Women with fake San Francisco childcare center swindled $500K in welfare: DA
Maggie Pasigan, 49, and her girlfriend, 47-year-old Daisy Avalos, are now facing charges including grand theft, welfare fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy, according to the district attorney's office.
Avalos is a city employee, the DA's office said. The couple appeared in court Thursday and pleaded not guilty.
District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said, 'My office will take action to ensure the integrity of our benefits systems and seek to hold those accountable who would defraud the system for their own personal gain.'
Pasigan and Avalos falsely claimed that they provided childcare and early childhood education services for 17 kids, prosecutors said. A two-month-long investigation into Pasigan and Avalos revealed the children did not exist, prosecutors said.
They received over $30,000 every month in childcare subsidies from a nonprofit organization contracted by the City of San Francisco, according to the DA's office.
Pasigan and Avalos are domestic partners, according to the DA's office. The San Francisco Human Services Agency became suspicious in 2023 when they discovered that Pasigan never disclosed the fact that Avalos was a city employee who earned regular income, and she was Pasigan's partner, according to the DA's office.
'Such income would have disqualified the household for public benefits, which are intended to assist only low-income families,' the DA's office wrote.
'The defendants' fraudulent actions diverted over $375,000 in taxpayer funds from multiplefederal programs, including HUD-assisted housing programs designed to provide safe andaffordable housing for low-income families,' said Robert Lawler of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General.
Investigators conducted surveillance for months of the couple's 'childcare center.' Prosecutors said there was no evidence of any children being present, dropped off, or picked up.
In total, the couple's conspiracy and fraud swindled more than $500,000 in public benefits from San Francisco, according to investigators.
Thursday is last day to drive along SF's Great Highway
Jenkins said, 'I would like to thank the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, the San Francisco Human Services Agency, and the San Francisco Housing Authority for their hard work and collaboration in this case with San Francisco Police and the San Francisco Sheriff's Office to expose this fraud.'
Pasigan and Avalos' next court appearance is scheduled for April 22.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Manhattan DA quietly pulls data dashboard amid slipping convictions
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's conviction rate has plunged every year since he took office — and he's hiding the ugly numbers from the public, The Post has learned. Just 35% of felony cases – 6,871 out of 19,602 crimes – ended in convictions last year, down from 37% in 2023, 40% in 2022, and 42% in 2021 before Bragg took office, according to data from the state Division of Criminal Justice. And those numbers are way down from 2019, the last year before New York's woke discovery reform laws took effect, when 64% of felonies resulted in convictions. Advertisement 4 Alvin Bragg's conviction rate has fallen every single year since he took office. Steven Hirsch Even when the Democratic prosecutor's office did win a conviction, 66% of the time it was a charge downgraded to a misdemeanor or even a non-criminal violation. And the number of felony cases Bragg simply refused to prosecute has nearly doubled since he took over – from 7% in 2022, to 8% in 2023 and 12% in 2024. Advertisement Bragg ordered prosecutors to stop seeking prison for hordes of crimes including armed robberies and drug dealing in his Day 1 memo. 'These outcomes are by design,' Rafael Mangual, legal fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told The Post. 'Bragg's philosophy is that incarceration should be the last resort. And he won't even pursue prison terms beyond 20 years, irrespective of the offense.' Mangual says Bragg fails to acknowledge that 'prison is where we get the public safety benefits – because individuals who are currently engaged in criminal conduct are going to be taken out of commission.' 4 Felony conviction rates have dropped and refusals to prosecute have risen since Bragg took office. NY Post Design Advertisement Misdemeanor convictions are tanking too, plummeting from 24% in 2022, to 21% in 2023 and 17% in 2024, records show. Bragg declined to prosecute 9% of misdemeanors in 2022, then 19% in 2023 and 31% in 2024, according to the data. But the public would never know any of this because the DA's office quietly yanked the data dashboard from its website. 4 The data page of the Manhattan DA's website has been 'under construction' since the fall. Advertisement It's been 'under construction' since October. 'They hid it knowing that DA Bragg is going to be up for re-election,' slammed outraged West Village resident Scott Evans. 'They're hiding behind the curtain of 'there's no data to talk about.' ' Evans says he's pressed Bragg's representatives about the missing page at community meetings – only to be told they don't want the public to 'misinterpret the data.' A spokesperson for Bragg told The Post he's working with the other boroughs' DA's on how to present the data, without adding more specifics. 4 A screenshot of the Manhattan DA's data page taken on September 25, before it was taken down. Scott Evans Before it was pulled, the DA's office touted its data dashboard as 'groundbreaking.' 'The Manhattan DA's office is committed to enhancing transparency in the criminal justice system,' the website boldly used to claim. 'Our data dashboard, the first in New York State, provides the public with comprehensive data about our office's prosecutions.' Case data was updated weekly. Advertisement 'This is exactly the wrong time to take that tool away from the public, as we come into an election year and they try to evaluate whether that's the direction they want the DA's office be moving,' said Mangual.
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
Luigi Mangione has an issue with another health insurance company — and it's not UnitedHealthcare
Lawyers for the accused United Healthcare CEO killer, Luigi Mangione, are up in arms over what they say were "secret" communications between his New York prosecutors and Aetna, his former health insurer. They say prosecutors sent Aetna an "unlawful," back-channel subpoena seeking his confidential insurance account number and the time period for his coverage — and that in response, Aetna mistakenly sent prosecutors Mangione's entire, 120-page insurance record. This "trove of protected medical information" includes "different diagnoses as well as specific medical complaints made by Mr. Mangione," his lawyers complained in a court filing Thursday night. New York prosecutors should never have had access to these private records, his lawyers contend. And they should never have looked at them once receiving them, they also argue. Aetna emailed the records to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office on June 12, in four files, with a cover letter advising "confidential." Each file was separately labeled "in large-type bold letters 'Request for Protected Health Information," the lawyers wrote. "It would be impossible for anyone to view a single page of these records and not immediately see that they were private, confidential medical records within the scope of HIPAA," the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, the lawyers wrote. The sheer volume of Aetna's response should have alerted prosecutors that "the unlawful subpoena they served on Aetna resulted in far more material than they requested," the lawyers wrote. But instead of immediately sending the materials to the judge and the defense — where they should have been directly sent, as required by law — the DA's office says it downloaded them into an internal "discovery file," the lawyers wrote. The lawyers say prosecutors "sat on this information" for 12 days, until June 24, when they sent the judge and defense team an email forwarding the four files. Prosecutors have told Mangione's lawyers that in the interim, they had reviewed the records, but not "in their entirety," according to the defense filing. The defense filing, signed by defense lawyers Karen Friedman Agnifilo, Marc Agnifilo, and Jacob Kaplan, asks New York Supreme Court Justice Gregory Carro to order prosecutors to turn over all of their communications with Aetna. It also asks the judge to hold "a full evidentiary hearing," with sworn testimony, to determine possible remedies, including the recusal of lead prosecutor Joel Seidemann, the suppression of evidence, and the dismissal of Mangione's indictment. The subpoena, issued directly to Aetna and signed by Seidemann, bypassed the judge and defense team and should never have requested even the limited, HIPAA-protected information of Mangione's account number and period of coverage, his lawyers argue. "If they're seeking information that is privileged, like medical records, the DA can't just subpoena that stuff directly," veteran homicide public defender Sam Roberts told Business Insider on Friday. Prosecutors must first file a motion or application to the judge and defense team, alerting them to the subpoena, and then wait for the judge to review the subpoenaed materials privately, said Roberts, a senior staff attorney on the homicide defense task force of the Legal Aid Society. "It sounds like they jumped the gun here," Roberts said. "They got this information without first giving notice to the defense, and they got the information directly from Aetna when they should have sent it to the court first without opening it." Mangione's lawyers allege in their filing that the May 14 subpoena initially commanded Aetna to send someone to appear in court on May 23 with "the account number and period of time during which the following individual received coverage: Luigi Mangione." The subpoena was not made public or viewed by BI. May 23 was "a completely made-up date," on which no court proceeding was scheduled, Mangione's lawyers wrote. Along with the subpoena, Seidemann sent a cover letter with his phone number and email, advising that "in lieu of appearing personally with the requested documents," Aetna could mail or deliver the records to the court, the lawyers wrote. Prosecutors "were plainly lying to get the materials as soon as possible," they wrote, in order to bring their case to trial first, before he could be tried by federal prosecutors. In addition to the state-level case, which alleges murder as an act of terrorism, Mangione is facing related, death-penalty-eligible murder charges in federal court. Prosecutors in central Pennsylvania say they, too, will try him for forgery and firearm charges related to his arrest there on December 9, after a five-day national manhunt. Mangione's lawyers previously complained that in April, Manhattan prosecutors improperly listened to an 11-minute attorney-client phone call, something the DA's office has denied. Both state and federal jurisdictions are vying to be first to put Mangione on trial. Had Mangione's lawyers not been bypassed, they would have objected to the Aetna subpoena, including on the grounds that "the information sought is not relevant," they wrote. A spokesperson for the DA's office told BI on Friday that they will respond to the defense allegations in court papers. "Aetna received a subpoena for certain medical records, and we provided them appropriately," said Phil Blando, executive director for communications for Aetna's parent company, CVS Health. Asked if the district attorney subpoena requested details beyond Mangione's account number and coverage period, Blando told BI in an email, "You have our statement." Mangione, a 27-year-old software developer, remains in a federal jail in Brooklyn in the December 4 murder of Thompson. The 50-year-old father of two from Minnesota was shot in the back at close range outside a Midtown hotel where he was about to address the UnitedHealthcare shareholders meeting. Mangione is linked to the killing by his so-called "manifesto" and by DNA, ballistics, video, and fingerprint evidence, according to state and federal prosecutors. He is next due in state court on September 16, and in federal court on December 5; both courts are in Manhattan.
Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
California man arrested for brutal murder after being granted mental health diversion, having charges dropped
A California man was arrested for allegedly committing a brutal murder just three days after he was granted immunity from prosecution for separate misdemeanor charges under California's mental health diversion laws, prompting serious concerns about a system intended to protect public safety. On July 11, Napa County prosecutors filed murder charges against Ramiro Ochoa Mendoza, 36, for the killing of Noel Batres, 47, whose body was found under a bridge on July 3. Mendoza allegedly killed Batres on June 27. Mendoza, who had a history of criminal offenses and poor compliance on probation, was deemed mentally incompetent to stand trial earlier this year on misdemeanor charges including violating a restraining order and resisting arrest. Despite numerous attempts by defense counsel to dismiss the cases outright, the Court, following legislative guidelines, ordered Mendoza into a mental health diversion program with supervised release for the two remaining misdemeanors. Mendoza, however, failed to appear for his scheduled mental health diversion review and was deemed non-compliant with the terms of the program. "Mendoza promptly failed to appear in court for his mental health diversion review and was found to be out of compliance with the diversion program," the Napa County District Attorney's Office said. Even with repeated violations and non-compliance, the court was legally required to dismiss charges due to Mendoza's mental health status and the misdemeanor-only nature of his offenses. "Because the law prohibits prosecution from continuing in cases where a defendant is deemed incompetent on only misdemeanor charges, the court had no choice but to dismiss both remaining cases and did so on July 8, 2025," the DA's office said. The dismissal followed recent legislative reforms, specifically Senate Bill 317, that bar courts from restoring competency in misdemeanor-only cases, even if the defendant shows signs of escalating behavior. Mendoza was re-arrested on July 11 and now faces murder charges with enhancements related to his prior offenses and the alleged brutality of Batres' killing. The case is already fueling debate over the limits of mental health protections and their implications for public safety. "This case highlights the real-world impact of the recent legal reforms, where courts are required to prioritize mental health treatment over traditional prosecution, even when defendants exhibit an unwillingness or inability to comply with court-ordered programs," Napa County Deputy District Attorney Katie Susemihl said in a statement. California Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones criticized California's "mental health diversion" law, arguing it allowed a violent repeat offender to be released without proper oversight, leading to the murder of an innocent man. "This is yet another devastating example of California's soft-on-crime policies creating more victims instead of preventing crime. Under the so-called 'mental health diversion' law, a violent repeat offender was released and just days later, he brutally murdered an innocent man," Jones shared in a statement with Fox News Digital. "The system failed at every turn. This law prioritizes the rights of offenders over public safety, even when individuals show no willingness to comply with court-ordered treatment. If someone is truly mentally unwell, they should receive help within the justice system — not be dumped back onto our streets without accountability or oversight," he continued. Jones called the current system broken and urged legal reform to prevent further tragedies and better protect the public. "Californians deserve better than laws that protect dangerous individuals while endangering the public. It's time to fix this broken system before more innocent lives are lost," Jones said. A GoFundMe campaign was launched to assist with returning Batres' remains to his home country of Guatemala. According to the page, Batres was a resident of Napa for 26 years. "Noel was not perfect by any means. However, he was a wonderful, caring, gentle soul," the page read. "We ask that you please help us send Noel back home to be seen by his immediate family one last time before they lay him to rest." Mendoza was being held without bail at the Napa County Department of Corrections. Fox News Digital reached out to Governor Gavin Newsom's office for comment, but did not immediately receive a response. Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to
