
Trump Butler assassination attempt: Secret Service knew of threat 10 days before rally, failed to act, GAO report
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the Secret Service's internal systems for sharing classified intelligence were siloed and ineffective, contributing directly to a breakdown in rally security planning.
'The Secret Service had no process to share classified threat information with partners when the information was not considered an imminent threat to life,' the GAO report stated.
The GAO report, released by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) on Saturday, revealed that neither the Secret Service agents on the ground nor local law enforcement had been informed about the threat.
'Secret Service and local law enforcement personnel central to developing site security plans for the rally were unaware of the threat,' the report noted.
Even the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Pittsburgh field office—which had jurisdiction over the rally—reported that he never received the information.
'He reported that if he had received the threat information, he would have requested additional assets, such as ballistic glass, additional drone mitigation, and a full counter-sniper advance team,' the GAO said.
Senator Grassley sharply criticised the agency, saying the Butler shooting was the result of cascading failures.
'One year ago, a series of bad decisions and bureaucratic handicaps led to one of the most shocking moments in political history,' Grassley said in a statement, according to The New York Post.
'The Secret Service's failure on July 13th was the culmination of years of mismanagement and came after the Biden administration denied requests for enhanced security to protect President Trump.'
Grassley described the 98-page GAO report as a 'comprehensive overview of the failures' and called for urgent reforms.
'This information would not have been possible without congressional oversight, and my work will continue,' he was quoted as adding.
'Americans should be grateful that President Trump survived that day and was ultimately reelected to restore common sense to our country.'
The GAO also flagged major operational deficiencies in the planning and staffing of the Butler rally:
Of the 14 agents interviewed, five said they relied solely on their own experience for decision-making, as there were no standard protocols or oversight.
The site agent assigned to Butler was new to the role, and the rally was her first time planning a large outdoor event.
Drone support was unavailable—either allocated to the party conventions or inoperable.
The few drones present were flown by inexperienced operators, and some malfunctioned during deployment.
The GAO's findings come days after the Secret Service announced disciplinary actions against six agents and confirmed it had implemented 21 of 46 oversight recommendations, with 16 more in progress.
Grassley says the report offers not just a condemnation, but a roadmap.
'More importantly, this report offers a clear path forward for the Secret Service to improve, so it can prevent another Butler from ever happening again,' he said.
The July 13, 2024 attack left Trump wounded and a supporter dead, sparking multiple investigations and the resignation of Secret Service Director Sean Curran. The fallout continues to reshape security protocols surrounding political figures in the US.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's tariffs offer India a trade opening but policy action will be key, says NITI Aayog
New Delhi: The Trump administration's tariff policies have opened up opportunities for India to gain market share in several product categories, but the Asian nation must act swiftly to capitalize on this advantage, NITI Aayog said in a quarterly assessment released Monday. In its Trade Watch report, the government's policy think tank said India should implement targeted export promotion measures, deepen its integration into global value chains, and pursue a services-focused trade deal with the US to fully leverage these shifting trade dynamics 'These developments highlight the strategic importance of the US as India's largest export destination and a key growth corridor,' the report said. The findings are based on US trade policy announcements made between April and 10 July and reflect the global trade landscape 'as they stand today,' a senior NITI Aayog official said. According to the report, over 61% of the value in India's top 30 broadly defined export product categories, and around 52% in the top 100 more granular product categories, could benefit from expanded access to the US market. To unlock this potential, NITI Aayog recommended that India build institutional frameworks with the US in areas such as digital trade, cross-border data flows, and mutual recognition agreements—steps that could help expand India's already robust services exports. The two countries are currently in the final phase of negotiating a trade deal that could help avert higher US tariffs on Indian exports. The agreement must be signed by 1 August to prevent these duties from taking effect. However, politically sensitive sectors such as dairy and agriculture remain sticking points for India. The report also assessed India's broader trade performance during the December quarter of FY25. Merchandise exports grew a modest 3% year-on-year to $108.7 billion, while imports rose 6.5% to $187.5 billion, widening the trade deficit to $78.7 billion. However, this was partially offset by a strong performance in services exports. A services surplus of $52.3 billion, driven by a 17% increase in outbound services, helped narrow the overall gap. Services exports stood at $102.6 billion during the quarter, while imports were at $52.4 billion. India's export composition remained relatively stable, though the report noted a sharp surge in exports of aircraft, spacecraft and parts, which jumped over 200% year-on-year, driven by rising demand from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the Czech Republic. While India's export basket is still dominated by lower-tech goods, NITI Aayog said the structure is 'gradually shifting toward medium-high and high-tech,' citing growth in exports of electrical machinery and arms and ammunition as evidence of increasing export sophistication. North America and the European Union continue to account for around 40% of India's total exports. International trade is a powerful catalyst for economic growth, productivity, and long-term development across nations, the report said, describing India's trade performance during the quarter as one of cautious resilience amid global uncertainty. India ranked as the world's fifth-largest exporter of digitally delivered services in 2024, clocking $269 billion in exports—fuelled by strong demand for IT services, professional consulting, and R&D outsourcing. This, the report noted, cements India's position as a global hub for digital trade.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
41 minutes ago
- First Post
Are Trump's America and Europe heading for divorce?
While the trans-Atlantic alliance was central to US foreign and defence policies for seven decades, the United States and Europe have diverged sharply under US President Donald Trump. From geopolitics to trade, Trump's assaults on European countries risk total breakdown of trans-Atlantic ties. read more For more than seven decades, the trans-Atlantic alliance with Europe had been central to US defence and foreign policies, but that's not the case anymore. In his second term, US President Donald Trump has not just withdrawn the commitment to European security but has increasingly aligned the United States with Russia, the principal adversary of Europe. It's not just in the security domain that the United States and Europe have diverged under Trump, but it extends to tariffs, the broader geopolitics, and even domestic politics. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here we highlight four areas of divergence that suggest the United States and Trump might be headed towards a divorce under Trump. Trump threatens to kill Nato in Europe In the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, Trump said that he would encourage Russia to invade more European countries like Ukraine if they would not do his bidding. He said that he would tell Russia to do 'whatever the hell they want' with Nato allies. Trump's disdain for Nato dates back to his first term when he repeatedly trashed allies for not spending enough on defence. As a result, at last month's Nato Summit, the allies committed to raising their defence spending to 5 per cent that Trump had asked for. But there is no guarantee that Trump would stay committed to the collective defence principle that is at the foundation of Nato. Moreover, Trump has consistently refused to commit US backstop to a European peacekeeping force in Ukraine. As a result, there are concerns that Russia could use Trump to essentially kill Nato. In the absence of US support, there are fears that European members of Nato would not respond to a Russian aggression and that would essentially mean the death of Nato and open vast swathes of Europe for Russian advance. Russia is likely to attempt such aggression against smaller Nato members that rely most on Nato's protective umbrella. If these nations fail to respond on their own or fellow Nato nations fail to mobilise militarily to their defence under the collective defence principle, Nato would be essentially dead as there would be essentially no Nato without the collective defence principle, Jamie Metzl, a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, previously told Firstpost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'If Putin gets anything resembling a victory in Ukraine, what he is going to do next is to needle a Nato member, such as Lithuania, and even if Russia goes just 50 feet inside Lithuania, the country is understandably going to invoke Article 5. If Nato fails to mobilise in Lithuania's support, then the collective defence principle of Nato would be dead and Putin would have defeated Nato with just a minor incursion with perhaps a small contingent of 'little green men' that he used in Crimea,' said Metzl, who previously served in the White House National Security Council. Trump & Europe's opposite take on geopolitics For Europe, Russia is the biggest security threat. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has plunged Europe into the worst security crisis since the World War II. For Trump, however, Russia is not an adversary. He has sought a partner in Russian leader Vladimir Putin, whom he has fawned over for decades. While European leaders have pressed him for sanctions on Russia, Trump has sought a reset in political and economic ties with Russia. He has sought joint initiatives with Russia in the energy sector. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has also parroted Russian propaganda and falsely blamed Nato, former US President Joe Biden, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for starting the ongoing war with Russia. The divergence is not just limited to Europe. It extends to other conflicts as well, most notably the war in the Gaza Strip. While Europe has often criticised the Israeli war in Gaza and has worked to improve the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave, Trump has completely endorsed Israeli war that has killed tens of thousands of people and levelled the majority of enclave. As per Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's own assessments, civilian casualties are more than double of terrorists' in Gaza. Trump has not just completely endorsed Netanyahu's policy, but has also vowed to annex Gaza and expel all Palestinians in what amounts to ethnic cleansing. He has said he would develop Gaza into a resort town. Trump's tariff war on Europe Trump has also waged a tariff war on Ukraine, slapping 30 per cent tariffs on the European Union (EU). The EU is the largest US trading partner. EU Maros Sefcovic has said that such tariffs will make the existing trade 'almost impossible to continue'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'If [the tariff] stays 30 [per cent]-plus, simply trading as we know it will not continue, with huge negative effects on both sides of the Atlantic. I will definitely do everything I can to prevent this super-negative scenario,' Sefcovic further said. Trump's regime change juggernaut Trump and his allies have been openly interfering in domestic politics of European countries. They have openly supported far-right parties in various countries and have worked against moderate parties. Trump has openly endorsed far-right, neo-Nazi party AfD in Germany. He also endorsed right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki in Polish presidential election. He has also put his weight behind the far-right National Rally in France. Trump's former ally, Elon Musk, has also personally endorsed AfD in Germany and vowed to oust the Labour Party in the United Kingdom and replace it with far-right Reform Party.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
King Charles to host Donald Trump at Windsor Castle: First US president to get second invite; September state visit confirmed
US President Donald Trump will make an unprecedented second state visit to the United Kingdom from September 17 to 19, Buckingham Palace announced on Monday. King Charles III and Queen Camilla will host Trump and his wife Melania at Windsor Castle during the three-day visit, marking the first time a US president has been extended such an invitation twice. According to the palace, the invitation was issued personally by King Charles via a letter hand-delivered by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer during a White House visit in February. Reacting to the invite at the time, Trump had called it a 'great, great honor' and said staying at Windsor Castle was 'really something.' Trump's visit comes amid Starmer's efforts to maintain cordial ties with the US leader, in hopes of shielding the UK from the kind of tariffs Washington has imposed on other nations. State visits in Britain are traditionally used to honor close allies and, in some cases, reset strained relationships. While Trump enjoyed the full royal treatment during his first state visit in 2019 under Queen Elizabeth II, his upcoming visit is expected to follow a similar ceremonial format, with military parades, a carriage procession, and a state banquet hosted by the monarch. However, the visit is likely to spark public protests similar to those seen during Trump's previous UK visit, when demonstrators flew a giant baby Trump blimp near Parliament. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like SNS에서 화제인 그 팔찌, 예쁜데 의미까지... 굿네이버스 더 알아보기 Undo Trump's planned arrival also raises diplomatic sensitivities for King Charles, who serves as head of state for both the UK and Canada. Trump's recent comments suggesting Canada could become the 51st US state have drawn criticism, and Charles, during a recent visit to Canada, reaffirmed the nation's sovereignty. The Trumps will stay at Windsor Castle due to ongoing renovations at Buckingham Palace, as was the case during French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit last week.