logo
We checked out Tesla's supervised, invite-only robotaxi launch. Here's what we saw

We checked out Tesla's supervised, invite-only robotaxi launch. Here's what we saw

CNBCa day ago

Tesla's June launch of its long-awaited "robotaxi" requires a lot of qualifiers: it was supervised, open only to a few invitees and included somewhere between 10-20 vehicles.
The stock jumped 8% the day after the launch, and some participants and observers called it a success. The shares have largely given back that gain since then.
"I thought it was extremely smooth. Everything we saw," said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives. "Not just from a safety perspective. Maneuverability was way impressive. I thought actually even better than Waymo out of the gates. I thought going into it was going to be an eight out of 10. I think it's a 10 out of 10 relative to our experience."
Other experiences were less smooth: One vehicle drove on the wrong side of the road, one vehicle stopped in the middle of traffic, one braked suddenly on a 40 mph street and another vehicle dropped off a passenger in the middle of an intersection.
Since 2016, CEO Elon Musk has been promising that Tesla vehicles were on the cusp of full autonomy.
Tesla's Master Plan, Part Deux, envisioned a future where every Tesla owner would be able to "add your car to the Tesla shared fleet just by tapping a button on the Tesla phone app and have it generate income for you while you're at work or on vacation, significantly offsetting and at times potentially exceeding the monthly loan or lease cost."
He said in October of that year that all Tesla vehicles would have the hardware necessary for full self-driving.
In 2019, he said Tesla would have 1 million robotaxis on the road by 2020.
So far, none of these predictions have come true. And many researchers and rivals have disputed Musk's claim that Teslas already have all the hardware needed for full autonomy.
The electric car maker is taking a very different path from every other major company working toward fully self-driving vehicles. It does not use radar or lidar — laser-based devices that map the environment around the vehicle.
Companies like Alphabet's Waymo and Amazon's Zoox each use both radar and lidar. Tesla, in contrast, primarily uses cameras. Musk has said he thinks software can make up the difference."Inside the autonomous vehicle industry, I think the thing that's both frustrating and just puzzling is that, you know, everyone seems to be on the same page," said Ed Niedermeyer, a journalist who has covered Tesla for years and who wrote a book on the company. "You talk to almost any major expert and they'll say, you know, what Tesla is doing is interesting. It's pushing the technology forward in certain ways. Right? It's like teaching a dog to drive. If you can teach a dog to drive a little ways, that's super impressive. Does that mean you're going to build a business around dogs driving taxis? No."
The other key difference is Tesla has long been promoting what Niedermeyer calls a "general solution" to full self-driving. That means every Tesla will be able to drive itself under all circumstances anywhere in the world.
This is pretty much what Musk said in Tesla's second Master Plan, "When true self-driving is approved by regulators, it will mean that you will be able to summon your Tesla from pretty much anywhere."
This presents tremendous technical challenges.
"If your operating domain is the whole world, how do you ever get enough miles to know that you've covered everything that you're ever going to see in all the conditions that exist out there in the world?" Niedermeyer said.
Everyone else is taking the Waymo route — deploying fleets of vehicles to a small contained area like parts of Austin, Texas, Phoenix and San Francisco.
The fact that Tesla chose to only deploy robotaxis in a section of Austin, rather than let them roam everywhere, is one reason why Niedermeyer said the company is kind of proving that Waymo is taking the more feasible approach.
"It's funny because Tesla wants Austin to be the show, the performance that shows, 'hey, like, we're doing this, we can do driverless, right?'" he said. "But really what it's showing is, well, Waymo kind of had it right all along."
Musk still has fans and believers.
"Tesla is the future," said Darko Protich, an Austin resident who CNBC spoke with at a local coffee shop.
Protich said he has owned a few Tesla vehicles and has ridden in similar autonomous vehicles from Waymo, which he said he grew to like after a bit of apprehension. He has also ridden in robotaxi-like cars in China, and has less confidence in those.
"They're not as safe," Protich said. "They're smaller. But I believe in Teslas, honestly."
Another fan is Michael Simon, from Buda, Texas.
"I just think it's amazing what, what Elon is doing," he said. "When I saw robotaxis were active, I was like, I want to ride."
Neither Protich nor Simon had ridden in the initial launch models, but both said they were looking forward to the chance.
"Elon has made a huge investment in the Austin area, and if I were younger and still working, I would absolutely put in a resume for Tesla to try to go to work for them and be part of that exciting technology and the future," Simon said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ford CEO Jim Farley Favors Waymo Over Tesla On Self-Driving: Report
Ford CEO Jim Farley Favors Waymo Over Tesla On Self-Driving: Report

Forbes

time30 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Ford CEO Jim Farley Favors Waymo Over Tesla On Self-Driving: Report

Ford Motor Company's chief executive officer Jim Farley poses next to the newly unveiled electric ... More F-150 Lightning outside of their headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan on May 19, 2021. - One day after winning an enthusiastic endorsement from President Joe Biden, Ford will officially preview the all-electric version of its best-selling F-150 truck on May 19, 2021. The battery-powered Ford F-150 "Lightning" is part of the US auto giant's $22 billion campaign to ramp up its electric vehicle offerings by 2025. (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images) Ford CEO Jim Farley doesn't agree with CEO Elon Musk on what technologies work best for self-driving. TL;DR: Farley said Waymo's approach, which uses LiDAR in addition to cameras and radar, is the best approach for Ford. Tesla's Robotaxi service and Full-Self Driving (FSD) vehicles use a cameras-only approach. 'When you have a brand like Ford, when there's a new technology, you have to be really careful. We really believe that LiDAR is mission critical," Farley said at the Aspen Ideas Festival on Friday, according to a report from Fortune. Waymo vs Tesla: Farley vs Musk 'To us, Waymo,' Farley said, according to the report, adding that Ford considered LiDAR to be important because 'where the camera will be completely blinded, the LiDAR system will see exactly what's in front of you.' One way of thinking about LiDAR is that it's a safety net for what cameras may miss. In contrast, Tesla and CEO Musk have been adamant about a cameras-only approach. Tesla, which launched its Robotaxi service in Austin earlier this month, is going with cameras-only for its Robotaxi service and FSD, the latter on option on Tesla vehicles and being promoted for the newest 2026 Model Y. 'The way that the road system is designed is for AI. I should say it's for intelligence, biological neural net and eyes. That's how the whole road system is designed,' Musk said in a CNBC interview in May. And Musk has also argued that Waymo's system is too expensive. 'The issue with Waymo's cars is that they cost 'way mo' money,' Musk said during the first quarter earnings conference call. 'The car is very expensive. Made in low volume. Teslas probably cost a quarter or 20% of what a Waymo costs,' he said. Ford, for its part, currently offers BlueCruise, an Advanced Driver Assist System, that is analogous to Tesla's Autopilot and General Motors Super Cruise. Like GM's Super Cruise, Ford's system is designed primarily for hands-free highway driving. Neither is as ambitious as Tesla FSD which is designed to handle both local and highway driving.

Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich?
Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich?

The Magnificent 7 stocks have made headlines in recent years for their eye-popping returns. In fact, taken as a whole, Amazon (AMZN), Google parent company Alphabet (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and Tesla (TSLA) have been credited with propping up the entire market — and that's not much of an exaggeration. According to J.P. Morgan, those seven stocks alone contributed a whopping 55% of the S&P 500's entire return in 2024. But their outperformance was even greater in 2023, when they made up an incredible 63% of the S&P 500's return, helping them earn their 'magnificent' nickname. Read Next: Learn More: In a nutshell, if you had the foresight to invest in the Magnificent 7 stocks at the beginning of 2023, you would have done quite well. How well? Read on to see how this statistical performance translates into real dollars and cents. Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $87.70 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $176.77 Total percentage return: 101.6% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $20,160 Check Out: Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $84.00 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $216.10 Total percentage return: 157.3% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $25,730 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $128.27 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $198.42 Total percentage return: 54.7% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $15,470 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $14.60 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $144.69 Total percentage return: 891.0% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $99,100 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $119.78 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $702.12 Total percentage return: 486.2% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $58,620 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $235.04 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $479.14 Total percentage return: 103.9% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $20,390 Closing price on Dec. 30, 2022: $123.18 Closing price on June 16, 2025: $329.13 Total percentage return: 167.2% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $26,720 Total return in 2023: 76% Total return in 2024: 48% Year-to-date return in 2025 as of June 16: 0% Current value of $10,000 invested on Dec. 30, 2022: $26,048 As a whole, the Magnificent 7 stocks would have more than doubled your money over the past 2 1/2 years. Individual stocks within the Magnificent 7, however, would have multiplied your money exponentially. Nvidia, for example, single-handedly blew away the returns of both the S&P 500 and the other stocks within the Magnificent 7, returning a massive 891%. If you had invested $100,000 in Nvidia at the end of 2022, you'd be sitting on a nearly $1 million portfolio in just 2 1/2 years. The bottom line is that yes, investing any amount of money in the Magnificent 7 stocks at the start of 2023 would have earned you considerable gains. While some analysts are predicting more gains ahead, bear in mind that to earn these types of returns, you have to take on considerable risk. In 2022, for example, the Magnificent 7 stocks dropped 40% as a whole, with some of its individual components losing more than 65% of their value. As high reward comes with high risk, be sure that investing in the Magnificent 7 stocks matches up with your financial objectives and risk tolerance. Editor's note: All historical closing prices were adjusted for splits, dividends and capital gain distributions, and were sourced from Yahoo Finance. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Would Investing $10K in the Magnificent 7 Stocks in 2023 Have Made You Rich? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg Want to Control AI by Crushing ChatGPT's Father
Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg Want to Control AI by Crushing ChatGPT's Father

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg Want to Control AI by Crushing ChatGPT's Father

The AI race was never going to be polite. But what's unfolding in Silicon Valley in 2025 looks more like Succession meets Black Mirror than a traditional tech rivalry. Forget code. This is about power, control, and a rapidly closing window to dominate the most transformative technology in history. At the center of the fight: three men, three worldviews, and one finish line. Let's break down the combatants. This one is personal and litigious. Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit devoted to building safe, open-source artificial intelligence. But the bromance collapsed when Musk attempted to take control of the company in 2018 and failed. He left bitterly and has been attacking OpenAI ever since. In 2023, Musk sued OpenAI and Altman, accusing them of betraying the nonprofit's mission by aligning too closely with Microsoft and putting profit over safety. The lawsuit is still grinding through federal court. Among other things, it claims OpenAI's flagship product, ChatGPT, is a closed-source commercial weapon funded by Big Tech and wrapped in secrecy. Altman denies the betrayal and OpenAI has countersued. The legal drama is thick and both sides have subpoenaed internal documents. Meanwhile, Musk's xAI is developing its own ChatGPT rival and launching it on X (formerly Twitter). This is a very public and very expensive fight over who gets to define ethical AI. Stakes: Both want to build AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, a system smarter than humans. Musk wants to do it his way with radical transparency and no corporate strings. Altman wants to do it with Microsoft money, oversight, and a mission-first approach. The future of AI safety and perhaps civilization is the prize. They were supposed to be on the same team. Microsoft has invested over $13 billion in OpenAI and uses ChatGPT to power Bing, Copilot, and Azure. But now the two companies are increasingly at odds and headed for a potential breach. Microsoft has quietly built its own internal AI team called MAI, which is developing foundation models independent of OpenAI. The company wants more control, fewer surprises, and possibly a total replacement. Altman, meanwhile, has turned OpenAI into a hybrid nonprofit-corporate juggernaut. He's building custom chips, launching an AI app store, and moving fast into hardware and enterprise services. Microsoft sees this as direct competition. It's a fraying marriage held together by mutual benefit, but barely. Stakes: A real split could upend the entire enterprise AI ecosystem and open the door for rivals like Google, Meta, or Anthropic to swoop in. This relationship could end with another courtroom clash. It's the quietest war but maybe the most cutthroat. Meta has made AI its top priority for 2025 and Zuckerberg is going straight for Altman's team. In recent months, Meta has offered $100 million and more in signing bonuses to OpenAI researchers in a bid to poach top talent, Altman says. So far, most have stayed loyal to Altman. But the scale of the offers has shocked the Valley. In a podcast with his brother, Altman didn't mince words: 'They started making these, like, giant offers to a lot of people on our team, you know, like $100 million signing bonuses,' Altman said, adding:'It is crazy.' He accused Meta of 'just trying to copy OpenAI, down to the UI mistakes.' Zuckerberg's strategy is familiar. Outspend, out-recruit, outlast. Meta's AI tools are still basic compared to ChatGPT, but with enough hires and acquisitions (like rumored talks with voice-AI startup PlayAI), Meta hopes to leapfrog the field. Stakes: Zuckerberg is fighting not just for dominance in AI, but for relevance. If Meta fails to catch up, it could be left behind in a world where AI, not social media, is the next major computing platform. New episode of Uncapped with @sama. Enjoy 🤗 — Jack Altman (@jaltma) June 17, 2025The AI race has become a war of personalities. Altman, the techno-missionary. Musk, the chaos capitalist. Zuckerberg, the empire builder. Each believes they are the only one who can lead humanity into the next era of intelligence. What's unfolding is a battle for the infrastructure of the 21st century: who owns the models, who trains the machines, and who gets to decide what AI thinks. And if the lawsuits, subpoenas, and poaching wars are any indication, they're willing to burn billions to win.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store