
This Mass. company still makes T-shirts in the US. Its owner doesn't think tariffs will help.
Advertisement
Goodwear generates an estimated $3 million a year in revenue, employs four people, and survives in part by exporting merchandise to Japan, where consumers demand authentic 'Made in the USA' clothing. Other clothing brands that still manufacture inside the US. include American Giant, Everlane, and Todd Shelton.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
However, any apparel maker that wants to be the size of Nike and make clothes in the US. is doomed to fail, Liquori said.
That's a discouraging sentiment for anyone hoping Massachusetts can reprise its industrial dominance from a century ago, when mills in Lowell and other parts of Massachusetts employed tens of thousands.
But by the late 20th century, globalization prompted apparel manufacturers to shift operations to developing countries in Asia and Latin America. Today, more than 97 percent of clothing sold in the US. originates overseas while only 2.5 percent of apparel is domestically produced, according to AllAmerican.org, an advocacy and research group, who supports US. manufacturers.
Advertisement
Experts say returning apparel making to the US. in any meaningful way is highly unlikely, even with tariffs. By some estimates it currently costs $1- $3 in labor costs to make a shirt in China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh compared to $8 to $20 for the United States and Western Europe.
'Those are not the kind of jobs we want anymore,' said Thomas Roemer, senior lecturer in operations management for MIT's Sloan School of Management, who also directs the school's Leaders for Global Operations. 'We want upscale, better paying positions.'
But back in the 1970s, when Liquori was a teenager, nearly all of clothing was US-made. He first became interested in apparel when he attended a silk screen class in high school. He offered to print his track team's name and logo on their t-shirts.
'Everybody took off their white t-shirts that they had on under their dress shirt and threw it at me,' he said. 'And they were all very excited.'
In 1983, Liquori launched Goodwear USA and eventually sold shirts across the country alongside brands like Champion, Russell, and Reebok.
However, the 1994 passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and China's decision to open its borders decimated the US. apparel industry as companies outsourced their operations to foreign labor.
Fortunately for Liquori, Goodwear apparel became a hit in Japan where retailers and consumers demanded authentic Made in the USA merchandise.
Advertisement
'Our phone was ringing off the hook more by virtue of we were one of the remaining people still making domestically,' he said.
Goodwear was also able to control its costs because it never owned its own factory. Goodwear also worked hard to identify a group of factories still operating in the US. where it could easily increase and decrease its orders as needed.
'That's sort of our talent, vetting these vendors,' he said. 'These factories are becoming fewer and fewer but knowing how to pivot and use the people that are still alive in the industry is the testament to the Goodwear brand.'
Liquori also said Goodwear produces higher quality, more durable clothing than low-cost competitors.
'If you buy a better-quality garment, it's going to last longer,' he said. 'You might pay $50 for one of our shirts, but isn't that better than buying a $12 Old Navy shirt four or five times over the next five years?'
But experts say that argument, while valid, doesn't jibe with consumers today. Americans have become addicted to ultra cheap fast fashion that they can constantly dispose of and replace, said DeAnn Campbell, a consultant with Rethink Retail advisory and research firm.
'Americans no longer want to pay full cost,' Campbell said. 'We have come to a point where we are not going to give up cheap clothing without some extreme pain.'
Brian Kelly, a former top executive with Sears and Lane Bryant, also thinks Made in the USA is no longer a compelling brand.
'I don't know if Made in America really resonates anymore,' he said. 'The current atmosphere has become an ugly place.'
The challenges are real, Liquori said.
Advertisement
'Consumers definitely care that it's Made in the USA,' he said. 'But then when the rubber hits the road … they'll just buy everything on price.'
Thomas Lee can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia
WASHINGTON/CANBERRA/CHICAGO, July 25 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said the sell 'so much' beef to Australia after Canberra relaxed import restrictions on Thursday, but economists and traders said high prices and tight supplies make major American exports unlikely. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for U.S. beef. The move will not significantly increase U.S. shipments, though, because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower, analysts said. U.S. companies export small quantities of beef to Australian buyers. They import much more in the form of lean beef used to make hamburgers, particularly as U.S. production has declined because of tight cattle supplies. U.S. beef prices set records this year after ranchers slashed their herds due to drought that burned up pasturelands used for grazing. The total herd size fell to 94.2 million head as of July 1, a record low for that date, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data on Friday. A ban on cattle imports from Mexico because of New World screwworm, a devastating livestock pest, and steep tariffs on Brazilian beef that are set to take effect on Aug. 1 could further tighten meat supplies, and require additional imports of Australian beef. 'We can't get enough beef in the U.S. right now, so we're bringing it in from Australia and Brazil,' said Dan Norcini, an independent U.S. livestock trader. 'We're not going to be selling anything significant to anyone.' Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tons of U.S. product moving the other way. 'They have more cattle than people,' said David Anderson, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M University. 'That's why they export so much.' Different taste U.S. and Australian beef also taste different. Many Australians like the grass-fed beef raised there, not marbled beef from U.S.-raised cattle that are generally fed with grain, said Jerry Klassen, chief analyst for Resilient Capital in Winnipeg. He predicted the United States will not export substantial amounts of beef to Australia in the next five years. 'We just aren't in a position to export much beef to anyone, and the reality is Australia doesn't really have much need for U.S. beef,' said Karl Setzer, partner at Consus Ag. The barriers that remain to exporting significant volumes of U.S. beef to Australia appeared to be lost on Trump this week. 'We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 'The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE.' Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States, a characterisation many economists dispute. 'For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on U.S. beef,' U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a 'major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for U.S. farmers and ranchers.' Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of U.S. biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted U.S. beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. The U.S. sources some of its feeder cattle from the two neighboring countries. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said U.S. cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. 'We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump,' shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia faces a 10% across-the-board U.S. tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: 'I'm not too sure.' 'We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement,' he said. 'We think that they should do that anyway.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire who called cash 'trash' has a warning
Billionaire who called cash 'trash' has a warning originally appeared on TheStreet. Billionaire investor Ray Dalio believes the feud between U.S. President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell comes down to one thing: the value of money. In a post on X, Dalio said: "While good central bankers try to get the balance right between being too easy and being too tight, looking at indicators of which way things are leaning to 'lean against the wind.' So, there is a natural tension between central bank leaders and those in office who want to make people happy and get re-elected." He explains that every country that takes on too much debt often lowers its interest rates and devalues its currency, which benefits people who borrow money but disadvantages those who save or lend a July 24 post, Dalio explains: "The classic way of dealing with it is to push real interest rates down and devalue money, which is bad for creditors and good for debtors. That is what Donald Trump is pushing for and what Jay Powell is defending against." This type of friction isn't unique, said the founder of Bridgewater Associates. Presidents often favour loose monetary policy - low interest rates and a high level of money in the economy - because it has a positive impact on the economy in the short term. Central bankers have the mandate to maintain low inflation and manage the economy, acting as an independent force. Dalio has a harsh message Dalio also points out how much the U.S. dollar has lost value when compared to other assets over the past year. He says: 'Over the last year, the dollar was down 5% against a basket of other major currencies, down 27% against gold, and down 45% against Bitcoin.' Over the past year, Bitcoin has surged by more than $52,911, reflecting growing investor interest in alternative stores of value amid ongoing economic uncertainty, as per charts. In contrast, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the dollar's strength against a basket of major currencies, has slipped by 0.02% during the same further cautioned that the government will not take action to correct things until it is a real crisis. "History shows that strong steps to protect money's value usually only happen after serious pain," he wrote. Dalio has never been a cheerleader for the future of the dollar. Dalio told the media in 2023 that he owned Bitcoin and 'cash is trash' and said that he preferred Bitcoin to bonds. Later, that year, he also said that he "owns some Ethereum,".He views both assets as alternative forms of money in a world where the dollar is depreciating. Billionaire who called cash 'trash' has a warning first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PepsiCo to end manufacturing at Detroit plant
This story was originally published on Food Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Food Dive newsletter. PepsiCo is closing part of its operations at a Detroit facility as the snack and beverage giant aims to bring production in line with sagging consumer demand. The company said in a Michigan WARN notice it will discontinue its production, maintenance and transport operations at the beverage facility on Sept. 27. PepsiCo said its warehouse, fleet, delivery, sales and field-service technician teams will continue to operate at the location. Approximately 83 people will be laid off as part of the move, according to the WARN notice. 'We are committed to supporting those impacted through this transition, and we are offering pay and benefits to impacted employees," PepsiCo said in a statement. The partial closure marks the latest move by the New York-based company to consolidate operations. Last year, it announced it would shutter bottling plants in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Illinois and Georgia. PepsiCo also has closed snack facilities in New York and California. PepsiCo's beverage business has struggled as consumers continue to shift away from sugar-laden offerings. In the company's most recent quarter, volumes in its North American beverage operations fell 2% despite strength in Pepsi Zero Sugar. Still, the performance marked a slight improvement from the 3% drop the unit posted in 2024. Earlier this week, PepsiCo announced it will launch prebiotic versions of its namesake soda this fall to attract health-conscious consumers back to its Pepsi brand. Recommended Reading PepsiCo to shutter 3 more bottling plants, lay off hundreds Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data