US lawmakers question whether CBS cancelled Colbert's show for political reasons
The Late Show With Stephen Colbert will end its 10-year run on CBS in May 2026, the network said on July 17.
WASHINGTON - Democratic lawmakers are questioning the timing of CBS's announcement to cancel The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, which came days after Colbert criticised the network's parent company for paying President Donald Trump US$16 million (S$20.6 million) to settle a lawsuit.
Hours after CBS executives characterised the move as 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night', lawmakers began suggesting that the cancellation was linked to Paramount's recent settlement with Mr Trump.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., wrote on social media that the settlement with Mr Trump 'looks like bribery', and Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said: 'People deserve to know if this is a politically motivated attack on free speech.'
Paramount recently agreed to pay Mr Trump US$16 million to settle his lawsuit over the editing of an interview on the CBS News programme 60 Minutes.
Colbert, a longtime critic of Mr Trump's, panned on July 14 that the settlement as a 'big fat bribe', a reference to Paramount's multibillion-dollar merger with the movie studio Skydance that still requires approval from the Trump administration.
CBS executives said in a statement on July 17 night that the decision was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount'.
The show's cancellation comes during a period of upheaval in the world of late-night television, as viewers migrate away from traditional broadcast and cable television and as advertising revenue for late-night programmes plummets. Colbert's show will end in May, when his contract expires.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore A deadly cocktail: Easy access, lax attitudes driving Kpod scourge in S'pore
Singapore 'I thought it was an April Fool's joke': Teen addicted to Kpods on news that friend died
World DOJ asks judge to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
Asia 'Guardian angels': Taiwan's dementia-friendly village promotes ageing in place
Opinion A modern interpretation of Islam in Indonesia fuels a push for 'global Muslims'
Singapore Critical infrastructure in S'pore under attack by cyber espionage group: Shanmugam
Singapore What is UNC3886, the group that attacked Singapore's critical information infrastructure?
Singapore NTU upholds zero grade for student accused of using AI in essay; panel found 14 false citations or data
Still, Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who caucuses with Democrats, also cited the pending merger in a social media post on July 18 morning.
'Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired,' Mr Sanders said. 'Do I think this is a coincidence? NO.'
Colbert said during the July 17 taping of the show that he was informed of the cancellation on July 16 night. For his part, Colbert had joked on July 14 that his moustache would protect him from any pressure that comes from 'the new owner's desire to please Trump', asking: 'How are they going to put pressure on Stephen Colbert if they can't find him?'
Senator Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who was a guest on Colbert's show on July 17 night, demanded more answers as to whether the show was cancelled for political reasons.
'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know,' Mr Schiff wrote on X.
Mr Trump, meanwhile, celebrated the decision to cancel the show.
'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired,' Mr Trump said in his own social media post. 'His talent was even less than his ratings.' NYTIMES
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
SAM Contemporaries returns for second edition with six large-scale installations
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox (Front row from left) Artists Chu Hao Pei, Lee Pheng Guan, NEO_ARTEFACTS, Masuri Mazlan, Syahrul Anuar, (back row from left) curators Angela Pinto, Joella Kiu, Siobhan Tang, Syaheedah Iskandar, Seline Teo, Berny Tan, Angelica Ong and Teng Yen Hui in the space for How To Dream Worlds at Singapore Art Museum. SINGAPORE – A recreation of a sandy excavation site with pop culture relics like Indiana Jones' Holy Grail. An eerie home occupied by tubular latex and a shower cubicle periodically spraying red mist. And 10kg of dried lalang corralled into metal frames. Singapore Art Museum's (SAM) second edition of its biennial platform, Contemporaries, returns on Aug 1 with six large-scale installations by emerging artists being shown under the title How To Dream Worlds, in Tanjong Pagar Distripark.

Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
UK rejects criticism that move to recognise Palestinian state rewards Hamas
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer delivers a statement inside No. 10 Downing Street on the day the cabinet was recalled to discuss the situation in Gaza, in London, Britain, July 29, 2025. REUTERS/Toby Melville/Pool LONDON - Britain on Wednesday rejected criticism that it was rewarding militant group Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. The sight of emaciated Gaza children has shocked the world in recent days and on Tuesday, a hunger monitor warned that a worst-case scenario of famine was unfolding there and immediate action was needed to avoid widespread death. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline for Israel, prompted an immediate rebuke from his counterpart in Jerusalem, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of their 2023 cross-border attack. U.S. President Donald Trump said he did not think Hamas "should be rewarded" with recognition of Palestinian independence. Asked about that criticism, British Transport Minister Heidi Alexander - designated by the government to respond to questions in a series of media interviews on Wednesday - said it was not the right way to characterise Britain's plan. 'This is not a reward for Hamas. Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death," she told LBC radio. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MHA to support HSA's crackdown on Kpod abusers and help in treatment of offenders: Shanmugam Business S'pore's economic resilience will face headwinds in second half of 2025 from tariffs, trade conflicts: MAS Business S'pore's Q2 total employment rises, but infocomm and professional services sectors see more job cuts Singapore Fewer than 1 in 5 people noticed suspicious items during MHA's social experiments Asia Powerful 8.8-magnitude quake in Russia's far east causes tsunami; Japan, Hawaii order evacuations Singapore Migrant workers who gave kickbacks to renew work passes were conservancy workers at AMK Town Council Asia 'Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deals behind the scenes Singapore Escape, discover, connect: Where new memories are made France announced last week it would recognise Palestinian statehood in September. Successive British governments have said they would recognise a Palestinian state when it was most effective to do so. In a televised address on Tuesday, Starmer said that moment had now come, highlighting the suffering in Gaza and saying the prospect of a two-state solution - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Israel - was under threat. Starmer said Britain would make the move at the U.N. General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, made clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank and committed to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution. REUTERS

Straits Times
a few seconds ago
- Straits Times
Voice actors push back as AI threatens dubbing industry
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A microphone is seen at a recording studio in Vienna, Austria, April 6, 2018. REUTERS/Heinz-Peter Bader/File Photo PARIS/BERLIN - Boris Rehlinger may not turn heads on the streets of Paris, but his voice is instantly recognisable to millions of French filmgoers. As the French voice of Ben Affleck, Joaquin Phoenix, and even Puss in Boots, Rehlinger is a star behind the scenes — and now he is fighting to keep his craft alive in the age of AI. "I feel threatened even though my voice hasn't been replaced by AI yet," the actor, who is part of a French initiative, TouchePasMaVF, to protect human-created dubbing from artificial intelligence, told Reuters. He said there was a team of professionals, including actors, translators, production directors, dialogue adapters and sound engineers, to ensure audiences barely notice that the actor on screen is speaking a different language than they hear. The rise of global streaming platforms such as Netflix, which relies heavily on dubbing to make global hits such as "Squid Game" and "Lupin", has amplified demand. Consumer research firm GWI says 43% of viewers in Germany, France, Italy and Britain prefer dubbed content over subtitles. The market is expected to grow to $4.3 billion in 2025, reaching $7.6 billion by 2033, according to Business Research Insights. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MHA to support HSA's crackdown on Kpod abusers and help in treatment of offenders: Shanmugam Business S'pore's economic resilience will face headwinds in second half of 2025 from tariffs, trade conflicts: MAS Business S'pore's Q2 total employment rises, but infocomm and professional services sectors see more job cuts Singapore Fewer than 1 in 5 people noticed suspicious items during MHA's social experiments Asia Powerful 8.8-magnitude quake in Russia's far east causes tsunami; Japan, Hawaii order evacuations Singapore Migrant workers who gave kickbacks to renew work passes were conservancy workers at AMK Town Council Asia 'Hashing things out': Japan, Vietnam, EU contest terms of US tariff deals behind the scenes Singapore Escape, discover, connect: Where new memories are made That growth could also amplify demand for the so-far nascent technology-based solutions, with platforms competing for subscribers and revenue, and seeking to win over advertisers from their rivals by emphasising their increasing reach. But as AI-generated voices become more sophisticated and cost-effective, voice actor industry associations across Europe are calling on the EU to tighten regulations to protect quality, jobs and artists' back catalogues from being used to create future dubbed work. "We need legislation: Just as after the car, which replaced the horse-drawn carriage, we need a highway code," Rehlinger said. Worries over technology in the movie industry and whether it will replace the work of humans are not new. AI has been a flashpoint in Hollywood since the labour unrest of 2023, which resulted in new guidelines for the use of the technology. Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said this month that the company used generative AI to produce visual effects for the first time on screen in the original series "El Eternauta (The Eternaut)". It has also tested GenAI to synchronise actors' lip movements with dubbed dialogue to improve the viewing experience, according to three sources familiar with the work. These experiments rely on local voice actors to deliver the lines, rather than use AI to synthetically translate the on-screen performer's voice into another language. Such a use of AI for dubbing is permitted under the new SAG-AFTRA actors' union contract, which covers voice-over dubbing from foreign languages into English. It also requires that the actor rendering the dubbing service be paid. Netflix declined to comment on its use of AI in dubbing when asked by Reuters. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Such test-runs by an industry giant will do little to allay the fears of dubbing actors. In Germany, 12 well-known dubbing actors went viral on TikTok in March, garnering 8.7 million views, for their campaign saying "Let's protect artistic, not artificial, intelligence". A petition from the VDS voice actors' association calling on German and EU lawmakers to push AI companies to obtain explicit consent when training the technology on artists' voices and fairly compensate them, as well as transparently label AI-generated content, gained more than 75,500 signatures. When intellectual property is no longer protected, no one will produce anything anymore "because they think 'tomorrow it will be stolen from me anyway'," said Cedric Cavatore, a VDS member who has dubbed films and video games including the PlayStation game "Final Fantasy VII Remake". VDS collaborates with United Voice Artists, a global network of over 20,000 voice actors advocating for ethical AI use and fair contracts. In the United States, Hollywood video game voice and motion capture actors this month signed a new contract with video game studios focused on AI that SAG-AFTRA said represented important progress on protections against the tech. STUDIOS EXPERIMENT Some studios are already cautiously exploring AI. Eberhard Weckerle, managing director of the Neue Tonfilm Muenchen studio, hopes AI and human dubbing can one day coexist. "The fear is that AI will be used to make something as cheap as possible and then people will say, 'Okay, I'll accept that I'll have poorer quality'. And that would actually be the worst thing that could happen to us," said the sound engineer whose studio worked on the German version of "Conclave" and is currently dubbing Guy Ritchie's new film. Earlier this year, the German-dubbed version of streaming service Viaplay's Polish crime series "Murderesses" was removed after criticism from viewers about the monotony of its AI-generated dialogue. The streamer had decided to look into alternative dubbing options due to how prohibitively expensive going through the traditional channels can be in Germany. The hybrid dubbing, created with Israeli startup DeepDub, used a mix of human and AI voices. DeepDub did not respond to an emailed request for comment. "We'll continue offering subtitles and reserve dubbing for select content," said Vanda Rapti, the executive vice president of ViaPlay Group, ViaPlay Select & Content distribution. Despite the disquiet over that series, other potential viewers seem more sanguine. According to GWI, nearly half of viewers said their opinion would not change if they learned that the content they liked was generated by AI. Some 25% said they would like it slightly less, and only 3% said they would like it much more. 'INTEREST IS HUGE' Stefan Sporn, CEO of Audio Innovation Lab, which used AI to dub the Cannes Film Festival entry "Black Dog" from Chinese to German, believes AI will reshape, but not replace, voice work. Humans will always be needed for emotion, scripting, and language nuance, he said, "just not to the same extent". Audio Innovation Lab's technology alters the original actor's voice to match the target language, aiming for authenticity and efficiency. "Interest is huge," said Sporn, adding that producers, studios and advertisers all want to know how well it works. Another startup, Flawless AI, bills itself as an ethical AI company that works with local voice actors and uses its technology to match the on-screen actor's lip movements to the different languages. "When AI technologies are used in the right way, they are a silver bullet to change how we can film-make in a new way," co-CEO Scott Mann said. REUTERS