SACP members chased out of ANC election workshop
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers
THE South African Communist Party (SACP) has launched an attack on its tripartite alliance ANC deputy secretary-general Nomvula Mokonyane, accusing her of chasing the communist party's members away during a recent elections workshop in Mpumalanga.
During the workshop, aimed at strategising for the 2026 Local Government Elections, Mokonyane issued a directive, asking SACP delegates to leave, citing that the party would not strategise with a group intending to contest elections independently.
The directive, according to sources, also angered some SACP leaders, who accused Mokonyane of also breaking the longstanding relationship the party has had with the ANC and Cosatu.
SACP national Spokesperson Mbulelo Ndlazana confirmed the incident, stating that the party's decision to contest the local government elections independently is not a reflection of the political relationship between the two organisations.
'Certain members and leaders of the SACP were removed from an elections workshop in Mpumalanga. The SACP is aware of this action and has engaged the ANC about it,' Ndlazana said.
He further stated that the alliance was not an election, and therefore, electoral contests do not determine the fate of the political relationship between alliance partner organisations.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He blamed the ANC leadership in Mpumalanga for failing to address the matter before extending an invitation.
'The ANC local leadership committed an error by inviting the SACP into the workshop, given the fact that the SACP is contesting the elections independently.
'The fact that the SACP is contesting the local government elections independently and in its name means its election strategy and plans are internal to it, and this is true of the ANC as well,' Ndlazana said.
The SACP has met all requirements to contest the elections, as confirmed by the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC).
The ANC has criticised the SACP's decision, arguing that it could split the Alliance vote and benefit opposition parties.
ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula previously questioned the theoretical basis for the SACP's decision, stating that if the communist party wants more influence, it can be resolved through discussions on deployment lists.
The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) has backed the SACP's decision to contest the 2026 local government elections independently.
In its secretariat report at its elective conference in Benoni, Ekurhuleni, the NUM called for the mobilisation of the 'popular front of the left' against the Government of National Unity (GNU).
SACP General Secretary Solly Mapaila said there was no turning back from forging ahead with their plans.
'I cannot reverse this decision; no one in the Communist Party can reverse this decision. It's a decision taken by Congress,' Mapaila said.
Cape Times
SACP General Secretary Solly Mapaila insists that the party will contest the local government elections next year.
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
32 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Noise over substance: The ANC Youth League is being strangled by slogans
If the ANC Youth League does not rise to this challenge, it risks becoming irrelevant in the society it seeks to change. In recent years, South African politics has been increasingly defined by spectacle, slogans and populist posturing — often at the expense of rigorous intellectual debate and critical policy thinking. A wider crisis of thought that jeopardises the fundamental underpinnings of democratic engagement and transformation is reflected in the rise of anti-intellectualism, particularly among youth political movements such as the ANC Youth League. Anti-intellectualism is not simply a rejection of formal education. It is disdainful of critical thinking, academic inquiry and informed debate. It manifests in celebrating charisma over competence, loyalty over logic and noise over nuance. Within the league, this trend is becoming dangerously normalised. Once a breeding ground for ideological sharpness and future leaders of substance, the ANC Youth League too often rewards militant soundbites and performative radicalism while sidelining young thinkers who seek to ground their activism in theory, research and long-term strategy. The roots of this crisis are complex. Years of institutional decay in the ANC have eroded the culture of internal political education. Once-vibrant debate forums, political schools and intellectual mentorship are weak or absent. The post-apartheid period demanded robust frameworks for reconstruction and development. However, opportunists skilled at populist rhetoric, rather than policymaking, have gradually taken over the political arena. Anti-intellectualism flourishes in this setting. Using feelings rather than facts enables leaders to evade responsibility. It turns serious issues like unemployment, inequality and land reform into rhetorical battlegrounds rather than sites of rigorous intervention. The league, which once counted thinkers like Anton Lembede and Peter Mokaba among its leaders, now risks becoming a parody of its former self — more comfortable with empty slogans than building a coherent vision for youth empowerment in a rapidly changing world. Worse still, the anti-intellectual turn has created a generational rift. Young South Africans who challenge the status quo from within — those who demand better schools of political thought, progressive research and ethical leadership — are often labeled as 'elitist', 'sellouts' or 'not radical enough'. This creates a toxic environment where mediocrity is rewarded and intellectual ambition is punished. The damage is not contained within youth politics. It permeates the larger political conversation. Debates in parliament are frequently reduced to trivial showmanship. Policy documents are either disregarded, poorly researched or plagiarised. Hashtags and viral outrage, rather than thoughtful consideration, shape public engagement. This crisis of thought is a national problem, undermining our ability to govern effectively, hold leaders accountable and foster democratic participation rooted in knowledge. There are exceptions — young activists, scholars and leaders pushing back against this trend by combining political commitment with intellectual rigour. However, they are often isolated, unsupported and swimming against the tide. Without institutional support for intellectual development within political structures — especially the league — they will continue to be marginalised. First, the league must reclaim its intellectual tradition. This means reviving political education with urgency and integrity. Long-term programmes that examine history, ideology, economics and international movements are preferable to workshops that are merely check-box exercises. These initiatives must push young leaders to consider the intricacies of change in a post-colonial, capitalist society and to look beyond catchphrases. Second, political leadership must stop treating intellectualism as a threat. South Africa needs a leadership culture that values thinkers, readers and researchers as much as it does activists and organisers. The binary between theory and practice must be rejected in favour of a synthesis that produces clarity of vision and effectiveness in action. Third, civil society, universities and independent think-tanks must step into the void. If political parties fail to create space for young intellectuals, other institutions must offer platforms for engagement, critique and public education. Democracy does not survive on votes alone — it survives on the circulation of ideas, the contestation of narratives and the evolution of political thought. Finally, young people must resist the pressure to conform to anti-intellectual norms. They must read, write, question and debate — not in isolated academic silos, but in the streets, community halls and digital spaces where the political is lived. To think critically is not to be less revolutionary. On the contrary, it is the most revolutionary act in a society starved of meaningful ideas. Our political institutions are fragile. Our economy is stagnant. Our youths are restless. We cannot afford a political culture that glorifies ignorance and punishes insight. The crisis of thought is not abstract — it has material consequences. It means policies that fail. Leaders who mislead. Movements that collapse. If the ANC Youth League does not rise to this challenge, it risks becoming irrelevant in the society it seeks to change. Nevertheless, if members can reclaim the power of intellectualism — rooted in justice, truth and revolutionary theory — they can become the vanguard of a new political era, one defined not by noise but by substance. Siyanda Kate is a PhD candidate (Political Studies) at Nelson Mandela University.
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Seventy years on — understanding the Freedom Charter in changing times
Just as the Congress of the People — the way the Freedom Charter was created — was a process and not an event, the same is true of the charter itself. Its meaning was not finalised on the day of its adoption on 26 June 1955. The Freedom Charter does not have an obvious interpretation that stands in place from generation to generation. How we interpret the document is affected by where we are located, what our interests are in looking at the charter, what we hope for, and what resonates with the charter in terms of aspirations that people have for a better life. Obviously, the conditions — of any time — affect what can be done to provide basic needs and realise the aspirations of the charter. It's now 70 years since the Freedom Charter was adopted at the Congress of the People on 26 June 1955. There are still many things to learn about the charter, some of which entail what I would suggest ought to be a revision of how we understand the document. Just as we used to say that the Congress of the People — the way the Freedom Charter was created — was a process and not an event, the same is true of the charter itself. Its meaning was not finalised on the day of its adoption on 26 June 1955. Its meanings (in the plural) must be modified in different conditions as we grow and learn more and our democratic consciousness may develop. The first thing to notice is that the charter emerged from a process of extensive consultation, not simply from the president of the ANC saying that there was extensive consultation, as Cyril Ramaphosa does in relation to the National Dialogue. The Congress of the People process is now well documented, and the statements of participants testify to it entailing arduous consultations with people from all walks of life in order to access views from a range of classes and strata. (See Raymond Suttner and Jeremy Cronin, 50 Years of the Freedom Charter, 2006 and Ismail Vadi, The Congress of the People and Freedom Charter: A People's History, 2015.) The Freedom Charter was adopted as a consensual document, a consensus emerging from a long process of demands being heard and recorded and distilled into the short document that is accessible, and has remained part of many people's political development and part of their ways of evaluating the present and progress towards realising freedoms today. An example of changing meanings is with one of the key clauses of the Freedom Charter which reads that 'The People Shall Govern!', and until recently that was interpreted to mean that people would have the right to elect representatives to Parliament. It does remain the understanding of many. That is why in the book that I wrote with Jeremy Cronin, one has Dorothy Nyembe, who served 18 years in prison, saying about the Freedom Charter that the people were going to vote for Chief Albert Luthuli (then ANC president), Dr Monty Naicker (then president of the Natal Indian Congress and Dr Yusuf Dadoo (then president of the Transvaal Indian Congress) to lead them into Parliament. So the notion of 'The People Shall Govern!' entailed the realisation of its meaning through voting for Parliament, what is known as representative democracy. About 30 years later in the People's Power period of the UDF in a number of parts of the country, one saw people taking control of their own destiny at a local level, kicking out the police and Bantu Administration officials of the apartheid regime. They then created their own street committees, block committees and other projects of self-government at a local level with the meaning being similar to 'The People Shall Govern!', but at a local level and with the masses taking direct control. One of the people who was interviewed in this period, Weza Made from Uitenhage, said specifically that what they were doing with the People's Power period was to implement the first clause of the Freedom Charter, 'The People Shall Govern!' This illustrates what it means to give meaning to something like the Freedom Charter. The meaning of words must be constantly rethought in the light of new experiences. In striving for freedom, these become part of our understanding. In fact, one must give a new meaning in the context of the present where one has an election-centred notion of freedom. There may be diverse notions of what it means to exercise political freedom, and it need not mean that ideas of popular power ought to be suppressed or, alternatively, that representative democracy must give way to popular, direct democracy. We should see freedom as involving a combination of popular power and popular inputs into all organs of the government. Right now, there are limited spaces for popular inputs into legislation and other processes of government, and there is zero official space for popular, direct democracy. That is the official space, but there are unofficial spaces for the popular, notably inhabited by the shack dwellers' movement, Abahlali baseMjondolo. There may be others who without publicity can be characterised as popular democratic sites. Representative and popular democracy are not antagonistic to one another if the meaning of representative democracy is to give voice to the voters who are not present in Parliament and other elected bodies, but have delegated the representative to carry out their interests, to re-present them in the organs of Parliament, as if they were there. The Freedom Charter and nation building In the Struggle against apartheid, much of the discussion and debate among comrades who were fighting for a free South Africa related to what was called the 'national question', or sometimes 'nation building' or what comprised a new nation. In thinking more about the Freedom Charter, I've come to believe that one of its key products was a contribution towards nation building. In the course of this short document, you have a number of propositions. These headings of parts of the Freedom Charter themselves comprise a vision of the new South Africa, that the charter and the people who made it believed should comprise what a new nation should be. What is useful for us is that these are not scientific categories in the main, but moral qualities that ought to inform us. The headings under which these political and moral qualities emerge are: The People Shall Govern! All National Groups Shall Have Equal Rights! The People Shall Share in The Country's Wealth! The Land Shall Be Shared Among Those Who Work It! All Shall Be Equal Before the Law! All Shall Enjoy Equal Human Rights! There Shall Be Work and Security! The Doors of Learning and Culture Shall Be Opened!' There Shall Be Housing Security and Comfort! Charterists and the role of the Freedom Charter in the Congress movement Those who supported the ANC-led liberation movement were often referred to as Charterists. That was one of the key bases for delineating who belonged in the Congress movement, who supported the leadership of the ANC and the UDF. In working on these lines of demarcation, the main thing was to convince the public that the Congress movement, as opposed to other movements, best represented their interests. The Freedom Charter would be alluded to as one of the bases on which that claim was made. But there was not room at that time for careful scrutiny of all the clauses of the charter and to give it meanings that had some authority within the organisations. I think this is true of a lot of ideas that were used to rally people and get people to rally behind a document like the Freedom Charter. This is not the same as giving it a definitive meaning. In some ways, that is a strength in that hopefully people start to debate the meanings of documents of the liberation movement in a time of peace. Unfortunately, that has not happened from what I can see. The Freedom Charter as a nation-building document The Freedom Charter emerged as a national project of the ANC and its allies. In that sense, it was a popular process of consultation to hear people's views as evidenced in the documentation of the Congress of the People campaign. On the one hand, it was a popular process, but on the other, it was part of national liberation, a project for building a new nation, a new nation with a series of values that it sought assistance in getting people to make their own preferences, expressing what worried them in South Africa at the time and what they saw as remedying the problems that they faced. The Freedom Charter is a nation-building document and does not go into details like a constitution, but it sought to elicit from people ideas as to what their future should be. It's a document that tries to join people and to find ways of binding people. That is why throughout the document one finds stirring allusions to the unity of the people and ways of joining people to one another. DM
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
EDITORIAL: It's game over for the DA in the GNU
DA leader John Steenhuisen's announcement that his party, including ministers serving in Ramaphosa's Cabinet, will not take part in the upcoming National Dialogue, is immaterial, argues the writer. Image: Armand Hough/ Independent Newspapers THE DA now has little to no ground to argue against the perception that the ANC has reduced it to a mere bystander in the so-called Government of National Unity (GNU). That is why President Cyril Ramaphosa can fire a DA deputy minister from his executive without being concerned about the political implications for his decision. From the start, the ANC has always been firmly in control of the direction the government takes despite failing to secure enough votes to govern the country as a single party in last year's elections. Ramaphosa knows all too well that the DA's desperation to remain in government runs so deep that it will not retaliate with severe action even when he acts against DA members in the executive. The DA was always going to find it difficult to impose itself in the GNU because it entered the coalition government for the wrong reasons. Its stated objective of keeping the EFF and Zuma's MK Party out of government plays into the ANC's hands. ANC secretary general Fikile Mbalula's utterances that the government won't collapse even if the DA leaves the GNU should be seen as a declaration that the DA's involvement in the GNU is immaterial. Just like DA leader John Steenhuisen's announcement that his party, including ministers serving in Ramaphosa's Cabinet, will not take part in the upcoming National Dialogue. The DA must leave the GNU with whatever little pride it still has. Its role in opposition benches was more effective than it is in this current government. The past 12 months have proved this. Almost all the policies and Bills it opposed remain firmly in place and some of them will be implemented on behalf of the ANC by their ministers. Leaving the GNU will allow it to make a head start in campaigning to win some of the key metros that remain hung. It's there that it should demonstrate its governing strength. It can find inspiration from renowned Pan-Africanist Professor Patrick Lumumba's words when he correctly points out that: 'No matter how good you are…if you stay for too long, you spoil it. A good dancer must know when to leave the stage.' CAPE TIMES
