Penang passes water resources bill for integrated, holistic management
GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Legislative Assembly today passed the Penang Water Resources Bill 2025 to manage the state's water resources in a more integrated, holistic and sustainable manner.
The Bill was passed by a majority voice vote after being debated by six assemblymen from the government and opposition blocs.
When tabling the Bill earlier, State Infrastructure, Transport and Digital Committee chairman Zairil Khir Johari, said its introduction is a strategic move toward integrated management of water use, development and protection to enhance greater efficiency.
He explained that the new enactment is necessary to replace the Water Enactment of 1967, which is outdated and limited in scope, as it only grants authority through district officers and lacks the provisions required to meet current needs.
'In addition, there are gaps in existing federal laws, such as the Environmental Quality Act 1974, that hinder a comprehensive approach to addressing water pollution,' he said.
'With mounting pressure from population growth, rapid development and the effects of climate change, water management requires a more systematic, efficient approach backed by strong legal authority,' said Zairil.
He explained that the Bill would provide a solid legal foundation for stricter monitoring and enforcement, the integration of smart technologies in water management, and clearer definitions of the rights and responsibilities of various stakeholders in safeguarding water resources.
As such, he said the state government is confident that the Bill, comprising 61 clauses across 10 parts, will offer a clearer legal framework to govern the abstraction, use, conservation and quality of water resources on the island.
The assembly also passed the Penang Water Resources Board Bill 2025, along with two motions: the Special Report of the Committee on Standing Orders of the Penang Legislative Assembly, and the activation of the Select Committee on Federal-State Relations.
The first meeting of the third session of the 15th Penang State Legislative Assembly, which began on May 19, saw the submission of 75 oral questions, 769 written questions, and the tabling of two Bills and three motions.
The sitting was adjourned to a date to be determined later.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Indian state pushes jail terms for 'fake news', sparks worries
BENGALURU: Draft legislation by India's tech hub state of Karnataka that would impose jail terms of up to seven years for spreading "fake news" and other misinformation has stirred concerns among free speech activists that it could lead to censorship. With nearly one billion internet users, the stakes are high in a sprawling country of many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections. India's federal government already regulates social media content with legislation empowering it to order takedowns of disputed content. But some states such as Karnataka have begun taking their own measures. Karnataka's bill, the strictest of its kind yet, stipulates that those posting "fake news" and "anti-feminist" content, or "promoting superstition", would face imprisonment along with potential fines. The 11-page Karnataka Mis-Information And Fake News (Prohibition) Bill does not define such offences in practice, but said special courts and a regulatory committee would be set up to implement it. Free speech advocates have cited what they say would be the risk of selective enforcement arising from Karnataka's measure and flagged concerns that people posting memes or making honest mistakes online could be prosecuted. "Misinformation is fairly subjective and every person who uses the internet is susceptible to falling within the dragnet of this law," said Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation, a New Delhi-based digital advocacy group which first made the Karnataka draft legislation public. The state government of Karnataka, home to the city of Bengaluru that hosts the offices or branches of many Indian and foreign tech giants, has said the bill will be released for public consultation before implementation. Priyank Kharge, Karnataka's IT minister, said on Friday "there is a lot of misinformation on the proposed Misinformation Bill in public." He later added that the "sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder" and the government's focus was to tackle misinformation and fake news, "and nothing beyond that." He did not immediately respond to Reuters calls seeking further comment on Monday. Karnataka's move could risk creating multiple regulations imposing conflicting obligations and regulatory challenges for companies, said Aman Taneja, partner at law and policy firm Ikigai. Some Indian media have sharply criticised the draft bill. The Deccan Herald newspaper on Monday titled an opinion piece "A remedy that's worse than the menace", saying the Karnataka government should "do away with the criminal provisions" in the legislation. India has over the years held talks with US tech giants like Google it sees as having been slow to remove fake news posts, and New Delhi in 2019 set up a "Fact Check Unit" to debunk what it sees as misinformation.
The Star
4 days ago
- The Star
Bill Moyers, broadcaster and LBJ's White House press secretary, dies at 91 -Washington Post
(Reuters) -Bill Moyers, a key member of Democratic President Lyndon Johnson's inner circle and later a guiding force in American journalism during more than 40 years in public television, has died at the age of 91, the Washington Post reported on Thursday. At a time when critics said broadcast news was becoming fluffier and shallower, Moyers pursued a thoughtful, in-depth approach, bringing an intellectual perspective delivered in a soothing Texas twang. He took an activist approach to the job and The Nation magazine called him a "radical presence" in broadcast news, which his critics said was proof that the Public Broadcasting Service network should not get federal funding. Starting in 1971, Moyers had regular shows on public television, including "Bill Moyers' Journal," "Now With Bill Moyers," "Moyers on America" and "Moyers and Company," as well limited-run series on the U.S. Constitution, faith and mythology. Among the other topics he explored at length on his shows were poverty, racism, money in politics, climate change, income inequality, the shortcomings of the media and what he called the "pirates and predators of Wall Street." "He used the tools of the documentarian to wield a velvet sledgehammer, bludgeoning corporate polluters and government ne'er-do-wells with precision and grace," New York Times media columnist David Carr wrote in 2004. Billy Don Moyers was born in Hugo, Oklahoma, on June 5, 1934, and grew up mostly in Marshall, Texas. A dutiful, energetic overachiever, he dedicated himself to school, church and work, including a job at the local newspaper. His early adult life would be a tug of war between the pulpit, the press and politics. He was attending North Texas State College when he first went to Washington in 1954 as a summer intern in the office of then-Senate Minority Leader Lyndon Johnson. When he returned to school, transferring to the University of Texas, he worked on the student newspaper and Johnson made sure he had a job at the Austin television station owned by his wife, "Lady Bird" Johnson. He also pursued the ministry, becoming ordained as a Baptist minister in 1954 and earning a master of divinity degree at the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in 1959. Johnson's legendary powers of persuasion eventually prevailed and Moyers became an aide during Johnson's unsuccessful presidential run against John F. Kennedy in 1960. After the election, Kennedy chose Moyers to be assistant director of his newly established Peace Corps. After Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 and Johnson became president, Moyers moved to the White House. He was only 30 years old but became one of the most important people in Washington - a duty-bound, deal-making extension of his boss. He served as Johnson's press secretary, adviser, speech writer and congressional go-between. In 1965, he appeared on the covers of Newsweek and Time, which called him "LBJ's Young Man in Charge of Everything." Moyers was a driving force in forging Johnson's Great Society legislation - laws and programs that included the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the "war on poverty," Medicaid and Medicare, conservation and aid to education. "He taught me so much about politics and about what's possible, about human behavior, about the consequences of decisions," Moyers said of Johnson in a 1989 Texas Monthly interview. "At the same time, he was a driven man, a man who could consume you." Critics said Moyers sometimes got his hands dirty on Johnson's behalf. He was known to leak stories and plant questions with the press corps in advance of news conferences. The Washington Post reported that he ordered the FBI to search for gay people in the administration, and CBS correspondent Morley Safer said in his autobiography that Moyers also had a role in the FBI's bugging of civil rights leader Martin Luther King. Moyers left Johnson's service in 1967 - partly because he no longer believed in his boss's war in Vietnam - to become publisher of Newsday, a Long Island, New York daily. The newspaper won two Pulitzer Prizes under his leadership, but he left in 1970 after the publisher deemed him too liberal. Moyers then went on a bus ride around the country that he chronicled in the book "Listening to America: A Traveler Rediscovers His Country." He made his move to PBS in 1971 with "Bill Moyers Journal" and in 1986 he and his wife, Judith, started their own production company to make shows for public television stations. Moyers had stints with the major networks - as a correspondent and commentator with CBS in the 1970s, and NBC and MSNBC in the 1990s - but greatly preferred the freedom and depth that public television offered. Moyers and his wife had three children, William Cope, Alice Suzanne, and John Davidson. (Writing by Bill Trott; Editing by Steve Orlofsky and Rosalba O'Brien)
Focus Malaysia
4 days ago
- Focus Malaysia
UK corporate crime reforms: Lessons for Malaysia
AS global scrutiny of corporate wrongdoing intensifies, governments are being pressed to close gaps in legal frameworks that allow powerful organisations to escape accountability. The United Kingdom's (UK) proposed Crime and Policing Bill 2025, which builds on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA), signals a fundamental shift in how corporate criminal liability is approached. For Malaysia, grappling with recurring corporate scandals and persistent enforcement gaps these developments offer a timely lesson in legal reform. The UK's current reforms break from its traditionally narrow 'identification principle', under which corporate criminal liability hinged on proving that the directing mind and will (typically, board-level executives) possessed the necessary criminal intent. This model had long struggled to hold large, complex corporations accountable, as misconduct often occurred several layers below board level. The result was a form of de facto immunity for major corporations an issue Malaysia knows too well from high-profile cases like 1MDB. The ECCTA, along with the proposed Crime and Policing Bill, challenges and reshapes the existing status quo. The UK is introducing a broader 'senior manager' test that attributes liability to a corporate entity if a senior manager, acting within their actual or apparent authority, commits an offence. Initially limited to economic crimes such as fraud and bribery, the new Bill proposes to expand this principle to all criminal offences, including environmental breaches, health and safety violations, and potentially even regulatory offences under data protection or competition law. Should Malaysia give serious consideration to this matter? The relevance for Malaysia Malaysia has made progress in recent years with frameworks like the corporate liability provision under Section 17A of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, which imposes liability on companies for bribery committed by associated persons. But unlike the UK's evolving regime, Malaysia's framework remains limited in scope. It does not yet offer a comprehensive system that attributes liability to senior individuals beyond bribery, nor does it extend to a broader array of corporate misconduct. In an era where corporate actors are transnational, crimes like money laundering, tax evasion, and environmental damage frequently cut across jurisdictions. Yet Malaysia's legal system lacks the robust extraterritorial reach that both ECCTA and the proposed UK Bill provide. The UK reforms allow for corporate liability even where only part of the conduct occurs in the UK, or where the victim is a UK national. Malaysia must adopt a similarly outward-facing approach, particularly given the global footprint of its GLCs, listed companies, and state-linked institutions. Why reform is crucial now First, Malaysia is at a credibility crossroads. Although enforcement agencies have made strides in tackling corruption and economic crime, public confidence in institutional accountability remains fragile. Legal reform that closes loopholes in corporate criminal liability can help restore faith in the system and signal a genuine commitment to good governance. Second, the global enforcement landscape is shifting. The creation of a new taskforce involving the UK, France, and Switzerland aimed at prosecuting international financial crime shows that enforcement is becoming more collaborative and less tolerant of inaction. The US, traditionally a leader in anti-corruption enforcement via the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, has slowed enforcement. This vacuum is being filled by European actors. Malaysia, a regional economic hub, risks reputational harm and legal isolation if it does not modernise its approach. Third, as ESG (environmental, social and governance) accountability becomes mainstream, companies are being judged not just by profitability but by compliance and integrity. A modern liability regime that deters wrongdoing by making corporations answerable for the actions of their senior personnel aligns with this global shift. This is especially pertinent given Malaysia's reliance on natural resources, extractive industries, and a growing digital economy sector where regulatory breaches can have far-reaching effects. Key takeaways for Malaysian reform Malaysia should consider key corporate liability reforms, drawing from the UK's legal framework. First, the basis of liability should be broadened beyond bribery to encompass all serious economic crimes, environmental offences, and regulatory breaches, ensuring comprehensive accountability. A 'Senior Manager' test should also be introduced, holding companies liable for misconduct by individuals with significant decision-making authority, even if they are not board members. Additionally, the scope of authority must be clarified to include 'apparent authority,' preventing firms from denying liability for criminal acts carried out in role-relevant contexts. Malaysia should also enhance the extraterritorial application of its laws, enabling prosecution of offences that affect Malaysian interests, even when elements occur abroad. Finally, to foster a culture of prevention, Malaysia could adopt a mechanism similar to the UK's Deferred Prosecution Agreement regime, which encourages companies to implement robust compliance programs and self-report misconduct in exchange for more flexible enforcement. These reforms would significantly strengthen corporate accountability and regulatory integrity. ‒ June 26, 2025 R. Paneir Selvam is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geopolitical matters. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Shutterstock
