logo
Gender ruling ‘could lead to trans prisoners getting seriously hurt'

Gender ruling ‘could lead to trans prisoners getting seriously hurt'

Yahoo17-04-2025
The Supreme Court gender ruling could lead to trans prisoners getting 'seriously hurt', a trans woman who was moved from a men's to a women's prison a decade ago to serve a sentence has said.
Her comments come as a solicitor also warned the judgment by the UK's highest court on Wednesday, that the definition of a woman in equality law is based on biological sex, could 'gravely affect very vulnerable prisoners'.
The ruling means transgender women with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) can be excluded from single-sex spaces if 'proportionate'.
Latest prison service data for 2023/24 shows there were 295 transgender prisoners in England and Wales, with 51 in female prisons and 244 in male prisons.
Of the transgender prisoners in the male estate, 225 self-identified as transgender female, while 48 inmates in the women's estate self-identified as transgender male.
Tara Hudson was handed a 12-week custodial term by magistrates in 2015 for common assault.
She served half of the sentence, spending one week in an all male prison and the remaining five in a women's prison after a petition calling for her to be transferred attracted more than 100,000 signatures.
The 36-year-old has lived as a woman all her adult life.
'I had huge public support back then but now I feel like somebody in my situation would not get that support,' she told the PA news agency.
Ms Hudson, of Somerset, said she believes if a trans woman was embroiled in a situation like hers now, she would not be transferred to a women's prison.
'There would be no sympathy,' she added. 'But there was sympathy for me, and that just shows how much it's changed in the past 10 years because of such intense debate over something that's actually very, very small and has been blown out of proportion.'
Ms Hudson stressed that she was 'in the middle' of the debate, that both sides have opinions she agrees with and disagrees with.
Asked if she believes the Supreme Court ruling will affect vulnerable prisoners, she told PA: 'Yes. I fear that there's going to be a case like mine.
'I think a trans woman is going to get seriously hurt.
'If you look very, very feminine like I did when I was 26 – I was a glamour model – the pressure that I was put under on that male prison wing is something that I'd not want to see anyone go through,' Ms Hudson continued.
'If you look like an attractive woman, regardless of biology, and you're put into a male prison wing with males who haven't had sex in a long time, stuff is going to happen.'
She said there needs to be more trans wings in prisons.
On the ruling in general, she said she neither condemns nor welcomes it, but admitted it made her feel 'hopeless'.
'I think women, biological women, deserve to have their own spaces and if they don't want to be around transgender women in safe spaces then they have that right to choose, but I'm worried about the transgender women that are going to be forgotten and thrown under the bus because of this,' Ms Hudson said.
'Because we do suffer from domestic abuse. We do suffer from many things. We need protection, and some toxicity needs to be taken out of the debate and it doesn't seem like anybody is willing to do that.'
'As a victim of domestic abuse, I do worry about transgender women – where they have to go when they've been hurt and when they're trapped – they deserve a place to go as well,' she added.
'I felt the ruling was coming,' Ms Hudson said.
'It makes me feel hopeless.
'When I spoke out to the media I was told that I was helping to make a change and that's what I wanted to do, I wanted to help to make a change and that change has been bad, it's gone in a really bad direction.
'Most trans people just want to get on with their lives and live quiet lives. They don't want to make a fuss about anything.'
She said people need to 'come together' and 'say we're going to do better'.
Maya Grantham, senior associate solicitor for Leigh Day, said the Supreme Court ruling would not affect hundreds of prisoners but it could 'gravely affect very vulnerable prisoners quite severely'.
As of March 31 last year, 10 prisoners were known to have a gender recognition certificate, who were not included in the transgender prisoner data detailed by the prison service's offenders equalities report.
Ms Grantham said: 'A lot of transgender people are incredibly vulnerable and the male estate does pose quite significant problems to anyone who is vulnerable.
'It's completely unsuitable for someone living as a woman.'
She added: 'There's a lot of physical and sexual violence in male prisons and we are placing vulnerable people in that environment.
'It just feels like a massive step back to be treating them according to sex when we know that transgender people are vulnerable.
'It's not that this is going to be a widespread issue that affects hundreds of people, but it's a change that could very gravely affect very vulnerable prisoners quite severely.'
The ruling comes after policy changes came into force in February 2023, and under the changes, transgender women who are sentenced to custody cannot be held in the women's estate if they retain male genitalia or have been convicted of a violent or sexual offence – unless in the most exceptional cases.
There is one transgender prisoner unit in the prison estate, at HMP Downview, in Sutton, which is designed to hold trans women deemed to be too high risk to be accommodated in women's prisons, but also at risk from other inmates in male jails.
A Government spokesperson said: 'This ruling brings clarity and confidence, for women and service providers.
'This Government remains unwavering in its protection of women.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil's Top Court Defies Trump, Signals No Retreat on Bolsonaro
Brazil's Top Court Defies Trump, Signals No Retreat on Bolsonaro

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Brazil's Top Court Defies Trump, Signals No Retreat on Bolsonaro

Donald Trump's tariff threat against Brazil over a legal probe into his political ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, caught the Supreme Court in Brasilia off guard. The top court is in recess during July — not all its judges were even in the country — making it difficult to convene to formulate a response. But a group of justices including Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing the former president's case, immediately began discussing a response aimed more at asserting national sovereignty than easing tensions with the US.

Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office
Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office

Axios

time3 hours ago

  • Axios

Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office

President Trump touted the U.S. as the "hottest" and "most respected country in the world" on Sunday as he reached the six-month mark of his second White House term. The big picture: Trump's second term has come with a series of challenges both at home and abroad, though he has seen some successes with the passage of the " big, beautiful bill" and the Supreme Court ruling in his favor in several significant cases. In a Truth Social post Sunday, the president claimed his second term is "being hailed as one of the most consequential periods of any President." "In other words, we got a lot of good and great things done, including ending numerous wars of Countries not related to us other than through Trade and/or, in certain cases, friendship," he continued. "Six months is not a long time to have totally revived a major Country. One year ago our Country was DEAD, with almost no hope of revival. Today the USA is the 'hottest' and most respected Country anywhere in the World. Happy Anniversary!!!" he wrote. Zoom out: Trump's administration has negotiated three ceasefire deals between six countries since he took office in January, but efforts to generate an agreement between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Israel and Hamas haven't materialized. During his 2024 campaign, Trump repeatedly said he would end the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours if he returned to the White House. Between the lines: In a separate Truth Social post, Trump touted his approval ratings, claiming that his numbers among Republicans have gone as high as 95% in "various polls." It's unclear which polls the president was referring. According to Gallup, Trump's June approval rating was 40% among voters across both parties, down from 47% when he took office in January. When broken down by party, 86% of Republicans approved of Trump's job as president in June. 36% of Independents and 1% of Democrats agreed. A CBS News/You Gov poll published Sunday showed similar numbers. Overall, the president had a 42% approval rating, with 89% of GOP, 32% of Independents and 5% of Democrats giving their approval. Zoom out: Trump said in his post that his numbers had been boosted by "Radical Left Democrats" exposing the "Jeffrey Epstein hoax."

Murder conviction tossed all because killer's sleepy pal was kicked out of NYC courtroom: ruling
Murder conviction tossed all because killer's sleepy pal was kicked out of NYC courtroom: ruling

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Murder conviction tossed all because killer's sleepy pal was kicked out of NYC courtroom: ruling

A state appeals court tossed out a Queens murder conviction because the killer's buddy was booted from the courtroom for falling asleep — even though the accused was clearly guilty. The state Appellate Division panel said in a bizarre ruling last week that convicted killer Donald White was denied a public trial because Judge Michael Aloise booted his friend from the courtroom before White was found guilty of murder, robbery and weapons possession in 2016. 3 A state appellate court threw out a Queens murder conviction because the killer's friend was booted for falling asleep. Christopher Sadowski Advertisement 'Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence,' according to the decision, which was filed Wednesday. 'Nevertheless, the defendant is entitled to a new trial because the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in excluding a spectator from the courtroom, thereby violating the defendant's right to a public trial,' the judges said. The ruling means White, who is still being held in state prison, gets a new trial in the case. Advertisement Veteran civil rights attorney Ron Kuby, who was not involved in the case, chided Aloise's decision to toss White's pal, who was not identified, from the trial on the first day. 'Judges serve the public, not the other way around,' Kuby told The Post. 'A courtroom is not a judicial fiefdom. Every defendant has a Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. 3 A state appellate court said Donald White was denied a 'public' trial because his friend was kicked out of court. REUTERS 'Judicial pettiness and peevishness are not reasons to remove spectators,' he added. 'Now a murder case must be retried and the victim's loved ones must go through agony again, all because a judge got pissed at a spectator for napping.' Advertisement White, 36, was charged with killing pot peddler Henry Jenkins in St. Albans in June 2010. At trial, his pal dozed off in court during the first day of testimony. Aloise's decision to kick him out came after the jury left the room, but the Appellate Division judges said he was too hasty, and didn't consider other options — like warning the man not to do it again. Even though the judge reversed his decision the next day, the appeals panel said White's friend may not have known that — and thereby didn't know he was welcome back in the courtroom. Advertisement 3 Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz is reviewing the decision to throw out Donald White's murder conviction. Stephen Yang 'The spectator was not present at the time and had no reason to believe that he could return to the courtroom was insufficient to remedy the court's error,' the ruling said. A spokesperson for the Queens District Attorney's Office said prosecutors were reviewing the ruling. Al Baker, a spokesman for the state Office of Court Administration, which oversees the Empire State court system, declined to comment on Aloise's decision or the appellate ruling. White's attorneys did not respond to a request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store