
Clinton Mayor Jack Gilfoy Jr. dies over the weekend
'It is with deep regret and sadness, per the notification of Mayor Jack Gilfoy Jr.'s wife, that we are informing our community that Mayor Gilfoy passed away today [Saturday] at 2:10 p.m.,' the city's post said. 'We ask that you please respect the wishes of his wife and give them privacy during this difficult time. We appreciate your prayers and positive thoughts. Thank you.'
Gilfoy was first elected mayor in 2011.
'A good mayor and a good man taken too soon. He was always focused on making Clinton a better a better place,' said Dave Crooks, Eighth District chairman for the Indiana Democratic Party.
Terre Haute Mayor Brandon Sakbun also offered his condolences.
'Jack was a veteran and a true leader in west central Indiana. His impact will not be forgotten. On behalf of our community, I offer heartfelt condolences and prayers to our neighbors in Clinton during this difficult time,' Sakbun said.
A graduate of Clinton High School and a Vietnam War veteran, he also oversaw the family-owned business, Model Cleaners, according to his biography on the city's website.
Arrangements had not been announced Monday afternoon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
US Security Partner Deepens Military Ties With China
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Vietnam—a United States security partner in Southeast Asia—is set to participate in a joint army exercise with China for the first time, a neighboring country with which it has maritime disputes. Newsweek has contacted the Vietnamese Defense Ministry for further comment via email. Why It Matters Vietnam and China claim sovereignty over two island groups in the South China Sea—the Spratlys and the Paracels. In response to Beijing's growing presence in the region, which has often led to standoffs and clashes, Hanoi has followed its rival's example by consolidating its presence on islands it controls through land reclamation and the construction of military infrastructure. Once adversaries during the Vietnam War, the U.S. and Vietnam have gradually expanded their defense partnership since normalizing diplomatic relations in 1995. This includes the transfer of former U.S. Coast Guard vessels and the delivery of U.S. military training aircraft, enhancing the Southeast Asian nation's capacity to protect its sovereignty in disputed waters. A Chinese soldier participates in a mine sweeping training exercise at a minefield along the China-Vietnam border in southwest China's Yunnan Province in late August 2018. A Chinese soldier participates in a mine sweeping training exercise at a minefield along the China-Vietnam border in southwest China's Yunnan Province in late August 2018. Peng Xi/Chinese military What To Know Chinese and Vietnamese ground forces will conduct a training exercise in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region—located in South China and bordering Vietnam—in mid to late July, focusing on joint border patrol, China's Defense Ministry said in a statement on Sunday. According to Beijing, the joint exercise aims to enhance what it calls "mutual learning and exchange of border patrol experiences" and deepen cooperation between the two militaries. This marks the third cooperative engagement between Chinese and Vietnamese forces since April, when their naval forces and coast guards conducted two separate joint patrols in the Beibu Gulf—also known as the Gulf of Tonkin—off the coasts of Vietnam and China. While the Chinese military did not reveal the duration of the exercise, the state-run Vietnam News Agency reported that the drill began on Monday and is scheduled to end on July 30. Citing Chinese military expert Zhang Junshe, the report stated that the exercise is essential to maintaining peace and stability along the China-Vietnam border and in the broader region. Beijing and Hanoi agreed in 1999 to clearly define their 900-mile-long land border. Border demarcation and marker placement were completed in 2008, and the two neighboring countries signed three legal documents on land border management the following year. In April, China and Vietnam organized a border defense friendship exchange, during which Defense Ministers Dong Jun and Phan Van Giang inspected border troops and held talks. What People Are Saying Chinese Defense Minister Admiral Dong Jun said at the China-Vietnam Border Defense Friendship Exchange in April: "The two militaries should be aligned with the relationship orientation of 'comrades and brothers,' further enhance strategic communication, deepen exchanges at all levels and in all fields, improve the quality and effectiveness of border defense friendly exchanges, continuously expand pragmatic cooperation, and make greater contributions to accelerating the construction of a strategically significant China-Vietnam community with a shared future." Vietnamese Defense Minister General Phan Van Giang said at China-Vietnam Border Defense Friendship Exchange in April: "As an important part of the bilateral relationship, the cooperation between the two militaries has been continuously deepened and achieved remarkable results. Vietnam is willing to join hands with China to build a more pragmatic pillar of security cooperation and bring more benefits to the two countries and their people." What Happens Next It remains to be seen how China and Vietnam will navigate their defense relations in border management, as both countries have yet to resolve their disputes in the South China Sea.


Time Magazine
3 days ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Administration Releases FBI Records on MLK Jr.
The Trump Administration on Monday released a trove of FBI documents related to the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., ending a court-ordered seal that had kept the documents out of public view since they were collected by the FBI in 1977. The release includes more than 230,000 pages of records detailing the FBI's investigation into King's assassination, including internal bureau memos, foreign intelligence cables, and previously unpublished material related to James Earl Ray, the man who pleaded guilty to King's assassination before recanting. It was not immediately clear if the documents would reveal any new information about King's murder or his life. King's family released a statement on Monday urging the public to view the files 'within their full historical context,' noting the personal nature of the matter. They also reiterated their belief that Ray was not solely responsible for King's death. 'As the children of Dr. King and Mrs. Coretta Scott King, his tragic death has been an intensely personal grief—a devastating loss for his wife, children, and the granddaughter he never met -- an absence our family has endured for over 57 years,' they wrote in a statement reviewed by The Associated Press. 'We ask those who engage with the release of these files to do so with empathy, restraint, and respect for our family's continuing grief.' In a statement, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard described the release as a 'historic step' that fulfills President Donald Trump's Executive Order issued in January that directed agencies to declassify and publish assassination records related to King, President John F. Kennedy, and Senator Robert F. Kennedy. 'The American people have waited nearly sixty years to see the full scope of the federal government's investigation into Dr. King's assassination,' Gabbard said. 'Under President Trump's leadership, we are ensuring that no stone is left unturned in our mission to deliver complete transparency on this pivotal and tragic event in our nation's history. I extend my deepest appreciation to the King family for their support.' The files were originally not scheduled for public release until 2027, 50 years after they were put under court-ordered seal. King was assassinated on April 4, 1968, while visiting Memphis. In the lead-up to his death, he had increasingly turned his focus toward economic justice and opposition to the Vietnam War, drawing heightened scrutiny from political leaders and law enforcement. Then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover authorized an aggressive campaign of wiretaps, hotel room bugs, and disinformation intended to discredit King and undermine the civil rights movement. Though Ray pleaded guilty to the assassination, he later tried to withdraw the plea and insisted he was not involved. Members of King's family have long expressed doubts about Ray's role, with Coretta Scott King and others publicly calling for a broader investigation into possible government involvement. A Justice Department inquiry concluded in 2000 that there was no evidence to support those assertions. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which King co-founded in 1957, opposed the release, arguing that the FBI illegally surveilled King and other civil rights figures. The timing of the MLK files' release has raised questions, as the Trump Administration is currently facing pressure over its refusal to release additional files related to the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender who died in custody in 2019. Trump last week ordered the release of limited grand jury testimony but declined to unseal the full case file, prompting frustration among his supporters.


Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
Trump, And Future Presidents, Will Battle The Fed Until It Reforms
Flags fly over the Federal Reserve Building in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Getty Images President Trump's war against the Federal Reserve isn't unusual, historically. Until our central bank changes its ways, future presidents will also have their battles. It's no surprise that President Trump's intense fight with Fed boss Jerome Powell is generally portrayed as the short-sighted White House bully-battling the heroic head of a crucial, independent institution that's attempting to do what's right to stop inflation. If Trump takes Powell's scalp, most observers warn, terrible things will unfold because of the ballooning national debt. This narrative is wrong. Presidents going head to head with our central bank isn't that unusual. Presidents Reagan, Bush 41 and Clinton had occasional beefs with Fed bosses. It's unrealistic to think that commanders-in-chief wouldn't be sensitive to the Fed's slowing the economy. The Federal Reserve brings this on itself because of its long-time philosophy that prosperity causes inflation, and the cure for that is depressing economic activity. The real cure for monetary inflation is keeping the dollar's value steady, instead of letting it go up and down like a yo-yo. For a variety of reasons the best barometer for stability is the price of gold, and the second best is a broad index of commodities. When the price of gold fluctuates, it's not the real value of gold fluctuating, but the value of the dollar. When the Fed puts itself in the position of guiding the economy, it shouldn't be surprised when presidents get involved. The current spat between the White House and the Federal Reserve, rowdy though it may appear, is somewhat mild compared to fights in the past. During WWII, the Fed agreed to keep both short- and long-term interest rates low to help the government finance the war against Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. But the rate-fixing persisted after the conflict. When the Korean War got underway, the Fed said it was going to stop the fix because inflation would skyrocket. President Harry Truman and his Treasury Department vigorously fought the move. Truman felt it was high interest rates after WWI that had depressed the economy, thereby bankrupting his new haberdashery. The issue was personal. The fight got ugly. Finally, an agreement was reached. Fed independence was reaffirmed and interest rates were allowed to rise. However, the head of the Fed was, in effect, fired and a Treasury Department official put in his place. The expectation was that the official, William McChesney Martin, would continue the low-rate policy. Instead, Martin, who would serve as Fed chairman for 19 years, raised them. Years later when Martin ran into Truman, the former president hissed at him, 'Traitor!' In 1965 Martin got into an ugly battle with President Lyndon B. Johnson. Martin wanted to raise rates because he feared the inflationary effects of Johnson's massive domestic spending and the huge Vietnam War outlays. When Martin wouldn't bend, Johnson ordered him and others to his Texas ranch. Johnson, a large man, got so angry he took Martin by the lapels and threw him against the wall. Martin eventually caved. In the early 1970s, President Nixon, who had taken the U.S. off the gold standard and imposed nationwide price and wage controls, wanted Fed chair Arthur Burns to pursue an easy-money policy to help Nixon win reelection. To make Burns more compliant, Nixon aides planted untrue stories about Burns' wanting a big salary increase while other wages had been frozen. Burns caved and a hideous inflation ensued. In these cases, the Fed was right and the presidents were wrong. But this hasn't always been so. For instance, Reagan had a valid point regarding Paul Volcker's tight-money policy in the mid-1980s. And in his fight with the central bank, Trump is also right. The Fed is playing anti-Trump politics. Hopefully, the president and his team will start making the valid case that the Fed's operating philosophy is profoundly wrong. If keeping the dollar stable and trustworthy were to become the Fed's goal in the future, then it would no longer try to manipulate the economy—and presidents would no longer have a reason to fight it.