
Ireland's niche tour guides: Holidays for foodies, newlyweds and baby-boomers
The Pennsylvanians wed overlooking Dunquin pier in Co
Kerry
, with their parents as the only guests. They poured pints in Páidí Ó Sé's pub and celebrated in 'some of Dingle's finest establishments afterwards over a three-day tour', Mia Tobin recalls of what was, for her, a standout trip in April.
It is not the only quirky story that Tobin of Brewery Hops shares with The Irish Times. Her firm is but one of a proliferation of small-bus tour companies established over recent years that offer visitors a more intimate, experiential and tailor-made holiday in Ireland.
A windy wedding: Mollie Lyons, Ryan McGrady and tour guide Mia Tobin at Dunquin.
With the
Central Statistics Office tourism numbers
pointing to a continuing decline in inbound visitors, some operators are seeking to stay ahead in a toughening climate by operating in a niche market.
READ MORE
Such companies provide a welcome addition to the tourism sector's portfolio of guided holidays, according to
Fáilte Ireland
and, it says, 'they complement rather than compete with larger coach operators, offering diversity in the market and helping to increase dwell-time in destinations'.
'The growth of boutique tours reflects evolving visitor preferences for more immersive tours and often appeal to culturally curious travellers seeking authentic, off-the-beaten-path experiences,' says Paul Keeley, director of regional development, Fáilte Ireland.
For Tobin, the quirkiness of these smaller tour groups has included couples getting engaged and old college friends enjoying reunions.
She is a Tipperary native and became smitten by the potential of a tourism career while working for a tour company in the wilds of the Yukon in northern Canada. 'By the time I came back home, I had decided to leave the corporate world and never wear a suit again,' she says.
Tobin started working with Vagabond Tours in Co Wicklow in 2011 and stayed with them for seven seasons while slowly developing Brewery Hops and going full-time in 2018.
'My customers are mostly couples and friends from North America, typically aged from 40 to 70, culturally curious and with a love of food and drink,' she says. 'They are happy to get off the beaten tour track to meet the local producer and taste their craft produce.'
However, day-to-day issues such as rising fuel and accommodation costs, and even the closure of many cafes and restaurants on Mondays and Tuesdays, can cause challenges, she says. Parking can prove difficult depending on the area, while 'Kerry welcomes buses, you are fined in Galway city if you stay over an hour'.
Larry Coady, of Anam Croí, talks about Charles Fort at Kinsale Harbour.
It was during Covid that Tobin's former colleague at Vagabond Tours, Larry Coady, who had worked as the company's general manager, began to develop his small tours concept, Anam Croí.
After being laid off during Covid 'the seed germinated' for his business, which began in 2022 and offers tours for a maximum of 13 people.
'Many of our clients are pretty seasoned travellers. They may have previously done coach tours and are now looking for a more personal experience.'
He says 'accessibility to places, unreachable by big coaches, allows [them] to reach some hidden gems while avoiding the crowds at major visitor attractions'.
Like with many small tour groups, the majority of Anam Croí's clients are North American and Australian, with 'baby boomers' – people born between 1946 to 1964 – encompassing the main age profile.
A group on an Anam Croí tour
'People are increasingly attracted by our scenery as well as the culture, heritage and, of course, the people. Most are pleasantly surprised and blown away by the high quality and freshness of our food,' he says.
Discovering familial roots remains a factor, albeit one that is tapering off, Coady says.
Rob Rankin's Vagabond Tours has a fleet of 25 small buses on the road
When Scottish native Rob Rankin started Vagabond Tours with one Land Rover pulling a trailer in 2002, his friends thought he was mad. Today, Vagabond and Driftwood Tours, based in Greystones, has a fleet of 25 small buses on the road.
'We were the first multi-activity adventure tour company here, blending the outdoors with culture and history as part of a scheduled experience,' Rankin says.
He says Vagabond's pioneering concept had led to at least 10 of his former guides having started their own specialised bus tour companies, with a good working relationship with all of them.
'When we started out in 2002, there was very little infrastructure here for outdoor leisure activities. There were no greenways, no bike-hire companies, for example. While land access for hiking can still be a problem, Fáilte Ireland has done really good work over recent years,' he says.
He stresses that 'farmers have every right to protect their lands and not be exposed to insurance claims', but that 'more marked trails would, on the other hand, be insured by government and provide an important educational resource for these tour companies'.
Rankin says the 'essence of what people want has not changed much since we started. They are still looking for an authentic and quality experience of Ireland, with a relaxed social element'.
All three operators are happy to confirm the Trump factor has not been an issue to date 'fingers crossed'.
Although tellingly, Tobin says, 'return guests who want to come back next year have said their equity in stocks has plummeted, which is the fund for the Ireland trip'.
'If there is a large economic recession in the US, we will certainly feel the repercussions in tourism in 2026,' she says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
European unity would have broken down in a trade war with the US
Not great, but could have been worse. That was the European Union negotiators' take on the tariff deal agreed with US president Donald Trump this week. The agreement saw the EU accept tariffs – or import taxes – of 15 per cent on practically all future trade with the US. US products heading in the other direction will not be subject to similar levies when sold into the EU. Indeed many pre-Trump tariffs the bloc charged on US goods at lower rates of 1 to 4 per cent will be dropped to zero. This deal is the product of the EU's strategy of calm dialogue over confrontation. The French government has led the criticism of the tariff deal, summing it up as the EU submitting to Trump. Some in Ireland have also expressed concern, but the Government knows it is in no position to gripe. READ MORE Given its exposure and dependence on trade with the US, Ireland was insistent throughout the talks that the EU should avoid doing anything to antagonise Trump or escalate the dispute. The European Commission , the EU's executive arm that led the talks, was not negotiating a trade deal. That would involve two countries or economic blocs trashing out a mutually beneficial accord, with concessions on either side. This was a loose political agreement on tariffs, where the EU sucked up a certain amount of pain to put an end to Trump's threats of even higher charges. Thoughts of an open tariff brawl between the two sides, escalating into a trade war, struck fear into the hearts of officials and politicians in Brussels, Dublin, Berlin and many other capitals. European trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic , who was heavily involved in the talks, has insisted this truce was the best it could get. Commission officials were privately smug when UK prime minister Keir Starmer signed a deal with Trump in June locking in 10 per cent tariffs. The EU felt confident it could land more favourable terms, given its greater economic heft. That thinking put too much weight on rules that previously governed global trade relations and failed to fully consider Trump's animus towards the European project. The EU also failed to fully grasp Trump's vision of tariffs as leverage for negotiating concessions from allies and generating tax revenue. In a normal year the US collects about €8 billion from – mostly very low – tariffs on EU goods. Internal commission calculations predict Trump's tariff shakedown will lead to about €80 billion a year being collected by the US. Those sums even take account of some slowdown in trade as a result of the tariffs raising the cost of EU-made products in the US. The alternative would have been to call the US president's bluff and see if he followed through on threats to put 30 per cent tariffs on trade on August 1st. Turmoil in the financial markets previously forced Trump to reverse the excesses of his 'liberation day' tariff agenda. This might have happened again. The problem for European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen was that EU unity would not withstand any kind of prolonged trade war. An autocratic system such as China's can unilaterally match Trump's tariffs with its own, increasing the rates again and again to force Washington to the negotiating table on a more equal footing. The EU is a composite of 27 member states, each with different economic pain thresholds and perspectives on how the talks should be run. France is talking a tough game now. It was also lobbying hard behind the scenes to water down proposed retaliatory tariffs, one of the main pieces of leverage in the talks. Paris wanted the commission to drop plans to threaten counter-tariffs on US whiskey, bourbon and agricultural produce, fearing French wine, champagne and dairy would be targeted in response. Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris sent Sefcovic a shopping list of US products the Government wanted spared. It included aircraft, bourbon, agricultural goods, medtech, thoroughbred horses, animal feed and ingredients used by food producers. Ireland's had been one of the loudest voices of caution. The Government pushed back against the idea of the EU using emergency powers to target US multinationals and tech giants in the dispute. The commission was afraid a cycle of US tariffs and EU counter-tariffs would have put millions of jobs in Europe at risk. In such a scenario the governments of Germany, Italy, Ireland and others would have been clamouring, if not screaming, for the EU to cut a quick deal that stopped the economic bleeding. The end result of that alternative timeline might still have been blanket US tariffs of 15 per cent or painfully higher rates. Maybe Trump would have blinked first. We won't know.


Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Tommy Martin: Jim McGuinness has been getting a gleeful shoeing but lots of it is small-minded nonsense
I write this column while on holidays in Kerry, which, I'm sure you will understand, is not ideal. Nothing against the singular charms of the Kingdom, but when they have just beaten your county by 10 points in an All-Ireland final, it can be hard to stomach. This is exclusive subscriber content. Already a subscriber? Sign in Take us with you this summer. Annual €130€65 Best value Monthly €12€6 / month


Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on X's court defeat: the conflict will continue
The High Court's rejection of X's challenge to Ireland's new online safety code may come to be seen as a milestone in the enforcement of Europe's digital rulebook. It is also a reminder that the battle over online content regulation is not simply a matter of legal interpretation or child protection policy. It sits squarely in the middle of a transatlantic struggle over who sets the rules for the digital economy. Ireland's Online Safety Code, enforced by Coimisiún na Meán, requires platforms to shield children from harmful video content, introduce age checks and parental controls, and prevent the sharing of material that promotes self-harm, eating disorders or bullying. The court ruled these measures fall within the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive and complement the Digital Services Act, dismissing X's claims of overreach. That finding may seem straightforward from a European perspective. The EU has long sought to assert that technology companies must respect European standards if they wish to operate here. But the US views such measures through a different lens, shaped by its dominance in the tech sector and a political culture that prizes free expression in almost absolute terms. The commercial stakes are immense. The global tech services market is overwhelmingly dominated by American firms: Meta, Google, Apple and Amazon. EU regulation is therefore not just a neutral exercise in public protection but, inevitably, a rebalancing of power between the jurisdictions where these companies are based and the markets in which they operate. That tension is heightened by the fact that Ireland is home to the European headquarters of many of these firms, making it the front line in this conflict. READ MORE In Washington, the issues are often couched in the language of principle. Conservative figures such as JD Vance have been vocal in their defence of unfettered online speech, casting regulation as censorship. Such arguments, while grounded in America's First Amendment tradition, also align neatly with the commercial interests of the companies whose revenues depend on maximising user engagement. The defence of principle and the defence of profit are intertwined. The ruling against X will not end these disputes. The tech industry's legal resources are vast, and its political allies influential. But it confirms that Ireland, acting within the EU framework, has the authority to challenge the ethos of the platforms it hosts. That will not be welcomed in boardrooms in California or on Capitol Hill. As the digital economy becomes a key arena of US-EU competition, Ireland's decisions will be read not only as regulatory acts but as statements about where power lies in the online world. Tuesday's judgment suggests that, at least for now, that power may be shifting.