Lead ammunition to be banned for hunting and shooting in England, Scotland and Wales
The restrictions will be phased in over three years from 2026, rather than the five set out in an official report last year, prompting some shooting organisations to say replacement ammunition may not be fully available in time.
The change to the law, announced by the environment minister Emma Hardy, will outlaw shotgun pellets containing more than 1% lead, and bullets that have more than 3%.
Ammunition using lead has long been identified as a significant pollutant and a particular risk to waterbirds. The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT) estimates that about 100,000 waterbirds in the UK die every year from lead poisoning.
The ban is 'a huge day for wildlife, particularly the migratory waterbirds who call our wetlands their home', said the WWT.
Campaigners say birds often eat discarded lead pellets, confusing them for seeds or grit.
A 2022 report found 99.5% of pheasants killed using shotgun pellets contained lead, showing that previous efforts to persuade shooters to voluntarily use different ammunition types had achieved little.
The ban, which will apply in England, Scotland and Wales, follows recommendations in December last year by the Health and Safety Executive, which said lead ammunition should be phased out over five years.
The HSE proposals followed a public consultation.
The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) said it backed the overall change, but disagreed with the recommended timetable being shortened by two years.
The three-year transition was happening on the assumption that the ammunition was readily available, Terry Behan from the BASC said. 'That is not the case for commercial and supply reasons beyond our sector's control. We urge government to adhere to a five-year timescale proposed by the Health and Safety Executive.'
Tim Bonner, the chief executive of the Countryside Alliance, said his organisation also backed the wider change, while saying the shorter transition period would be 'challenging for ammunition manufacturers'.
He said: 'This is an important step for the future of shooting, which will benefit the countryside and rural economy. The alliance has long advocated a move away from lead ammunition, which is necessary and beneficial.'
Hardy said: 'Britain is a proud nation of nature lovers, but our rivers are heavily polluted, and majestic birds are declining at an alarming rate. This new ban on lead in ammunition for most uses will help reverse this – rejuvenating pride in our countryside by protecting precious birdlife and cleaning up rivers.
'Non-lead alternatives are readily available, and we'll continue to work closely with the shooting sector throughout this transition.'
James Robinson, the head of birdlife charity the RSPB, said: 'Long known to be a poison, we have campaigned for decades to have lead ammunition removed from use. This move, whilst long overdue and stopping short of a full ban, will mean that Britain will become a safer place for millions of birds and other wildlife.'
There is an exemption for the outdoor shooting of permitted birds and animals using small-calibre bullets, because of a lack of suitable non-lead alternatives. Also exempt are airguns, and ammunition used by elite athletes, the military, police and in outdoor target shooting ranges with risk management measures.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN GLOVER: Britain is broken. Wherever you look the State is failing. In many ways the mess is worse than in the 1970s - when Labour last ruined the country
Nearly 40 years have passed since Norman Tebbit, who died this week, was a power in the land. He was one of a handful of outstanding Conservative Cabinet ministers who gave Margaret Thatcher vital support in her crusade to save Britain from the depredations of socialism. Tebbit wasn't an intellectual. He didn't even go to university. But he understood with greater clarity than grander Tories with Oxbridge degrees how militant trade unions were destroying this country. His greatest achievement was to curb their excesses.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Smart meters are a symbol of energy companies' contempt for customers
SIR – Christopher Howse ('The creeping tyranny of smart meters is a national disgrace', Comment, July 11) is not alone in having been let down by EDF. I too fell for its threats, although in my case the meter was at least fitted at the arranged time. Unfortunately, here in rural Wales, the signal is not reliable. I told EDF that my device was not working, to which it merely replied that this was a known fault – leaving me no better off than I was before I had it. I now have to take readings myself and submit them online each month. Kevin Cottrell Grosmont, Monmouthshire SIR – I can sympathise with Christopher Howse. I live in a first-floor flat with the electricity meters on the ground floor, and I too was browbeaten by EDF into having a smart meter installed. When the job was done, I asked for the meter display so that I could keep an eye on my use. I was told it would be sent to me. Several weeks passed, so I called EDF's customer service line and asked where my display was. I was told that, as my meter is on the ground floor and my flat is on the first floor, it would not work. Ian Carter Lytham St Annes, Lancashire SIR – I succumbed to EDF's badgering and agreed to have smart meters installed in the three blocks of flats that I manage. A date was set – but nobody came. No explanation, no apology. Joseph B Fox Redhill, Surrey SIR – In your article (''Not clear if heat pumps will save people money', government adviser admits', July 10), a spokesman for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero says: 'The British people are showing record demand for heat pumps, which enable families to save around £100 a year by using a smart tariff.' The same article suggests that a heat pump can cost £13,000 to install. My maths may be rusty, but this equates to a pay-back time of 130 years. If the heat pump is anything like my fridge, though, it will only last 10 years before it needs replacing. Dr Andrew Slater Sedlescombe, East Sussex SIR – Heat pumps are at their most efficient in hot weather and their least efficient in cold weather. When are our homes more likely to require heating? Frank Smith Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Time for an emergency budget? Rachel Reeves facing fresh turmoil after GDP falls again - as Chancellor's old tweet scathing the Tories comes back to haunt her
Rachel Reeves faced a fresh blow yesterday as figures showed the economy shrank unexpectedly in May for the second month in a row. Sparking further warnings of a tax raid this autumn, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product (GDP) contracted by 0.1 per cent. It follows a 0.3 per cent drop in April – prompting fears the economy is heading for an overall recession in this year's second quarter. Ms Reeves faced more embarrassment as it emerged she called for an emergency budget when the economy also shrank by 0.1 per cent in 2022. The Tories accused her of 'rank hypocrisy', and asked: 'If [she] won't follow her own advice, how can she expect the country to follow her?' In the unearthed tweet from May 2022, Ms Reeves said: 'GDP figures see dramatic drop to -0.1 per cent in March. This adds to the worries families already face from the cost of living crisis. 'If the PM and Cabinet come back from their Away Day in Staffordshire today with anything less than an Emergency Budget, they will have failed.' As well as the latest figures showing the economy had shrunk by the same amount as in March 2022, the Labour Government was also on a Cabinet away day, at Chequers, yesterday. Ms Reeves said the figures were 'disappointing' but renewed her pledge to boost economic growth. Amid speculation she will launch a tax raid this autumn, business yesterday claimed the Chancellor was already taxing it too hard. An old social media post from 2022 has been highlighted, in which Ms Reeves reacted to a 0.1 per cent monthly fall in activity by demanding an emergency Budget Ben Jones, the Confederation of British Industry's lead economist, said: 'With growing fiscal challenges and the autumn Budget on the horizon, the Chancellor must provide clear reassurance – no new taxes on business and instead offer a commitment to work alongside firms to dismantle barriers to growth.' The ONS data shows GDP was weighed on by the manufacturing sector, which suffered another steep decline in activity and falling construction output. Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride told the Mail last night: 'In 2022, Rachel Reeves demanded an emergency budget over a minus-0.1 per cent dip in GDP. 'Today, under her watch, we've had two consecutive months of economic contraction – and all she offers is spin. This is rank hypocrisy. 'If Rachel Reeves won't follow her own advice, how can she expect the country to follow her?' Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'Three years ago, Rachel Reeves said that a 0.1 per cent drop in GDP figures was grounds for an emergency budget. 'She's now presided over two back-to-back months of GDP decline and is leading the UK into recession. It's about time she was handed her P45.' A No 10 spokesman said the GDP figures 'mainly reflect global instability and monthly figures tend to be more volatile', adding: 'It comes after a 0.7 per cent growth in Q1 from this year, far beyond the OBR's forecast for 0.2 per cent... The UK is still forecast by the International Monetary Fund to be the fastest growing European G7 country.' Asked about a possible emergency budget, No 10 said: 'There is a Budget this autumn and we will work towards that in the normal way.'
