Trump's to send more weapons to Ukraine in major U-turn
Trump was seated next to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during the event, which came just hours after the White House defended what it called a 'standard pause' to review the state of U.S. stockpiles, even admit Russia's relentless and ongoing attacks. 'We're going to send some more weapons. We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard. Now, they're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons, your defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess,' Trump said.
Hegseth could be seen glancing at Trump and nodding repeatedly while the president spoke about Russia 's ongoing attacks on Ukraine. Also making noticeable gestures was CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who was seated next to Hegseth. Ratcliffe glanced quickly in Trump's direction, raised an eyebrow, then looked upward while taking a large breath.
NBC reported July 4th that the Pentagon held up a shipment of weapons for Ukraine for a week amid concerns about the capacity of U.S. stockpiles. It said the move blindsided lawmakers, allies, and officials in Kiev and was a 'unilateral step' by Hegseth. Trump, who held an angry Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February where Vice President JD Vance accused Zelensky of not being thankful, on Monday called the war a 'horrible, horrible thing.' 'And I'm not happy with President Putin at all,' he said.
Just hours before Trump announced the U.S. would be sending weapons, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had dismissed a question about whether Trump had ordered the change or if the Pentagon did it without his approval. 'This was a standard review by the Pentagon of all weapons and all aid and all support that the United States is providing,' he said, adding that it applied to regions around the world.
'When the Secretary of Defense took office, he directed the Pentagon to conduct this review to ensure that everything that's going out the door aligns with America's interests,' she said. 'So it's a pause to review, to ensure that everything the Pentagon is pushing out there is in the best interest of our military and our men and women.' The Pentagon confirmed the change, saying at Trump's direction the DOD 'is sending additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops,' spokesman Sean Parnell said.
During the NATO summit, Trump fielded a question from Ukrainian Myroslava Petsa of the BBC, who asked if the US would sell Patriot missile defenses that Ukraine is using to defend against repeated Russian drone and missile attacks. Trump called it 'rough stuff.' The Telegraph reported Monday that Ukraine would get a third of the Patriot defense interceptors it was seeking. Trump had shared his frustration after his last Putin call, telling reporters: 'I didn't make any progress with him at all.'
On Friday, shortly after they spoke, Russia unleashed its largest drone attack of the war on Kiev. Celebrating the news of the shipment was House Republican Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas. 'Glad to see this news. Vladimir Putin is a thug who feigns an interest in peace, then turns around and bombs entire cities. He must be stopped before his aggression extends beyond Ukraine. Thank you, @potus, for projecting peace through strength in every corner of the globe!' McCaul posted on X.
Former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blasted 'restrainers' in the administration and issued a statement attacking the 'strategic incoherence of underfunding our military and restricting lethal assistance to partners like Ukraine.' 'This time, the President will need to reject calls from the isolationists and restrainers within his Administration to limit these deliveries to defensive weapons. And he should disregard those at DoD who invoke munitions shortages to block aid while refusing to invest seriously in expanding munitions production,' he said. The statement tore into 'self-indulgent policymaking of restrainers' that he said 'has so often required the President to clean up his staff's messes.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Amazon withdraws ‘error-strewn' biographies of SNP politicians
The online retailer Amazon has removed unofficial biographies of high-profile SNP politicians from sale that were allegedly strewn with errors. The books, which appeared to have been created using AI, included two on First Minister John Swinney and his predecessor Nicola Sturgeon that were taken down from the site after The Times newspaper reported they contained several false claims. Four more unofficial biographies of Ms Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, another former first minister, were listed as unavailable on Monday after the BBC asked Amazon about the titles. The firm said it removed books that violated its content guidelines. The Times reported that a book about Mr Swinney – called John Swinney Biography: John Swinney: Scotland's Education Architect – falsely claimed the first minister was born in the US to a Polish mother. The newspaper also highlighted several inaccuracies in other books about Ms Sturgeon and Mr Yousaf's families. The books about Mr Yousaf, who was privately educated, repeatedly suggested he had grown up in poverty. One claimed to be an 'exposé' of a police investigation into SNP finances. According to the book description on Amazon, it was written by 'renowned author' Brian B. Porter, who was said to have told the story of Ms Sturgeon and the SNP with 'expert storytelling and meticulous research'. It was the only book of the four to have been reviewed. It had an average rating of 1.3 out of five stars, with disappointed readers describing it as 'terrible' and lacking 'any detail or substance'. Brian B. Porter is named as the author on several other books listed on Amazon – including titles on Silvio Berlusconi, the late Italian former prime minister, the late songwriter Burt Bacharach and Bobby Hull, a Canadian ice-hockey player. An Amazon spokesman said: 'We have content guidelines governing which books can be listed for sale, and we have proactive and reactive methods that help us detect content that violates our guidelines, whether AI -generated or not. 'We invest significant time and resources to ensure our guidelines are followed, and remove books that do not adhere to those guidelines.' Both the Scottish and UK governments have spoken of the positive impact AI technology could have on efforts to improve public services However, writers and publishers have expressed fears about the impact of generative AI programmes, such as ChatGPT, on the creation of new literature and books.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US supreme court clears way for Trump officials to resume mass government firings
The US supreme court has cleared the way for Donald Trump's administration to resume plans for mass firings of federal workers that critics warn could threaten critical government services. Extending a winning streak for the US president, the justices on Tuesday lifted a lower court order that had frozen sweeping federal layoffs known as 'reductions in force' while litigation in the case proceeds. The decision could result in hundreds of thousands of job losses at the departments of agriculture, commerce, health and human services, state, treasury, veterans affairs and other agencies. Democrats condemned the ruling. Antjuan Seawright, a party strategist, said: 'I'm disappointed but I'm not shocked or surprised. This rightwing activist court has proven ruling after ruling, time after time, that they are going to sing the songs and dance to the tune of Trumpism. A lot of this is just implementation of what we saw previewed in Project 2025.' Project 2025, a plan drawn up by the conservative Heritage Foundation thinktank, set out a blueprint for downsizing government. Trump has claimed that voters gave him a mandate for the effort and he tapped billionaire ally Elon Musk to lead the charge through the 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, though Musk has since departed. In February, Trump announced 'a critical transformation of the federal bureaucracy' in an executive order directing agencies to prepare for a government overhaul aimed at significantly reducing the workforce and gutting offices. In its brief unsigned order on Tuesday, the supreme court said Trump's administration was 'likely to succeed on its argument that the executive order' and a memorandum implementing his order were lawful. The court said it was not assessing the legality of any specific plans for layoffs at federal agencies. Liberal justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the sole member of the nine-person court to publicly dissent from the decision, which overturns San Francisco-based district judge Susan Illston's 22 May ruling. Jackson wrote that Illston's 'temporary, practical, harm-reducing preservation of the status quo was no match for this court's demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this president's legally dubious actions in an emergency posture'. She also described her colleagues as making the 'wrong decision at the wrong moment, especially given what little this Court knows about what is actually happening on the ground'. Illston had argued in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing, siding with a group of unions, non-profits and local governments that challenged the administration. 'As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress,' she wrote. The judge blocked the agencies from carrying out mass layoffs and limited their ability to cut or overhaul federal programmes. Illston also ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs, though she delayed implementing this portion of her ruling while the appeals process plays out. Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul pursued by Trump and Doge. Tens of thousands of federal workers have been fired, have left their jobs via deferred resignation programmes or have been placed on leave. The administration had previously challenged Illston's order at the San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals but lost in a 2-1 ruling on 30 May. That prompted the justice department to make an emergency request to the supreme court, contending that controlling the personnel of federal agencies 'lies at the heartland' of the president's executive branch authority. The plaintiffs had urged the supreme court to deny the justice department's request. Allowing the Trump administration to move forward with its 'breakneck reorganization', they wrote, would mean that 'programs, offices and functions across the federal government will be abolished, agencies will be radically downsized from what Congress authorized, critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will lose their jobs'. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The supreme court's rejection of that argument on Tuesday was welcomed by Trump allies. Pam Bondi, the attorney general, posted on the X social media platform: 'Today, the Supreme Court stopped lawless lower courts from restricting President Trump's authority over federal personnel – another Supreme Court victory thanks to @thejusticedept attorneys. Now, federal agencies can become more efficient than ever before. The state department wrote on X: 'Today's near unanimous decision from the Supreme Court further confirms that the law was on our side throughout this entire process. We will continue to move forward with our historic reorganization plan at the State Department, as announced earlier this year. This is yet another testament to President Trump's dedication to following through on an America First agenda.' In recent months the supreme court has sided with Trump in some major cases that were acted upon on an emergency basis since he returned to office in January. It cleared the way for Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face. In two cases, it let the administration end temporary legal status previously granted on humanitarian grounds to hundreds of thousands of migrants. It also allowed Trump to implement his ban on transgender people in the US military, blocked a judge's order for the administration to rehire thousands of fired employees and twice sided with Doge. In addition, the court curbed the power of federal judges to impose nationwide rulings impeding presidential policies. On Tuesday the Democracy Forward coalition condemned the supreme court for intervening in what it called Trump's unlawful reorganisation of the federal government. It said in a statement: 'Today's decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy. 'This decision does not change the simple and clear fact that reorganizing government functions and laying off federal workers en masse haphazardly without any congressional approval is not allowed by our Constitution.'
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Emmanuel Macron says Europeans will ‘never abandon Ukraine'
The French president said Britain and France must work together to protect the international order, in an address to the UK parliament on Tuesday. Macron was welcomed to Britain by King Charles for the first state visit by a European leader since Brexit. During his speech to parliament, the French leader said Europe would never abandon Ukraine, adding that Britain and France would work with the 'coalition of the willing' until the last minute to secure a ceasefire. He also spoke of a need for Britain and France to reduce risks posed by relying too much on the United States and China for trade
