
The bizarre conspiracy theory behind the new South Park episode mocking Donald Trump
According to a viral thread by @Bloomser1, the new South Park isn't just satire—it's strategic sabotage. The theory? That Matt Stone and Trey Parker used Trump as bait to blow up their own parent company's multibillion-dollar merger.
The claim sounds outlandish until you trace the recent history between South Park, Paramount, and Donald Trump. And suddenly, it doesn't sound so crazy after all.
A mess of lawsuits and billion-dollar deals
The trouble began years ago when Warner Bros.
Discovery, which owns HBO, sued Paramount over streaming rights to South Park. Paramount had sold HBO Max access to the back catalogue but later tried to move new specials and episodes to its own platform, Paramount+. Warner cried foul, and the lawsuit dragged on—creating chaos behind the scenes and complicating South Park's production schedule.
Enter Skydance Media. In 2024, Paramount began negotiations to merge with the studio in a bid to salvage its crumbling empire.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
But complications emerged, including a lawsuit from Donald Trump himself over a CBS interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.
Desperate to remove any obstacle to the merger, Paramount agreed to pay Trump $16 million to settle the suit. Skydance, eager to smooth things over, pledged another $20 million post-merger. All of this unfolded as the FCC—controlled by the current administration—delayed regulatory approval.
Then came South Park.
Creative freedom? Not quite
According to @Bloomser1's thread, Matt and Trey had been growing increasingly frustrated with the studio. The incoming Skydance executives reportedly interfered with the terms of their new deal, delayed production by two weeks, and even meddled in the creators' negotiations with other platforms like Netflix and HBO. Two weeks ago, the duo reportedly threatened to sue Paramount themselves.
Shortly after that, Paramount handed them a new $1.5 billion contract.
And then—almost immediately—this episode aired.
Rage bait as revenge
The episode, savage in its depiction of Trump, arrived just one day after the Paramount–South Park deal was finalised. According to @Bloomser1, this timing is no accident.
The theory is that Matt and Trey, furious over years of interference, used the episode to deliberately provoke Trump—hoping he'd retaliate by suing Paramount again or using his influence to derail the Skydance merger.
It's a high-risk, high-reward gambit: rage-baiting the most litigious man in America in order to punish a studio that, in their eyes, had long overstepped its bounds.
The irony? They may have pulled this off the day after cashing a billion-dollar cheque from that same studio.
What happens next?
Neither Stone nor Parker have commented publicly on the theory, and there's no confirmation that Trump plans to re-litigate anything—yet. But with the FCC still holding off on approving the Skydance-Paramount merger, and Trump known for acting on impulse, it wouldn't take much to reignite tensions.
If the episode was indeed designed as a trap, the question becomes: will Trump take the bait? Either way, South Park may have just turned studio politics into a blood sport—disguised, as always, in fart jokes and animation.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
'Why Isn't He Paying?' Trump's Golf Visit To Cost Scottish Taxpayers
Turnberry: It may not be typical golf attire, but one of the most ubiquitous outfits seen on US President Donald Trump 's golf course Friday ahead of his visit was the reflective yellow vest worn by Scottish police. The standard issue garb that is far removed from the traditional Turnberry tartan was highly visible on the dunes, the beaches and the grass as thousands of officers secured the course in advance of protests planned during the president's visit to two of his Scottish golf resorts. Trump was expected to arrive Friday evening to a mix of respect and ridicule. His visit requires a major police operation that will cost Scottish taxpayers millions of pounds as protests are planned over the weekend. The union representing officers is concerned they are already overworked and will be diverted from their normal duties and some residents are not happy about the cost. "Why isn't he paying for it himself? He's coming for golf, isn't he?" said Merle Fertuson, a solo protester in Edinburgh holding a hand-drawn cardboard sign that featured a foolishly grinning Trump likeness in a tuxedo. "It's got nothing whatsoever to do with public money, either US or UK" Policing for Trump's four-day visit to the UK in 2018 cost more than 14 million pounds ($19 million), according to Freedom of Information figures. That included more than 3 million pounds ($4 million) spent for his two-day golf trip to Turnberry, the historic course and hotel in southwest Scotland that he bought in 2014. Police Scotland would not discuss how many officers were being deployed for operational reasons and only said the costs would be "considerable." "The visit will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other UK police forces as part of mutual aid arrangements," Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said. Scottish First Minister John Swinney said the visit would not be detrimental to policing. "It's nonsensical to say it won't impact it," said David Kennedy, general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, the officers' union. Kennedy said he expects about 5,000 officers to take part in the operation. He said a force reduction in recent years has police working 12-hour shifts. Communities that are understaffed will be left behind with even fewer officers during Trump's visit. "We want the president of the United States to be able to come to Scotland. That's not what this is about," Kennedy said. "It's the current state of the police service and the numbers we have causes great difficulty." The Stop Trump Scotland group has planned demonstrations Saturday in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dumfries. The group encouraged people to "show Trump exactly what we think of him in Scotland." Trump should receive a much warmer welcome from UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is expected to meet with him during the visit. Swinney, the left-leaning head of Scottish government and former Trump critic, also plans to meet with the president.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Tarrif, not negotiation': Trump says he doesn't expect Canada trade deal; August 1 deadline set for 35% duty
Donald Trump (AP file photo) US president Donald Trump has said he does not expect a trade deal with Canada before his 1 August deadline, warning of heavy tariffs if talks fail. Speaking before flying to Scotland on Friday, Trump said, "We haven't really had a lot of luck with Canada. I think Canada could be one where there's just a tariff, not really a negotiation. " Canadian prime minister Mark Carney, however, made it clear this week that Ottawa won't be rushed. 'Canada will not accept a bad deal,' he said, pushing back against US pressure. — Tablesalt13 (@Tablesalt13) Trump has threatened a 35% tax on Canadian goods if no agreement is reached. But the tariff won't apply to products that fall under the existing North American trade pact between the US, Canada, and Mexico. Washington has already imposed a 25% blanket tariff on certain Canadian goods, a 50% tariff on aluminium and steel, and a 25% duty on all non-US-built cars and trucks. Trump claims these steps will protect American jobs and industry. Canada, which sends about 75% of its exports to the US, could take a major hit — especially its auto sector, which is closely tied to the American market. Talks between the two sides have been ongoing since Carney took office in May, but progress has been slow. Meanwhile, Trump has announced trade deals with other countries, including Japan, which agreed to a 15% tariff in exchange for a $550 billion investment in the US.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Gaza, Ukraine and beyond: Is Trump's bid to be a global peacemaker falling apart?
The United States cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks this week plunges one of President Donald Trump's pushes to solve global conflicts into new uncertainty. read more The United States' decision to withdraw from Gaza ceasefire negotiations this week has cast fresh doubt over President Donald Trump's attempts to resolve some of the world's most intractable conflicts. The faltering of talks aimed at ending the 21-month war between Israel and Hamas marks another setback for Trump whose efforts to broker international peace agreements have stalled across multiple fronts. Though back in office for only six months, the Republican president has sought to position himself as a global peacemaker. Some of his aims, such as ending the Ukraine war before taking office, have yet to materialise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump has cited humanitarian motives for his diplomatic pursuits, he has also been vocal about his desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Several allies have nominated him for the honour. Ceasefire efforts in Gaza: No major progress Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, announced Thursday that the U.S. was recalling its negotiating team from Qatar. Talks there had failed to yield a breakthrough. Witkoff accused Hamas of not engaging in 'good faith', though he did not elaborate. Despite a visit to Washington earlier this month by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the negotiations have produced little progress. Witkoff said the U.S. would now 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home', but officials declined to provide further details. Asked about the issue on Friday, Trump told reporters that Hamas was uninterested in a deal and added, 'I think what's going to happen is they're going to be hunted down.' Ukraine war: Stalemate persists Trump previously vowed to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within 24 hours of assuming office, but the war continues with no sign of resolution. Despite increasing criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump has not supported a bipartisan U.S. sanctions bill. Instead, he gave Russia 50 days to accept a peace plan, delaying punitive measures. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This delay has allowed Moscow to intensify its military offensive. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated his willingness to hold direct talks with Putin, but Russia has rejected the offer. Lower-level negotiations held in Istanbul on Wednesday ended without progress. Russia continues to demand that Ukraine withdraw from four regions it annexed in 2022 and abandon its NATO ambitions, terms Kyiv and its Western backers have rejected. Iran conflict: Ceasefire but no nuclear deal The US and Israel recently carried out joint strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, leading to a fragile ceasefire. However, Washington has not yet reached any agreement with Tehran over its nuclear programme. An Iranian diplomat said this week that Tehran is open to talks with the US but only if steps are taken to rebuild trust. Meanwhile, Iran is also exploring a separate negotiation path with Britain, France and Germany—three parties to the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump withdrew from during his previous term. Foreign ministers from the four countries met Friday in Istanbul, warning that sanctions could be reinstated if there is no movement on a new deal by August. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Progress on some fronts Despite the setbacks, Trump has managed to broker certain regional agreements. In June, the US facilitated a peace accord between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, ending years of tension. The agreement includes commitments to cease hostilities, respect each other's sovereignty and grant US access to critical minerals. In May, the Trump administration claimed to de-escalate tensions between India and Pakistan following cross-border strikes. However, India denied any international interference. Earlier in July, US special envoy Tom Barrack announced a limited ceasefire between Israel and Syria following Israeli intervention in the latter's internal conflict. While the ceasefire was hailed as a success, the episode disrupted efforts to normalise relations between the two nations. With inputs from agencies