
Best stocks and shares Isas: Compare the top providers and choose a platform that's right for you
There is a huge range on offer and the stocks and shares Isa that's best for your circumstances depends on how you want to invest.
Investing comes with more decisions to make than saving cash, which usually involves simply picking an account with a best-buy savings rate. Do you want to pick shares, choose funds or ETFs, or have your investing platform do the work for you? The answer to this should heavily influence which platform you choose.
We run through the best investment platforms in this guide – from do-it-yourself platforms to providers that can manage your investments for you.
Below, we give our pick of the best stocks and shares Isas for different investors, helping you decide which is right for you.
Best stocks and shares Isa accounts
The first decision to make is whether you want to pick and manage investments yourself or have the provider do it for you. You then need to look at the services different stocks and shares Isa platforms provide and their costs.
Below you can find the best stocks and shares Isas to consider, separated into DIY investing and managed options.
It can be daunting to know where to start, so we spoke to Tom Francis, head of personal finance at Octopus Money, who gave his top tips about opening a stocks and shares Isa. He told us the key is to start small – but do something rather than nothing as a first step.
'Know that you won't see gains straight away and focus on the act of contributing, instead of the day-to-day performance. The magic of compound interest takes time, so set up a direct debit for an amount you can afford and forget about it.
'Once you have started, you can then really tailor your savings, investments and pensions to your future goals to get the best possible results.'
Stocks and shares Isas for DIY investors
Here's our selection of the top stocks and shares Isas for DIY investors. We believe certain investing platforms stand out for various features – we explain more below the table.
Our selection of the top DIY stocks and shares Isa providers to consider is below, along with what we believe each provider stands out for. These are in alphabetical order. Before going ahead, make sure you do your own research and think carefully about your needs and goals. Read more about how we test and review investment platforms.
AJ Bell Dodl*
AJ Bell is a well-known investment platform and Dodl is its app-based offering. It offers cheap access to ready-made investments, with a platform fee of 0.15 per cent (£1 a month minimum) and a fee for ready-made funds of 0.31 per cent, or 0.45 per cent for an ethical alternative. This makes it attractive for those new to investing.
A selection of around 80 stocks lets you get started with choosing your own investments, but when you want more choice you'll have to move elsewhere.
> Learn more about AJ Bell Dodl*
Charles Stanley Direct: Good for straightforward account fees
Charles Stanley Direct*
Unlike other investment platforms, Charles Stanley Direct doesn't charge platform fees in different bands – 0.3 per cent is what you'll pay across all of your investments, with a £60 minimum and £600 maximum. This keeps fees simple.
Charles Stanley Direct also offers a free, no-obligation 15-minute investment coaching session and although a downside is its high dealing fee of £10 a trade (or £4 for fund dealing), you get £100 in trading credits a year.
Hargreaves Lansdown: Good for investment research and customer support
Hargreaves Lansdown*
Hargreaves Lansdown is the biggest and most well-known of the UK's investment platforms. It's particularly regarded for its investment research and customer support, but its account fee is higher than other DIY investing platforms at 0.45 per cent.
Fund dealing is free but share dealing costs £11.95, which is also high. Still, if you'd prefer to choose an established name and think you'll need extensive research and customer support, it's worth considering Hargreaves Lansdown.
Interactive Investor*
Interactive Investor is different to other stocks and shares Isa providers because it charges flat account fees, rather than fees as a percentage of your investments. It's £4.99 a month for a stocks and shares Isa up to £50,000 and £11.99 a month above that.
This is good for people with larger pots, because you'll pay the same whether you have £50,000 or £150,000. Just watch out for other fees, for fund dealing for example. This costs £3.99 but other providers offer this at no cost.
InvestEngine was founded in 2019 and has been growing in popularity for its simplified approach to investing. It only offers ETFs, which are products that track the performance of a particular market or sector. There is no account fee when investing yourself and a low 0.25 per cent account fee when choosing a ready-made option.
The low fees and easy access to a diversified range of investments through ETFs make InvestEngine an option to consider for beginners, however it's possible investors may prefer to go with a more well-known name.
> Learn more about InvestEngine*
Prosper: Good for potentially zero-cost investing
Prosper*
Prosper stands out because it refunds fees on around 30 funds. This along with zero account fees means that you could invest at no cost to you, however as a new platform it's not well-known or tried-and-tested yet among investors, plus it's app-only.
The platform is also worth considering if you want to invest in active investment funds. The likes of Trading 212 and InvestEngine don't allow you to choose Open Ended Investment Companies (OEICs), while Prosper gives you a limited choice of them including Fundsmith Equity and M&G Global Dividend.
Trading 212: Good for intermediate investors who want low fees
Trading 212*
Trading 212 can be overwhelming when you first open an account, but it's a good low-cost option for more experienced investors. There's no account fee or dealing fees and the foreign exchange fees are lower than some other platforms.
Trading 212's social trading features allow you to discuss investments, follow other investors and replicate investment strategies and there's a large range of investments to choose from. Just make sure you stick to its investing accounts rather than opening a CFD trading account. CFDs are very risky and not something that we cover.
> Learn more about Trading 212*
Managed stocks and shares Isas to consider
If you'd rather make a few decisions before opening a stocks and shares Isa and then have the provider manage your investments, these are some of the best-known options.
How to choose a stocks and shares Isa
'Start by thinking about the level of control you would like over where you're investing your money,' says Tom Francis, head of personal finance at Octopus Money.
Answering the questions below can help:
How much experience do you have with investing – and if you're a beginner, do you want to learn as you go along, or delegate investing to someone else?
How much risk are you willing to take when investing?
Do you know what you'd like to invest in based on your attitude to risk – for example shares, investment funds, or investments that track certain markets?
If you have some ideas about the above, you could consider opening a DIY stocks and shares Isa.
On the other hand, if you're inexperienced or don't have much time to dedicate to managing your investments, you could start with a managed option. Just be aware that managed platform fees are usually more expensive than DIY options.
When it comes to fees, you'll want to keep them as low as possible, but you should think about the level of service and support you'll need when investing. For example, the cheapest stocks and shares Isas include InvestEngine, Prosper and Trading 212, but fee-free platforms won't always offer the same level of investment research and customer service as more established players like Hargreaves Lansdown and Interactive Investor.
Once you know which type of stocks and shares Isa you'd like, you should compare the platform fees as well as other key aspects of the account, such as the choice and flexibility available and the fees and limitations around transferring to another provider later on.
Do you want to manage your own investments?
If you have some experience with investing already – or want to learn – you might be comfortable opening an account with a DIY investing platform.
These let you pick your investments yourself or choose a ready-made set of investments that the provider puts together.
Decisions about where to invest rest on your shoulders. Even when choosing a ready-made option, the provider won't recommend what to choose or how to manage your money on an ongoing basis.
You'll need to think carefully about how much time you can dedicate to managing your investments, and if you're not experienced already, how motivated you are to learn.
There's plenty to consider, including the ideal mix of investments based on the level of risk you want to take. For example, what will you allocate to more volatile investments such as equities, and what will you allocate to investments considered to be safer, such as bonds?
Many of these services support you with educational content and detailed investment research designed to help you answer questions like the above, so they can still be suitable for more adventurous beginners who are happy to learn as they go along.
Do you want someone else to manage your investments?
Alternatively, some providers can manage your investments for you. You'll usually have to tell the investment platform about your attitude to risk initially, and sometimes you can choose a particular investment style.
The key difference is these services pick investments based on your profile and then look after them on an ongoing basis. The platforms we've listed are 'robo-advisors' which means they use algorithms to pick and manage investments, although you usually still have access to human customer support.
For beginners, those with little investing experience, or people who just don't want to dedicate time to investing, this can be a stress-free route. But these providers usually charge higher fees than do-it-yourself platforms. And you should still keep an eye on performance, comparing it against other platforms and how the markets have performed more generally.
Check the fees
The account fee is the headline rate the provider charges for looking after your investments, but research other fees too. These include fees for:
Buying and selling investments
Setting up a regular payment into an investment of your choice
Underlying investments – known in most cases as the ongoing charges figure (OCF)
If you're choosing your own investments, consider fees in relation to the type of investments you'd like to buy and how often you think you'll be trading. For example, some platforms charge a fee for buying and selling funds, while others offer this for free.
The cheapest stocks and shares Isa might not always be the right one for you, so it's best to compare providers based on your needs and goals.
Ready-made investments vs managed options
Even when investing in a ready-made portfolio, it's best to see this as a form of DIY investing. The important difference between the services above is the level of personalisation and ongoing management of your investments.
Many DIY investing platforms offer ready-made investments. This is a set of investments built around a particular investment style and attitude to risk – for example 'cautious', 'adventurous' or 'ethical and green' portfolios.
But these ready-made investments aren't specific to you. They're often made up of existing funds that track certain markets or sectors and you still must choose a ready-made portfolio yourself.
With a managed option, the provider picks and looks after your investments based on information you give initially, tweaking them over time. Investments are more personalised to you and your goals, but management fees are more expensive than DIY options.
No matter whether you want to pick investments yourself or go for a managed option, you should check the fees for the underlying investments as well as the annual account fees.
These vary depending on the type of fund or investments. Keep this mantra in mind: high fees eat into investment growth, so it's best to keep costs as low as possible.
What is a stocks and shares Isa?
A stocks and shares Isa – or Individual Savings Account to give it the full official term – is a tax-free account for your investments.
In the same way that the interest earned within a cash Isa isn't subject to income tax, investments within a stocks and shares Isa can grow tax-free.
Investments held outside of a tax-free account are liable for taxes including capital gains tax, dividend tax and income tax.
The downside is you can only save up to £20,000 a year across all your Isa accounts, which is your annual Isa allowance.
You can split this any way you like, for example by stashing £5,000 in a cash Isa as part of an emergency fund and then investing up to £15,000 in a stocks and shares Isa.
Usually when you withdraw money from an Isa, you won't be able to replace it in the same tax year without using up more of your Isa allowance. As an example, if you still have your full allowance left to use, but withdraw £2,000 and then pay it back in a week later, your allowance will reduce to £18,000 for that tax year.
But there is a type of Isa called a flexible Isa, which does allow you to withdraw money and replace it in the same tax year without affecting your allowance. If you think you'd like this feature, check whether the Isa is flexible when comparing accounts.
Can you have multiple Isas?
Rules introduced in April 2024 mean there's no limit to the number of stocks and shares Isas you can open and contribute to in the same tax year.
Previously, it wasn't possible to pay in to more than one Isa of each type in the same tax year.
You still have only one Isa allowance of £20,000, so you should keep an eye on the total amount you've used. If you go over your allowance, you need to get in touch with HMRC.
How does a stocks and shares Isa work?
Think of an Isa as a protective shield for the investments you own within the account.
If you buy a share in a company for £100 and then sell it for £125, you've made a decent profit – which is tax-free within your stocks and shares Isa.
Outside of your Isa account, you'd potentially have to pay capital gains tax on your profit.
Investing your money in stocks and shares comes with more risk than saving within a cash Isa.
The value of your investments can rise and fall in value, so it's best to choose an investment Isa if you're happy with keeping your money locked away for the longer term. Many experts suggest five years as a minimum.
This way you can smooth out the highs and lows of the market. For example, if you had to withdraw money when markets tumbled at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, you'd be solidifying any losses your money had suffered.
Are stocks and shares Isas worth it?
A stocks and shares Isa can be worth it if you're happy to lock your money away over the long term and are comfortable with taking on some risk.
It's a good idea to have emergency savings that you can access easily. Many experts recommend saving between three and six months' worth of essential living expenses, which can keep you afloat if your income changes.
A stocks and shares Isa isn't right for this purpose, because the value of investments rise and fall regularly and it can take time to sell them. If there's a downturn in the markets when you need to withdraw money, you'll end up cementing any losses.
Beyond your emergency fund, it's a good idea to consider ways to make your money work harder for you. By taking more risks with your money, it's possible to get a better return than the interest on cash savings – although it's possible to get back less than you invested, too.
It's important to think about your attitude to risk and how comfortable you are with riding out any dips in the value of your investments. If you think a sustained downturn in how much your investments are worth will cause you sleepless nights, it might be wiser to consider safer places to store your money first.
Many experts suggest investing for at least five years. This gives investments enough time to smooth out fluctuations in their value. When you eventually withdraw your money, it means there's a better chance your investments would have grown on average.
> Here are the best easy-access cash savings rates
Inflation eats into the value of cash over time
If you stashed cash under your bed and forgot about it for five years, it'll be worth less than when you stored it away because prices of goods and services rise over time. This is known as inflation.
This means you won't be able to buy as much with your money as you did when you hid it under your mattress.
The interest rate you receive in cash savings accounts helps to mitigate the effects of inflation. But you must keep track of which accounts pay more than the current inflation rate.
Interest offered in easy access accounts from the UK's biggest banks often don't beat it, meaning savings languishing in these accounts are losing money over time.
Another way you can potentially beat inflation is by investing. Over time, the growth of your investments stops inflation from eroding the value of your money.
Keep in mind there's no risk-free way to invest in an attempt to beat inflation. But over the long term, returns on investments in a diversified portfolio of stocks and shares tend to outpace it, says Tom Francis, head of personal finance at Octopus Money.
'It's important to remember that you will typically be investing in the largest companies in the world, which create products we love and use daily, like Apple, Coca Cola and Netflix,' he told us.
Be sure to keep an eye on the UK's current inflation rate, as well as the top rates offered in cash savings accounts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Reform's bacon and egg offensive to woo business
Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice is conducting a 'bacon and eggs' charm offensive to woo British businesses ahead of the next election. Tice told The Mail on Sunday that he and other senior party figures, including leader Nigel Farage, had been meeting 'dozens and dozens and dozens' of bosses for breakfast meetings. He said they included chief executives, finance chiefs, chairmen and top lobbyists at FTSE 100 and FTSE 250-listed firms, as well as those at private and foreign-owned companies. It echoes the 'smoked salmon and scrambled eggs' charm offensive by Labour ahead of the last General Election. Tice, pictured with Farage, said the 'penny dropped' for many firms about Reform's potential to form the next government after its landslide success in May's local elections and taking a 14-point lead in the latest national opinion poll. And he dismissed concerns raised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) about whether Reform's sums added up, dismissing the respected economic think-tank as 'the institute for feeble studies'. Tice said: 'Lots of companies recognise we are a serious contender to be the next government, whenever the election is. They are taking it seriously, so want to meet me and understand where we're coming from on a variety of big issues. 'Whether you want to call it the bacon and eggs offensive or whatever, a series of breakfasts and other meetings are going on, and it is going well, and we're doing quite a lot of it.' A well-placed City source who alerted The Mail on Sunday to the meetings suggested there was some scepticism among business leaders about Reform's plans. Firms contacted by this newspaper were tight-lipped over whether they had met Tice. One FTSE 100 director, who asked not to be named, said he had 'not seen him' as part of the drive, but had once bumped into the politician and 'couldn't find anything we could agree on'. However, Tice said the reaction had been positive, particularly relating to plans to scrap the net zero carbon climate goal. 'We understand the language of business,' he said. 'I was chief executive of a billion-pound multinational listed company. Nigel's a businessman. We understand what it takes to save the British economy. 'We are talking about our dead seriousness about scrapping net zero and that is greeted with almost universal joy on a private basis. Privately, they all admit it's bonkers, it's costing them a fortune, it's making them uncompetitive.' Tice said Reform had told oil and gas companies to prepare applications for drilling licences in the North Sea 'so they can be checked and pre-approved before an election and rubber-stamped within a matter of days' if Reform were to win. He added: 'We're not mucking about. We're very clear that things like net zero, ESG (environmental, social and governance) investing, DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) – it's all for the birds. It all goes and we will be pretty aggressive on that and anyone who tries to get in our way.' The IFS's analysis of Reform's tax-cutting plans found that raising an individual's annual tax threshold from £12,570 to £20,000 and other measures could cost up to £80 billion a year, and that the party's strategy involved large, unspecified cuts to public services. And Simon French, chief economist at investment bank Panmure Liberum, has warned that Britain could face an 'immediate and violent' sterling crisis if Farage wins power. But Tice dismissed these, calling the IFS estimate a 'back-of-the-fag-packet guess' saying: 'We expect the enemy to do that.' Asked whether business leaders were convinced by Reform's plans, Tice said: 'They get it.' He added that he and Farage were 'probably two of the most successful financial, economic, businesslike MPs they've ever met'.


Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
BP's scramble to rally big investors behind new chief
Amanda Blanc embarked on an intense charm offensive among top BP shareholders last week to convince them that the choice of low-profile building materials executive Albert Manifold as chairman made sense. There had been an expectation in the City that a thorough recruitment process – conducted by the no-nonsense Aviva chief executive – who is BP's senior independent director and who led the search – might yield a more prominent chairman with wider knowledge of the energy industry. BP was stung by early criticism of Manifold by City brokers Panmure Gordon, who accused the oil giant's board of a 'panic appointment'. The energy giant also found it necessary to repudiate derogatory comments made by an unnamed 'bitter and twisted' losing candidate for the post. Working from Aviva's Canadian headquarters in the last few days, Blanc spoke to all of BP's leading UK and American investors and has seemingly managed to turn the tide of opinion. Most now are reportedly positive about the BP board's final choice. But there was some disappointment at the oil giant's headquarters about the lack of a rise in the share price following the announcement, as well as at some of the negative briefing in the Square Mile. Blanc is said to have convinced leading investors that the naysayers who challenged the choice of Manifold 'lacked credibility'. In selling the selection to the City, BP and its advisers have pointed to Manifold's stellar, under-the-radar performance at CRH, where he drove the value of the group's shares up 342 per cent during a ten-year tenure. The share price performance of CRH, which moved its listing to New York two years ago, is described by BP insiders as 'magnificent'. Blanc is also understood to have pointed to Manifold's considerable experience in making deals, and his knowledge of a building materials industry that has come under close scrutiny from regulators. Despite claims about the new chairman's modest Irish-based lifestyle, it has been noted that he became one of the best rewarded executives in the British Isles, amassing some £54 million of stock options between 2020 and 2024. But while Manifold has a reputation for successfully managing bids and deals, chairing the oil giant is regarded very differently. Being BP chairman requires great diplomatic skills given that its operations include sensitive territories such as Iraq. He will also have to contend with the battle being waged by chief executive Murray Auchincloss to refocus the company on oil production after a disastrous effort under his predecessor Bernard Looney to transmogrify the company into a green energy pioneer. Nevertheless, BP insists that the job of chairman is to lead the board and hold the management to account. 'It is not to be the deep technical expert,' one person involved in the search noted. Being an industry expert is also no guarantee of success. Manifold's predecessor, Helge Lund, a Norwegian veteran of the oil sector, quit due to mounting investor pressure and criticism of his performance in the role. An adviser to BP's rival Shell expressed surprise that the selection panel overlooked its newest non-executive director, Simon Henry, who was appointed to the board earlier this month. Henry is a former finance director of Shell and has been influential on the board of mining giant Rio Tinto. BP's response is to argue that in bringing both Henry and Manifold aboard, the group 'had the best of both worlds'. Manifold's first task will be to keep notorious activist investor Elliott Investment Management onside. It welcomed his appointment and wanted to see him 'urgently' address the company's 'shortcomings'. But other leading American holders of BP shares have recognised that turning the tanker around will take time, and believe that the newish team deserve at least eight quarters, or two years, of grace to show that things are on the mend. The big question is whether Manifold will be able to withstand the pressure on BP to cut back spending on new oil and gas facilities while providing better returns to shareholders. He has experience in this area, having previously faced down activists at CRH. There has been some concern about the length of the process to appoint the chairman. Blanc insisted on a thorough process using head-hunters, a long-list and short-list, and bringing the board along with her. But the drawn-out procedure allowed speculation to build of a takeover approach by Shell. Fortunately for BP's top team, Shell denied any early-stage talks and took itself out of the picture for at least six months. Outside observers were not the only ones surprised by the choice of Manifold, with many BP insiders having no knowledge of his background. In a bid to bolster his credentials, he has in the past few days made a point of touring the oil giant's offices in St James's Square in central London and holding a series of one-to-one meetings with executives and colleagues. But only time will tell if the former building materials boss can cement his legacy at BP.


Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Boom time for Barrow as Naval orders flood in
HMS Agamemnon sits in the open dock as workers add finishing touches to the latest Astute Class submarine to roll off production lines at Barrow-in-Furness. Completion of the sixth of a seven-boat order begun in 2001 might, in years gone by, have been followed by the town's shipyard facing a contract drought and winding down. But its fortunes are now different – with a full order book for decades to come, bringing investment and prosperity to an isolated corner of Cumbria. Rising fears of global conflict mean billions of pounds of orders from the Royal Navy for shipyard owner BAE Systems. Four Dreadnought submarines will eventually replace the Vanguard class vessels that carry Britain's Trident nuclear weapons. The Government has also placed an order for up to 12 nuclear-powered Aukus attack submarines. As a result, BAE is upping its workforce at Barrow-in-Furness from 11,000 to 17,000 – on a par with the shipyard's historic peak – and is near-trebling its apprenticeship programme to 1,000. And a £220 million investment in infrastructure over the next ten years, awarded by Rishi Sunak's government, is seeing benefits with improvements to the A595, Barrow's link to the M6. Barrow's population of 67,000 has grown for the first time in nearly 40 years, with newcomers attracted by the stunning coastline and Lake District. On a recent visit accompanied by Defence Secretary John Healey, Prime Minister Keir Starmer described its renaissance as a 'blueprint for the nation'. Leading BAE's training at its £25 million submarine Academy For Skills And Knowledge, which opened in 2018, is Jim Perks. The former submarine captain said: 'We've known for years the Government's requirement for submarines is growing. We needed to increase our workforce dramatically, increase the size of the yard and improve the supply chain.' He said the company adopted a 'grow your own' approach, recruiting via the academy, which is expanding with a high-tech training hub in the Debenhams store, which closed in 2021. Perks said the hub would allow apprentices to learn techniques on simulators so they can be 'up to speed' before joining teams on real boats. Recruits are a 60:40 split of trade versus degree apprentices, and demand is high with 4,000 applicants in 2024 and 6,000 this year. While there is a tradition of generations of Barrow families working at the shipyard, Perks, who is also recruiting more women, said: 'Some of the most complex machines in the world are made here by Barrovians, but we want to look further afield too.' Carrie, 20, a trainee electrician following in her father's footsteps, said: 'I wanted a hands-on job and was always interested in engineering and carrying on the tradition.' Olivia, 19, training to be a joiner, said: 'I think it's good for the town as there's not been too much to offer around here. It's particularly helpful for young people. It's a good start in life with job security.' Local traders are starting to see an upturn after years of decline. Ashley Holroyd, 33, owner of Coffee D'Ash, opened a branch next to the hub last year having previously sold his drinks from a trailer. He now employs eight staff, and said: 'I came to Barrow in 2017 when the shops were closing and footfall was close to dead.' Pointing to the smartened-up town centre, he added that it now 'feels like a town on the up'. BAE's investment in Barrow is mirrored on the Clyde in Glasgow, where it is building eight Royal Navy Type 26 destroyers. The firm has invested £12 million in an academy – opened by Princess Anne in April – to train 300 recruits annually for the sites at Govan and Scotstoun. Referring to the threat posed by Russia, vice-admiral Sir Simon Lister, managing director of BAE's Navy Ships business, who spent over 40 years in the Royal Navy and was briefly British Naval attache in Moscow, said: 'Over 48 years in the Armed Forces and in the military and defence industry, I'd say this is the most tense and challenging time for us all.' BAE has also invested £300 million in production facilities at Glasgow to cut the time it takes to build each £1 billion destroyer by a third, from 98 months to 66. This includes opening a giant shipbuilding hall, allowing two warships to be assembled at once under cover rather than being built in sections before being joined together under scaffolding. Among apprentices at BAE's Glasgow academy is Anna, 30. She said almost 'every male member of my family' had worked in the yards or on ships. She added: 'My dad served in the Royal Navy, my grandad was in the Royal Naval Reserve and my great grandad, Edward McKnight, was a chief engineer for the Royal Navy. I'm following in my family's footsteps.'