Marine Le Pen brought the far right to France's front door
In 2022, she came closer than anyone thought possible, winning more than 40% of the vote in the runoff against Emmanuel Macron. The Élysée Palace seemed within reach.
Now her political future may lie in ruins. On Monday, a French court convicted Le Pen of embezzling European Union funds and barred her from holding office for five years. The sentence may have done more than just potentially remove her from the next presidential race. It may have ended the most sustained far-right bid for power in Western Europe since World War II — surpassed only, in outcome, by Italy's prime minister, Giorgia Meloni.
But the political earthquake Le Pen set in motion will rumble for years to come.
Le Pen was born in 1968 into a family already on the fringes of French politics. In 1972, her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, founded the National Front party rooted in racism, antisemitism and a yearning for France's lost empire.
She was just 8 years old when a bomb destroyed the family's apartment in Paris in what was widely seen as an assassination attempt on her father. No one was seriously hurt, but the blast marked her for life. She has said it gave her a lasting sense that her family was hated, and that they would never be treated like other people.
As a young woman, she studied law, became a defense attorney and learned how to argue her way through hostile rooms. In politics, she didn't wait for her turn. In 2011, she wrested control of the party from her father. In 2015, she expelled him after one of his Holocaust-denying tirades.
She renamed the party the National Rally. She replaced leather-jacketed radicals with tailored blazers and talking points. She talked less about race, more about the French way of life. She warned of 'civilizational threats,' called for bans on headscarves and promised to put French families first.
Her tone changed. Her message didn't.
In one of her sharpest political maneuvers, she sought out a group long despised by her father: the LGBTQ+ community. Le Pen filled her inner circle with gay aides, skipped public protests against same-sex marriage and framed herself as a protector of sexual minorities against 'Islamist danger.'
Critics called it 'pinkwashing' — a cosmetic tolerance masking deeper hostility. But it worked. A surprising number of gay voters, especially younger ones, started backing her. Many saw strength, clarity and the promise of order in a world spinning too fast.
She ran for president three times: in 2012, 2017 and 2022. Each time, she climbed higher. In her final campaign, she was confident, calm and media savvy. She leaned into her role as a single mother, posed with her cats and repeated her calls for 'national priority.' She no longer shocked. She convinced.
Behind her stood a constellation of far-right leaders cheering her on: Hungary's Viktor Orbán, Matteo Salvini and Giorgia Meloni in Italy, the Netherlands' Geert Wilders. They saw in her not only an ally, but a leader. Her mix of cultural nationalism, social media fluency and calculated restraint became a blueprint.
'Marine Le Pen posts pictures of her cat, talks about being a mother. But when it comes to policy, there's no softening,' said Pierre Lefevre, a Paris-based consultant. 'It makes extreme positions seem more palatable, even to people who might otherwise be put off.'
When Le Pen lost in 2022, she didn't vanish. She regrouped, stayed present in parliament and prepared for 2027. Polls had her leading. Macron cannot run again.
Then came Monday's verdict.
The court found that Le Pen had siphoned off millions of euros in public funds while serving in the European Parliament, paying party staff with money intended for EU assistants. Prosecutors described it as deliberate and organized. The court agreed.
She was sentenced to two years of house arrest, fined $108,200 and banned from holding public office for five years. She said she would appeal. The house arrest sentence will be suspended during the appeal, but the ban on holding office takes effect immediately.
Her allies erupted in outrage. Orbán declared, 'Je suis Marine' — I am Marine. Salvini called the ruling 'a declaration of war by Brussels.' Meloni lamented it was 'depriving millions of citizens of their representation.' President Trump decried it as 'a very big deal. ... It sounds like this country.' In Paris, her supporters called it political persecution. Her opponents fist-pumped in the streets.
Even in disgrace, Le Pen remains one of the most consequential political figures of her time. She took a name that once evoked hatred and transformed it into a serious vehicle for national leadership. She made the far right electable. She blurred the line between fringe and power.
Her party, the National Rally, became the largest last year in France's lower house of parliament. Her handpicked successor, 29-year-old Jordan Bardella, now leads it. He is polished and popular, but he lacks broad political experience and name recognition.
Whether Le Pen returns after her ban, fades into silence or reinvents herself again, her mark is permanent. She forced mainstream rivals to adapt to her language. She turned fear into votes and redefined what was politically possible in a republic once seen as immune to extremism.
She never became president, but she changed the race and the rules.
Adamson writes for the Associated Press. AP journalist Colleen Barry in Milan contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
EU Agrees to Pay 15% Tariff on Most Exports to US
By and Samantha Stewart Save Good morning. The US and EU strike a deal. A new premium credit card joins the fray. And China moves to launch an international AI organization. Listen to the day's top stories. Just in time for the Friday deadline, the US and European Union have reached an agreement that will see the bloc face a lower-than-threatened 15% tariff on most goods, including cars. China bought itself some more time, with the South China Morning Post reporting that the US will hold off on implementing measures against the country for another 90 days.

Epoch Times
26 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Meets EU's von der Leyen on Sunday: Trade Talks and More
U.S. President Donald Trump is meeting with the head of the European Union, Ursula von der Leyen, on Sunday to clinch a trade deal that would likely impose a 15 percent baseline tariff on most EU goods but end months of uncertainty for European companies. 🇺🇸More Breaking News, Special Reports, and Live Coverage on NTD:


Forbes
42 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Risk Of Rushing: Details Murky On Trump, Van Der Leyen Trade Deal
President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen shakes hands with President during a ... More meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on Sunday in Scotland. (Photo by) President Trump and European Union President Ursula von der Leyen shook hands on a deal Sunday to stave off 30% tariffs on U.S. imports from the E.U., which could have been effective on Friday, though it remains unclear what the deal is. Perhaps what they really agreed to is to stall for more time. Historically, trade agreements take a great deal of time and review before being announced. That said, it appears that most if not all U.S. imports from the European Union will face a 15% tariff. That's one area of disagreement if not among the two parties, then at least among the first reporting on the limited 'details.' It also appears that most U.S. exports to the 27 nations of the European Union will not have a tariff. That's another area of disagreement, at least in the early reporting. That 15% tariff on U.S. imports is up slightly from the 10% 'baseline' tariff already in place with all countries of the world since Trump began the global trade war to reduce the U.S. deficit, which is still increasing. It is, of course, significantly higher than the 1.2% tariff rate on U.S. imports from the European Union that preceded it. (The 'deal' would seem to lower the 25% tariff in place on passenger vehicle imports into the United States.) On the U.S. export side, the zero tariff rate would replace a rate of 2.8%, so not a big change. But a spokesperson for the European Union would not respond to a 'request for comment about Trump's claim." Here's where it gets really important: Does the 15% tariff on E.U. imports include critical medicines and the compounds used to make those medicines, imports into the United States that Ireland and other European nations dominate? President Trump says no, according to one news source. 'We have 15% for pharmaceuticals,' Von der Leyen said, according to another. I wrote last week about the risk of the trade war on Americans' access to important medicines because of the United States' reliance on Europe for so many medicines and a great deal of the chemical compounds used to produce drugs here. Regardless of whether pharmaceuticals are hit with 15% tariffs or not, it is not hard to imagine that whatever tariffs are ultimately imposed will put pressure on prices as the U.S. government collects revenues from the European Union and a host of other nations. One thing on which Trump and van der Leyen did agree was that making a deal was important to both sides, given the strength of the trading relationship. The United States' top 15 trade partners, which account for 44.40% of all U.S. trade, including 44.22% of all U.S. exports and 44.51% of all imports, includes the following seven European Union nations: Overall, the trade with just these European Union nations is relatively balanced, with those seven accounting for 21.38% of all U.S. trade, including 20.27% of all exports and 22.05% of all U.S. imports. The overall deficit with these five nations is $149.61 billion. The percentages for all 27 European nations is similar on total trade and U.S. exports but it drops on imports, since many of the other countries are without the same buying power. Overall, the European Union is accounting for 20.22% of all U.S. imports and 18.57% of all U.S. exports through May, the latest data available from the U.S. Census Bureau. Gaining clarity on the issues will be important. Six of the 10 U.S. imports from the European Union where the E.U. was a dominant source were in the area of pharmaceuticals and with chemical compounds used to make medicines in this country. The same six in 10 statistic is true of U.S. exports to the 27-nation European Union. For example, 99.22% of $42.95 billion in U.S. imports in the insulin, hormone and steroid category (HS code 2937) through May were from the European Union, with 98.48% coming from Ireland, according to my analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data. It is the top U.S. import from the European Union this year. The same category is a top U.S. export to the European Union, accounting for 53.85% of the $4.94 billion in U.S. exports to the world, ranking fourth overall to the European Union. But the 15% tariffs would affect a broad range of exports and imports. The European Union is responsible for 79.77% of the $2.97 billion in wine imports into the United States through May and 80.78% of $2.15 billion in perfumes. While these are the U.S. import categories that the European Union dominates by global market share, they are not the largest by value. Among those not mentioned above for market share that are among the top 10 by value from the European Union are: It is, of course, not clear whether those last two would face tariffs or not. Switching over to the U.S. export side, the European Union has an appetite for the broad nut category (HS code 0802) that is dominated by shelled almonds and pistachios in the shell, with 37.49% of the $4.09 billion total in U.S. exports through May headed to the European Union. In addition, the E.U. has a thirst for the alcoholic spirits category (HS code 2208) that is dominated by bourbon and whiskey, with 46.66% of the total $1.08 billion sent to the world. Any decrease in tariffs on these would certainly be welcome. During the press conference announcing the framework for a deal, Trump emphasized that the European Union would be increasing its purchase of U.S. energy and, he hoped, cars. The European Union, Trump said, would be buying $750 billion in U.S. energy products, though it was not clear over what period of time or even which ones, specifically. In 2024, U.S. exports to the world of oil, gasoline and other refined petroleum products, and natural gas such as LNG – the dominant categories – was less than $300 billion. And most refined petroleum exports stay in the Western Hemisphere. But the European Union is a big market for U.S. exports of oil, petroleum gas and cars. One thing is clear: There is more work to be done before it is clear what the deal on which Trump and van der Leyen shook hands actually is.