Al Jazeera English's Fault Lines Investigates Israeli Military Shootings of Children in Gaza
Al Jazeera English's award-winning documentary programme, Fault Lines, releases a harrowing investigation on 27 March 2025 called Kids Under Fire. It documents the systematic shooting of children in Gaza by Israeli forces.
Since Israel's war on Gaza began in October 2023, foreign journalists have been barred from independent access. However, only doctors have been granted repeated entry.
Over several months, Fault Lines spoke with 20 American physicians who volunteered in Gaza's hospitals. They describe an unmistakable pattern—children arriving at emergency rooms with gunshot wounds, often to the head and chest. Many of them did not survive.
Kids Under Fire provides overwhelming evidence of different cases of children being intentionally shot. Physicians who served at different hospitals, at different times, recount treating dozens of children with nearly identical injuries.
The documentary also explores how the U.S. is complicit in this violence. Doctors who witnessed these killings firsthand say that when they met with American lawmakers, they were met with indifference—if not outright skepticism.
Under the Leahy Law, U.S. military aid is prohibited from reaching foreign military units accused of human rights violations. Former State Department official Charles Blaha, who oversaw human rights vetting, admits in the film that he signed off on a process that never once held Israel accountable.
Tim Rieser, a senior foreign policy advisor who helped draft the Leahy Law, says: 'There's probably not a unit in the Israeli army that either hasn't been trained and or received equipment from the United States. But It is the only country that we are aware of that the law has been so consistently not applied to.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Hegseth defends results of US strikes in push to win public opinion battle
agencies washington US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth took the lectern at the Pentagon briefing room on Thursday morning with two goals. He wanted to present evidence of the success of the American attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, pushing back against a preliminary defence intelligence assessment that suggested the strikes were less effective. And he wanted to berate the American media and paint their coverage of that preliminary report as unpatriotic and disrespectful to the 'brave men and women' in the US military. It was a briefing aimed at winning over divided public opinion on the attacks – and to satisfy an audience of one in the White House, who has been railing against the media coverage for days. The former goal is still in question, but the latter seems to have been a mission accomplished. 'One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!' Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social after Hegseth concluded. During his half-hour briefing, Hegseth ticked through a range of intelligence information, although little of it was new. He read from a Wednesday letter penned by CIA Director John Ratcliffe that claimed there was 'intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years'. He cited an earlier Israeli intelligence finding, detailed a recent statement by Iranian leaders and reviewed initial findings of 'very significant damage' by the International Atomic Energy Agency. After General Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provided information about the development and power of the 'bunker buster bombs' used in the attack – including how they were used to repeatedly hit the ventilation shafts at Iran's Fordo facility - Hegseth told Americans to use their common sense when deciding whether the strikes were successful. 'Anyone with two eyes, ears and a brain can recognise that kind of firepower, with that specificity at that location and others is going to have a devastating effect,' he said. 'You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated, choose your words,' he said. 'This was a historically successful attack.'
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Russia condemns Israeli strikes on Iran, defends own war
The Kremlin has criticized Israel's recent airstrikes on Iran, insisting the conflict is not comparable to Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. 'The outbreak of the conflict, actually, and the Israeli attacks on Iran were absolutely not provoked,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told state news agency TASS on Thursday. By contrast, he said, the background to the 'special military operation' - as Moscow calls its invasion of Ukraine - is 'well known to everyone.' Israel has defend its strikes on Iran with the need to stop the Tehran's nuclear weapons programme. The Israeli government sees the programme as a direct threat to its country. Russia, meanwhile, has justified its invasion of Ukraine by citing security concerns, including NATO expansion and the alleged oppression of Russian-speaking minorities. The attack on February 24, 2022 took place without warning - just a few days earlier, the Kremlin had publicly denied having any invasion plans. Iran is one of Russia's closest allies in the Middle East and uses Iranian-designed drones in its war on Ukraine. (DPA)
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump secures unique oversight in US steel buyout
Agencies President Donald Trump will control the so-called 'golden share' that's part of the national security agreement under which he allowed Japan-based Nippon Steel to buy out iconic American steelmaker U.S. Steel, according to disclosures with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The provision gives the president the power to appoint a board member and have a say in company decisions that affect domestic steel production and competition with overseas producers. Under the provision, Trump — or someone he designates — controls that decision-making power while he is president. However, control over those powers reverts to the Treasury Department and the Commerce Department when anyone else is president, according to the filings. The White House didn't immediately respond to questions Wednesday about why Trump will directly control the decision-making and why it goes to the Treasury and Commerce departments under future presidents. Nippon Steel's nearly $15 billion buyout of Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel became final last week, making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Trump has sought to characterize the acquisition as a 'partnership' between the two companies after he at first vowed to block the deal — as former President Joe Biden did on his way out of the White House — before changing his mind after he became president. The national security agreement became effective June 13 and is between Nippon Steel, as well as its American subsidiary, and the federal government, represented by the departments of Commerce and Treasury, according to the disclosures. The complete national security agreement hasn't been published publicly, although aspects of it have been outlined in statements and securities filings made by the companies, U.S. Steel said Wednesday. The pursuit by Nippon Steel dragged on for a year and-a-half, weighed down by national security concerns, opposition by the United Steelworkers and presidential politics in the premier battleground state of Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered. The combined company will become the world's fourth-largest steelmaker in an industry dominated by Chinese companies, and bring what analysts say is Nippon Steel's top-notch technology to U.S. Steel's antiquated steelmaking processes, plus a commitment to invest $11 billion to upgrade U.S. Steel facilities. The potential that the deal could be permanently blocked forced Nippon Steel to sweeten the deal. That included upping its capital commitments in U.S. Steel facilities and adding the golden share provision, giving Trump the right to appoint an independent director and veto power on specific matters. Those matters include reductions in Nippon Steel's capital commitments in the national security agreement; changing U.S. Steel's name and headquarters; closing or idling U.S. Steel's plants; transferring production or jobs outside of the U.S..
