‘Fantastic Four' and ‘Nip/Tuck' star Julian McMahon dead at 56
The news was confirmed by a statement on the official 'Nip/Tuck' Facebook page, and an additional statement from his wife Kelly McMahon who told Deadline on Friday that her husband 'died peacefully this week after a valiant effort to overcome cancer.'
McMahon starred opposite Dylan Walsh in the Ryan Murphy-created 'Nip/Tuck' following two upscale plastic surgeons and their exploits. The series ran for six seasons between 2003 and 2010, and was nominated for 18 Primetime Emmys, winning one for best prosthetic makeup.
Concurrently, he played Dr. Victor Von Doom in the 'Fantastic Four' movies costarring Jessica Alba and Chris Evans from 2005 and 2007. (Dr. Doom is the villain soon to be portrayed by Robert Downey Jr. in the upcoming 'Avengers: Doomsday.')
McMahon's notable additional credits include recurring characters on TV's 'Charmed' and 'Profiler.' The Australian-American actor also recently appeared in 'FBI: Most Wanted' and Netflix's 'The Residence.'
With a resume of credits that began in the late 1980s, McMahon worked up until recently, with a role in the new Nicolas Cage movie 'The Surfer,' out this summer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
38 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump White House calls out Smithsonian for pushing 'one-sided, divisive political narratives'
EXCLUSIVE: The Trump administration is turning its attention to the Smithsonian Institution, accusing the taxpayer-funded museum complex of using federal dollars to promote what it calls "one-sided, divisive political narratives" that fail to honor the greatness of the American story. White House official Lindsey Halligan blasted content currently on display at the National Museum of American History's Entertainment Nation exhibit in an exclusive email to Fox News exhibit, which explores American pop culture, has drawn internal and external criticism for what some see as a politically loaded interpretation of cultural milestones. "American taxpayers should not be funding institutions that undermine our country or promote one-sided, divisive political narratives," Halligan said. "The Smithsonian Institution should present history in a way that is accurate, balanced, and consistent with the values that make the United States of America exceptional."DONALD TRUMP FIRES NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY DIRECTOR FOR BEING 'STRONG SUPPORTER' OF DEI The White House statement comes on the heels of several striking examples from the exhibit. One placard, featured alongside a 1923 circus poster, reads: "Under the big top, circuses expressed the colonial impulse to claim dominion over the world." Another, describing early American entertainment, declares: "One of the earliest defining traits of entertainment in the United States was extraordinary violence." The exhibit reframes iconic American characters through a critical, politically-charged lens. On The Lone Ranger, the display states: "The White title character's relationship with Tonto resembled how the U.S. government imagined itself the world's Lone Ranger." Mickey Mouse, a beloved American cultural icon, is not spared either. A display for the 1928 cartoon Steamboat Willie states, "Mickey challenged authority, but not everyone was in on the joke." It continues: "Mickey Mouse debuted as the deckhand 'Steamboat Willie' in 1928, amidst a rising anxiety felt by many that modern living and city life were eroding family and community ties and loosening moral codes… But the new character's outsized facial features, white gloves, and trickster temperament were vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackface minstrelsy." In reference to the Indiana Jones film series, another panel reads: "His character embodied a confident righteousness that, in many ways, captured the essence of the 1980s" above another subhead referencing President Ronald Reagan's famous speech, asking, "Are you better off?"KENT STATE STUDENT'S VIOLENT ANTI-TRUMP ART DISPLAY SPURS OUTRAGE One panel calls Magnum, P.I. a challenge to the "popular perceptions of Vietnam veterans as damaged misfits." A section on Jon Stewart's Daily Show refers to it as "the go-to for viewers who mistrusted politicians and the reporting process." Another panel highlights the late pop star Selena Quintanilla-Pérez and frames her cultural impact through identity politics. "Selena got us talking about identity," with a quote from the late singer reading, "I feel very proud to be Mexican." The text goes on to say her work "cast a light on the longstanding cultural and growing political influence of Mexican American and Latinx communities within the United States." "The examples [Fox News Digital] highlighted from the National Museum of American History are part of the problem the Trump Administration aims to fix," Halligan said. "Framing American culture as inherently violent, imperialist, or racist does not reflect the greatness of our nation or the millions of Americans who have contributed to its progress." Halligan confirmed that a top-to-bottom content review is already underway, with input from senior Smithsonian leaders and the Board of Regents. "We are working with leadership at the Smithsonian to audit and review all content at the museums," she said, "and we are committed to ensuring that such content honors our country's founding principles, tells the stories of American heroes, and does not promote fringe or activist ideologies masquerading as history." She added, "We will provide updates on this audit as our progress unfolds." The Smithsonian Institution responded to Fox News Digital with the following brief written statement: "The museum is committed to continuous and rigorous scholarship and research and unbiased presentation of facts and history. As such, and as previously announced, we are assessing content in Smithsonian museums and will make any necessary changes to ensure our content meets our standards." The Institution did not answer specific questions regarding who authored the Entertainment Nation exhibit, whether outside academic consultants or activist organizations were involved, or who made the decision to present all exhibit text bilingually in English and Spanish. The controversy comes amid a broader push by President Donald Trump to reshape cultural institutions he says have veered too far left. In March, Trump issued an executive order directing the Board of Regents to eliminate "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" from Smithsonian museums. He accused the institution of embracing what he called "a revisionist movement" aimed at "undermining the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." The Board of Regents includes the vice president, the chief justice of the United States, six members of Congress, and nine citizen regents. Vice President J.D. Vance and Congressman Carlos Giménez, both recent appointees, have advocated for an expedited review of Smithsonian content. Giménez, in a prior interview with The Wall Street Journal, confirmed tensions at the board's June meeting over how quickly to proceed, though ultimately a compromise was reached. The Smithsonian receives approximately two-thirds of its $1 billion annual budget from federal appropriations. The Entertainment Nation exhibit opened in December 2022 and was billed as a permanent exhibition to "celebrate the power of popular culture to shape and reflect history." It is housed in a prime space on the museum's west wing and features artifacts and media from movies, television, sports, and music. While the museum's stated goal is to explore how entertainment intersects with American identity, the Trump administration argues that it instead uses culture to smuggle in ideology often at odds with the values most Americans hold. "Americans deserve a Smithsonian that inspires national pride, tells the truth, and reflects the greatness of this country," Halligan said. "Not one that serves as an agent for social change and cultural subversion."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Woman Kicks Sister Out of Baby Shower After She Calls Her Baby Name 'Outdated'
A woman kicked her own sister out of her baby shower after she made fun of the name she chose for her child In a post on Reddit, the woman writes that she and her husband recently settled on a name for their baby girl — and she announced it at her shower But when her sister continually made fun of the name, she kicked her outA woman says she kicked her own sister out of her baby shower after she made fun of the name she chose for her child. In a post shared to Reddit, the anonymous 32-year-old writes that she is currently seven months pregnant and recently learned she's having a girl. "Me and my husband have been thinking of names [and] until we decided on a name we like, we decided to name her 'Audrey,' " she writes. But at her recent baby shower, there was one person who was not a fan of the name — her own sister. "When I told everyone at the baby shower, one of my sisters told me it was an 'outdated name' and that she'd get bullied for having a name like that (which is funny because she wanted to name her daughter 'Ashhliegh' pronounced as 'Ashley' before her husband stopped her)," she adds. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. She continues: "After a while of her making comments about the name we eventually just kicked her out of the shower and I blocked her on all social media's when she kept messaging me telling me to change the name." Now, other Reddit users are weighing in on the situation, with many saying they would have made the same decision. "The way I would have dragged my sister for having any kind of opinion she would have kicked her own self out of the party," wrote one commenter. Added another: "I imagine your sister is still pissed about being told 'Ashhliegh' was stupid and was prepared to criticize any baby name you suggested." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Furious Aunt Reacts to Niece's Wedding Dress Code: 'No Hats, No Colors, Just Black'
A woman is debating if it's unreasonable for her to be "shocked" by her niece's wedding dress code In a Mumsnet post, she revealed her niece has chosen a monochrome theme for her fall nuptials 'No hats. No fascinators. No flowers in our hair. No coloured shoes or handbags. And wait for it — no nail polish,' the woman saidA woman is in shock after discovering the dress code her niece has chosen for her upcoming wedding. Describing her niece as a "bridezilla" on Mumsnet, the woman said she understands that it's "her day — her rules" and can therefore choose whatever she desires for her wedding this October. However, that hasn't stopped her from being "shocked" by her niece's strict dress code for the occasion. "We are all to wear black and only black," the woman said as she began listing the rules. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! "No hats. No fascinators. No flowers in our hair. No coloured shoes or handbags. And wait for it — no nail polish," she added. The woman said her niece wants a "monochrome wedding." But, she's eager for opinions on whether or not she's being unreasonable for not liking the dress code. A poll shared underneath the June 22 post garnered hundreds of votes, with the majority of people telling the woman that she wasn't unreasonable. "That is really odd. Especially the bit about no nail varnish. I only wear black with a big flash of colour (bright shoes, hair wrap etc). Wearing all black washes me out a bit and doesn't seem very celebratory," one person commented. "Blimey, I went to a funeral last week and the wife of the deceased asked us not to wear black as it would be too depressing. She wanted to celebrate her husband's life. Black at a wedding sounds really miserable," another said. A third chimed in, "Is it bats---? Yes. Is it overstepping to insist on how people have their nails? Yes. But is it only one day out of your life for someone you love and fairly easy to accomplish (charity shops have racks and racks of black clothing)? Yes. But I am with you, I think it's fairly ridiculous." "I'd honestly not go if I were invited to a wedding with a specified colour scheme," another person said. "It's indicative of entirely the wrong priorities and a strong indication that the wedding may well be crap. Because the priority is the look of photos and not the hosting of guests." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. While several commenters said they wouldn't go to the nuptials, other responses to the post said they had seen a similar dress code become trendy on social media. "It's an Instagram trend. The black dresses were all evening dresses in the one I saw and looked very stylish, so quite different from a funeral," one person wrote. They continued, 'I think North American wedding dress code tends to be more evening dress than in the U.K. (my brother's Canadian mil [mother-in-law] wore a beautiful evening gown to their wedding, but looked a bit bridesmaid, but I've since discovered that's normal in North America). It's not what I would choose, but I don't think it's that outrageous a request.' Read the original article on People
