Indigenous Wampis are ambushed in Peru after government backs out of anti-mining joint patrol
The 60-member mission was ambushed and shot at as they were patrolling near the Wampis community of Fortaleza on Saturday, just days after the Peruvian government's sudden withdrawal from a planned joint enforcement operation to confront the illegal mining.
No one was hurt in the attack.
For two years, the Wampis Nation has pressed state agencies and the public prosecutor's office in Peru to work together to monitor for and remove illegal mining operations from the Santiago River basin.
Days before a scheduled joint operation, government agencies pulled out without explanation, according to Amazon Watch, a U.S.-based environmental and Indigenous rights nonprofit.
In response, the Wampis launched their own mission and its first patrol was attacked on Saturday.
Indigenous leaders say the incident highlights the growing risks faced by land defenders and the government's failure to uphold its promises.
A Wampis official described the attack to The Associated Press. The around 60 Indigenous leaders, community guards and technicians were tasked with monitoring the environmental impacts of illegal gold mining in the Bajo Rio Santiago region.
' People started throwing explosives — I don't even know what kind they were — and then came the gunfire,' said Evaristo Pujupat Shirap, 45, communications officer for the Autonomous Territorial Government of the Wampis Nation.
'Bullets hit the vehicle and even pierced a teacher's jacket at chest level,' Shirap added.
The Peruvian government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Members on the Wampis mission were armed with hunting rifles, but according to Shirap, leaders had instructed the group not to fire under any circumstances.
While they did fire a few warning shots into the air, no direct confrontation took place, Shirap added.
'We will not stand by while our rivers are poisoned and our forests destroyed,' said Galois Yampis, vice president of the Wampis government.
Peru's "government failed to honor its commitments, so we are acting to defend our territory and the future of our people,' he added.
The Indigenous Wampis territorial guards are community-led environmental defenders trained and organized by the autonomous territorial government of the Wampis Nation.
Their aim is to protect Wampis ancestral lands from illegal activities such as mining, logging, and drug trafficking, while upholding their cultural values and vision of Tarimat Pujut — a life in harmony with nature.
Raphael Hoetmer, Amazon program director at Amazon Watch, a longtime ally of the Wampis, said they only confront violent criminals — "yet are left to face danger without state protection.'
The Wampis Nation has long been urging Peru and gold-importing nations to strengthen enforcement against illegal gold trade and invest in Indigenous-led territorial monitoring and sustainable development.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 hours ago
- The Independent
Brazil's congress passes bill to overhaul environmental regulations
A bill to overhaul environmental regulations in Brazil was passed by the country's lower house Thursday, drawing criticism by the environmental minister who floated the possibility of a presidential veto. With the bill already passed by the Senate in May, it now goes to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who casts himself as an environmental defender and later this year will preside over the first U.N. climate talks, known as COP30, to take place in the Amazon. Lula can sanction the project, veto it in its entirety or veto only certain aspects. Lula has not publicly comment on what action he might take. If signed by Lula, the sweeping legislation will weaken federal agencies' environmental licensing powers. Among other measures, it speeds up review for projects deemed priorities by the federal government, reducing the approval process from three bureaucratic steps to one. It also eliminates reviews for upgrades to existing highways, which could clear the way for to pave the whole of a highway that runs about 900 kilometers (560 miles) through the western part of the Amazon. Environmentalists argue that the project will lead to mass clearing of a pristine area of rainforest. The bill's approval is a victory for supporters who argued Brazil's current regulations needs to be simplified, but a blow for environmental experts and green activists, who refer to it as the 'devastation bill.' The bill passed with a strong majority, 267 votes to 116. After the bill passed, Environment Minister Marina Silva told local press that the bill undermined environmental legislation and that the federal government would still seek alternatives, including the possibility of a presidential veto. A campaign in the lead up to the vote said the bill could lead to a regression in pollution control - risking health issues - increase water contamination and scarcity, increase deforestation and undermine protected areas. At the heart of concerns is the proposal to install a self-declaration process for environmental licensing, which Suely Araújo, the public policy coordinator at the Climate Observatory network of NGOs, said would cover around 90% of total projects in Brazil. Companies would 'file a description online, press a button, and the license will be issued,' she said, calling the proposal 'by far the worst piece of legislation' ever from an environmental standpoint. Last week, more than 300 nonprofits, including Greenpeace and WWF Brazil, signed a petition expressing their 'deep concern' regarding the bill which they say, 'represents a huge institutional setback for Brazil and the collapse of over 40 years of development of national environmental legislation.' ___ Gabriela Sá Pessoa contributed from Sao Paulo.
Auto Blog
14 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Volvo Cuts US Lineup to Survive Against Trump's Tariffs
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. View post: Amazon is selling a 'powerful' $100 cordless impact wrench for only $50, and shoppers say it's 'a beast' Another victim of tariffs According to reports by both Reuters and Automotive News, Swedish automaker Volvo is making some drastic cuts to its lineup to turn a profit as President Donald Trump's tariffs make it harder to sell a broad range of vehicles in the U.S. Previously, Volvo offered a range of sedans and station wagons alongside a selection of crossover SUVs; however, the Geely-owned automaker said that it will fully phase out these cars from its U.S. offerings due to declining consumer demand and complications from import tariffs. According to a Volvo spokesperson who spoke to AutoNews, Volvo will cease offering the Chinese-assembled S90 and the Swedish and Belgian-assembled V60 wagons in the U.S. starting in the 2026 model year. This leaves the V60 Cross Country as the only non-SUV in Volvo's U.S. lineup. Volvo will ramp up U.S. production of popular SUVs This decision comes as the U.S. has levied tariffs of 27.5% on European-made cars and 100% on EVs imported from China, forcing automakers to review their product strategies. In light of this, Volvo Cars CEO Håkan Samuelsson said in remarks on CNBC's Europe Early Edition on July 17 that the company would 'definitely not' pull out of the U.S. market, where it has been present for 70 years, adding that it will bring the XC60 into production in the U.S. 'What we are doing is, first of all, we want to fill our factory that we have in South Carolina. It should be the strategic asset it was intended to be. So, we have to utilize it more,' Samuelsson said. 'Second, of course, now with the tariffs, it is very natural to bring in a [car model with] big-selling volume. We are bringing in the XC60 SUV,' he added. Following a July 16 announcement, Samuelsson said during Volvo Cars' Q2 2025 earnings call on July 17 that U.S. production of the XC60 will ramp up in early 2027. Despite currently being tasked with EX90 and Polestar 3 production, Volvo's South Carolina assembly plant only made about 20,000 vehicles last year—just 13% of its capacity. The XC60 'will bring high volumes to the factory [and] together with the increase in the EX90, will give that factory much better utilization,' Samuelsson said. Volvo CFO Fredrik Hansson added that the cost of localizing XC60 production is in the 'very low single-digit billion [U.S. Dollars].' as it previously built the S60 sedan, which is mechanically similar to the XC60. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 'The plant is already adapted for that production,' Hansson said. 'That means we can find very cost-efficient ways to [build the XC60].' Source: Volvo Volvo CEO urges EU to drop tariffs against the US Following the announcement of a 10 billion Swedish kronor ($1 billion) Q2 2025 operating loss, Volvo Cars CEO Hakan Samuelsson said that the European Union should reduce its tariffs on U.S. car imports while politicians in Brussels work toward a trade agreement with the Trump administration. 'If Europe is for free trade, we should be the ones showing the way and going down to very low tariffs first,' Samuelsson told Reuters, adding that European automakers do not need protection from U.S. competitors. 'I think it's absolutely unnecessary, the European car industry definitely does not need to have any protection from American auto builders.' In a series of letters written to the leaders of other countries and key trading partners, President Donald Trump has threatened to raise tariffs on imported goods from the EU to 30% on Aug. 1. Previously, the U.S. had a 2.5% tariff on EU-built cars, while the EU had a 10% tariff on imported vehicles from the U.S. However, Samuelsson recognizes that he has limited say as a businessperson and can only limit his company's exposure to it. 'These are the measures we have control over, rather than when it comes to tariffs, we can only have an opinion like everybody else,' he said. The XC60 overtakes the 240 to become Volvo's best seller Final thoughts In remarks to Reuters, Bill Wallace, the owner of the Wallace Automotive Group, which owns Volvo retail locations in Florida, told the newswire that in the luxury segment that Volvo competes for buyers in, shoppers are quick to pick other brands if pricing becomes an issue. 'At the end of the day, even with a luxury model, they are going to compare their payment with a BMW, Lexus, or a similar model … and if it's a little bit higher … you're just gonna lose the business,' he said. Wallace does have a point. Although Volvo has a reputation for building and selling fairly attractive and solid mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid luxury SUVs, it is doing so in a crowded market. To make matters worse, Mercedes and BMW's answers to the XC90 are both made in the United States. As I said before, Volvo CEO Samuelsson may be determined to increase American production of its high-volume models while the U.S. engages in challenging trade discussions with nearly every nation, but any decisions about the company's future must be carefully calculated if it wants to continue selling in the U.S. from here on out. About the Author James Ochoa View Profile
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Constance Marten only discovered Mark Gordon was imprisoned twenty years for rape after he assaulted two police officers at the birth of their first child, unseen family court documents reveal
Following Constance Marten and Mark Gordon's convictions for the gross negligence manslaughter of their baby daughter Victoria, the Mail has released exclusive podcasts revealing never-before-heard details about the couple. In this third episode of the award-winning Trial Plus series, veteran crime correspondent Rebecca Camber breaks down previously withheld family court documents that refute many of the narratives Marten spun during the trial. On Monday, Marten and her lover Gordon were convicted of causing their daughter's death after going on the run to stop her being taken into care. They will be sentenced on September 15. Not only do the family court proceedings expose the apathy Marten and Gordon felt towards the safety of their children, but they also provide shocking details about the couple's relationship. 'They meet and immediately go to South America to get married for what Marten describes as a spiritual ceremony in Peru', Camber told the podcast. 'Even then, he hasn't told her about his appalling history – the fact that he spent nearly two decades behind bars in an American prison. 'Marten only finds out after the birth of their first child, when Mark Gordon, at the hospital, assaults two police officers. 'He then has to appear in court and it's then that it emerges he has been breaching sex offender notification requirements. 'She learns there is a substantial history with this man, and that he is on the sex offenders register. 'The social worker who makes that note says that Marten, although surprised, seems totally unconcerned about his history.' In 1989, a 14-year-old Gordon was sentenced to 40 years in prison for the rape of his neighbour at knifepoint while her two children slept next door, and for later attacking another neighbour with a shovel. Gordon was charged with multiple serious offences including armed kidnapping, four counts of armed sexual battery, one count of burglary with a deadly weapon, and one count of aggravated battery. Another shocking revelation within the documents relates to an incident where Marten was allegedly pushed out of a first-floor window. While the couple tried to claim in family court that the event was an accident and that Gordon was being unreasonably targeted by social services, the documents reveal why the courts believed it was domestic violence. 'This isn't just a simple fall where Marten gets up and feels fine', Camber said. 'The documents show that she shattered her spleen and damaged her kidney. She had internal bleeding and needed a blood transfusion. 'These are very serious injuries. Their neighbour made a phone call to the ambulance services at 3:35 in the morning, having heard screaming between Marten and Gordon. 'She saw a woman fall 18 feet from the first-floor window of a terraced house. Marten hit a car – Gordon doesn't call for any help at all while she's on the ground screaming. 'When the paramedics arrive, Gordon doesn't even let them into the house. It's why it's so important we see these documents… this is a very clear case of a woman being thrown out of a window. 'Gordon came up with the implausible story that he fell with her and landed on his feet – because the neighbour was the only witness and didn't see the push, police have to say they can't proceed with it as a criminal offence. 'But this turns out to be a real turning point in family court proceedings, because they now knew there was serious risk of harm to Constance and their children.' To hear more revelations from the documents and to discover why social services said they were scared of Marten, subscribe to The Crime Desk, the home of arresting podcasts from The Daily Mail.
