AI porn case student facing criminal probe by Hong Kong privacy watchdog
Hong Kong's privacy watchdog has started a criminal investigation into a university student accused of using AI to generate pornographic images of classmates and other women, while the city's leader has pledged to examine regulations elsewhere and look for 'best practices'.
A spokesman for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data warned on July 15 that anyone who disclosed another person's information without their consent with the intent to harm or with reckless disregard for potential harm could be criminally liable.
'The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data has begun a criminal investigation into the said matter. We have no further comments at this stage,' the spokesman said.
The case centres on a University of Hong Kong (HKU) law student who received a warning from the institution after he was found to have used AI to generate explicit images.
Three of the victims made public their accusations against the student referred to as 'X' in social media posts on Saturday as they alleged the university had not done enough to hold the man accountable.
The trio said they had no plans to report the incident to police, as they had learned that 'such acts had not been regulated by the local criminal framework'.
Weighing in on the case on Tuesday, Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu called on institutions to deal with students' misconduct seriously, saying any illegal acts should also be reported to law enforcement agencies.
Lee pointed to current legislation such as the Crimes Ordinance, which covered Internet activities and countered threats to publish intimate images without consent and access to a computer with dishonest content.
But he conceded that artificial intelligence (AI) was an emerging technology that was evolving 'very rapidly', with new capabilities and developments appearing in a very short period of time.
'The government will closely monitor the situation regarding the fast development and application of AI, examine global regulatory trends, and conduct in-depth research into international best practices to see what we should do in regard to the case,' Lee said before his weekly meeting with the government's top decision-making Executive Council.
He warned that any conduct that caused harm to others could constitute a criminal offence and infringe individual rights and privacy.
'Universities should deal with student misconduct seriously,' he said, stressing that institutions were responsible not only for imparting knowledge but also for cultivating students' moral character.
'While some misconduct may be dealt with under internal university rules, any act that may [run] counter [to] the law should be reported to law enforcement agencies for action.'
In their earlier statement on social media, the three victims said a friend of X had discovered pornographic images of multiple women on his personal laptop in mid-February. When questioned, X admitted he had used photos of the victims – mainly screenshots from social media – as material to generate pornographic images using free online AI software.
But questions have been raised about whether he can be charged under the law as the city's regulations covered acts of voyeurism and the publication or distribution of images – rather than just their creation.
The Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau earlier said that existing laws would be reviewed if necessary.
HKU said on Monday that it was conducting a review of the incident and pledged to take further action after several victims demanded that more be done.
In a letter addressed to students of HKU's law faculty on Sunday, dean Fu Hualing expressed his 'deepest concern' regarding the incident that involved 'offensive, abusive and deplorable' behaviour.
'The faculty unequivocally condemns all forms of gender discrimination, harassment, and misconduct,' he said, vowing to conduct a thorough review of the case and take appropriate action to ensure a safe and respectful learning environment for all students and staff.
Acknowledging the challenges created by emerging AI tools in the school environment, he said the faculty had been working closely with the university to review and strengthen existing policies and outreach efforts to address the issue. – South China Morning Post
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Was it illegal? Hong Kong university's AI deepfake porn scandal ignites debate
HONG KONG: The potential dangers of using generative AI made the headlines in Hong Kong, after a student from a top local university allegedly used artificial intelligence tools to create hundreds of pornographic images of dozens of his female classmates and teachers. The incident has sparked calls for the government to update its laws to regulate use of the technology, as Hong Kong prepares to launch its first ChatGPT-style AI service this year. The case involving the University of Hong Kong (HKU) quickly gained public attention over the past week, after three victims took to social media anonymously to convey their unhappiness with the university's handling of the matter. According to what the victims shared in an Instagram post on July 12, pornographic images of around 20 women were found in February on the personal laptop of the HKU law student, whom they referred to only as X. The more than 700 photos discovered included original innocuous screenshots and digitally manipulated indecent images of women who were the student's 'friends, university classmates, seniors, primary school classmates and even secondary school teachers'. 'Upon questioning, X admitted to using photos of the victims… as material to generate these pornographic images using free online AI software,' the Instagram post read. 'It is understood that none of the victims authorised X's actions.' It was not clear how the images were discovered or whether he had distributed them. The victims alleged that after the case was brought to HKU's attention in March, the university proposed only written and verbal reprimands for the student and cited legal advice that he was unlikely to have committed any legal offence. 'Most victims felt that the university's response was insufficient to hold X accountable,' the post said. It added that those affected considered existing legislation inadequate to address the incident, leaving them 'unable to seek punishment for X through Hong Kong's criminal justice system'. The three victims told The Straits Times that they filed a complaint to the city's equality watchdog, but did not make a police report as they believed that 'deepfakes, which represent a relatively new form of sexual violence, fall outside the scope of existing laws'. 'However, we hope this incident will raise public awareness about deepfakes and push for legislative reforms,' they said. They also expressed disappointment in online opinions, which have been split along gender lines. 'We call on the public to recognise the seriousness of sexual violence issues,' they said. 'Voicing out personal stories of injustice should never be framed as the promotion of patriarchalism or feminism; it should be understood as a basic right in a law-based society. 'The perpetrators should be the only ones condemned,' they added. In the wake of the scandal, the authorities have warned the public on the severity of such misconduct and said that they would carefully consider how best to manage such cases. Chief Executive John Lee addressed the issue directly on July 15, placing the onus on the university to 'deal seriously' with the matter and to report it to law enforcement agencies if it constitutes a legal offence. 'The government will… examine global regulatory trends, and conduct in-depth research into international best practices to see what we should do,' Lee added. Currently, there is no dedicated legislation in Hong Kong that governs the use of generative AI. It is an emerging field, and countries are still grappling with the regulatory aspects of the new technology's impact on employment, productivity, the economy and society. Following Lee's comments, the city's privacy watchdog, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, said it had opened a criminal investigation into the incident. HKU, meanwhile, said it had issued the student a warning letter and instructed him to apologise to his victims. It also clarified that the university's investigation was still ongoing. Technology minister Sun Dong cautioned users of AI tools that they would have to 'bear the legal responsibilities' for how they choose to use them. His ministry, the Innovation, Technology and Industry Bureau, said separately that the government would 'review existing legislation (governing the application of AI) if necessary'. 'The use of AI is a double-edged sword... The key is to have proper guidance and a comprehensive legal framework,' Sun told local broadcaster RTHK on July 19. The minister's remarks came as he shared details of Hong Kong's first home-grown ChatGPT-style AI service, which is slated to be launched within the year. The DeepSeek-powered chatbot, called HKGAI V1, has already been tested in 13 government departments, and can generate content ranging from translations, meeting minutes and travel itineraries, to videos. 'It is an all-round working platform that can handle all kinds of tasks, like helping you to compose a report, lyrics, or even a song,' Sun said. The service is free for all Hong Kong residents, who will be able to download it via the government's iAM Smart digital identity app, which is similar to Singapore's Singpass. DeepSeek is China's answer to the United States' ChatGPT, which is inaccessible in Hong Kong except through a virtual private network. OpenAI, the US firm behind ChatGPT, has blocked the AI chatbot's use in the city, mainland China, and Macau since July 2024. The confluence of HKGAI V1's upcoming launch and the recent HKU scandal has called to question whether Hong Kong is adequately equipped to regulate the burgeoning use of generative AI tools in the city. Professor Benedict Chan, director of Hong Kong Baptist University's (HKBU) Centre for Applied Ethics, said the ease of misusing the increasingly sophisticated generative AI technology has raised 'serious concerns about privacy, consent and social trust'. 'The key challenge is to ensure that these powerful tools are used responsibly, with safeguards in place to prevent misuse,' Prof Chan, who is also associate dean at HKBU's faculty of arts and social sciences, told ST. As AI technology advances and its range of applications widens in scope, new laws should be made to fill any gaps, said Alex Liu, managing partner at law firm Boase Cohen & Collins. 'Law reform in this area has been overdue,' Liu told ST. 'There are fundamental issues that need to be addressed by the legal system, legislature and executive with regard to AI. For example, data privacy, intellectual property, liability in the event of accidents, and many other areas in which AI impacts our daily lives.' In the HKU case involving deepfake porn images, however, Liu suggested that existing laws may already be sufficient to address the misconduct. The student could have violated laws in Hong Kong's crimes and personal data privacy ordinances 'if he used a computer dishonestly to create or distribute the images (or) if the AI-generated images were based on real photos of classmates or teachers (that) were used without consent', the lawyer said. The three victims suggested that legislation against deepfakes should cover their creation and distribution, as well as the potential risks that the fabricated content poses. 'The non-consensual creation of these indecent photos has undermined our personal autonomy and dignity, and inflicted psychological damage on us, the victims,' they said. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Is Philippines getting short end of US tariff stick? 19% rate slammed as ‘worst insult'
MANILA (SCMP): A new trade deal hailed by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr as a 'significant achievement' has been slammed by critics at home as the 'worst insult' after Manila secured only a one percentage point tariff cut from Washington while granting American goods duty-free access. Marcos, the first South-East Asian leader to be hosted by President Donald Trump since his return to the White House, visited the US capital from Sunday to Tuesday for a series of talks centred on trade and security. The trip came as Manila sought to defuse tensions over Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariff policy, which had initially imposed a 17 per cent duty on Philippine exports in April before increasing it to 20 per cent earlier this month. The outcome – a 19 per cent tariff rate on Philippine goods alongside zero tariffs for US exports – was unveiled by Trump on his Truth Social account after holding a joint press conference at the White House. Marcos defended the result, insisting the concession was more significant than it appeared. 'Now, one per cent might seem like a very small concession. However, when you put it in real terms, it is a significant achievement,' he said, adding that the 19 per cent figure reflected the 'special relationship between the Philippines and the United States'. As part of the agreement, the Philippines would also scrap tariffs on American automobiles, Marcos said. The deal was expected to result in increased imports of soy, wheat and pharmaceutical products from the US – moves he said could help narrow the current trade deficit, which stood at US$4.9 billion in 2024. When asked whether the Philippines was 'getting the shorter end of the stick', given that the new rate was still higher than the 17 per cent imposed earlier this year, Marcos replied: 'Well, that's how negotiations go.' Deal slammed Imee Marcos, who chairs the Senate foreign relations committee and has become openly estranged from her brother, was scathing in her assessment. 'A mere one per cent reduction in tariff rates for Philippine goods while having zero tariffs for US goods certainly does not look like a win for the Philippines,' she said in a statement. The president's ally, Senator Panfilo Lacson, who was re-elected under the Marcos slate, issued a statement saying the new tariff rate 'is definitely not the most fair deal between decades-old friends or allies like the United States and the Philippines'. 'If I may add, it is the worst insult that a host can throw at his guest. It is time for us to look for other trade partners,' he said, referring to the fact that Marcos was invited for a state visit by Trump and had even stayed at the Blair House for the trade talks. The top-winning Akbayan Party list group criticised Marcos for signing such a 'lopsided' deal. 'To make matters worse, the supposed deal reportedly includes a zero tariff on imported US cars, a move that may be illegal under international trade rules. Such preferential treatment can only be granted through a formal free-trade agreement,' said party president Rafaela David. Jonathan Ravelas, managing director of eManagement for Business and Marketing Services, told This Week in Asia that he had expected a 'lower tariff rate of 17 per cent' –the rate which Trump had earlier imposed in April. The financial risk analyst said 'the imbalance' between a 19 per cent tariff rate for Philippine exports and a zero per cent rate for US exports 'undermines fair trade and places Philippine exporters at a competitive disadvantage. Reciprocity is key to sustainable bilateral trade'. He warned that a zero tariff rate on US imports could mean the Philippine market being flooded with cheaper American products, thereby threatening domestic industries. Ravelas cited electronics, garments and agricultural exports as 'most vulnerable'. He called on the government to cushion the impact by providing these sectors with 'export tax relief, market diversification support and trade adjustment assistance for displaced workers'. For Ronald Acoba, founder and chief investment strategist at Trading Edge Training & Consultancy, the modest concession is a consuelo de bobo – a Filipino term to denote mock consolation. Acoba, however, noted that the new rate put the Philippines 'on par' with the 19 per cent for Indonesia and 20 per cent for Vietnam. 'Additionally, our 19 per cent levy may be considered 'better' than Singapore's baseline 10 per cent rate since Singapore was consistently running a trade deficit with the US,' Acoba told This Week in Asia. Praise and pressure During their joint press conference at the White House, Trump praised Marcos as a 'tough negotiator' but also took a swipe at his predecessor Rodrigo Duterte, who had once been described as 'Asia's Trump'. Trump accused Duterte of 'maybe tilting toward poor China' and added: 'We untilted it very, very quickly … and I just don't think that would have been good for you.' In a statement issued as Marcos wrapped up his trip, the US embassy in Manila said the State Department had approved at least 3 billion pesos (US$60 million) in new foreign assistance to support Philippine energy, maritime and economic development initiatives. 'This is the US government's first announcement of new foreign assistance for any country since the Trump administration began its review and realignment of foreign assistance in January,' it noted. The embassy added that Secretary of State Marco Rubio intended to work with Congress to allocate an additional 825 million pesos to 'catalyse private sector development' in the Luzon Economic Corridor – a flagship project originally launched under former president Joe Biden and backed by both the US and Japan. The initiative aims to boost investment in transport, logistics, energy and semiconductors across northern Luzon. - South China Morning Post/ANN
New Straits Times
16 hours ago
- New Straits Times
No more jaguh kampung: 13MP must fix education at its root
WE know this story too well. For decades, learner drivers have been quietly told to pay a little extra — not just for driving school fees, but also for something more insidious. A token for the tester, so he would be more lenient. It was whispered as tradition, shrugged off as harmless. But it boils down to one thing: the lowering of standards. And it does not stop at driving tests. Stories abound of students scraping through with the barest of marks, or earning distinctions with percentages that would not meet the bar elsewhere. If this continues, we are not building a nation — we are building a myth. A jaguh kampung mindset: champions of the small pond, unprepared for the ocean. The 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), running from 2026 to 2030, places education and talent development at the heart of national transformation. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim — himself a former education minister — has called for sweeping reforms. And rightly so. He knows, perhaps better than most, what must be done. We need: PRESCHOOL reform that nurtures curiosity, not just compliance; TEACHER training that attracts the committed and talented, not those seeking a stable government job; and, A NATIONAL embrace of STEM education as the foundation of future competitiveness. Because here's the truth: if we fail to invest in the early years and the educators who shape them, we are not just short-changing students — we're sabotaging our future workforce. The 13MP rightly elevates Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). For too long, TVET was treated as a fallback. But in a world hungry for skilled technicians, coders and creators, it's the new frontline of innovation. Politicians and educators must stop viewing TVET as a second-tier option. It's not. It's strategic. It's essential. The 13MP promises to tackle the urban-rural education gap. But promises must be matched with infrastructure. Digital access, teacher deployment and community engagement must be prioritised — not just in policy papers, but in budget allocations and boots-on-the-ground execution. In this respect, Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil deserves credit for pushing Internet access in rural schools. But we need more than connectivity — we need continuity, quality and commitment. For far too long, we have treated education as a routine function — another line item in the national budget. But when we neglect its deeper purpose, we find ourselves adrift. As Ghanaian philosopher Ernest Agyemang Yeboah reminds us: "Education is the spine of every nation. The better the education, the better the nation." Education needs a reckoning. And the 13MP could be that moment — if we dare to treat education not as a segment, but as the soul of our national progress. Education must be the engine of economic and societal progress. No compromise on quality upskilling, lifelong learning and workforce readiness. This is where Kesuma — the Human Resources Ministry under Steven Sim — can play a transformative role in shaping Kesuma Bangsa: the young talent who will be the pride ofMalaysia. With talent development now a national priority, reorganising the National Education Master Plan to reflect current realities is not optional — it's imperative. Malaysia's education system has long been caught between legacy structures and modern demands. We have spent years tweaking curricula, debating exam formats and sparring over language policies. But the deeper question remains: are we preparing Malaysians to thrive — not just survive — in a world that's changing faster than our syllabi? The 13MP offers a rare window to answer that question with boldness. The time is now.
