&w=3840&q=100)
Meet the 'Japanese Trump', who won big in elections
Sohei Kamiya, leader of the Sanseito party, during an election campaign in Tosu, southwestern Japan. AP
Donald Trump changed the political game and he came onto the scene in 2015.
Ever since his ascendancy to the Oval Office, Trump has spawned a number of political imitators.
You have Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, also known as the 'Trump of the tropics', Javier Milei in Argentina, and Rodrigo Duterte in The Philippines.
Now, Sohei Kamiya in Japan can be added to that list.
Kamiya, whose Sanseito (participate in politics) party has won 14 seats in Japan's Upper House, has created a stir.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This comes as the country's ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost seats and right-wing parties gained in the in parliament's upper house.
But who is Kamiya, 47, known as the 'Japanese Trump'? What do we know about him?
Let's take a closer look:
Who is he?
Little is known about Kamiya, a former supermarket manager and English teacher.
Kamiya as a young man worked in his father's business which later went bankrupt.
However, Kamiya grew disgruntled with the LDP's fundraising driven culture and left the party.
He founded Sanseito soon afterwards.
Kamiya is a reservist in Japan's military – known as the Self-Defence Force.
Kamiya, a populist, has claimed to be inspired by Trump's 'bold, political style.'
Much like Trump, he has fanned the flames of 'globalists' trying to take over Japan, railed against elites, immigrants and taxes.
'Under globalism, multinational companies have changed Japan's policies for their own purposes,' Kamiya said at one rally in Kagoshima 'If we fail to resist this foreign pressure, Japan will become a colony!'
He has also made a fervent appeal to Japan's identity.
'Japan must be a society that serves the interests of the Japanese people', he has said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Kamiya founded his Sanseito party in 2020 – at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.
He said he did so by 'gathering people on the Internet'.
Sanseito during the pandemic took a harsh tone on vaccines and slammed the 'global elite'.
The party's YouTube channel has over 360,000 subscribers.
It relies on small donors.
While Kamiya didn't run this year – he won a seat in Japan's 248 Upper House in 2022 – he has resonated strongly with Japan's youth.
He has campaigned extensively across the country for his party's nearly six dozen candidates.
The party itself polled third in a nationwide race.
It has increased its base in the upper house from just 2 seats, including Kamiya himself, to 14 seats.
In the run-up to the polls, it became well-known for its 'Japan First' platform – against the influx of immigrants and over-tourism.
Japan in recent years has more and more opened itself up on immigration – mainly to combat low birth rates and an aging population.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Kamiya's complaints about stationary wages, spikes in inflation and costs of living have drawn plaudits from youth.
'Right now, Japanese people's lives are getting harder and harder,' Kamiya said. 'More and more foreigners are coming (to Japan)'.
Japan's Sanseito party leader Sohei Kamiya (R) shakes hands with candidate Saya (L) at a vote-counting centre in Tokyo on July 20, 2025. Image- AFP
'I am attending graduate school but there are no Japanese around me. All of them are foreigners,' said Yu Nagai, a 25-year-old student who voted for Sanseito earlier on Sunday. III
'When I look at the way compensation and money are spent on foreigners, I think that Japanese people are a bit disrespected,' Nagai said after casting his ballot at a polling station in Tokyo's Shinjuku ward.
The party has suggesting capping the number of foreign residents in each town or city, setting limits on immigration and benefits that foreigners can avail of.
The party also wants to make it more difficult for foreigners to become citizens.
Japan, the world's fastest aging society, saw foreign-born residents hit a record of about 3.8 million last year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
That is still just three per cent of the total population, a much smaller fraction than in the United States and Europe, but comes amid a tourism boom that has made foreigners far more visible across the country.
What about Sanseito?
Sanseito has called for stricter espionage laws, more tax cuts and renewable energy.
Sanseito is being compared to the Maga movement in America, the AfD in Germany and Reform in UK.
Much like Maga, it too is anti-vaccine.
'Sanseito has become the talk of the town, and particularly here in America, because of the whole populist and anti-foreign sentiment,' Joshua Walker, head of the US-based non-profit Japan Society, said. 'It's more of a weakness of the LDP and Ishiba than anything else'.
Critics have decried Sanseito's manifesto as 'xenophobic and discriminatory'.
The party has also adopted a strong support for 'traditional gender roles'.
Kamiya, ahead of the polls, attempted to tamp down on some of the party's contentious ideas.
He also attempted to woo female voters.
However, since the polls, Kamiya has adopted a far more stringent tone.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The public came to understand that the media was wrong and Sanseito was right,' Kamiya said.
'The phrase Japanese First was meant to express rebuilding Japanese people's livelihoods by resisting globalism. I am not saying that we should completely ban foreigners or that every foreigner should get out of Japan,' he added.
Experts say Kamiya could fill the vacuum in Japanese politics left by Shinzo Abe.
'The LDP has been unable to hold onto the revisionist and xenophobic element that used to be contained in the Abe faction,' said Koichi Nakano, a Harvard-affiliated political scholar.
Increased pressure on Ishiba
Though the results have weakened Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's grip on power further, he has vowed to remain party leader.
While the ballot does not directly determine whether Ishiba's administration will fall, it heaps pressure on the embattled leader who also lost control of the more powerful lower house in October.
Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and coalition partner Komeito returned 47 seats, short of the 50 seats it needed to ensure a majority in the 248-seat upper chamber in an election where half the seats were up for grabs.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba attends a press conference at the headquarters of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in Tokyo on July 21, 2025, the day after the prime minister's coalition lost its upper house majority. File Image/Pool via Reuters
That comes on top of its worst showing in 15 years in October's lower house election, a vote which has left Ishiba's administration vulnerable to no-confidence motions and calls from within his own party for leadership change.
Speaking late on Sunday evening after exit polls closed, Ishiba told NHK he 'solemnly' accepted the 'harsh result'.
'We are engaged in extremely critical tariff negotiations with the United States…we must never ruin these negotiations. It is only natural to devote our complete dedication and energy to realizing our national interests,' he later told TV Tokyo.
Asked whether he intended to stay on as premier, he said 'that's right'.
Japan, the world's fourth largest economy, faces a deadline of August 1 to strike a trade deal with the United States or face punishing tariffs in its largest export market.
The main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party finished second with 22 seats.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'South Park' co-creator jokes he's 'terribly sorry' over premiere that drew White House anger
Earlier in the day, the White House issued a statement on the 27th season premiere, which aired Wednesday night. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in the statement. 'President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' Later in the panel, Parker said they did get a note from their producers on Tuesday night's episode. 'They said, 'OK, but we're gonna blur the penis,' and I said, 'No you're not gonna blur the penis,'' Parker said. The premiere also took aim at Paramount and its $16 million recent settlement with Trump just hours after Parker and Stone signed a five-year deal with the company for 50 new episodes and streaming rights to previous seasons. The Los Angeles Times and other outlets report the deal was worth $1.5 billion. In the episode, Trump sues the town of South Park when its residents challenge the presence of Jesus Christ – the actual person – in its elementary school. Jesus tells them they ought to settle. 'You guys saw what happened to CBS? Yeah, well, guess who owns CBS? Paramount,' Jesus says. 'Do you really want to end up like Colbert?' CBS and parent Paramount Global canceled Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' last week, days after Colbert sharply criticized Paramount's settlement of Trump's lawsuit over a '60 Minutes' interview. CBS and Paramount executives said it was a financial decision to axe 'The Late Show.' The efficiency of 'South Park' production, and the brinksmanship of its creators, allow it to stay incredibly current for an animated series. 'I don't know what next week's episode is going to be,' Parker said at Comic-Con. 'Even just three days ago, we were like, 'I don't know if people are going to like this.''

Hindustan Times
44 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why did Donald Trump warn tech giants like Google and Microsoft against hiring Indians?
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday lashed out at major American technology companies for outsourcing manufacturing to China and employing workers in countries like India. US President Donald Trump gestures during an event in Washington DC, July 23, 2025(REUTERS) Speaking at the AI Summit in Washington, Trump declared that such practices would no longer be tolerated under his administration. 'Many of our largest tech companies have reaped the blessings of American freedom while building their factories in China, hiring workers in India and slashing profits in Ireland, you know that,' Donald Trump said. 'All the while dismissing and even censoring their fellow citizens right here at home. Under President Trump, those days are over.' The remarks came as the President signed three executive orders aimed at boosting the US artificial intelligence (AI) sector. Among these was a sweeping White House action plan titled the America's AI action plan, designed to secure US leadership in global AI development. 'America first' strategy Trump urged technology giants like Google and Microsoft that are based in US to adopt a more patriotic approach to their operations, aligning with what he described as national interests. 'We need US technology companies to be all in for America. We want you to put America first. You have to do that. That's all we ask,' news agency PTI quoted Trump as saying. He further called for 'a new spirit of patriotism and national loyalty in Silicon Valley and long beyond Silicon Valley.' Framing AI development as essential to economic and military supremacy, Trump declared: 'America is the country that started the AI race, and as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.' He added, 'Winning this competition will be a test of our capacities unlike anything since the dawn of the space age.' Trump's recent comments criticising American tech companies for outsourcing jobs and hiring foreign workers have sparked concern among the global tech community, particularly in countries like India. While no formal policy changes have been announced as of now, industry experts say the President's remarks could influence the hiring decisions of major tech firms that depend on skilled talent from India. Indian professionals working in areas such as software development, data science, and artificial intelligence in the US may now face growing uncertainty.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Language As Privilege: How English Reinforces Caste And Class In India
While English-medium education is seen as a pathway to upward social mobility and a doorway to better career opportunities, it benefits only the small elite population English is undeniably far more than just a language; its omnipresence has transformed it from a linguistic tool into a system of power and advantage in itself. English has so naturally been established as a 'global default" that we often overlook the dominance it holds over our communication. It has evolved to function paradoxically, both as a classificatory criterion that divides people, and as a unifier that binds our linguistically, regionally, and culturally diverse subcontinent together. Rosemary Salomone (2022), in her work The Rise of English, builds on sociologist Pierre Bourdieu's concept of cultural capital and uses India as an example to demonstrate how English can be a strategic tool for social mobility, as well as a marker of exclusion. Similarly, Mathew (2018), in his piece 'Aspiring and Aspiration Shaming', introduces the concept of 'aspiration shaming," wherein elite social actors dismiss or critique the English-medium schooling aspirations of the non-elites, revealing anxieties about shifting hierarchies. These aspirations are embedded in everyday mothering practices, such as enrolling children in English-medium private schools, investing in after-school English tuitions, and vigilantly overseeing schoolwork at home. For marginalised mothers, these aspirations are a moral and ethical act that helps them negotiate and navigate through poverty, envisioning a better future for their children. The book Medium of Instruction Policies: Which Agenda? Whose Agenda?, edited by James W. Tollefson and Amy B.M. Tsui, provides a comprehensive analysis of how language policies in education are deeply intertwined with socio-political processes, via diverse case studies. Chapter 9, 'Medium of Power: The Question of English in Education in India," gives us an account of how English education was introduced in India to create an intermediary class that would facilitate smoother administration, eventually leading to the foundation of English language domination. The upper castes treated English-medium education as a knowledge tool, which percolated down to Indian society at both the class as well as caste levels. This gatekeeping and selective access to English-medium education was contested by the lower castes, as they sought inclusion in the mechanics of nation-building. Since English education became a stepping stone to socio-economic advancement, it created a caste-based segregation disguised as a language barrier. While English-medium education is largely seen as a pathway to upward social mobility and a doorway to better career opportunities, we must acknowledge the unfortunate truth that it benefits only the small elite population that has had the cultural capital of prior exposure to English in a way that can be applied, rather than just a skeletal understanding of the language, which is just enough to score well in exams via rote learning. English-medium education is pedestalised and gold-plated with the superficial promise of social prestige and 'modernity," which is very much out of sync with the actual implementation of policies and pedagogical methods. This essentially creates a dichotomy where English-medium education is a default preference for most, but at the same time, is a ground for division among diverse groups, perpetuating social hierarchies rather than bridging them. English-medium education is skewed in favour of the privileged with existing access to resources such as well-funded schools and an English-speaking environment that reinforces caste and class divides. The widespread notion that English instruction from a young age guarantees better English skills has been debunked time and again. Pedagogical trends show that for disadvantaged students, foundational literacy in their mother tongue—which is already familiar to them—tends to improve the overall quality of learning. However, the paradox lies in the fact that while English-medium education is divisive on one hand, it also serves to bridge the communication gap between those from completely different regional backgrounds. The number of private schools in rural India has ballooned, with many private as well as government schools now offering English-medium instruction. Although teachers in government schools are adequately trained, certified, and qualified to teach, private school children still tend to perform better overall. This difference in performance could at least partly be attributed to the disparity in infrastructure. Research advocates that children learn best in their mother tongue, with additional languages being introduced gradually rather than right from the start. Despite evidence supporting mother-tongue instruction, many governments worldwide implement assimilationist language policies that prioritise dominant languages—English being one in this case. This has led to what Skutnabb-Kangas (2000) calls 'silent ethnocide," where Indigenous languages and cultures are gradually erased through formal education. In India, the allure of English has dominated education, and this language barrier, combined with poor infrastructure, contributes to high dropout rates. This challenges the 'maximum exposure" myth, which is a fallacy at best. Yet, we must not treat the mother-tongue-based language model, backed by reliable scholarly conclusions, as a one-size-fits-all strategy, because it might not work unless it is regionally adapted or modified to fit students' needs. A common neighbourhood school where multilingualism would thrive alongside the acquisition of English as a practical skill—rather than a superior one that serves only social prestige—is more likely to benefit marginalised students. Using activities that integrate students' home languages with English, as well as hands-on materials like newspapers and advertisements, are changes that could facilitate better language learning outcomes. Teacher-focused changes, including training in the psycho-social and linguistic aspects of English language use in students' daily lives to create inclusive classroom environments, are likely to be more meaningful. Some of India's English Language Teaching (ELT) methods are overly dependent on grammar-translation and rote learning, with minimal focus on meaningful communication. The Three Language Formula, an excellent step by the Modi government, introduced to promote mother-tongue-based multilingualism while ensuring students gain proficiency in Hindi and English, has been advocated by numerous scholars. What is interesting is that marginalised communities view English as a tool for empowerment and upward social mobility. Interestingly, studies suggest that a disproportionate emphasis on English-medium education has deepened marginalisation. The literature on English education in India unequivocally points towards a multilingual approach as being the best strategy to overcome linguistic-based disparities in education. This ultimately boosts the overall return on investment in education in terms of better career opportunities and creative, application-based learning. It would be interesting and practical for future research to explore how we can utilise and incorporate digital and AI tools into teaching methodology for more efficient and multi-modal learning. For example, smartboards can be used to teach a large number of students at the same time, rather than trying to micro-invest in every child from the beginning. Teachers could use programmes like Duolingo as creative ways to teach children effectively by gamifying the course content. Additionally, it would be crucial to restructure teacher training programmes to equip teachers with the necessary skills to contextualise learning, rather than rigidly sticking to textbook-based rote learning practices. An example of this could be drama-based or role-play formats of teaching. Another innovative technique could be asking teachers to keep reflective journals that document what teaching strategies worked or didn't and why, in order to identify and improve pedagogical methods. This doesn't mean certain strategies must be discarded outright—they could be appropriately modified, and if they don't work in one region, they might in another. top videos View all Lastly, a relatively under-researched aspect of learning is the role of groupism in diverse environments and its effects on learning. Educational institutions have increasingly strived to make their campuses diverse for inclusivity. However, even in diverse institutions, students tend to stick to their own class, region, and language-based cliques, which renders the attempts at learning from diverse peers futile. Does groupism add an extra layer of social pressure to speak a certain language to be accepted and treated a certain way on campus, or does it create conditions of motivation in students to enhance their language skills to fit in better with their peers? The answer to these questions will vary based on a multiplicity of factors, but they are crucial to quality learning. Yashee Jha, a multi-faceted student, is an avid commentator on various topical issues. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 25, 2025, 13:27 IST News opinion Opinion | Language As Privilege: How English Reinforces Caste And Class In India Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.