Israel's defense minister plans to hold Gazan population in ‘humanitarian city' on ruins of Rafah, Israeli media reports
In a briefing to reporters Monday, Israel Katz said the zone would initially house some 600,000 displaced Palestinians who have been forced to evacuate to the Al-Mawasi area along the coast of southern Gaza, multiple outlets who attended in the briefing reported. Palestinians who enter the zone will go through a screening to check that they are not members of Hamas.
They will not be allowed to leave, Katz said, according to Israeli media. Eventually, the defense minister said the entire population of Gaza – more than 2 million Palestinians – will be held in the zone. Katz then vowed that Israel would implement a plan, first floated by US President Donald Trump, to allow Palestinians to emigrate from Gaza to other countries.
Israeli politicians, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have eagerly supported the emigration plan, despite no country publicly expressing any willingness to take part. At a White House dinner with Trump Monday, Netanyahu said, 'We're working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realize what they always said, that they want to give the Palestinians a better future, and I think we're getting close to finding several countries.'
Katz said the zone for displaced Palestinians will be run by international bodies, not the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Israeli media reported. The IDF would secure the zone from a distance, Katz said, in a plan that appears to imitate the aid distribution mechanism of the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). GHF operates the distribution sites, but the IDF surrounds them militarily.
It's unclear what bodies would agree to participate in Katz's plan, especially since most international organizations refuse to take part in GHF's distribution sites due to serious concerns about impartiality and the safety of the Palestinian population. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed trying to approach the distribution sites since they began operating a month ago, according to health officials in Gaza and the United Nations.
A spokesman for Katz has not responded to repeated requests for comment.
Asked about the plan at a press conference on Tuesday evening, IDF spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said the military 'will present several options to the political echelon.'
'Every option has its implications. We will act according to the directives of the political echelon,' Defrin added.
On Tuesday, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK opposes the new plan, just as it opposed GHF.
'I'm surprised at the statements that I've seen from Mr. Katz over the last 24 hours,' Lammy told a parliamentary committee. 'They run contra to the proximity to a ceasefire that I thought we were heading towards.' Lammy added that he does not recognize the plan 'as a serious context in which the people of Gaza can get the aid and support that they need at this time.'
In a statement Tuesday, Hamas said that Israel's 'persistent efforts to forcibly displace our people and impose ethnic cleansing have met with legendary resilience. Our people have stood firm in the face of killing, hunger, and bombardment, rejecting any future dictated from intelligence headquarters or political bargaining tables.'
Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer, said Katz's plan amounts to the forcible transfer of a population in preparation for deportation. Both of these are war crimes, Sfard told CNN.
'If they are done on a massive scale – whole communities – they can amount to war crimes,' Sfard said, dismissing the notion that any departure from Gaza could be considered voluntary.
'There is no consensual departure. There is no voluntary departure. People will flee from Gaza because Israel is mounting on them coercive measures that would make their life in Gaza impossible,' he said. 'Under international law, you don't have to load people on trucks at gunpoint in order to commit the crime of deportation.'
A senior diplomat from the United Arab Emirates, considered one of the key countries in any plan for post-war Gaza, said removing Palestinians from the enclave would be unacceptable. 'The UAE has publicly and categorically rejected the forced displacement of Palestinians…our public position and our private position is that we reject the forced dislocation of any Palestinians from the territory now to rebuild Gaza,' Lana Nusseibeh told CNN.
Qatar, which is now hosting proximity talks between Israel and Hamas, also rejected the deportation of Gaza's population. 'We have said very clearly we are against any forced relocation of Palestinians, or any relocation of Palestinians outside their land,' Majed Al Ansari, spokesman for the Qatari Foreign Ministry, said on Tuesday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Best Judge of ‘Real Peace' in the Mideast
The most important thing to note about 'A Hebron 'Emirate' or a Colonial Deception?' (op-ed, July 10) is that the author, Mahmoud Jabari, writes from Geneva. He lives there, while the Palestinians whose peace proposal he criticizes live in Hebron or part time in East Jerusalem. Mr. Jabari claims to have left during the second intifada. That was 20 years ago. Surely those on the ground have a better grip on life there and how to improve it than he. Mr. Jabari writes that his family had long lived in Hebron and 'didn't leave by choice. The violence of the second intifada and the relentless aggression of Israeli settlers made staying impossible.' The area where Mr. Jabari lived, H2, is populated by about 35,000 Palestinians who actually 'didn't leave by choice' and didn't find 'staying impossible.' They're still there.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - GHF is actually feeding Gazans, not letting Hamas extort them — and paying a price
The likelihood of a ceasefire in Gaza could turn on whether Israel meets a core demand of Hamas to stop a successful effort to feed the Palestinian people. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has distributed more than 60 million meals over the last five weeks without interference or diversion. This has severely undercut Hamas's revenue streams, because Hamas has for years stolen humanitarian aid and sold it at high prices, despite the daily struggle of the Palestinian people to meet their basic needs. For Israel, the priority remains unchanged in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023 terror attacks: eliminate Hamas and free the hostages still held in its underground labyrinth. At the same time, however, the world cannot ignore the immense suffering of Gaza's innocent civilians, most of whom are trapped by Hamas's control. Nor can Israel revert to the status quo ante, when Hamas was starving Gazans so it could finance terror. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, of course, has a singular mission: to feed the people of Gaza, safely and directly. It operates with transparency, logistical expertise, a commitment to human dignity, and yes, coordination with the Israeli government. Without that coordination, its food would face the same looting and diversion that plagues other aid organizations who see Israel as an obstacle. For this success, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been rewarded with cheers from the Palestinian people in Gaza, as well as robust international condemnation from nearly everyone outside of the Trump administration, which has chipped in at least $30 million in support. These critics claim that the foundation violates humanitarian principles by working with Israel. Their statements ignore the facts and focus instead on ideology. What they call 'neutrality' often serves as an excuse to avoid confronting the actions of Hamas, which routinely blocks aid and threatens aid workers. Apparently, if you play by Hamas's rules — accept their fabricated statistics, their propaganda, and their theft of aid — you are considered 'legitimate' by much of the legacy media. But if you challenge that system by delivering aid efficiently, securely, and without Hamas' interference, you become the villain. Even worse, Hamas has now turned its violence against Palestinian civilians for working with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Recently, Hamas attacked a bus of Palestinian foundation volunteers. According to regional reports, a Hamas unit killed or detained dozens of aid workers. Its operatives have also attacked American aid workers with explosives packed with ball bearings then before retreated into crowds of aid seekers, all in the hope of drawing fire and creating an international incident. Despite the violence, the United Nations has remained nearly silent. The European Union has offered no meaningful condemnation. Some affiliated agencies have continued to question the foundation's mission while ignoring the violence. Only the U.S. has led with clarity in its condemnations. The U.N., the International Red Cross and other captains of civil society insist on a sacrosanct neutrality that is effectively moral blindness. There are good and evil in this world. Feeding starving civilians is good; stealing the aid and murdering the people who feed them is evil. People of faith should recognize that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is delivering help where others have failed and doing so in the face of violence and death-threats. It deserves our support, not our suspicion. The values behind this work are not abstract. They reflect the deepest commitments of the Judeo-Christian tradition: charity, mercy and human dignity. While the ceasefire negotiations are underway, the UN, EU and international aid organizations should publicly pledge to work with GHF. If they will not assist, they should at least stop obstructing those who will. The time for moral equivocation has passed. Congress will soon hold hearings on the delivery of humanitarian aid in Gaza, too. Lawmakers should examine not only the work the foundation has done, but also the failure of other agencies to condemn or confront Hamas. If these groups continue to undermine the foundation or turn a blind eye to violence against its staff, American policymakers should reconsider how humanitarian dollars are allocated. Those who cannot condemn terror should not be trusted to address suffering. The tools of compassion are challenging the forces of cruelty. Feeding the hungry is a sacred duty and now, thanks to the foundation, the people of Gaza are enjoying reliable access to food. Hamas's opposition to feeding Palestinians must be understood. Aid organizations failing to fulfill their mission to bring aid to the people need to be named. And those who place bounties on their heads must be condemned and isolated. In a conflict filled with gray zones, this is a line the world must be willing to draw. Rabbi Abraham Cooper is a senior leader with the Simon Wiesenthal Center and chairman emeritus of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Iran says it's considering US offer to restart nuclear talks
Iran's foreign minister said the U.S. is trying to revive nuclear talks with Tehran while stressing that his country is in no hurry to resume negotiations. 'The Americans insist on returning to the negotiating table,' Abbas Araghchi said in televised remarks Saturday, adding that Iran has received 'multiple messages.' Tehran is weighing its options regarding the timing, location, and structure of potential talks, but is 'in no rush to enter into reckless negotiations.' Araghchi served as lead negotiator in Oman-mediated talks with the U.S., which collapsed after Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's nuclear sites on June 13. The strikes killed several top military and nuclear officials, and hit densely populated urban areas as well as Tehran's Evin Prison. Araghchi's remarks follow U.S. President Donald Trump's Monday dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, where he said he was open to lifting sanctions on Iran. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, who led the U.S. delegation in the earlier talks, said a meeting with Iran was expected within the week. Araghchi also said that Iran needs guarantees it won't be attacked again if the talks don't succeed. 'Some assurances have been expressed that there will be no war again, and we are reviewing these,' he said without elaborating. 'If an opportunity arises to secure the interests of the Iranian people, we won't miss it. The doors of diplomacy are never closed.' The U.S. joined the Israeli assault on June 22, striking three Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump claimed to have 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear infrastructure, while Iranian officials said the sites were 'badly damaged' but not destroyed. In response, Iran fired missiles at a Qatari air base used by U.S. troops. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took effect later in June and has held so far, despite both sides accusing each other of violations. Araghchi also reiterated that Iran's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency 'has not stopped,' though he added that monitoring requests will now be reviewed 'on a case-by-case basis' and handled exclusively through Iran's Supreme National Security Council. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.