Defendant,' reads a portion of the lawsuit. Lululemon's lawsuit specifically accused Costco of selling items that infringed on the design of its ABC line of pants, its Define line of jackets, and its Scuba line of zip-ups and hoodies. Lululemon also argues that Costco may be intentionally trying to 'confuse' customers into believing Lululemon was supplying the clothing to Costco for sale under the latter's 'private label.' In addition to forcing Costco to stop selling the alleged 'knockoffs' or 'dupes' (as the lawsuit refers to them), Lululemon is seeking unspecified monetary damages. A representative for Costco did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Lululemon's lawsuit also comes after articles in the Washington Post and The New York Times (both of which are cited in the court docs) reported on the similarities between Lululemon's products and Costco's offerings. In WaPo's article, which was published in January, the author noted that social media users were alerting followers to the Luluemon 'dupes' on their accounts. 'People just eat it up,' one of them told the outlet. In the NY Times article, published in April, the author pointed out several similarities between the ABC pants and the Kirkland (Costco) version, but ultimately found that Lululemon's were 'more thoughtfully designed.' Even still, Lululemon seems intent to show Costco who wears the pants in the athleisure retail world. 'We take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary,' a Lululemon spokesperson told Reuters.

Lululemon sues Costco, alleging the discount retailer copied its designs
Lululemon sues Costco, alleging the discount retailer copied its designs

Yahoo

time30-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Lululemon sues Costco, alleging the discount retailer copied its designs

Lululemon is suing Costco, accusing the discount retailer of selling "confusingly similar" replicas of its jackets, sweatshirts and pants. In a lawsuit filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the athletic and lifestyle apparel company claims that certain Costco products imitate its own designs so closely that it constitutes "trade dress" infringement, which occurs when a product mimics another so closely that it confuses consumers. The apparel company claims that Costco's "knockoff" designs, or product "dupes," violate trademark law because "some customers incorrectly believe these infringing products are authentic Lululemon apparel." In other cases, "customers specifically purchase the infringing products because they are difficult to distinguish from authentic Lululemon products," the lawsuit alleges. "Indeed, one of the purposes of selling 'dupes' is to confuse consumers at the point-of-sale and/or observers post-sale into believing that the 'dupes' are Plaintiffs' authentic products when they are not," the lawsuit alleges. Lululemon refers to itself in the lawsuit as a "path-breaking" apparel company that has set a new standard for performance athletic wear, adding that its "construction techniques" and "strategic fits" help it stand out to consumers. Reached for comment, the Vancouver, Canada-based company said it fiercely defends its products. "As an innovation-led company that invests significantly in the research, development and design of our products, we take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary," a Lululemon company spokesperson told CBS MoneyWatch. Costco did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch's request for comment. While copycat products can be so poorly constructed and designed that they pose no threat to the originals, Costco's dupes have caused a stir for their verisimilitude to the authentic Lululemon goods. A January headline in The Washington Post read, "Is that hoodie Lululemon or a Costco dupe? No one has to know but you." On social media, users post images and videos of Costco athletic-wear products with the hashtag #luludupe or #lululemondupes. What items does Lululemon say Costco copies? The items at the center of the lawsuit include Lululemon's popular "Scuba" hoodies and sweatshirts, its "Define" jackets, and "ABC" stretch pants — that resemble khakis pants — for men. Lululemon's Scuba hoodie retails for $118, while its Define jacket sells for $128. The ABC pants cost $128. According to Lululemon, Costco's infringing products include: Danskin Ladies Half-Zip HoodieDanskin Half-Zip PulloverJockey Ladies Yoga JacketSpyder Women's Yoga JacketHi-Tec Men's Scuba Full ZipKirkland 5 Pocket Performance Pant Lululemon is seeking damages in the form of lost profits, and for Costco to cease the manufacturing and distribution of products Lululemon claims violate trade dress. Video shows Arizona police rescuing baby left alone for days Saving money vs. saving lives Colorado firebombing victim dies, suspect to be charged with 1st-degree murder

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store