‘Stable' Quebec avoids a second credit rating downgrade
By
QUEBEC — A second credit rating agency has taken a look at the Quebec government's finances and says it is comfortable with the province's debt situation.
In a statement issued Tuesday, the Canadian agency DBRS decided to maintain Quebec's credit rating, which determines the costs of borrowing to finance the debt, at AA (low) with a 'stable perspective.'
The DBRS decision is the opposite of the decision to lower Quebec's credit rating by another agency, Standard and Poor's, in April. S&P lowered Quebec's rating from AA- to A+.
It was the first time in 30 years that Quebec suffered a credit downgrade. It came as a blow to Premier François Legault's government, which was first elected in 2018 promising sound fiscal management.
'Because or the ongoing tariff threat, Morningstar DBRS anticipates some near-term deterioration in Quebec's fiscal and debt metrics, potentially reducing flexibility within its current credit ratings,' DBRS said in a statement.
'However, the slowing pace of expenditure growth and continued commitment to restore fiscal balance, along with the province's large and diversified economy, give us comfort that Quebec can minimize the deterioration in its public finances.
'Despite the near term deterioration, the province remains committed to restoring fiscal balance by 2029-30, consistent with the goal articulated in last year's budget.'
In his 2025-2026 budget presented March 25, Quebec Finance Minister Eric Girard forecast a $13.6-billion deficit, a historic record. The budget included an annual increase in spending of only 1.7 per cent but record spending on infrastructure projects as a way to counter the effects of an economic downturn sparked by American trade tariffs.
S&P based its downgrade on the increase in government spending, including the infrastructure allocation.
DBRS takes note of Quebec's approach but remains optimistic.
'As a result of near-term deterioration in the fiscal outlook and a substantial capital investment program, Quebec has relaxed its debt reduction targets. The province plans to reduce net debt to GDP to 35.5 per cent by 2032-33 and 32.5 per cent by 2037-38 (previously 33 per cent and 30 per cent respectively).
The agency adds: 'While the ongoing trade uncertainty is expected to weigh on consumer and business confidence and investment intentions, domestic consumption should remain supported by easing monetary policy along with relatively strong labour markets and household savings.'
Legault has said if Quebec is hit with full 25-per-cent tariffs on its trade, the province could lose 100,000 to 160,000 jobs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
36 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump: the least bad outcome
Opinion I would rather eat worms than write about the current hullabaloo on the American right over the conspiracy theories about pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his various pals and accomplices. The temptation is just to sit back and enjoy watching the MAGA revolution devour its own children, but duty calls. It is not enough just to wish that both sides lose. (Well, all of the many sides, really.) It is becoming clear that this scandal will probably injure U.S. President Donald Trump personally and weaken him permanently. It doesn't matter whether he was really implicated in Epstein's crimes or not. As usual, it's the attempted cover-up that does the damage. Nobody outside the United States has any influence on how the political storm that is growing there comes out, but everybody has a stake in the outcome. Even an increasingly isolationist America that is descending into political chaos is still the world's greatest military power and a major economic player. What happens there matters, but what should we hope for? The first principle is that we should all work to ensure that Trump remains in office for the remaining 42 months of his four-year term. He would only leave voluntarily if his entanglement in the Epstein affair grows so damning that he has to resign in order to be pardoned by his successor, JD Vance, but that is not out of the question. The great virtue of Trump as candidate for the role of first American dictator is that he's not up to the job. The push towards a 'soft fascist''authoritarian system is real and quite rapid — the ever-growing ICE is emerging as his private army — but his instinctive preference for a state of chaos that maximizes his options is not a sound foundation for a lasting dictatorship. Another three-and-a-half-years of Trump freed from all the restraints that the 'grown-ups' put on him during his first term will probably do great damage to the U.S. economy. However, it would also make it unlikely that either a chosen successor (or Trump himself in defiance of the constitution) could win the presidency in 2028. Democracy in the United States can survive Trump, and not just as a Hungarian-style 'elective dictatorship.' The number of people who swallow all the lies is shocking and shaming, but they never exceed half the population. A democratic comeback is possible. On the other hand, democracy in the United States would probably not survive a 'President' Vance who took power long enough before the 2028 election — whether by succession to a physically incapacitated or criminally implicated Trump or simply by a putsch — to rig the vote. Just look at him. You know it's true. So put up with Trump. Within limits, of course. The limits would include any U.S. invasion of a near-neighbour (Greenland, Panama, Canada), but the rest of the world has tacitly accepted U.S. air-strikes on at least half-a-dozen distant countries in recent decades. Now is not the right time to get picky about it. And what about the impact on world trade of Trump's ceaseless tampering with tariffs? This is a self-healing wound, in the sense that a rapidly growing number of countries are concluding that the United States is not a reliable trading partner. The endless struggle to keep up with the changes is just not worth it. The likely outcome is that supply chains will increasingly go around the United States rather than to or through it. That's not a limitless disaster for the United States, just a handicap that can be repaired in time. The arrival of Trump 2.0 has been a shock to both the global trading system and the alliance structures that had prevailed since the 1950s, but they are adjusting fast and fairly well to the new realities. Or at least, it could have been a lot worse. It could still take a turn for the worse, of course, but that's always the case. The task when things are threatening to fall apart is always to decide what is really important to preserve, and make your other choices and goals serve that overriding objective. Right now, that means keeping Vance from the throne, even at the cost of putting up with Trump. Gwynne Dyer's new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World's Climate Engineers.
Winnipeg Free Press
36 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Take time off: systems need some duplication
Opinion More than 20 years ago, I chaperoned a U.S. university abroad program to England. A professor with us went to an office to get student/visitor group London tube passes. Arriving half an hour before closing, the clerks said no, they couldn't help. He'd have to return the next day. They wouldn't stay late to meet a customer's needs for any reason. We joked that it wasn't the customer service we'd come to expect. When we moved to Canada in 2009, we noticed that, on a spectrum, Canada's overall customer service was between the U.S. and the U.K. Canadians were happy to help, if it wasn't inconvenient. Sometimes exemplary customer service is more expensive. It requires extra time from employees. Yet, a system without enough employees or a willingness to meet clients' needs becomes dysfunctional. In Manitoba, our bureaucracies and businesses struggle with this. The business mantra of eliminating 'extra' streamlines staffing, sometimes to a breaking point. This occurred in health care when Premier Brian Pallister's system eradicated small neighbourhood labs in favour of a Dynacare monopoly. The government also removed city urgent care clinics. The NDP government has begun to remedy this. They've reopened an urgent care at Misericordia hospital, for instance. It's a slow process. This is a necessary step. Systems need some redundancy, and not just because, in that older case, tourists might need transportation passes. Canadian work culture retains a healthy notion that taking a real vacation, perhaps off-grid and out in nature, is a good idea. However, without job training duplication, each summer, many people still at work must wait on others' return to work to get things done. As a writer or editor, sometimes there's no use submitting anything in August or December. Nobody senior enough to make decisions would be in the office anyway. Does this phenomenon happen in Manitoba? Absolutely. I've been the observer to a complicated committee hiring process at the university level. After nearly nine months of committee work, applications, and interviews, a recommendation's been made to hire two professors. Now, the approval process sits in limbo, because the right dean/vice-provost/hiring official is off at the cottage and doesn't check email. Meanwhile, those candidates might well accept positions elsewhere. The committee might lose an entire academic year's worth of work. The solution isn't a workaholic approach, as many U.S. employees take, incessantly checking work emails, even while on vacation. Citing the tsunami of messages they have upon their return, they never allow themselves a break from the workload. Without real time off, it's nearly impossible to avoid burnout. Instead, consider the approach taken by many who staff smaller businesses or offices. Everyone knows how to do their work and has been trained or asked to occasionally step in to cover someone else's responsibilities. While this might appear to be 'out of the job description,' it offers multiple benefits. First, and most important for efficiency of commerce, it allows work to function all the time. Work continues even while someone is on vacation. Whether it's a smaller rural office or a huge bureaucracy, if someone always has access to the passwords, the keys, or the right paperwork process. This is crucial, not just for trips to the cottage, but also due to accidents, injuries, parental or family leave. We're all human. Sometimes life interferes with a perfectly streamlined work environment. A well-run system doesn't collapse because the person who signs the paycheques or knows the passwords is out of the office for a day. Second, a system that trains workers to cover other tasks allows every employee to learn new skills. Helping people to learn on the job means they can continue to gain new stimulation in the workplace. This paves the way towards new positions or future promotion. Introducing mastery of new systems means some employees won't become bored and seek employment elsewhere. Third, an environment where everyone is trusted to rise to the challenge results in a team collaboration. It's an approach that allows positive community building. One hopes never to have an emergency, but a team that thinks fast and adjusts when someone has an accident and can't be at work is a healthy (and more productive) work environment. We all like to think we are indispensable. While it's true that we're all unique, big institutions and little shops alike don't need diva personalities to function. Instead, we should be considering how best to find functional solutions while allowing each other time to recharge and live our lives. This approach is the most efficient model, because it saves time in the long run and requires us to grow and do more, rather than just staying in our lane while our colleagues are off at the beach. Joanne Seiff, a Winnipeg author, has been contributing opinions and analysis to the Free Press since 2009.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
This High-Yielding ETF Pays Monthly and Invests in Top Canadian Dividend Stocks
If you're investing in dividend stocks, you know the importance of trying to balance safety and yield. You want the best yield you can, without having to sacrifice safety or have to worry about a dividend cut in the future. A good way to maintain safety while taking advantage of a high yield is by investing in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that offers a good payout. For Canadian investors, an excellent option is the Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (TSX:PDC). The fund's portfolio gives you a position in approximately 44 stocks, with a heavy focus on bank stocks. Its top four holdings are Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (TSX:CM)(NYSE:CM), Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD)(NYSE:TD), Bank of Montreal (TSX:BMO)(NYSE:BMO), and Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS)(NYSE:BNS). In total, financial stocks account for around 40% of its overall portfolio. The ETF has a management fee of 0.50%, which is comparable to similar funds, and isn't too expensive overall. It makes distributions to investors every month and yields around 4.3%. Since the start of the year, the Invesco fund has generated returns of around 8%. With a beta value of more than 0.9, the ETF's performance will largely follow how the overall market performs, and thus, it can be a relatively safe investment; it isn't likely to be highly volatile given the nature of its holdings and their stability. The fund can be a solid option whether you want a good buy-and-hold investment to not worry about, or if you simply want some recurring monthly dividend income to collect.
