Retailers cash in on Army's 250th anniversary and "No Kings" protest
What to know about Army anniversary parade
What to know about Army anniversary parade
Merchandise has cropped up for sale on Amazon, Temu and other online retailers in a move to cash in on two coinciding events: the Army's 250th anniversary parade and the "No Kings" protests against the Trump administration.
For the Army's 250th anniversary, hundreds of items appeared for sale on Amazon and Etsy including T-shirts, hats, mugs and more. One T-shirt for sale on Amazon and Etsy, for example, reads "250 Years Defending Liberty" with the U.S. flag, while another commemorates "250 Years of Service" with the message, "Freedom Isn't Free."
On China-based Temu.com, a seller shipping goods from a U.S.-based warehouse offers a T-shirt reading "No Kings in America" and featuring the Statue of Liberty and American flag for $5.20. On Amazon, a search for "No Kings" yielded 1,000 results.
Much of the merchandise available on the e-commerce giant's site is printed on demand, meaning not in stock. Sellers print T-shirts or make the goods as soon as they are ordered to avoid sitting on unwanted inventory.
Walmart, which has distanced itself from an ad promoting No Kings that was funded by Walmart heiress Christy Walton, offers a more limited amount of merchandise related to the events on its website.
It's common for sellers to quickly mock up merchandise tied to current events. For example, retailers were quick to start selling apparel featuring images of President Trump with a bloodied ear after he was shot at a rally last year in an assassination attempt.
The No Kings protests were scheduled to coincide with a military parade in Washington, D.C., celebrating the Army's 250th anniversary. The day was also President Trump's 79th birthday.
Editor's note: This story has been updated with more information about the range of items for sale.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
29 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Costco has a nearly secret way members can save more money
If you're someone who pays $65 or $130 a year to get access to Costco, you're no doubt doing it for the savings involved. After all, why pay an annual membership fee to get into Costco when you could instead waltz into your local Walmart or Target and shop to your heart's content? Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The reason so many people are willing to pay Costco's membership fees is that they get great value in exchange. And that value comes in the form of not just low prices, but also outstanding customer service. Related: Costco's latest price change shocks members There aren't many retailers with a return policy as flexible as Costco's. With very few exceptions, any item that doesn't meet your needs or expectations can be brought back to the store for a complete refund. And if you're worried that returning a jacket you bought a year ago will result in some major customer-service stink eye, think again. Costco wants members to be happy with the products they buy. And the company has no problem processing returns that are reasonable in nature. It's one thing to buy a piece of furniture, use it for two years, and then bring it back to the store on the basis of not being satisfied now that it's worn and tattered. But if you're returning items in store-bought condition long after the fact, there shouldn't be any issue. Image source: Shutterstock While it's nice to be on the receiving end of great customer service, the main value of a Costco membership lies in the savings you can reap. Most of us go through things like milk, eggs, toilet paper, tissues, and cleaning products on a regular basis. Being able to pay less for those items is a great way to stretch your budget at a time when life seems to have gotten obnoxiously expensive. Related: Costco finishes rolling out massive food court menu change Plus, Costco offers savings on more than just groceries and household staples. If you've ever shopped for clothing or outerwear at Costco, you may have saved yourself a small fortune compared to buying similar items at a department store. And if you're someone who has the budget for travel, booking a trip through Costco could save you hundreds of dollars. The savings on a single vacation, in fact, could be enough to cover the cost of a membership for many years, making your $65 or $130 investment more than worth it. Even if you've been a Costco member for many years, there are certain lesser-known benefits you may not be aware of. And one of them could save you a boatload of money. We're talking about Costco Next, and it's a program that gives you access to different suppliers from which you can buy goods directly. Related: Costco CEO admits warehouse club may change its hours You can access Costco Next through the company's website or app. From there, you can browse to see what items are available and purchase the products you want or need directly through Costco's curated list of suppliers. It's that simple. The reason Costco Next offers so much savings is that it cuts out the middleman, so to speak. Because you're buying directly from a vetted supplier, you're actually taking Costco out of the equation. When Costco sells you products at its stores, it's making a profit by charging you more than the cost of acquiring those goods. That doesn't happen with Costco Next. Now you may be wondering: What's in it for Costco? And the answer is simple. First, Costco benefits by providing a service to members that's likely to increase customer loyalty. Secondly, with Costco Next, Costco gains information on member purchasing trends. One thing Costco always strives to do is keep its inventory fresh and exciting. By using data from Costco Next, the company can make strategic decisions on what items to bring into its warehouse club stores. All told, Costco Next is a win-win for everyone involved - Costco, suppliers, and members. It pays to check it out so you can get even more value out of your membership. Maurie Backman owns shares of Costco. Related: Costco quietly pulls popular product, upsets fans The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WPP (WPP) Slid on Weaker-Than-Expected Results
Hotchkis & Wiley, an investment management company, released its 'Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund' first quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. In Q1 2025, the MSCI World Index decreased by 1.8%, driven by the decline of mega-cap growth stocks. The Magnificent Seven represented over 22% of the MSCI World Index in the quarter, collectively experiencing a decline of 14%. The Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund returned 5.96% in the quarter, outperforming the MSCI World Value Index's 4.81% return. For more information on the fund's best picks in 2025, please check its top five holdings. In its first-quarter 2025 investor letter, Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund highlighted stocks such as WPP plc (NYSE:WPP). WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) is a creative transformation company that offers communications, experience, commerce, and technology services. The one-month return of WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) was -8.28%, and its shares lost 23.15% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On July 1, 2025, WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) stock closed at $35.88 per share, with a market capitalization of $7.741 billion. Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund stated the following regarding WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) in its Q1 2025 investor letter: "WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) is a large ad agency holding company. WPP's stock price came under pressure following weaker-than expected Q424 earnings results. The company trades at a low multiple of consensus earnings with a good balance sheet, we believe WPP can deliver near mid-teens returns from the combination of capital return and capital-free organic growth." A media buying executive looking out a window at a brand advertiser's billboard. WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 9 hedge fund portfolios held WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) at the end of the first quarter, which was 5 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns, and doing so within a shorter timeframe. If you are looking for an AI stock that is as promising as NVIDIA but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about the undervalued AI stock set for massive gains. In another article, we covered WPP plc (NYSE:WPP) and shared the list of undervalued European stocks to invest in. Oakmark International Fund also attributed WPP plc's (NYSE:WPP) decline during the quarter to the same factor in its Q1 2025 investor letter. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q1 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. While we acknowledge the potential of WPP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
Texas Delivers On Housing Reforms, Connecticut Stumbles
Mexican American family having a party in backyard of sustainable home with solar panels on the ... More roof. Suburb area of Houston, Texas. The median sale price for a home in the United States was $440,913 in May, about $140,000 more than five years ago. The housing affordability problem that started in a few coastal cities has spread across the country, and the only way to solve it is to build a lot more housing. This year Texas passed several laws that will do just that, while in Connecticut a similar bundle of reforms was vetoed by the governor. In its legislative session that ended earlier this month, Texas passed a number of reforms to make it easier to build more housing. The first law, SB 840, requires municipalities to allow what is commonly called missing-middle housing. These are housing types that lie between large single-family homes and multi-story apartment buildings, such as duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes. Many local governments have rules that effectively ban these types of homes, but now they will be allowed in any area already zoned for commercial or mixed-use development. This will enable developers to build affordable housing near shops, restaurants, and jobs, a pattern of development that was common across the country but has largely taken a backseat to residential-only suburbs since the 1960s. Another law, SB 15, will make it easier for developers to build smaller homes in Texas. The law prohibits cities from requiring lot sizes of more than 1,400 square feet in new greenfield subdivisions of at least five acres. Land is a big contributor to the cost of housing, comprising between 20% and 40% of the cost of a new house. Allowing builders to use less land will make housing more affordable for lower- and middle-income families. The third pro-housing law, SB 2477, removes regulations that discourage office-to-residential conversions. This law prevents local governments from tying up conversion projects with unnecessary traffic studies, parking requirements, and zoning changes. Last year, the Pew Charitable Trusts released a report showing that converting office buildings to single-room occupancy units is a feasible and effective way to add more housing in dense city centers. This new law will pave the way for such projects in Texas's big cities. The next law, SB 2835, allows developers to build apartment buildings up to six stories with only one staircase. Single-stair apartment buildings are cheaper to build—reducing construction costs by 6% to 13%—and can fit on smaller lots than double-loaded corridor buildings. Their flexibility is especially important for infill development in cities, where lots are often small and irregularly shaped. Finally, HB 24 eliminates a loophole that enabled small groups of anti-housing protesters to block new housing projects. The old law made it too easy for a minority of residents to use petitions and other mechanisms to stifle development. The new law modernizes the community feedback process to create more predictability for builders and ensures that property owners are not unduly prevented from using their land to help communities meet the growing demand for more housing. Texas has grown rapidly since the pandemic, and these reforms will make it easier and cheaper to build the housing it needs. The reforms are timely, too. In a recent study, economists Edward Glaeser and Joseph Gyourko find that many Southern and Western metro areas are not adding as much housing as they used to, which is pushing prices up. By passing these pro-housing laws, Texas is doing its part to reverse this trend so families can afford to live and work in the Lonestar state. Shifting to the Northeast, like Texas Connecticut had a chance to make housing more affordable this year. But unlike Texas, it whiffed on the opportunity when Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont vetoed HB 5002. Connecticut's home price-to-median income ratio is 4.4, below the U.S. average but still a signal that housing is too expensive. Worse, the gap between housing prices and income has widened over the last five years. HB 5002 would make several changes to the state's housing policies designed to improve affordability. These include reducing and eliminating parking requirements, making it easier to convert commercial buildings to residential units, encouraging more development near public transportation routes, and making it easier to build missing-middle housing such as duplexes and townhomes. The bill would also increase funding to support and improve governments' planning processes. During his veto announcement, Governor Lamont expressed support for many of the provisions in the bill. But in the end, he sided with local officials worried about the state infringing on local control. During his press conference, he said 'I think the only way to really make it work is if you have buy-in from the local communities.' In a unique twist, Connecticut Republicans—long thought to be the party of economic growth and property rights—led the effort to veto a bill that would have boosted economic growth and expanded individual property rights. Responding to Lamont's veto, Pete Harrison, the Connecticut Director of the Regional Plan Association and the Director of pro-housing organization DesegregateCT told me, 'We wish Governor Lamont let alone Republicans in Connecticut would show half the foresight and common sense that Red State Republicans have shown when it comes to housing policy. The disconnect is costing Connecticut billions in economic activity and future growth.' He added 'We hope the governor keeps his promise to call a special session where both he and Republicans will have another chance at stepping up as both the Democratic-controlled House and Senate have done.' While Governor Lamont's and Republicans' concerns about local control are understandable, it is important to remember local governments only have the control states grant them. If local governments abuse their authority—perhaps by making it unnecessarily difficult to build housing—state officials should step in to rectify the situation and uphold their responsibility to help the state prosper. When it comes to zoning and land-use regulations, there are powerful local incentives to restrict new development. Current homeowners, well-connected developers, and local politicians chosen from these groups often worry about the impact new development will have on their neighborhoods, so they hinder it. State officials are better positioned to overcome these concerns since they have an incentive to consider the broader economic effects more housing will have on the state's economy and budget. It would be wise for Governor Lamont to remember these dynamics the next time a housing bill crosses his desk. The high cost of housing is one of the biggest problems facing America. Research shows that high housing prices limit access to jobs and high-quality schools, delay family formation, and even reduce fertility. Young people are the most affected. According to one recent survey, 67% of Americans believe homeownership is unrealistic for young people. If this belief persists, it will undermine how younger generations view America: Not as the land of opportunity, but as a place where opportunity is hoarded by established homeowners at the expense of everyone else. Texas's officials are trying to fix the problem. We will see if Connecticut's join them.
