University of Michigan under federal scrutiny after arrest of Chinese scientists
DETROIT — The Trump administration is investigating potential foreign influence at the University of Michigan, claiming the school was indifferent to national security concerns raised by the FBI.
In a letter sent to the university on July 15, the U.S. Department of Education gave the university 30 days to turn over more than five years' worth of records related to foreign donations, foreign research collaboration, international students and their visas, as well as the names and contact information of school personnel who supervise all those things.
The letter said the university received $375 million in foreign funding since 2020 and has been late in reporting about $86 million of that amount. The letter also notes that the school spends more than $2 billion on research each year, and about half of that comes from the federal government.
"Additionally, many of UM's disclosure reports appear to include transactions in which the counterparty was erroneously identified by UM as nongovernmental," Paul Moore, chief investigative counsel for the Department of Education, wrote in the letter.
Universities must file semiannual reports with the department detailing their foreign contacts and funding. The letter said a review of the university's filings "reveals that incomplete, inaccurate, and untimely disclosures may have been submitted by UM, in possible violation of its foreign source funding statutory disclosure obligations."
University spokeswoman Colleen Mastony said in a statement that the school is committed to advancing knowledge and serving the people of Michigan and the world.
"The University of Michigan takes its responsibility to comply with the law extremely seriously, and we will cooperate fully with federal investigators," she said. "We strongly condemn any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university's critical public mission."
The investigation is the latest battle between the Trump administration and the school over things like antisemitism on campus, its use of diversity, equity, and inclusion, and the overhead costs it charges on federal research grants.
Does China benefit from it? Trump has been defunding university research.
Department of Education cites recent cases involving Chinese scientists
Universities with ties to China have also been under federal scrutiny as the administration has become increasingly concerned that China is potentially using open and federally funded research environments in the United States to circumvent export controls and other national security laws, according to Reuters. In May, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the United States will not tolerate "exploitation" of universities by the Chinese Communist Party or theft of U.S. research and intellectual property.
The Department of Education's investigation comes after three Chinese citizens were recently charged with attempting to smuggle dangerous biological materials into the United States for use at the University of Michigan labs.
In June, federal authorities accused two Chinese scientists of smuggling into the United States a "dangerous" fungus that causes a disease in crops so that one of them could research the pathogen at a university laboratory. Days later, another Chinese scientist was charged with allegedly bringing biological materials related to roundworms for research at the university.
"Despite the University of Michigan's history of downplaying its vulnerabilities to malign foreign influence, recent reports reveal that UM's research laboratories remain vulnerable to sabotage," Moore said in a separate statement.
Chinese student visas: Marco Rubio says US will revoke visas from Chinese students, add new restrictions
The Department of Education's letter also noted that the university in January closed a joint research institute it ran with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, after U.S. Rep. John Moolenaar, a Republican from Caledonia, highlighted ties that the school had to the Chinese military.
"UM continues to engage in substantial research collaborations with Tsinghua University, Peking University, Fudan University, and Zhejiang University — all universities deeply involved in China's emerging science and technology research efforts directly linked to military programs," the letter said.
According to the letter, Ann Chih Lin, director of the University of Michigan's Center for Chinese Studies, met with the director of the FBI in December 2022 and accused the bureau of overstating the threat of technology transfer to China in academic settings.
"Lin's assertions appear to be ill-conceived," Moore wrote in the letter. "Lin's apparent indifference to the national security concerns of the largest single source of funding for UM's annual research expenditures — the American taxpayer — is particularly unsettling."
Contributing: Christina Hall, Detroit Free Press; Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY; Reuters

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Politically Wavering Podcasters Roil Fans and Haters Alike
Some of the big shows that interviewed Trump during the election are now featuring left-leaning legislators, testing the appetites of their fans By Welcome back to another week of Soundbite. Following what many now call the 'podcast election,' the biggest podcasters who sat down with President Trump leading up to his victory are increasingly interviewing Democratic legislators. Their audiences and detractors alike are questioning the shift. We'll dig in. Plus, we have an update on the popular conservative podcaster Brett Cooper.


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
72 percent of Democratic voters ‘extremely motivated' ahead of midterms
Nearly three-quarters of Democratic voters are feeling motivated to vote in the next election cycle, according to the latest CNN/SSRS poll. The survey, conducted this past weekend, shows 72 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters are 'extremely motivated' to vote ahead of the midterms, compared to 50 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning voters. Among Democrats, motivation to vote his increased in the early months of President Trump's term in office — up 10 points from October, when 62 percent of Democratic voters said they were eager to vote in the 2024 presidential elections. Republican enthusiasm, meanwhile, has declined by 17 points from October, when 67 percent said they were extremely motivated to vote in the election. In September of last year, 68 percent of voters from both parties said they were excited about voting in the 2024 election. The latest data could be good news for Democratic Party, which saw nearly half as much enthusiasm in a poll taken in the October ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. 2024 Election Coverage In that poll, 44 percent of Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters were excited to vote in the midterms—close to the 48 percent of Republican and Republican-leaners who were eager to vote at the time. In the 2022 election, Democrats kept the Senate but lost the House to GOP control. In the 2024 election, Republicans won the majority of both chambers of Congress. The poll was conducted on July 10-13 and included 1,057 respondents. The margin of error is 3.5 percentage points.


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson eyes GOP-led Epstein documents measure to quell outrage
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is discussing backing a measure in support of disclosing more information related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, two sources told The Hill. Johnson's consideration of the move comes as outrage over the Trump administration's handling of the matter roils the Republican Party. In the House, GOP members of the Rules Committee, in particular, have gotten immense public pushback for voting down a Democrat-led amendment demanding more information be released. Just one Republican, Rep. Ralph Norman (S.C.), voted in favor of the measure in committee. The final structure and details of the measure were not immediately clear, and Republicans will have to walk a careful line in how they craft it as they balance placating the party's base with avoiding the wrath of President Trump. 'The House Republicans are for transparency and they're looking for a way to say that,' Johnson said. 'I've been very clear, the members have been very clear. The House Rules Committee Republicans have been taking incoming and criticism because they voted to stop the Democrats' politicization of this, and they're trying to stick to their job and move the procedural rules to the floor so we can do our work and get the rescissions done for the American people. They are for transparency, just as we all are, and we are looking for ways to express that. That's all it is,' he added. The MAGA base has expressed fury over the administration's handling of the case, while Trump has fumed over public calls for more information, calling the Epstein matter a 'hoax' and suggesting Democrats altered the files. The measure, however, will likely spell out that the names of whistleblowers and victims in the case should be shielded, one source noted, a difference from the Democrat-led amendment, which calls for the full release of materials. Punchbowl News first reported Johnson discussing backing an Epstein-release measure. The GOP-led effort comes as Democrats keep forcing votes on releasing the Epstein files, which have forced Republicans into the difficult decision of risking Trump's wrath or shooting it down despite anger among their constituents. Aside from the vote on the Democrat-led amendment in the House Rules Committee this week, Democrats tried to stage a floor vote on a resolution to compel the release of the files through an obscure procedural gambit. Their effort failed. Also looming over the debate is a bipartisan push to demand the release of the documents. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) are leading the measure — which several House Republicans have joined as co-sponsors — and they plan to start a discharge petition to force it to the floor if they gain support from at least 218 members. The Justice Department and FBI asserted in a memo last week that Epstein's death was a suicide and that he did not have a client list. Officials declined to release any more details, saying information under seal 'served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third-parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing.' Johnson made headlines earlier this week for notably breaking with Trump on the Epstein matter, saying that Attorney General Pam Bondi needs to 'explain' the decision to not put out more information 'It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it,' Johnson told conservative commentator Benny Johnson on Tuesday. The next day, Johnson said his comments were misinterpreted, and suggested there was no major difference between his position and Trump's, citing his statement that 'credible' information could be released. Trump on Wednesday, however, tore into those demanding more disclosures, calling those fixed on the case his 'PAST supporters' and asserting: 'I don't want their support anymore!' House GOP lawmakers — facing the competing pressures of Trump and an outraged voter base — have been at odds this week over whether the documents should be disclosed. Some House Republicans have said their offices are being inundated with constituent calls about the files, many of whom are frustrated by the Trump administration's handling of the matter.