Secret Conclave Exposé Reveals Who Almost Beat Leo
The papal conclave was moving toward crowning someone else Pope—until a turn of support vaulted Leo XIV to the top, a dramatic behind-the-scenes report has revealed.
Italian Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican's secretary of state, claimed over 40 votes from the 133 cardinals in the first round of voting after the conclave began on Wednesday, according to an exposé on the process in The Wall Street Journal. His support was bolstered by Italian cardinals, who made up the largest voting bloc of any country, with 17 electors.
Many Italian cardinals reportedly felt that it was once again time for a Pope from Italy. Italian popes held the papacy for 455 consecutive years until the election of Polish Pope John Paul II started a trend of three consecutive foreign pontiffs.
On the first day of the conclave, betting markets around the world listed Parolin as the favorite, with Luis Antonio Gokim Tagle, a Filipino cardinal known as the 'Asian Francis' because of his similar commitments to social justice, coming in second.
But by Thursday morning, Robert Prevost, a Chicago-born cardinal, began to gain momentum, while Parolin's vote count stagnated in the high 40s. To secure the papacy, a candidate would need to win a two-thirds majority—at least 89 of the 133 votes cast by the cardinal electors.
Parolin, who spent nearly his entire career in the Vatican's diplomatic service before becoming Pope Francis' second-in-command, lacked the hands-on pastoral experience that many cardinals sought, according to the Journal's report. Some of Parolin's detractors reportedly worked to undermine his candidacy by scattering their votes among multiple contenders.
By the time the cardinals took a break from deliberating in the Sistine Chapel, it was clear that Prevost—who'd spent two decades as a missionary in Peru—was the new favorite. 'At lunch, things were getting clarified,' American Cardinal Blase Cupich told the Journal.
In Thursday afternoon's vote, Prevost garnered over 100 votes—more than enough to become Pope.
Ironically, it fell upon Parolin, the highest-ranking cardinal in the room, to ask Prevost: 'Do you accept your canonical election as the supreme pontiff?'
'I accept,' Prevost said. He took the name Leo XIV.
Prevost had odds of less than 1 percent on the online betting site Kalshi, so some of those who placed longshot bets on Prevost becoming pope saw massive payouts. One bettor who took the gamble turned a $526 wager into $52,641.
Yet, as surprising as Prevost's rise may have seemed to outsiders, a sizable faction of cardinals reportedly saw him from the outset as the ideal choice to uphold Francis' vision of an inclusive church while shifting focus back to traditional doctrine. He was also seen as capable of tackling the Vatican's financial challenges.
Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the Archbishop of New York, told the Journal that a cardinal asked him, 'Do you know this 'Roberto?'' as Prevost's name began circulating in pre-conclave conversations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Starmer: Foreign affairs delayed me dealing with welfare rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer has said he did not get to grips with the growing rebellion over welfare reforms earlier as he was focused on international affairs. He also said he took ownership for his decisions and believed as leader he should 'carry the can' when things do not go well. The Prime Minister said he was occupied with the G7 and Nato summits and the escalating tensions in the Middle East for much of the past two weeks. He said he was 'heavily focused' on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend and that his 'full attention really bore down' on the welfare bill on Thursday. He defended the eventual U-turn, which came after more than 100 MPs launched a bid to kill the legislation with an amendment. 'Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome,' Sir Keir told The Sunday Times. He said all the decisions were his and that 'I take ownership of them'. There have been reports that rebel MPs blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the Government's approach. Sir Keir said: 'My rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can. 'I take responsibility for all the decisions made by this government. I do not talk about staff and I'd much prefer it if everybody else didn't.' Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but the concessions made leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere and point to possible tax rises in the autumn. On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. He said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch will hit out at Sir Keir as 'incapable of sticking to a decision' after he backed down on his plans. The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but the Prime Minister was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say in a speech next week. The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. As a year in office nears, more than half of voters think Labour has underperformed in that time, polling released on Saturday showed. The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Rod Stewart says he backs Brexit leader Nigel Farage in wide-ranging political discussion
Rod Stewart got political this week, saying he supports Brexit leader Nigel Farage over current Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "It's hard for me because I'm extremely wealthy, and I deserve to be, so a lot of it doesn't really touch me," the "Maggie May" singer told The London Times in a piece published Friday. "But that doesn't mean I'm out of touch. For instance, I've read about Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular. We're fed up with the Tories. We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well." Farage founded the Brexit Party in 2019, which eventually turned into the populist Reform UK, which he leads. His party would be on track to get the most seats in parliament if a general election were held this year, according to new polling, Sky News reported this week. The next general election is scheduled for 2029. Earlier this year, Reform UK had a series of electoral wins after it secured parliamentary, mayoral and several local election seats in what Farage said is proof that Reform UK is "now the opposition party to this Labour government." "What options have we got?" Stewart replied when a reporter expressed surprise at his support for Farage. "I know some of his family. I know his brother, and I quite like him. "Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit, and I don't know how he's going to do that. Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip." The 80-year-old had harsher words for American conservatives, especially when it comes to Ukraine. "Did you see the way [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy was treated for not wearing a tie when he went to the White House? I could have jumped on [President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance]," the singer, who temporarily took in a displaced family from Ukraine in 2022, said. "And it backfired because no one liked it. You've got the other d-------, the one with the motor car company, coming in wearing a baseball cap. … Mate, it's depressing." He was referring to Elon Musk, who has since left the administration. Stewart also had thoughts on the Israel-Hamas war. "It's depressing what's going on in the Gaza Strip," he said. "[Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu doesn't realize that this is what happened to his people under the Nazis, total annihilation. And Trump is going to turn the Gaza Strip into Miami?" The Brit also said he was "disappointed" Trump is moving "away from Europe, as America were our strongest allies." He said it also upset him that the U.S. is "signing a $47 billion arms deal with Israel. I think the British are still selling arms to the Israelis. How is it ever going to stop?"


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Serbia Arrests Dozens After Clashes at Anti-Government Rally
By Updated on Save Serbian police clashed with anti-government protesters after tens of thousands rallied in Belgrade demanding an early election to remove President Aleksandar Vucic and his governing party. Riot police arrested dozens of people in the violence late Saturday, using stun grenades and pepper spray against protesters who hurled rocks and confronted the officers. Six officers and at least two civilians were injured, police chief Dragan Vasiljevic told reporters.