
Yolanda Androzzo and Paul Nestadt: Safe storage of firearms would save Illinois teens' lives
We have watched too many families suffer devastating losses; we've learned how powerful that pause can be. It's the moment between a fleeting, impulsive thought and a permanent, irreversible action. And when a firearm is locked, unloaded and stored separately from ammunition, that small pause becomes a chance to think, to breathe and to live.
One of us is a psychiatrist specializing in suicide prevention; the other is an advocate working to keep children safe from gun violence. We see the consequences every day in our communities and emergency rooms. We know a moment of anger can end in murder. We know an impulse can end in suicide. And we know an effective policy can help prevent these situations and protect young lives.
That's why Illinois must pass the Safe at Home bill (Senate Bill 8). The measure is an improved child access prevention law that would increase the age of children, from 14 to 18, that would require their parents or guardians to store firearms securely. The law would reflect what we already know: Teenagers are kids. They act on impulse. When a gun is left unsecured, that impulse can turn fatal.
The examples seem endless. A 15-year-old Aurora boy was arrested by police after authorities say he stole his mother's car and gun. The 10-year-old daughter of a Cook County corrections officer brought her mother's loaded gun to school. A 14-year-old left their parents' loaded handgun in the bathroom of a DuPage County high school. An 8-year-old boy was killed and his 5-year-old brother shot when they got ahold of a loaded gun in Chicago.
These stories prove that the problem is not theoretical. It's urgent. And the research shows the solution is safe storage.
Paul is a psychiatrist specializing in suicide prevention who has studied this issue closely. In a recent study, he found that child access prevention, or CAP, laws, especially those expanded to apply to older teens, significantly reduce suicide, unintentional shootings and even homicides. When states require parents to safely store firearms for kids 16 and younger, youth suicide rates drop by up to 14%. Raising that age to 18, as the bill would do, has the potential to save even more lives.
In Illinois, we desperately need that protection. The state has the third-highest Black homicide victimization rate in the country, and 91% of firearm homicide victims are Black. Firearm suicide rates are rising among Black teens, while Black children and teens already die from gun violence at a rate 18 times higher than their white peers nationwide. These are not abstract statistics: They are lives cut short, futures stolen and families shattered.
We know how this happens. One in three children live in a home with a gun, but over half of gun owners don't lock all their firearms securely. And more than 80% of adolescent firearm suicides involve a gun belonging to a family member. This is not just about access. It's about a moment — a pause — and the chance to survive it.
Too often, families believe it won't happen to them. That their child isn't struggling. That their firearm is out of reach. But there is no immunity to impulsive decision-making, especially in adolescence. No family is immune from the public health crisis of gun violence. Everyone needs to store guns safely.
Safe at Home is about protecting our children and communities. It's a straightforward, evidence-based bill that reflects the values we all share. But we need action, not just awareness.
That's why Yolanda and others are heading to Advocacy Day in Springfield on Tuesday at 10:30 a.m. The impact of this law would be felt in every neighborhood in Illinois. Especially the ones already grieving too many young lives lost.
Gun violence is now the leading cause of death for children in Illinois and the U.S. We can't accept that. We don't have to. By safely storing firearms, we create a pause, a breath between impulse and tragedy. We offer every child, and every family, the chance to keep their story going.
Yolanda Androzzo is executive director for One Aim Illinois. Dr. Paul Nestadt is a core faculty member at the Center for Gun Violence Solutions and medical director of the Center for Suicide Prevention at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Hispanic officers allege mistreatment in Miami Gardens, call for chief's removal
Five Hispanic male police officers have notified Miami Gardens that they intend to file a class-action whistleblower lawsuit claiming they were the targets of racial discrimination. The Miami Gardens officers — who said they were suspended or demoted after filing complaints of unfair treatment with the city — have also demanded the termination of Police Chief Delma Noel-Pratt, named the city's first female Black chief in the largest Black majority city in Florida in 2017. 'The current police chief is out of control in terms of the mistreatment and abuse of officers, in particular Hispanic officers and officers who complain about wrongdoing,' Attorney Michael Pizzi said from a conference room at his Miami Lakes law office Wednesday, four of the five officers at his side. Miami Gardens police officers Juan Gonzalez, Christian Vega, Francisco Mejido, Rudy Hernandez and Sgt. Pedro Valdes all said they were retaliated against by command staff after questioning promotions, discipline and how rules are enforced internally. Federal complaint filed The officers have already filed a complaint with the Florida Commission on Human Relations and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Under federal law, the EEOC has up to 180 days to conduct an investigation into claims of discrimination or it must issue a notice of right to sue, allowing the officers to seek damages through a lawsuit. A whistleblower lawsuit can be filed in 30 days after giving the city notice. Sgt. Valdes claims he was relieved of duty for six months, forced to sit home 10 hours a day with pay — without any type of explanation. 'I was told, go home. No cause,' Valdes said. 'It's demoralizing because I have family members, including my wife, who's a police officer there. To play with our emotions and mental state for no reason — it's not right.' Miami Gardens Police executive officer Emmanuel Jeanty wouldn't go into detail about the reasons Valdes was relieved of duty, but said it was 'false' that the officer wasn't given a reason. 'He was informed and signed paperwork,' Jeanty said. The city did not comment on the officers' accusations when asked Wednesday. The police department, however, stood behind its decisions involving them. 'As the chief of police, I have every right to make the transfers or demotions that I see fit,' Noel-Pratt said. Miami Gardens, with a population of 110,000, is 71% Black and 26% Hispanic, according to the city's website. The police department's officers, in comparison, are 48% Black and 36% Hispanic as of 2024, according to data from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. Claims of demotions, harassment, abuse The officers claimed the targeted harassment campaign by the department left them with severe mental and emotional stress, even PTSD. Pizzi noted that some of the officers who served in the U.S. military were shocked and appalled that interactions with fellow officers were where they experienced trauma, not on the battlefield or on the streets fighting crime. Valdes, a 17-year Miami Gardens police veteran, said he was relieved of duty for six months without explanation and was only recently reinstated last week. Valdes said he had led a violent crime unit credited with reducing crime by 14%, only to be abruptly removed and reassigned. He also alleged that the department has systematically replaced experienced Hispanic and white officers with younger Black officers. Officer Francisco Mejido, a 13-year Miami Gardens police veteran, said his K-9 partner was taken away and he was removed from the unit after a minor body camera violation — even though his replacement had the same infraction. 'I had to break that news to my two young kids, to my wife,' Mejido said. 'Ever since then, the agency has come after me with multiple forms of discipline.' He also spoke of a broader issue of inconsistent disciplinary practices and favoritism within the department. Officer Juan Gonzalez, a 12-year Miami Gardens police veteran, described being reprimanded for speaking to other Hispanic officers at a crime scene. 'I was scolded for talking to Hispanic officers on scene,' Gonzalez said. 'I was followed by my supervisor in a threatening manner, in a hostile fighting position, with both fists clenched.' Gonzalez said he was demoted and removed from a federal task force assignment, resulting in a loss of income. The officers say their complaints to internal affairs, the city manager and human resources have been ignored. Now, they're turning to the courts. 'They've all stood up and complained,' Pizzi said. 'And they've all been targeted as a result of their complaints.' Miami Herald staff writer Devoun Cetoute contributed to this report.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
No cages, due process rights intact: ICE agents set the record straight on Trump's immigration enforcement
I.C.E. agents are setting the record straight about their work to "protect the public" after the agency has been bombarded with attacks by Democrats for their deportation efforts under President Donald Trump. "The Story" sat down with four agents—Paul, Andres, Celina and Daniel — who have served the country for several years, to ask about the hardships they have faced in recent months. (The agents' last names were withheld for their safety.) "There are officers here who have been attacked," Paul told anchor Martha MacCallum. "There are officers who have families, and they are well known in their communities, and they operate in a way where ... many people don't let their families ...(and) don't (let) their community know that they work for I.C.E. There is a sense of danger." Paul told Fox News the mask his colleagues wear is a sense of "security" for I.C.E. agents, who often have other jobs outside of law enforcement, such as business ownership. "We're following the law," Paul explained. "We're basically enforcing immigration law, administrative law, and we have every right to do that. So, in all honesty, that is really what we're doing. We're not out here just randomly picking up people … based on race and things like that, just to remove people and kick them out of the country." The agents clarified they operate through a "process" to remove illegal migrants. Under the Trump administration, the agents have seen more people being arrested and deported rather than being sent back into the streets. "We have our targets, we know who we're going to pick up, and we have our plan beforehand," Andres said. "We don't just go out there and look for anybody. We know who we're looking for." Agents can also make collateral arrests. "We know our target, and we're encountering them, and let's say he has a passenger with him and, you know, we ask for ID for our safety, and we vet them and we run a criminal record of them and if they're here in the country illegally ... they are a collateral, and we will take them into custody," Celina explained. Andres told Fox News that detainees are given accommodations in detention centers. They are provided with tablets to chat with family, beds, warm showers, and three meals a day. "To debunk that statement about cages, I can tell you right now, we have no cages at our detention centers, nor have I ever seen a cage in one of our detention centers," he said. Bond hearings are still happening under the Trump administration, according to the agent. "That is a due process right for every sovereign individual in the United States," Andres explained. "The approval process is based on certain factors, which – is the individual a threat to the community, is the individual a flight risk if we give a person a bond and he just skips town, or if the person already has an immigration order of deportation. So, those are determining factors that a judge will determine before issuing a bond. The bond process will remain the same, we will not and have not taken that right from people." The four agents expressed pride in their work in carrying out the mission of the agency. "I haven't met anybody that works for I.C.E. that is ashamed of what they do," Daniel said. "We're all proud law enforcement officers and the hardest working people I've ever met in my life."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate Report on Trump Assassination Attempt Lists ‘Preventable Failures' by Secret Service
A Senate report on the attempted assassination of Donald Trump cited 'a cascade of preventable failures' by the Secret Service that allowed a would-be assassin to target him. The report, released Sunday by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, accused the Secret Service of denying several requests from Trump's protective detail to increase his security during the 2024 campaign. 'Agents and officers chose not to retrieve radios from local and state law enforcement, limiting coordination at a critical time,' the report said. 'Known line-of-sight vulnerabilities were identified in advance but not addressed. An inexperienced operator was tasked with managing counter-unmanned aerial systems. Personnel who were vital to mission success were not requested.' The committee found that the Secret Service 'denied or left unfulfilled at least 10 requests' from Trump's security detail asking for 'additional resources' such as counter snipers, a counter drone system, and counter assault team personnel. The Secret Service did finally grant requests for a counter sniper, which Committee Chair Sen. Rand Paul said on Sunday's Face the Nation prevented the shooter from getting off more shots. 'On that day, in Butler County, Pennsylvania, that was the first time he was allowed counter snipers,' Paul said. 'If he had not had counter snipers, that assassin would have popped up again. He did pop up again to continue firing, and that's when he was taken out.' Six members of the Secret Service received disciplinary action, such as suspension without pay, following the assassination attempt, but none have been fired. Committee members expressed disappointment at 'the lack of disciplinary action for other individuals involved,' including a Secret Service officer who 'failed to relay critical information he obtained… regarding a suspicious individual with a range finder' to the agents assigned to Trump. Had this information been conveyed, Trump's protective detail could have stopped him from taking the stage, the report said. '[The Secret Service] did not want to assess blame,' Paul said. 'They did not want to look internally, and they wanted to discount any of their actions that might have led to this. This was a cover your ass sort of moment.' Paul accused Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle of lying in her congressional testimony when she said the agency had not gotten any requests to increase Trump's security before the Butler rally. 'There was a cascade of errors,' Paul said. 'When we talked to the people in charge of security, everybody pointed a finger at someone else.' Cheatle denied the allegation, saying that when she appeared before Congress, 'the information provided to me by personnel from Headquarters and the Trump detail, to include the current agency Director, confirmed my statement that no requests for additional support had been denied to our agents at Butler.' 'Any assertion or implication that I provided misleading testimony is patently false and does a disservice to those men and women on the front lines who have been unfairly disciplined for a team, rather than individual, failure,' she said. The report did not shed light on the motives of the shooter, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks. More from Rolling Stone Jordan Klepper Charts Trump's Long History With Jeffrey Epstein on 'The Daily Show' Why the Trump Administration Is About to Set Fire to 500 Tons of Emergency Food Speaker Mike Johnson Splits From Trump, Calls for Release of Epstein Files Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence