
Scottish Government warned over single-sex toilet policy
READ MORE
The warning centres on the Scottish Government estate — made up of 66 sites and 1,016 toilet facilities — where existing policy allows staff to use facilities based on self-identified gender rather than biological sex.
Around 18% of the facilities are gender-neutral single-user 'superloos', while the rest are designated as either male or female.
There are also numerous smaller sites — including fisheries and field-monitoring offices — where facilities may be shared or gender-neutral.
In April, the UK's highest court ruled unanimously that a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not alter a person's sex for the purposes of the Equality Act.
The judgment clarified that the terms 'man' and 'woman' in the legislation refer to biological sex, not acquired gender.
That ruling meant every organisation in the country needed to review their equality policies.
The Supreme Court ruled that sex in the Equality Act means biological sexWhile First Minister John Swinney initially welcomed the 'clarity' provided by the ruling, the Scottish Government has said it is waiting for further guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission before issuing new advice to Scotland's public sector — including prisons, schools and the NHS.
However, earlier this week, Dr Lesley Sawers, Deputy Chair and Scotland Commissioner for the EHRC, told The Herald that Scottish ministers had 'a responsibility to ensure their adherence to the Public Sector Equality Duty' — the legal requirement for public authorities in Scotland to consider protected characteristics, including biological sex, when carrying out their functions.
In response, a spokesperson said work was 'proceeding at pace to implement the ruling across Government'.
The Scottish Government's trans inclusion policy, signed off in January, states that 'staff should choose to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with' and that a GRC is not required to access single-sex spaces.
In a letter to John Somers, Director of Equality, Inclusion and Human Rights, Maya Forstater, Chief Executive of Sex Matters, said the policy was 'clearly unlawful'.
She added: 'The problem is not lack of infrastructure, but that the Scottish Government continues to operate an unlawful policy.
'As far as we can see, there is nothing to stop the Scottish Government immediately bringing the policy on toilets into line with the law, by making a statement that all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available. This would be in line with the Supreme Court judgment and the action taken by the Scottish Parliament.
'It is clearly a reasonably practical step in order to address the risk of individuals using opposite-sex toilets and other facilities.
'Please confirm, therefore, that you will take this step within seven days of the date of this letter.
'To the extent that the Scottish Government does not immediately stop the unlawful practices set out in this letter we may decide to commence proceedings without further warning.'
The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 require separate changing and toilet facilities for men and women 'where necessary for reasons of propriety'. Failure to provide such facilities, or to protect staff from discomfort or distress in those spaces, may also amount to unlawful harassment under the Equality Act.
The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
'Build a fair social security system with dignity for all'
The UK Government's own assessment of their plans for welfare benefits tells us that. The UK Government's process of bringing forward proposals for cuts to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and health-based Universal Credit for disabled claimants has been marked by chaos. This is decision making which has been irresponsible. These controversial changes to social security will see financial support for disabled people slashed in an effort to save £5 billion from the UK Government's welfare bill. The voices of disabled people have not been front and centre of the debate about how to build a better social security system. The changes represent a serious threat to disabled people's quality of life, dignity, and equality. Disabled people currently receiving PIP and Universal Credit continue under the current rules, with all new claimants facing harsh eligibility assessments which will see people go without the crucial support they need. Keir Starmer, the UK Prime Minister, might have done a partial U-turn on these plans for welfare benefits but instead of creating a fair welfare system for all, he has created a two-tier benefits system. New claimants will still be subjected to the new, harsher assessment regime, and will not receive the benefits they need and deserve. Scottish Greens are astonished that a UK Labour government would ever even contemplate such cruel and inhumane cuts at all. We are very disappointed that this cut in support for people who are unable to work due to disabilities and poor health after April 2026 will still go ahead. It is vital that we keep up the pressure to ensure that new claimants get what they need, because these reforms will hurt thousands of disabled people around the country for years to come. There is a lack of real evidence that a lower income will help disabled people to return to work. Cutting benefits will push more people into poverty. This could put further strain on local services such as the NHS and social care. Scottish Greens will keep fighting against these dangerous austerity measures from Labour and make the case for Scotland to build a fair social security system that treats everyone with dignity and respect. We have to recognise the power of disabled people's campaigning, and the importance of campaigning to deliver justice for disabled people continuing. The determination of disabled people and other activists is vital in the struggle to stop welfare cuts. We need to make sure that both the Scottish Government and the UK Government deliver security, and human rights for disabled people. This requires investing in our communities including local council services and not cutting the support disabled people rely on. We can work with disabled people's organisations who are committed to fighting poverty, and supporting and championing the rights of disabled people, their families, and carers. It is possible to create a more compassionate welfare benefits system that supports the wellbeing of disabled people.


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
How former leader Jeremy Corbyn threatens to become Labour's worst nightmare
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Overshadowed by the sheer size of the majority secured by Labour at last year's general election, the result in Islington North was largely dismissed as a minor blemish. The party's candidate had been soundly beaten by an independent, in what may have been an early sign that some traditional Labour voters were unimpressed by Keir Starmer. Of course, they might have gone along with the prevailing trend at that election had the independent in question not been Jeremy Corbyn, the seat's long-standing MP, the party's former leader and a champion of the hard-left. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He had been blocked from standing for Labour in the election after refusing to fully accept an Equality and Human Rights Commission report into allegations of antisemitism, which found the party had broken equality law under his leadership. Jeremy Corbyn speaks during a rally protesting against benefit cuts last month (Picture: Leon Neal) | Getty Images A terrifying prospect Corbyn might have gradually faded from national view, but talk of forming a new party with Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana – one of seven MPs to have the Labour whip removed within weeks of the election after rebelling over the two-child benefit cap – could see him find a new platform. After Sultana said the duo would "co-lead the founding" of a new party, Corbyn issued a statement pretty much confirming the news, although he waited more than 17 hours to do so. "The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape,' he said. 'Discussions are ongoing...' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In their wildest dreams and Starmer's worst nightmares, they will do to Labour what Reform UK are currently doing to the Conservatives, raising the terrifying prospect of a future election in which the essential choice is between Nigel Farage and Corbyn for Prime Minister. However, returning to the real world, a hard-left alternative might actually help Labour by getting rid of dyed-in-the-wool socialists from what is basically a social democratic party. On the other hand, even if it takes just a few percentage points of the vote off Labour that could, on current polls, virtually hand the next election to Reform.


Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
How former leader Jeremy Corbyn threatens to become Labour's worst nightmare
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Overshadowed by the sheer size of the majority secured by Labour at last year's general election, the result in Islington North was largely dismissed as a minor blemish. The party's candidate had been soundly beaten by an independent, in what may have been an early sign that some traditional Labour voters were unimpressed by Keir Starmer. Of course, they might have gone along with the prevailing trend at that election had the independent in question not been Jeremy Corbyn, the seat's long-standing MP, the party's former leader and a champion of the hard-left. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He had been blocked from standing for Labour in the election after refusing to fully accept an Equality and Human Rights Commission report into allegations of antisemitism, which found the party had broken equality law under his leadership. Jeremy Corbyn speaks during a rally protesting against benefit cuts last month (Picture: Leon Neal) | Getty Images A terrifying prospect Corbyn might have gradually faded from national view, but talk of forming a new party with Coventry South MP Zarah Sultana – one of seven MPs to have the Labour whip removed within weeks of the election after rebelling over the two-child benefit cap – could see him find a new platform. After Sultana said the duo would "co-lead the founding" of a new party, Corbyn issued a statement pretty much confirming the news, although he waited more than 17 hours to do so. "The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape,' he said. 'Discussions are ongoing...' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In their wildest dreams and Starmer's worst nightmares, they will do to Labour what Reform UK are currently doing to the Conservatives, raising the terrifying prospect of a future election in which the essential choice is between Nigel Farage and Corbyn for Prime Minister. However, returning to the real world, a hard-left alternative might actually help Labour by getting rid of dyed-in-the-wool socialists from what is basically a social democratic party. On the other hand, even if it takes just a few percentage points of the vote off Labour that could, on current polls, virtually hand the next election to Reform.