logo
Cashing in on his comeback, Trump rescues frail finances

Cashing in on his comeback, Trump rescues frail finances

Japan Timesa day ago
Last spring, even as Donald Trump's march back toward the White House dominated public attention, his finances, largely out of view, faced serious threats.
His office building in lower Manhattan generated too little cash to cover its mortgage, with the balance coming due. Many of his golf courses regularly lacked enough players to cover costs. The flow of millions of dollars a year from his stint as a television celebrity had mostly dried up.
And a sudden wave of legal judgments threatened to devour all his cash.
Then, with his clinching of the Republican nomination, everything began to change.
In the following months, Trump, along with his two eldest sons, Eric and Donald Jr., refocused the family business, forming a series of partnerships, especially in cryptocurrency, with investors who were willing to bank on his victory.
Once Trump won the presidency in November, that approach kicked into overdrive.
His family business announced numerous new deals that would financially benefit Trump directly, even as he made policy decisions that affected those industries or that involved countries in which the United States had political interests. Most glaringly, Trump is now both a partner in several crypto ventures and, as president, crypto's chief policy regulator, and he has signaled that he wants his administration to have a hands-off approach to digital currencies.
Today, those moves are seen by Trump's detractors as a money grab of historic proportions. But an analysis by The New York Times of thousands of pages of internal Trump Organization documents filed in one of the legal actions against him suggests a more urgent motivation for Trump's behavior: a need, rather than simply a desire, for easy money to keep his empire intact.
In late 2023, Trump boasted of having between $300 million and $400 million in cash when he testified as part of that legal action, a lawsuit brought by the New York attorney general that accused the Trumps of defrauding their lenders. His cash stockpile, Trump said, showed "how good a company I built,' and, he added in earlier testimony, "especially for a developer.'
Contrary to those assertions, records filed in the fraud case suggest that Trump's cash was not the product of a steady and strong empire. His balance had fluctuated wildly, hitting a low of $52 million in 2018, a small figure for the size of his operation. The subsequent increase came largely from the sale of properties and a payout of more than $150 million from a passive investment.
Moreover, the version of Trump's business that he projects - a real estate development company that executes large, complex tasks - hasn't existed for a nearly a decade, since the Trumps' last two major construction projects failed to make money.
Instead, Trump's wealth is now built on monetizing the family name in new ways and, intentionally or not, the office of the presidency. It is an enterprise in pursuit of multimillion-dollar checks - from actual real estate developers, from cryptocurrency and social media enterprises run by others. It is also a business that hawks Trump-branded trinkets such as watches and gold-toned mobile phones to the president's passionate supporters.
Many of the deals open multiple channels for anyone to funnel cash to a sitting president, often in ways that are untraceable under current disclosure requirements. And because some of what is being sold is use of the president's name, there are no clear metrics to gauge whether he has received market rate, a premium because of his office or, in effect, a hopeful bribe.
The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, has said that Trump abides by all conflict-of-interest laws and acts with only the interests of the American public in mind.
In response to questions from the Times, Eric Trump, who runs his father's businesses, issued a written statement saying the company is stronger than ever and largely debt free thanks to "the most iconic' properties and "cryptocurrency ventures on Earth.'
"I have never been more proud of our company,' the statement said. "Our portfolio is operating flawlessly, and 2025 will mark the strongest year in the remarkable history of the Trump Organization.'
Perfectly assessing Donald Trump's privately held businesses at any point in time is nearly impossible. But within months of his testimony in the New York civil fraud trial, all of his cash and liquid investments looked to be at risk.
His businesses had often required cash infusions before a judge in the trial entered a judgment against the Trumps of $355 million. Trump faced a second judgment of $88.3 million in the sexual abuse and defamation lawsuits brought by writer E. Jean Carroll.
Trump has not yet had to pay the judgments, which now total more than $600 million with interest. But he did have to put up cash totaling $175 million in the fraud case, and cash and bonds totaling $97 million in Carroll's cases, to pursue appeals.
He also faced a potential hit of $100 million from a long-standing tax audit, though it now appears unlikely that his political appointees at the Internal Revenue Service would sign off on such an assessment - another benefit of having returned to the Oval Office.
To be sure, Trump was not facing a calamity. He could have sold more properties, at the expense of his family's future wealth, to cover any shortfall.
The Trumps found a different path.
"His approach to almost everything at this point now seems to be that he's going to get away with whatever he can get away with, and sort of dare people to try to find legal or political ways to stop him,' said Noah Bookbinder, president of the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a liberal-leaning nonprofit group.
Escalator to nowhere
When Trump completed construction on Trump Tower four decades ago, its five-floor atrium was filled with luxury retailers from around the globe - Asprey of London, Buccellati, Cartier - creating a destination for high-end shoppers and tourists alike.
Those spaces, and the office rentals above, provided Trump with one of his most reliable sources of profits for decades, a 2020 analysis of his tax returns by the Times found.
The famed shimmering escalators leading up to the top retail floors are now roped off, the stores there having departed over the years. Two smaller spaces on the ground floor and below offer Trump-branded merchandise, such as license-plate frames and sweatshirts.
The atrium's signature design feature — a multistory marble water wall — has been turned off and covered by a large U.S. flag. Only one major retailer remains: Gucci, in the one space with visibility from the sidewalk.
At 40 Wall St., Trump's office tower in lower Manhattan, 25% of the building has been vacant since last year. In March, Fitch Ratings reported that, after covering basic expenses, the building generated $2 million per year less than Trump needed for his mortgage payments, and in a few years he will face a multimillion-dollar jump in the rent he pays for the ground under the building.
Vacancies have also haunted Trump's most recent large-scale construction site, a 92-story tower in Chicago. With most of the apartments and hotel rooms sold off years ago, Trump's ownership stake is comprised mostly of some 70,000 square feet of retail space that he had hoped would produce millions of dollars a year in rental income. Designed below street level with little visibility to passersby, those floors remain empty 16 years after the building was finished.
Things did not go measurably better with Trump's redevelopment of the Old Post Office in Washington, which opened as a hotel in 2016. He never recorded a profitable year there - despite its becoming a destination for acolytes of Trump during his first administration.
He sold his interests in 2022 to a private equity firm for $375 million, a price that elicited excitement from the Trumps. "To say the result is a financial success would be an understatement,' Eric Trump wrote in an email to company employees.
But company documents filed in the fraud case show that the sale did not cover Trump's costs on the project.
The hotel's buyer could not cover closing costs and borrowed $28 million from the Trumps before defaulting on the loan. Without that repayment, Trump was going to be left with $79 million from the sale after paying taxes, according to a spreadsheet created by his accountant and filed in the fraud lawsuit. Another company record filed in the case shows that he had invested about $100 million in the project.
It has now been nearly a decade since the Trumps completed the hotel. The years since have been marked by contraction.
In addition to the Washington hotel, in recent years Trump has sold control of a golf course in the Bronx, a mansion in Los Angeles, land on a Caribbean island, numerous luxury condominiums that he had held as rentals in buildings he constructed and the developable land around his golf course near Los Angeles.
Each sale brought a wave of cash, but also a diminished opportunity for future earnings.
Not looking to build
Trump rarely escapes to anywhere on weekends and vacations other than his own golf courses, where he goes to exercise, relax and be seen.
He has said that those 14 courses do not represent a "major business' for him, rather investments that reflect his love of the game. He spent hundreds of millions of dollars remaking them to his tastes, often with ornate clubhouses and elaborate artificial waterfalls.
Those investments have not always paid off.
A golf course appraisal expert for the New York attorney general's office examined the financial records of all but one of Trump's golf courses for 2011 through 2021 and found that at least half of them reported negative cash flow for multiple years.
One email showed Allen Weisselberg, the company's longtime head of finance, notifying Trump's two elder sons that the Trump Organization produced only $2.2 million in 2017, before taxes or disbursements to the family. A primary culprit was the golf courses, where the Trumps had spent almost $13 million more than planned on maintenance and improvements, while the courses brought in $15 million less in operating profits than expected.
Trump has also described his courses as real estate development projects in waiting. But the Trumps have not created a record of success toward that goal. Their efforts to add homes to his two courses in Scotland, for example, stalled.
The Trumps did win approval in January for a major development in the parking lot at Trump National Doral, a golf resort near Miami. The project would include nearly 1,500 condominium apartments and more than 140,000 square feet of commercial space.
But that plan does not appear to be the one that will restart the Trumps' real estate development business anytime soon.
During his deposition in the fraud case, Trump said that he might build there in a decade, leave it for his children to develop or "sell it to another developer for a lot of money and let them do it.' He said he often sought zoning approval to develop, just in case.
Regardless, Trump added, "we're not actively looking to build.'
In 2021, Deutsche Bank, which held Trump's mortgage, hired the firm Newmark to appraise Doral, Trump's highest-revenue resort, with four courses and 643 hotel rooms. The resulting analysis concluded that Trump had spent $379 million buying and renovating the resort, and that it was worth only $297 million.
The appraisal included an even more jarring finding. While Doral, like several of Trump's properties, was known to benefit from people looking to buy proximity to a president during Trump's first term, his managers believed even more potential customers stayed away because of him.
Trump's divisive public comments over time had pushed down bookings and room rates for six years running, his managers told the appraisers. The managers believed that "the Trump brand has negatively impacted' revenues at Doral.
Newmark's experts agreed, writing that "we believe that with a different brand, the subject might perform better.'
Spigot turned back on
The Doral appraisal highlights perhaps the starkest turn in the Trump family's finances.
The value of the Trump name as a brand on real estate projects and mass-market consumer goods made by others, both here and abroad, was central to sustaining his businesses during his peak years on "The Apprentice.'
The annual reports that the Trumps sent to their lenders showed television and licensing profits totaled $259 million from 2011 to 2017. But even with that deluge of cash, Donald Trump still reported an overall negative cash flow of $46.8 million from his empire.
Donald Trump Jr. testified glowingly during the fraud trial about those licensing deals. Compared with real estate development, they required no investment and little labor.
"I don't want to say it was free revenue,' he said, but "it was a pretty spectacular system that we were able to create.'
But the cash gusher from entertainment had slowed to a trickle by the time the elder Trump entered politics, and after he entered the White House in 2017, the company fell into a dry spell for new licensing deals. Some of that was because the Trump Organization pledged not to sign new foreign deals in an attempt to avoid conflicts of interest.
After Trump left office in January 2021, the Trump Organization did not announce a major new branding agreement until late 2022 — for a golf resort in Oman.
The spigot of foreign branding deals did not fully turn back on until after Trump clinched the Republican nomination and a second term seemed within reach.
After that, nine deals were announced in rapid succession: one each for developments in Vietnam and Serbia, two in India and five on the Arabian Peninsula, including a golf resort in Qatar, a residential tower in Jeddah, another tower in Dubai and two more in Riyadh.
All but one of the new licensing contracts came from relationships that predated Trump's first presidency. And some of those paying for the Trump name have made clear that his official stature was part of the attraction.
Kalpesh Mehta, a real estate developer in India, signed his first licensing deal with the Trumps 12 years ago. Mehta has said he met Donald Trump Jr. while they were both studying at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Donald Trump Jr. has joked that they are "like an old married couple.'
During inaugural events in January of this year, Mehta met with Eric Trump at Mar-a-Lago and the president-elect at the Trump golf course in Virginia. Weeks later, the Trumps and Mehta signed a new licensing deal for a commercial office tower in Pune, India. They announced yet another deal - their sixth - in April.
Mehta did not respond to requests for comment but has said that Trump-branded properties draw heightened interest in India.
Donald Trump's deals on the Arabian Peninsula all share a connection to one man: Ziad El Chaar, a Lebanese-born construction executive who first brought Trump into a branding agreement in 2013, for a golf course in Dubai, through a construction company based there called DAMAC.
El Chaar has since become CEO of DarGlobal, a subsidiary of Dar Al Arkan Real Estate, a large Saudi Arabia-based construction company with ties to the Saudi government. He has signed five more deals with the Trumps since last summer.
During a DarGlobal event introducing the Oman project, El Chaar said the Trump name "immediately put the project on the global map.'
Through a spokesperson, El Chaar declined to discuss DarGlobal's contracts with the Trumps.
Financial support from Saudi Arabia has also helped Trump's golf courses.
Since 2022, the Saudi-backed LIV Golf league has paid him to host annual tournaments at his resorts in Doral, Florida, and Bedminster, New Jersey. Neither the league nor Trump has revealed the amount of money involved. Trump has used his presidential bully pulpit to advocate for a merger between the U.S.-based PGA Tour and LIV Golf, which could reunite the world's top golfers on courses Trump owns.
On his federal financial disclosure forms, Trump has not been required to divulge the full amount promised to him in any of his licensing deals, only what he receives during a given year, which sometimes includes a management fee.
What information he has released suggests that the Trumps have raised the price for use of their name.
Trump's tax returns during his television celebrity years showed payments in round numbers when he signed a licensing contract, typically $750,000 or $1 million. Financial disclosure forms he recently filed showed payments of exactly $5 million each for the deal in Vietnam and one with El Chaar's company.
But in terms of the potential for anyone, from anywhere, to transmit hundreds of millions of dollars to a U.S. president, the recent wave of licensing agreements was only a warmup.
A massive stockpile
Last December, just months after Trump and his two eldest sons made their first public comments in support of digital currencies, Eric Trump was invited to appear as the keynote speaker at a bitcoin conference in Abu Dhabi.
He addressed the question he presumed to be on everyone's mind: Why are you here?
"I know all of you are thinking: 'Eric, you're from real estate family. You've spent your entire life in real estate, concrete, drywall,'' he said. "I built Trump Chicago,' he added twice, referring to a four-year project completed when he was 24.
Sixteen years after completion of the Chicago tower, the Trumps still invoke its memory to establish business gravitas and their chosen identity as real estate developers.
But their recent moves into crypto and other enterprises bear more in common with Donald Trump's licensing deals: little or no investment, risk or operational responsibility. Trump, and to a lesser extent his sons, generally serve as a means to draw attention and convert the president's political supporters into investors and paying customers.
Trump has invested nothing in Trump Media, the parent company of the social media site Truth Social, and has no official duties. But he received more than half of the company's stock, a stake that has fallen in value but is still worth $2 billion.
In crypto, the Trumps have entered into a series of partnerships. Their partners were the ones who have invested most or all of the capital, or raised money through token sales, and run the businesses. The crypto coins issued to the Trump family through its first foray into the sector, World Liberty Financial, have recently been worth at least $236 million.
The Trumps' sale of meme coins, otherwise worthless collectible digital trinkets, has been particularly lucrative. The fees collected by Trump and his associates on those sales have so far totaled $320 million, according to Chainalysis, a crypto analytics firm. The meme coins have proved to be a multimillion-dollar leap from the Trump-branded Bibles, guitars and watches that the Trumps sold during last year's campaign.
The long-term viability of the new businesses remains unclear, as does the liquidity of some of Trump's holdings in them. He cannot yet sell most of his crypto coins. And he would most likely crush Trump Media if he unloaded his stock, even as the company continues to lose money and struggles to produce $1 million per quarter in revenue, roughly the average of a single McDonald's restaurant.
But the new cash has already helped solve old problems.
Last month, the Trumps paid off the $115 million mortgage coming due on 40 Wall St. Analysts had said that the building's low rental income would make banks squeamish about refinancing.
Going forward, the new enterprises represent a massive stockpile with the potential to cover legal judgments, mortgage payments and holes in balance sheets for years to come.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial
Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial

The Mainichi

time2 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists faces federal trial

BOSTON (AP) -- A federal bench trial begins Monday over a lawsuit that challenges a Trump administration campaign of arresting and deporting faculty and students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations and other political activities. The lawsuit, filed by several university associations against President Donald Trump and members of his administration, would be one of the first to go to trial. Plaintiffs want U.S. District Judge William Young to rule the policy violates the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act, a law governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. "The policy's effects have been swift. Noncitizen students and faculty across the United States have been terrified into silence," the plaintiffs wrote in their pretrial brief. "Students and faculty are avoiding political protests, purging their social media, and withdrawing from public engagement with groups associated with pro-Palestinian viewpoints," they wrote. "They're abstaining from certain public writing and scholarship they would otherwise have pursued. They're even self-censoring in the classroom." Several scholars are expected to testify how the policy and subsequent arrests have prompted them to abandon their activism for Palestinian human rights and criticizing Israeli government's policies. Since Trump took office, the U.S. government has used its immigration enforcement powers to crack down on international students and scholars at several American universities. Trump and other officials have accused protesters and others of being "pro-Hamas," referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Many protesters have said they were speaking out against Israel's actions in the war. Plaintiffs single out several activists by name, including Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, who was released last month after spending 104 days in federal immigration detention. Khalil has become a symbol of Trump 's clampdown on campus protests. The lawsuit also references Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, who was released in May from a Louisiana immigration detention. She spent six weeks in detention after she was arrested walking on the street of a Boston suburb. She claims she was illegally detained following an op-ed she co-wrote last year that criticized the school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. The plaintiffs also accuse the Trump administration of supplying names to universities who they wanted to target, launching a social media surveillance program and used Trump's own words in which he said after Khalil's arrest that his was the "first arrest of many to come." The government argued in court documents that the plaintiffs are bringing a First Amendment challenge to a policy "of their own creation." "They do not try to locate this program in any statute, regulation, rule, or directive. They do not allege that it is written down anywhere. And they do not even try to identify its specific terms and substance," the government argues. "That is all unsurprising, because no such policy exists." They argue the plaintiffs case also rest on a "misunderstanding of the First Amendment, "which under binding Supreme Court precedent applies differently in the immigration context than it otherwise does domestically." But plaintiffs counter that evidence at the trial will show the Trump administration has implemented the policy a variety of ways, including issuing formal guidance on revoking visas and green cards and establishing a process for identifying those involved in pro-Palestinian protests. "Defendants have described their policy, defended it, and taken political credit for it," plaintiffs wrote. "It is only now that the policy has been challenged that they say, incredibly, that the policy does not actually exist. But the evidence at trial will show that the policy's existence is beyond cavil."

Global shares mostly down as Trump's tariff deadline looms and pressure steps up
Global shares mostly down as Trump's tariff deadline looms and pressure steps up

Japan Today

time4 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Global shares mostly down as Trump's tariff deadline looms and pressure steps up

Currency traders work near a screen showing the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI), top left, and the foreign exchange rate between U.S. dollar and South Korean won at the foreign exchange dealing room of the KEB Hana Bank headquarters in Seoul, South Korea, Monday, July 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon) By TERESA CEROJANO Global shares mostly fell Monday as the Trump administration stepped up pressure on trading partners to quickly make new deals before a Wednesday tariff deadline, with plans for the United States to start sending letters warning countries that higher tariffs could kick in Aug. 1. In early European trading, Britain's FTSE 100 was down 0.2% to 8,809.23 while Germany's DAX added 0.3% to 23,854.32. In Paris, the CAC 40 edged down 0.1% to 7,688.34. Japan's Nikkei 225 shed 0.6% to 39,587. 68 while Hong Kong's Hang Seng index edged down 0.1% to 23,887.83. South Korea's KOSPI index rose 0.2% to 3,059.47 while the Shanghai Composite Index edged 0.1% higher to 3,473.13. Australia's S&P ASX 200 fell 0.2% to 8,589.30. Oil prices also fell after OPEC+ agreed on Saturday to raise production in August by 548,000 barrels per day, accelerating output increases since oil prices jumped, then retreated, in the aftermath of Israel and U.S. attacks on Iran. U.S. benchmark crude was down 71 cents to $66.29 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, shed 41 cents to $68.39 per barrel. U.S. shares were set to drift lower with S&P 500 futures declining 0.4% to 6,295.50 and Dow futures down 0.2% at 45,012. 'We expect markets to be volatile into the 9-July deadline when the 90-day pause on President Trump's reciprocal tariffs expires for non-China trading partners,' the Nomura Group wrote in a commentary. It said the near-term outlook will likely hinge on several key factors like the extent to which trading partners are included in Trump letters, the rate of tariffs, and the effective date of such tariffs. A more distant implementation date might leave scope for some last-minute trade negotiations and maintain market optimism for potential resolutions or extensions, it added. 'With the July 9 tariff deadline fast approaching, all eyes are trained on Washington, scanning for signs of escalation or retreat. The path forward isn't clear, but the terrain is littered with risk," Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. On Thursday, a report showed the U.S. job market performed stronger than Wall Street expected. The S&P 500 rose 0.8% and set an all-time high for the fourth time in five days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 344 points, or 0.8%, and the Nasdaq composite gained 1%. In other dealings Monday, the U.S. dollar rose to 145.18 Japanese yen from 144.44 yen. The euro edged lower to $1.1734 from $1.1779. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Trump threatens extra 10% BRICS tariff as leaders meet in Brazil
Trump threatens extra 10% BRICS tariff as leaders meet in Brazil

Nikkei Asia

time4 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Trump threatens extra 10% BRICS tariff as leaders meet in Brazil

RIO DE JANEIRO (Reuters) -- President Donald Trump said the U.S. will impose an additional 10% tariff on any countries aligning themselves with the "Anti-American policies" of the BRICS group of developing nations, whose leaders kicked off a summit in Brazil on Sunday. With forums such as the Group of Seven and Group of 20 major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive "America First" approach of the U.S. president, the BRICS is presenting itself as a haven for multilateral diplomacy amid violent conflicts and trade wars. In a joint statement from the opening of the BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro released on Sunday afternoon, the group warned the rise in tariffs threatened global trade, continuing its veiled criticism of Trump's tariff policies. Hours later, Trump warned he would punish countries seeking to join with the grouping. "Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Trump did not clarify or expand on the "Anti-American policies" reference in his post. Trump's administration is seeking to finalize dozens of trade deals with a wide range of countries before his Wednesday deadline for imposing significant "retaliatory" tariffs. The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates as members. Saudi Arabia has held off formally joining, according to sources, while another 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in BRICS, either as full members or partners. Airlangga Hartarto, Indonesia's senior economic minister, is in Brazil for the BRICS summit and is scheduled to go to the U.S. on Monday to oversee tariff talks, an official told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In opening remarks to the summit earlier, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted joining either side of a polarized global order. "BRICS is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement," Lula told leaders. "With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again." BRICS nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40% of its economic output, Lula noted in remarks on Saturday to business leaders, warning of rising protectionism. Expansion of the bloc has added diplomatic weight to the gathering, which aspires to speak for developing nations across the Global South, strengthening calls for reforming global institutions such as the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund. "If international governance does not reflect the new multipolar reality of the 21st century, it is up to BRICS to help bring it up to date," Lula said in his remarks, which highlighted the failure of U.S.-led wars in the Middle East. Stealing some thunder from this year's summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his premier in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online due to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court related to his war in Ukraine. Still, several heads of state were gathered for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on Sunday and Monday, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. However, there are questions about the shared goals of an increasingly heterogeneous BRICS group, which has grown to include regional rivals along with major emerging economies. In the joint statement, the leaders called attacks against Iran's "civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities" a "violation of international law." The group expressed "grave concern" for the Palestinian people over Israeli attacks on Gaza, and condemned what the joint statement called a "terrorist attack" in India-administered Kashmir. The group voiced its support for Ethiopia and Iran to join the World Trade Organization, while calling to urgently restore its ability to resolve trade disputes. The leaders' joint statement backed plans to pilot a BRICS Multilateral Guarantees initiative within the group's New Development Bank to lower financing costs and boost investment in member states, as first reported by Reuters last week. In a separate statement following a discussion of artificial intelligence, the leaders called for protections against unauthorized use of AI to avoid excessive data collection and allow mechanisms for fair payment. Brazil, which also hosts the United Nations climate summit in November, has seized on both gatherings to highlight how seriously developing nations are tackling climate change, while Trump has slammed the brakes on U.S. climate initiatives. China and the UAE signaled in meetings with Brazilian Finance Minister Fernando Haddad in Rio that they plan to invest in a proposed Tropical Forests Forever Facility, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions about funding the conservation of endangered forests around the world.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store