Gates Foundation to spend $2.5 billion on ‘ignored, underfunded' women's health
The investment is among the foundation's first big commitments since Gates announced earlier this year that he would give away his $200 billion fortune by 2045. The investment is also around one-third more than the foundation spent on women's and maternal health research and development over the last five years.
'Women's health continues to be ignored, underfunded and sidelined. Too many women still die from preventable causes or live in poor health,' Gates said in a statement. 'That must change.'
The work will look at deeply under-researched areas that affect hundreds of millions of women in both high- and low-income countries, from preeclampsia and gestational diabetes to heavy menstrual bleeding, endometriosis and menopause.
Investment will focus on five key areas: obstetric care and maternal immunization; maternal health and nutrition; gynecological and menstrual health; contraceptive innovation; and sexually transmitted infection.
The aim is to kickstart research, develop products and ensure equitable access to them worldwide.
The foundation's head of gender equality, Dr. Anita Zaidi, said the field had been held back in part because of bias and a lack of data on key issues, such as how drugs cross into the uterus.
'If you look at the literature, there may be only 10 women who've been studied, ever,' she told Reuters. 'We don't even have the answers to these basic questions.'
Just 1% of the healthcare research and innovation spending went to female-specific conditions beyond cancer, a 2021 analysis by McKinsey & Co found.
Zaidi acknowledged that the $2.5 billion was a 'drop in the bucket' compared with what was needed and called on others to step in, including the private sector, philanthropists and governments.
Gates' ex-wife, philanthropist Melinda French Gates, has also invested in women's health since leaving the foundation last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A $2.5 billion pledge makes women's health a priority in Gates Foundation spend-down
Innovations on the horizon in women's health show what's possible with more investment. With the help of ultrasound equipment powered by artificial intelligence, frontline health care workers may be able to track the progress of developing embryos with a minimum of training. And birth control injections that last six months could give women more control over reproduction. Those are just two potential breakthroughs out of more than 40 the Gates Foundation intends to support through a five-year, $2.5 billion commitment on women's health research and development, more than triple the amount it has spent on women's health innovation over the past five years. 'Many of the most pressing conditions impacting women still remain understudied, underdiagnosed, and overlooked,' said Ru-fong Joanne Cheng, director of Women's Health Innovations at Gates. A very small share of medical research funding supports the study of health specific to women, including gynecological and menstrual health, obstetric care, contraceptive innovation, sexually transmitted infections, and maternal health and nutrition, the foundation said. It cited a 2021 McKinsey and Company study that found 1% of all medical research, setting aside cancer research, goes toward women's health. The foundation framed the commitment as part of its May announcement that it would spend down its assets over the next 20 years and concentrate much of its support on global health. While much of the research funded over the next five years will benefit women worldwide, the foundation said, the need is most acute in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. By devoting billions to women's health, the foundation has signaled it intends to continue to invest in the cause following the 2024 departure of Melinda French Gates, who led the foundation's support of girls' and women's health. Since her divorce from Bill Gates, French Gates has committed more than $1 billion to improve women's physical and mental health, provide more economic opportunity to women, and increase their political sway. The announcement follows a U.S. pullback of support for global maternal health programs during the first seven months of the Trump administration. The shuttering of the U.S. Agency for International Development and program reductions at the Centers for Disease Control have sunset programs focused on women's health. According to a March internal USAID memo, the agency's closure will stop services for 16.8 million pregnant women annually. In April, the World Health Organization said that the 40 percent decline in maternal deaths from 2000 to 2023 has been put at risk because of aid cuts. 'We need both innovation and delivery' While the foundation continues to focus on the delivery of health care globally in an era of governmental retreat, the $2.5 billion will focus squarely on research needed to save lives, Anita Zaidi, president of Gates's Gender Equality Division, said on a press call Monday to discuss the announcement. 'This is an innovation-focused announcement,' she said. 'We need both innovation and delivery.' It's important to remember that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has only been required to test novel drugs on women in clinical trials since 1993, and many tests are still only done on men, said Katy Brodsky Falco, founder of the Foundation for Women's Health, which plans to make $5 million in research grants this year. With Gates getting behind research and development of women's health with such a large commitment, others may follow, Brodsky Falco said. 'Hopefully it will bring the issue to the top of the conversation among private donors and family foundations, even if they otherwise haven't supported this type of work,' she said. Moses Obimbo Madadi, professor at the University of Nairobi, noted that postpartum hemorrhaging causes about 3,000 deaths annually in Kenya. If men were the victims, he said, a G7 conference would be called to find a solution, but research on the subject has largely been ignored because it claims the lives of women. 'We've treated this as a peripheral issue other than making it a centerpiece of our research,' he said, calling the Gates commitment a 'very good starting point.' _____ Alex Daniels is a senior reporter at the Chronicle of Philanthropy, where you can read the full article. This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as part of a partnership to cover philanthropy and nonprofits supported by the Lilly Endowment. The Chronicle is solely responsible for the content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit Alex Daniels Of The Chronicle Of Philanthropy, The Associated Press
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
A $2.5 billion pledge makes women's health a priority in Gates Foundation spend-down
Innovations on the horizon in women's health show what's possible with more investment. With the help of ultrasound equipment powered by artificial intelligence, frontline health care workers may be able to track the progress of developing embryos with a minimum of training. And birth control injections that last six months could give women more control over reproduction. Those are just two potential breakthroughs out of more than 40 the Gates Foundation intends to support through a five-year, $2.5 billion commitment on women's health research and development, more than triple the amount it has spent on women's health innovation over the past five years. 'Many of the most pressing conditions impacting women still remain understudied, underdiagnosed, and overlooked,' said Ru-fong Joanne Cheng, director of Women's Health Innovations at Gates. A very small share of medical research funding supports the study of health specific to women, including gynecological and menstrual health, obstetric care, contraceptive innovation, sexually transmitted infections, and maternal health and nutrition, the foundation said. It cited a 2021 McKinsey and Company study that found 1% of all medical research, setting aside cancer research, goes toward women's health. The foundation framed the commitment as part of its May announcement that it would spend down its assets over the next 20 years and concentrate much of its support on global health. While much of the research funded over the next five years will benefit women worldwide, the foundation said, the need is most acute in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. By devoting billions to women's health, the foundation has signaled it intends to continue to invest in the cause following the 2024 departure of Melinda French Gates, who led the foundation's support of girls' and women's health. Since her divorce from Bill Gates, French Gates has committed more than $1 billion to improve women's physical and mental health, provide more economic opportunity to women, and increase their political sway. The announcement follows a U.S. pullback of support for global maternal health programs during the first seven months of the Trump administration. The shuttering of the U.S. Agency for International Development and program reductions at the Centers for Disease Control have sunset programs focused on women's health. According to a March internal USAID memo, the agency's closure will stop services for 16.8 million pregnant women annually. In April, the World Health Organization said that the 40 percent decline in maternal deaths from 2000 to 2023 has been put at risk because of aid cuts. 'We need both innovation and delivery' While the foundation continues to focus on the delivery of health care globally in an era of governmental retreat, the $2.5 billion will focus squarely on research needed to save lives, Anita Zaidi, president of Gates's Gender Equality Division, said on a press call Monday to discuss the announcement. 'This is an innovation-focused announcement,' she said. 'We need both innovation and delivery.' It's important to remember that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has only been required to test novel drugs on women in clinical trials since 1993, and many tests are still only done on men, said Katy Brodsky Falco, founder of the Foundation for Women's Health, which plans to make $5 million in research grants this year. With Gates getting behind research and development of women's health with such a large commitment, others may follow, Brodsky Falco said. 'Hopefully it will bring the issue to the top of the conversation among private donors and family foundations, even if they otherwise haven't supported this type of work,' she said. Moses Obimbo Madadi, professor at the University of Nairobi, noted that postpartum hemorrhaging causes about 3,000 deaths annually in Kenya. If men were the victims, he said, a G7 conference would be called to find a solution, but research on the subject has largely been ignored because it claims the lives of women. 'We've treated this as a peripheral issue other than making it a centerpiece of our research,' he said, calling the Gates commitment a 'very good starting point.' _____ Alex Daniels is a senior reporter at the Chronicle of Philanthropy, where you can read the full article. This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as part of a partnership to cover philanthropy and nonprofits supported by the Lilly Endowment. The Chronicle is solely responsible for the content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts explain why daydreaming could actually be key to a productive day
Every day, we're faced with constant opportunities for stimulation. With 24/7 access to news feeds, emails and social media, many of us find ourselves scrolling endlessly, chasing our next hit of dopamine. But these habits are fuelling our stress – and our brains are begging for a break. What our brains really need is some much-needed time off from concentrating. By not consciously focusing on anything and allowing the mind to drift, this can reduce stress and improve cognitive sharpness. This can often be easier said than done. But attention restoration theory (Art) can help you learn to give your brain space to drift. While this might sound like a fancy name for doing nothing, the theory is supported by neuroscience. Attention restoration theory was first put forward by psychologists Rachel and Stephen Kaplan in 1989. They theorised that spending time in nature can help restore focus and attention. They proposed there are two distinct types of attention: directed attention and undirected attention. Directed attention refers to deliberate concentration – such as studying, navigating through a busy place or posting on social media. Basically, it's any activity where our brain's attention is being directed at a specific task. Undirected attention is when we're not consciously trying to focus on anything – instead allowing things to gently capture our attention without trying. Think listening to chirping birds or watching leaves gently rustling in the breeze. In these instances, your attention naturally drifts without having to force your focus. Without time for undirected attention, it's thought that we experience 'attentional fatigue'. This can make it increasingly difficult to focus and concentrate, while distractions become more likely to grab our attention. In the past, we encountered many situations in our daily lives that we might classify as 'boring'. Moments such as waiting for the bus or standing in the supermarket queue. But these dull moments also gave our minds a chance to switch off. Now, our smartphones give us the opportunity for constant entertainment. Being able to constantly expose ourselves to intense, gripping stimuli offers little mental space for our overworked brains to recover. But attention restoration theory shows us how important it is to create space for moments that allow our brains to 'reset'. Restoring attention The origins of Kaplan and Kaplan's theory can actually be traced back to the 19th century. American psychologist William James was the first to formulate the concept of 'voluntary attention' – attention that requires effort. James' ideas were published against the backdrop of the broader cultural movement of Romanticism, which lauded nature. Romantic ideas about the restorative power of nature have since been backed by research – with numerous studies showing links between time in nature and lower stress levels, better attention, improvements in mental health, mood and better cognitive function. The restorative benefits of nature are backed by neuroscience, too. Neuroimaging has shown that activity in the amygdala – the part of the brain associated with stress and anxiety – was reduced when people were exposed to natural environments. But when exposed to urban environments, this activity was not reduced. Numerous studies have also since backed up Kaplan and Kaplan's theory that time in nature can help to restore attention and wellbeing. One systematic review of 42 studies found an association with exposure to natural environments and improvements in several aspects of cognitive performance – including attention. A randomised controlled trial using neuroimaging of the brain found signs of lower stress levels in adults who took a 40-minute walk in a natural environment, compared to participants who walked in an urban environment. The authors concluded that the nature walk facilitated attention restoration. Research has even shown that as little as ten minutes of undirected attention can result in a measurable uptick in performance on cognitive tests, as well as a reduction in attentional fatigue. Even simply walking on a treadmill while looking at a nature scene can produce this cognitive effect. Time in nature There are many ways you can put attention restoration theory to the test on your own. First, find any kind of green space – whether that's your local park, a river you can sit beside or a forest trail you can hike along. Next, make sure you put your phone and any other distractions away. Or, when you face boring moments during your day, instead of picking up your phone try seeing the pause as an opportunity to let your mind wander for a bit. Each of us may find certain environments to be more naturally supportive in allowing us to switch off and disengage the mind. So, if while trying to put attention restoration theory into practice, you find your brain pulling you back to structured tasks (such as mentally planning your week), this may be sign you should go someplace where it's easier for your mind to wander. Whether you're watching a ladybird crawl across your desk or visiting a vast expanse of nature, allow your attention to be undirected. It's not laziness, it's neurological maintenance. Anna Kenyon is a Senior Lecturer in Population Health at the University of Lancashire. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
