Australians believe influencers peddle misinformation. So why are they so popular?
In the United States, where podcasters Joe Rogan and Theo Von played a major role in the election of Donald Trump, politicians are considered the main misinformation threat.
Loading
While younger Australians consume news on social platforms due to the convenience of different formats, the report's author, Sora Park from the University of Canberra, says they are aware of potential shortcomings of news coming from less trusted or verified sources.
'While they rely on these influencers, they also know that sometimes they're not accurate, and that mostly they're not journalists,' Park says.
But they value, and actively seek, a perspective in their news, says Park, with the research showing older audiences value truth and accuracy in reporting at almost twice the rate of those aged under 35.
Platforms such as TikTok, Instagram and YouTube are at the heart of the evolution of the traditional newsroom, says Nathan Powell, chief product and strategy officer at influencer marketing and data firm Fabulate. Trust is no longer earned through a press badge, says Powell, but rather through personality, consistency and perceived authenticity.
'The lines are blurring between journalist, commentator and entertainer, and that evolution is redefining how news is delivered and who gets to deliver it,' Powell says.
Loading
This year's election signalled the arrival of new media, with the Labor government inviting friendly online commentators and influencers into the federal budget lockup for the first time.
Phoebe Saintilan-Stocks, founder of woman-focused outlet Missing Perspectives, was part of this 'new media' cohort, and told the report it was a clear signal the government was attuned to the shifts taking place, with new players like herself influential as sources for Gen Z and Millennial audiences.
'The response to us being invited to Canberra, along with a collection of content creators and other 'new media', was totally unexpected — but maybe I was naive. As social-first media, we were made to feel unwelcome and branded as 'influencers' — and the fact that we attended the budget lockup became the story itself in legacy and mainstream media.'
The backlash is partly owed to the view that there are few checks and balances to ensure influencers and new media commentators meet the same standards to which traditional press are held. One of Australia's most popular online personalities and podcasters, Abbie Chatfield, was the subject of an Australian Electoral Commission review over her election posts, and whether they should have an authorisation message.
Chatfield was cleared of any wrongdoing after the AEC reviewed whether her combined posts with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Greens leader Adam Bandt breached electoral laws. However, Park predicts that electoral laws will change in the near future to ensure professional standards are met when considering politically influential material, regardless of its source.
'The trend that social media is a source of news is growing, and [the proportion of] people who only rely on social media will become bigger and bigger, so as that population grows, then definitely there needs to be some consideration about the quality of information that they provide,' Park says.
Olympic diver Sam Fricker has a large online audience and has interviewed subjects from across the political spectrum, including then opposition leader Peter Dutton and Labor minister Chris Bowen. During the election cycle, Fricker travelled to Queensland to interview billionaire Clive Palmer, even staying at Palmer's Coolum resort, which was closed to the public at the time.
Honesty, integrity, respect and goodwill are the most important values to uphold for creators, says Fricker, who says he stays neutral in all interviews, but was pressed in the lead-up to the election to disclose his own politics.
'When I've had political guests on, I've made a real effort to stay neutral. I've asked them all very similar questions, and the tone always comes from a place of curiosity and respect. I've never taken sides or tried to influence any vote, that's not what I'm about.'
Most prominent online commentators now openly speak from a partisan perspective.
During an 'influencer debate' organised by SBS' The Feed, six political commentators were placed in a room together ahead of the election and each was introduced and their political leaning disclosed. Chatfield was sold as a Greens voter, Cheek Media's Hannah Ferguson as a Greens member and teal supporter, and Freya Leach, a popular conservative online personality, as a Liberal Party member.
Loading
While the outcome was not a level-headed debate, it made compelling viewing, with young audiences increasingly seeking out news and personalities with a perspective that aligns with their own. Influencers being upfront with their politics resonates with their audiences, says Park.
With disinformation rife across the media and social platforms, Cheek Media's Ferguson says regulation and accountability are crucial to ensure Australians are consuming news they can trust.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Incredibly tough': Calls for PM to address over-regulation and over-taxation in business
Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson says one of Australia's largest business problems is over-taxation and over-regulation, calling upon the Albanese government for an end to the 'pleasantries'. This comes amid Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's address at Australia's Economic Outlook 2025. 'It's an incredibly tough environment,' Mr Wilson told Sky News host Danica De Giorgio. 'What we need the government to do is to not overtax and overregulate – and that's the problem that all Australian companies have got at the moment. 'We don't want any more pleasantries, our small, medium-sized, and even large companies in Australia need some action by this government. 'Something has to be done.'
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Herd on the Terrace: Roger Cook might be walking on a nightmare with 'Made in WA' pledge
The Bull has been pondering whether Roger Cook is walking into a nightmare thanks to his government's obsession with making stuff in WA. Cook was out of the frying pan and into the fire this week after revelations the next Tourism WA advertising campaign will be partly produced on the east coast. Procuring elaborate visuals of flying whale sharks from elsewhere would ordinarily not be especially unusual, given Western Australia has three million people and a reasonably small film industry. But the government has walked (on a dream) into a locally-built mess given 'Made in WA' was their flagship pledge in a thumping March State Election victory. When mission-critical manufacturing jobs including buses, power line towers and batteries must be assembled in the State — at great expense — artists would be fair enough to ask why there are no such requirements for creative work. Then where does it end? Stand down, BHP's fly-in, fly-out work force, Rita Saffioti wants you in Neerabup slapping together over-priced refrigerators. Petroleum engineer? Not any more! Off to Bellevue to join local procurement champions Alstom. The French company will bank $1.4 billion to make the new Metronet C-Series rail cars in India, ship them to Perth, and add a few highly uncomfortable seats in a warehouse. Hope you know how to hold a welding torch! The new trains are a true tribute to globalisation, although the local union movement would never admit that. When 'Made in WA' is your biggest promise, it becomes the metric by which every decision will be judged. We may have a shortage of workers in WA but there's never a deficit of political over-commitment. Just when you thought the so-called national carrier was cleared for reputational take-off, cyber criminals have aimed their keyboards at Qantas. Close to six million Australians were in fear that their frequent flyer points had been siphoned off to Nigeria this week when the Flying Kangaroo revealed a major data breach. Thankfully, the government-protected airline promised customers 'no frequent flyer accounts were compromised', just personal identity details. All good then! Why bother stealing all those hard-earned points anyway, given they would probably expire before arrival. The hackers are as yet unknown but The Bull expects they will soon release the membership list of Qantas' infamous Chairman's Lounge as proof of life. When director Todd Sampson — who parachutes off the board at the end of the month — hosted the 2016-2020 TV show Body Hack, we can only assume Qantas did not intend the title to be taken literally. We hope Todd can imitate Liam Neeson and personally track down Australia's Taken passport details. Recent openings in two of WA's top lobbying jobs will mean anyone who's ever been in a photo with the Artful Roger will want to put their hands up for the prized positions. Plenty of eyes are on Association of Mining and Exploration Companies boss Warren Pearce as a top option to replace Chamber of Minerals and Energy chief Rebecca Tomkinson when she jets off to a lucrative London trade gig. Also hunting for new hires will be the Chamber of Commerce and Industry WA, thanks to the swift departure of fly-in, fly-out boss Peter Cock after just four months. A tenacious orator, Pearce made a name for himself for scoring tax production credits (or taxpayer handouts, depending on your persuasion) for the State's critical minerals battlers, and is regarded as a tactful treader between business and government. The CME job requires ensuring powerful members — such as Rio Tinto and BHP — have their needs heard loud and clear at the cabinet table. And we wouldn't want these multibillion-dollar multinationals left without a voice. Alas, word is the lobbyist has actually started to turn a shade of cerulean denying his interest in the role, and is dead set on staying put . . . really.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Childcare privatisation a failed, disastrous experiment
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. CHILDCARE How many more examples of alleged abuse or exploitation must be endured before the penny drops that the neoliberal mantra of privatisation/corporatisation of essential services in the past few decades has been a disastrously failed experiment of incalculable cost? Instead of looking towards a more socially just and functional Scandinavian example, Australia followed the American pied piper to this dysfunctional 'law of the jungle' mentality, benefiting a privileged few – some undeservedly and/or obscenely disproportionately – at the expense of the vast majority, creating unnecessary and extreme inequality. Quality of life has been trampled by essentially unregulated exploitation allowed across our lifespan, from childcare to aged care and in between. Multiple commission reports gather dust while access to shelter, food, education, healthcare, family and societal cohesion, and our environment suffer at the altar of profit. The hole is deepening; is it not past time to stop digging? Joe Di Stefano, Geelong A passive public, a passive government The reason abuse and neglect is a real risk for Australians outsourcing any type of care to privatised industries is always a lack of necessary government legislation on the details of business operation. The best public response is to zoom in on each area of missing government legislation and to act as one village raising its children together because what happens to one might happen to all, and insist upon necessary legislation as a condition of public custom. The passivity of Australians towards the aged care system the royal commission identified as totally unacceptable should be an example to not be similarly passive about childcare. A passive public allows a government to remain passive. Criminal liability for harm and neglect was removed from the 2024 aged care bill, when providers suggested that they would walk away from the industry if the government legislated it. For children at least, Australians need to identify that perhaps the walking away of current business providers might be the only way to force the government to fulfil its regulatory responsibility for a care sector. Ruth Farr, Blackburn South Children and aged need protections During the pandemic, we realised how compromised aged care was, resulting in unnecessary deaths due to the industry business model. Now the childcare sector has been exposed for alleged heinous acts. Some services should be government managed and not operated for profit. Australia's development of its youngest and its aged both deserve the best possible service. Patrick Alilovic, Pascoe Vale South Many royal commissions not acted upon Your correspondent (Letters, 3/7) points out governments' failure to address systemic issues highlighted in royal commissions in aged care, disability services and child sexual abuse. Although royal commissions are the highest form of inquiry, there is no obligation for governments to accept a royal commission's recommendations. After 140 or so royal commissions in Australia, there are countless recommendations sitting in bottom drawers gathering dust. Sarah Russell, Mount Martha Men must be banned Many methods have been suggested in your pages in recent days as ways to minimise the risk of sexual abuse of children in childcare centres. Only one however, has the best chance of almost totally eliminating this hideous problem: Men should be banned from working in this childcare centre. Yes, this would be discriminatory – but surely the minimisation of harm to young children is more important than permitting the relatively few men who desire to, the right to work in this area. Working with children checks only measure whether or not criminal behaviour has been noticed; oversights can be faulty, and regulations can be got around. Nearly all sexual abuse of young children is carried out by men, and this would be the most simple and effective means of minimising the awful harm that often results from this monstrous kind of abuse. Freya Headlam, Glen Waverley, More likely offenders I write as a former Victoria Police detective who worked on child abuses. There is a compelling argument for banning male workers from childcare centres. On international data, the probability of a male assaulting a child is low but significant, whereas for a female it's effectively zero. (UK and Canadian studies from 2005 to 2017 have found that female child-sex offenders account for 4 per cent to 20 per cent of all offending (96 per cent or 80 per cent respectively for male). Banning male workers would be unfair and discriminatory, and challenge prevailing ideas of sex and gender. It would also rob children of the value of male role models. Ultimately however, it may prevent the devastating consequences of child sexual assault. Gregory M. Donoghue, Woodbridge, Tas Ban no answer Louise Edmonds' call to ban all men from working in early childhood education is as unsurprising as it is misguided (″ With more allegations of sexual abuse at childcare centres, is banning men the answer? ″, 3/7. The actions of an utter minority of men is not reflective of the sex as a whole, with cases of school principal Malka Leifer, a woman found guilty of abusing her child in Perth on Wednesday, and many other less high-profile cases demonstrating that predation is not sex-exclusive. A ban will indeed 'stain all the good men' by irrevocably associating any man working in early childhood with abuse. Edmonds' call echoes those encountered by nearly all male nurses and carers at some point in their training and careers. The view that only women should work in caring spaces and the willingness to write off 8per cent of the workforce (12per cent in nursing) is regressive, and is a knee-jerk response that doesn't address systemic issues that early childhood workers have been crying out against for years. We should lift up those who are working with us to create our children's futures, not beat them down. Wil Wallace, Wangaratta
