logo
Spending on special education in Oregon needs a revamped formula, researchers find

Spending on special education in Oregon needs a revamped formula, researchers find

Yahoo03-03-2025
Oregon is one of only seven states that caps special education funding, according to an analysis of the state's education funding issues. (Photo by)
Lawmakers got a three-hour crash course this week on fixes that are needed to Oregon's education funding formula to improve student learning and direct money toward the highest needs kids.
Among the most consequential findings was that Oregon's formula for how much money leaders send to schools to support students with disabilities leaves them under-resourced.
Oregon is one of seven states that cap spending on special education, and it has the lowest cap of all, according to the Virginia-based American Institutes for Research researchers, who discussed their analysis on Oregon's education funding during a joint meeting of the House and Senate Education committees last week. Lawmakers are considering a proposal this session, House Bill 2953, sponsored by Rep. Courtney Neron, D-Wilsonville, that would remove the funding cap but Oregon also needs more thoughtful spending on special education, the researchers found.
In the 2022-23 school year, the state gave school districts about $696 million to meet the needs of students with special needs, such as physical, developmental and learning disabilities like autism and speech and language impairment. That was 25% more than schools got in the 2018-19 school year. But inflation wiped out the spending power of that additional money, the researchers found.
And it wasn't enough.
In the 2022-23 school year, Oregon's 197 school districts spent more than $1 billion to meet the needs of students with disabilities, officials from Oregon's Department of Education said, forcing schools to cobble together the extra $375 million from other streams of funding, such as the Student Success Act meant to improve outcomes for underserved students.
In any of Oregon's school districts, just 11% of the student body with disabilities are entitled to extra money from the state — about $9,000 additional dollars above general per-pupil costs, per student — regardless of the type of disability the student has. In the average Oregon district, about 15% of students have disabilities and require additional resources.
Districts can apply for additional funding from the state when their student population with disabilities exceeds 11%, and nearly 90% of districts – 167 – apply.
Districts that exceeded the funding cap received, on average, about $2,800 for each student above the cap in recent years. That's about $5,300 less than what they would have received under the cap.
'Most districts in your state actually exceed your cap. And then even though they exceed the cap, they go on to get a waiver from the cap, which raises questions: what is the cap actually doing?' Tammy Colby, one of the American Institutes for Research researchers, asked lawmakers.
Jake Cornett, executive director of the nonprofit advocacy group Disability Rights Oregon, said eliminating the cap has been needed for years.
'Oregon needs to raise the special education cap and substantially increase funding that is directly tied to measurable outcomes for children with disabilities,' he said. 'It's past time for Oregon to hold school districts accountable for the money they receive.'
The additional costs of providing a fair and equal education for a deaf or blind student are about $24,000 annually, according to the U.S. Department of Education. For a student with autism, it's closer to $29,000 and for a student with a speech language impairment it's about $11,000.
But in Oregon, every student with a disability receives the same amount of additional funding under the state's funding formula. Because the state gives no special weight to funding schools based on the actual cost of the students' disability, schools have to come up with the difference.
The percentage of students identified for special education in Oregon did not increase much between 2018 and 2023, the researchers found, but more of those students have high-cost disabilities. The state's high-cost disability fund, an insurance policy that helps districts cover costs when serving a student costs more than $30,000 a year, also has a spending limit.
Despite legislative efforts to inject more money into the fund over the years, inflation has taken the power out of those dollars, and demand is outstripping supply, the research shows.
During the 2020-21 school year, the state put $50 million into the fund, which covered less than 60% of the requests for reimbursement from districts. Lawmakers have not raised appropriations to the fund in years, and today, it covers only about 40% of eligible expenditures from districts.
'Why is that a problem? Well, that means districts have to raise that revenue some other way,' Colby said. 'It comes out of unrestricted revenue. It can encroach on other kinds of programs and services that a district can offer.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Compared to Estimates, Dominion Energy (D) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics
Compared to Estimates, Dominion Energy (D) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Compared to Estimates, Dominion Energy (D) Q2 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics

Dominion Energy (D) reported $3.81 billion in revenue for the quarter ended June 2025, representing a year-over-year increase of 9.3%. EPS of $0.75 for the same period compares to $0.55 a year ago. The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.64 billion, representing a surprise of +4.54%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +8.7%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $0.69. While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health. Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance. Here is how Dominion Energy performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Total operating revenue- Dominion Energy Virginia: $2.71 billion compared to the $2.67 billion average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of +6.9% year over year. Total operating revenue- Contracted Energy: $245 million versus $262.43 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -13.7% change. Total operating revenue- Dominion Energy South Carolina: $836 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $765.6 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +9.7%. View all Key Company Metrics for Dominion Energy here>>> Shares of Dominion Energy have returned +2.8% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +2.3% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Dominion Energy Inc. (D) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges
Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges

The Senate confirmed President Donald Trump's pick to oversee higher education policy, a man with deep ties to the for-profit college industry, by a 50-to-45 vote on August 1. Senate Majority John Thune filed cloture on Kent's nomination earlier in the week. And the education committee had already advanced Kent on a 12-11 vote without a hearing in late May. The undersecretary at the Department of Education oversees billions in federal financial aid and is charged with ensuring America's colleges provide a quality education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon had previously told USA TODAY that Kent is a 'natural leader' whose experience and concern for students 'make him the ideal selection for under secretary of education." He had won the support of several prominent university trade groups who are opposed to Trump's attacks on universities, but said they supported Kent's nomination. His confirmation comes as the Trump administration seeks to reshape higher education and has launched numerous investigations into high profile universities. Kent had already been working at the agency on the administration's initiatives like K-12 school choice. But prior to working in the government, Kent had a long history working for or close to for-profit colleges. From 2008 to the end of 2015, Kent worked for Education Affiliates, a for-profit college company. When he left, he was a vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs. In 2015, the Department of Justice announced the company had agreed to a $13 million settlement to settle accusations it had gamed the federal financial aid system. The company told USA TODAY Kent was not involved in the settlement or the allegations of fraud. Critics, including student advocacy groups and teacher unions, had called on the Senate education committee to put Kent through a public hearing to answer questions about his time working for the company. And one of the original whistleblowers tied to that case, Dorothy Thomas, expressed concern about someone from the company's leadership holding the under secretary position. Kent had also worked for Career Education Colleges and Universities, a for-profit college trade group. He developed a reputation for deep policy knowledge while speaking against regulations geared toward the for-profit college industry. That group's CEO, Jason Altmire, said Kent was not driven by partisan politics and would bring an unbiased view to the under secretary position. He then went to work for Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration as a deputy secretary of education. Youngkin, in a prepared statement, said Kent improved how Virginia manages colleges and made them more accountable to students and families through increased transparency. Chair of the Virginia Senate's education committee, Democrat Ghazala Hashmi, told USA TODAY Kent had tried to destabilize accreditation in the state and he was aligned with efforts to dismantle consumer protections. In a departing message to the commonwealth, Kent said he was proud of reducing costs while pushing for free speech and accountability at Virginia's colleges. Chris Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC

No nominees deal
No nominees deal

Politico

time4 hours ago

  • Politico

No nominees deal

The Senate will try to break an impasse Friday to advance three spending bills in hopes of showing progress after days of discord. A separate holdup over presidential nominations, meanwhile, could come down to direct talks between Democrats and the White House. A patchwork of objections from senators on both sides of the aisle have held up the spending legislation for days and foiled a plan for what some had hoped would be a four-bill package. But members expressed new optimism Friday that a second, more limited attempt could move forward. It's one of two pieces of major business Republican leaders are hoping to wrap up before the Senate starts its traditional summer recess. In addition to the spending bills — where they are keen to show some progress ahead of the Sept. 30 government shutdown deadline — they also want to confirm a broad tranche of President Donald Trump's nominees. The nominee conversations appear more dicey, senators said, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Friday that he has put Trump officials 'into conversation directly' with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's team. Top White House staffers were also in the Capitol on Thursday night after Thune met with Trump at the White House. 'This is how this is ultimately going to get resolved,' Thune said. Meanwhile, GOP senators said leaders are running traps on a possible deal that would advance the smaller package of spending bills. Under the pending proposal, leaders would seek unanimous consent to tie together the fiscal 2026 spending bills funding the Veterans Affairs and Agriculture departments, as well as military construction projects and the FDA. A third spending bill, funding Congress itself, could be voted on separately. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins said Friday morning she expects a unanimous consent request on some constellation of those three bills. The Maine Republican is eager to show progress on bipartisan spending bills before the Senate leaves for its lengthy August recess. Upon their return, members will have only a handful of session days to make further progress ahead of the shutdown deadline. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) has made clear he will object to including Legislative Branch funding in the package and wants the chance to vote against the $7.1 billion bill. It's the smallest of the 12 annual appropriations bills, but Kennedy maintains it still costs too much. 'They agreed to my proposal,' he told reporters Friday. 'They're going to have one vote on [Military Construction–VA] and [Agriculture-FDA] together and separate vote on [Legislative Branch] so I can vote no. Then they'll marry them up later if all three pass, as they probably will.' Coming to a nominations deal could be much trickier, given Trump's determination to get all of his 150-plus pending nominees confirmed quickly. Trump on Thursday said on Truth Social that the Senate 'must stay in Session, taking no recess' until all of the nominees are confirmed. Even if senators stay in Washington, that goal will be all but impossible to meet absent Democratic cooperation. Democrats under Schumer are exploring whether to quickly confirm a smaller subset of nominees in exchange for other concessions, such as the release of government funding they claim has been illegally 'impounded' by the Trump administration. Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store