Chelsea's Club World Cup triumph a ‘statement', but what might be the cost?
For the latest updates, follow us @ArabNewsSport
Chelsea have also pocketed a stunning $115 million in prize money from the Club World Cup, but what if there comes a point in 2025/26 when their exploits of this season catch up with them?
While Chelsea have been competing at the Club World Cup in draining weather conditions, Premier League champions Liverpool and runners-up Arsenal have enjoyed extended off-season breaks.
Manchester City were also at the Club World Cup but they went out over a week earlier.
Global players' union FIFPro has been the leading voices expressing concerns about the demands on the game's biggest stars in an ever-expanding calendar.
One of the safeguards it proposed in a study published before the tournament was a mandatory four-week off-season break, along with four-week retraining periods before returning to competition.
Chelsea's off-season is drastically reduced, with their first match of the next Premier League campaign against Crystal Palace slated for August 17, exactly five weeks after the Club World Cup final. They have a friendly against Bayer Leverkusen on August 8.
'Tomorrow I have three weeks of holiay which is all I want right now because I have not stopped in 15 months,' said Maresca on Sunday.
It remains to be seen if Maresca and his players come back sufficiently refreshed before attacking a season in which they hope to go far in the Champions League, and which will end with the World Cup in North America.
PSG face an even tighter squeeze after a historic campaign for Luis Enrique's team, capped by their triumph in the Champions League final.
Their first competitive match of next season will be the UEFA Super Cup against Tottenham Hotspur in Italy on August 13, exactly one month after their defeat in New York — a chance to win more silverware, but at what cost?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
22 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
WNBA players and league officials meet for CBA discussions during All-Star weekend
WNBA players and league officials met Thursday before the start of the All-Star weekend festivities for discussions on a new collective bargaining agreement. All-Stars Caitlin Clark, Paige Bueckers, and Angel Reese were among about 40 players, most wearing business suits, who took part in the first face-to-face meeting featuring players since December. Players opted out of the current CBA last October and are seeking a better revenue sharing model, increased salaries, improved benefits, and a softer salary cap. The sides are far apart in preliminary discussions and agreed to another meeting this weekend. 'I don't know that I'm going to say progress, but we had spirited conversation,' said Terri Carmichael Jackson, the executive director of the Women's National Basketball Players Association. If a deal isn't done by the end of October, some players, including Napheesa Collier and Reese, have mentioned the potential of a walkout, which could present some immediate problems. The league has two new teams in Portland and Toronto starting next season, and the expansion draft has typically been in December. Free agency usually starts in January. The league has never lost a game to a work stoppage since it started in 1997. Jackson said the sides would eventually get to a new deal though wouldn't say if they got any closer to it Thursday. 'I think we're on track to get back to meeting and to engaging in conversations that will lead us to a CBA,' she said. Jackson said Thursday was the most players the union ever had in the room and was particularly impressed by the number of young stars such as Clark who have helped spark unprecedented growth across nearly every business metric from attendance and viewership. There's also the new 2.2 billion media rights deal that will start next season, and the league plans to expand to 18 teams by 2030 with each of the three new teams paying 250 million expansion fee. Players sent the league an initial proposal in February that the league finally responded to last month. Jackson believes the sides can overcome that slow start. 'I think we have plenty of time,' she said.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Damian Lillard returns to the trail blazers on a 3-year deal worth $42 million, Ap source says
Damian Lillard is back where he started. Lillard signed a three-year deal worth 42 million to return to the Portland Trail Blazers, a person with knowledge of the deal told The Associated Press on Thursday. The person spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity because the deal had not been officially announced. ESPN first reported the deal. Lillard was the sixth pick in the 2012 NBA draft by the Trail Blazers and spent 11 seasons with Portland before he was traded to the Milwaukee Bucks just before the 2023-24 season. The 35-year-old tore his left Achilles tendon during a first-round NBA playoff series against the Indiana Pacers and required surgery. The Bucks waived him earlier this month and stretched the remaining 113 million on his contract. This past season with the Bucks, Lillard ranked 10th in the league in scoring (24.9) and assists (7.1) while earning his ninth All-Star Game selection. Lillard posted a video to his Instagram on Thursday of the Trail Blazers locker room ending with a frame of a locker labeled with his name followed by the words 'Together Again.' He wrote 'RipCityyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!' Lillard averaged 32.2 points his final season in Portland. He became just the seventh player in NBA history to score more than 70 points in a game when he finished with 71 against the Houston Rockets that season.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Federal Reserve says building renovation complies with law, defends costs
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Thursday said the agency's renovation of two of its buildings is in compliance with plans approved by a local commission, disputing a White House suggestion that they may have violated the law by deviating from those plans. The letter is the latest salvo in an escalating battle between the Federal Reserve–an independent agency charged with fighting inflation and seeking maximum employment–and the Trump administration. President Donald Trump has for months criticized Powell and the Fed for not lowering its key interest rate, which the president says would boost borrowing and accelerate the economy. Powell has said he wants to see how the economy responds to Trump's sweeping tariffs, which could raise inflation and slow growth, before making any moves. Trump has even threatened to fire Powell, though he has since backed away and said Wednesday it was highly unlikely that he would take the unprecedented step of doing so. Firing the Fed chair could cause chaos in the financial markets. Several executives of Wall Street banks have said this week that the Fed's independence from day-to-day politics is crucial. Still, the Trump administration has seized on ballooning costs for the Fed's renovation of two century-old buildings to argue that Powell has mismanaged the project. The president can't fire the Fed chair because of a policy disagreement, but he could do so for cause, which is widely seen as some kind of malfeasance or neglect. Last week, the president's top budget adviser, Russell Vought, wrote Powell a letter that said Trump is extremely troubled by Powell's management of the project, which has risen in cost to about 2.5 billion, up from the Fed's initial estimate of 1.9 billion. Vought's letter also noted that Powell, in testimony before the Senate last month, said that the Fed removed some amenities that critics called ostentatious from its plans. Those plans had been approved by the National Capital Planning Commission in 2021. Vought said in his letter that if the renovation plans had changed, they were no longer in compliance with the approved plan and may violate the National Capital Planning Act. Powell responded Thursday that since the Fed's plans were approved by the NCPC in September 2021, it has made only a small number of design changes to scale back or eliminate certain elements and added that the changes weren't significant enough to warrant further review. 'The project is proceeding in accordance with the plan that the NCPC approved,' Powell wrote. 'The changes were intended to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases,' Powell said in his letter. Powell also defended the cost of the renovation: 'Both buildings were in need of significant structural repairs, including the removal of asbestos and lead contamination, as well as the complete replacement of antiquated systems such as electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, as well as fire detection and suppression systems,' he wrote.
