Illinois school district responds to federal probe into allegations of making girls change with transgender
The district provided a statement to Fox News Digital insisting that its actions were rooted in Illinois state law.
"Deerfield Public Schools District 109 complies with state law. The Illinois Human Rights Act prohibits all public school districts from discriminating on the basis of sex, including gender identity, and mandates that students must be permitted access to the locker room and bathroom that aligns with their gender identity," the statement read.
"We are sensitive to the privacy needs of all of our middle school students and ensure that no student is required to change into a gym uniform for physical education class in front of others. When both our middle schools were renovated in 2017, we added five private changing stations within each locker room that are available to all students. All students also have multiple options to change in a private location separate from the locker room if they wish."
The district also says it will work with local families to determine next steps.
"The District and the Board are united with our leaders and educators on this issue and have a shared commitment to upholding the law," the statement continued.
"The District and the Board call upon all of those expressing concerns or perspectives on this issue with our staff and educators to do so in a respectful and civil manner. We are glad to work with families to address any individual concerns and determine appropriate next steps to support your child's well-being and participation."
The U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights announced on Thursday that it is launching an investigation into the Illinois Department of Education, the Chicago Public School District 299 and Deerfield Public Schools District 109 over reported Title IX violations.
Illinois mother Nicole Georgas brought the situation to light when she filed a civil rights complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice after alleging that school administrators had attempted to force her 13-year-old daughter to change in front of a transgender student in the girls' locker room last month.
She revealed the complaint during a Board of Education meeting for Deerfield Public School District 109 last week, claiming the incident had taken place last month after her daughter had refused to change into her uniform during physical education because a biological male student had been present at the time.
"The girls want their locker rooms and bathrooms back. They want their privacy back. This is why I'm here tonight. My 13-year-old daughter's well-being, mental health and privacy are at stake," Georgas said during her speech at the board meeting on Thursday.
Georgas then raised the issue to the school's administration, noting to them that she believed it was a direct violation of President Donald Trump's Keeping Men out of Women's Sports executive order. She said in her speech that the school administration had informed her that, under the direction of its legal counsel, the transgender student was free to use both the girls' bathroom and the girls' locker room.
Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
11 hours ago
- News24
Former New Zealand top cop Jevon McSkimming charged over child porn, bestiality material
New Zealand's former deputy police commissioner lost the right to anonymity Monday after he was charged with possessing child sexual exploitation and bestiality material. Jevon McSkimming was arrested in June and charged with eight counts of possessing objectionable material, but the courts had prevented media from reporting his name or other details of the case. Appearing in Wellington District Court on Monday, McSkimming opted not to seek an extension of the suppression order. His lawyer, Letizea Ord, told Judge Tim Black 'there is not a further application in respect of name suppression. It's accepted that it can lapse today.' He is yet to enter a plea. Asked as he left court if he had a message for the public, McSkimming said: 'No'. The 52-year-old is alleged to have possessed child exploitation material and bestiality between specific dates. One of the charges states the offenses happened between July 2020 and December 2024. McSkimming was suspended from his job on full pay in December 2024, when an investigation into his conduct was launched. Details of those allegations cannot be reported. He was on leave for six months before his resignation in May. Judge Black remanded McSkimming on bail, and he will reappear before the court in November.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
McFarland asks voters to consider city sales tax measure for public safety, city improvement
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — The city of McFarland is asking voters to provide input on a suggested city sales tax measure, which will be voted upon during the special municipal election set in November. The city is asking the Kern County Board of Supervisors to consolidate a new special election with the one already scheduled in November. If approved Tuesday, the city can submit a ballot measure to the voters so they can consider an ordinance that would establish a 1% general sales tax, according to the board agenda. According to the city of McFarland's website, voters will consider the McFarland Essential City Services and Public Safety Measure during the Nov. 4 election. The measure proposes a 1% local sales tax to support city services. Kern County Fair to host admission, ride wristband flash sale on Friday These services include police patrols, emergency response, fire protection, road and pothole repair, downtown revitalization, community facility improvements, parks and senior services. The measure, if approved, is expected to generate about $1 million each year and remain in effect until ended by voters, the city said on its website. The measure would also require citizen oversight, independent audits and locally controlled funds. The McFarland City Council can use tax for general reasons if the measure is approved by at least four of the five councilmembers and the tax is approved by a majority vote during an election of the issue, the agenda said. The population of McFarland in 2020 was 14,161 and there are 5,065 registered voters in the city as of Monday. According to McFarland's adopted budget for fiscal year 2025-2026, the total general fund is projected to be $4,229,403 by June 30, 2026, with $2,749,886 of that being for capital improvement projects. The city said without an additional source of revenue, it will lack funds to repair and manage infrastructure, build a new police station and revitalize the downtown area, according to the agenda. The police station construction is expected to cost around $14 million, the city's budget report said. Other major capital projects include road reconstruction and water and sewer system improvements, which are estimated to cost $16.7 million and $58.9 million, respectively. The agenda also said the measure will allow the city to provide police services like quick responses to 9-1-1 emergencies, neighborhood patrols, crime prevention, investigations and more. Never miss a story: Make your homepage The deadline for the public to submit arguments for or against the tax measure is Wednesday, Aug. 6, at 4:30 p.m. Each argument should be less than 300 words and include the printed name and signature of the author(s), according to city officials. Arguments can be submitted to the McFarland City Clerk's Office, located at 401 West Kern Ave in McFarland. Changes or withdrawals for the arguments are allowed until the deadline. Rebuttal arguments must be less than 250 words and submitted within 10 calendar days after the final date for submitting direct arguments. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Judge again rejects Sean 'Diddy' Combs' efforts to be released ahead of sentencing
A federal judge denied a motion to release Sean 'Diddy' Combs on Monday, keeping the musician and hip-hop businessman jailed until his sentencing this fall. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian of the Southern District of New York found that Combs, convicted on two counts of interstate prostitution last month, "fails to satisfy his burden to demonstrate an entitlement to release." The judge's decision came after Combs' ex-girlfriend Virginia Huynh, who was set to testify in his federal trial but dropped out before the proceedings started, wrote a letter to the judge urging his release on bail. Huynh was identified as 'Victim-3' in the federal government's sprawling indictment against Combs, 55, who was acquitted in early July of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges but convicted on two counts of interstate prostitution. In the letter, Huynh — publicly identifying herself by name for the first time — wrote that she wanted to 'share my observations about [Combs'] character and to respectfully request that the Court permit his release on bond while the case proceeds.' 'I believe it is important for the Court to have a full picture of who he is beyond the allegations,' Huynh said in the one-page letter, which Combs' legal team filed Sunday. Huynh wrote that her relationship with Combs was 'not always perfect,' beset by 'ups and downs' and 'mistakes.' But in time, she wrote, he 'made visible efforts to become a better person and to address the harm he had caused.' By the end of their relationship, she added, 'he embodied an energy of love, patience and gentleness that was markedly different from his past behavior.' 'To my knowledge,' Huynh told Subramanian, 'he has not been violent for many years, and he has been committed to being a father first.' She said that she does not view Combs as 'a danger to me or to this community' and that his children 'depend on him for emotional and financial support.' 'Allowing him to be at home will also support the healing process for all involved,' Huynh wrote in closing. 'I respectfully ask that you consider these factors when deciding his eligibility for release.' In a letter to Subramanian last month, prosecutors argued that Combs should not be given bail because he is a flight risk and a danger to the community. In denying Combs' motion for bail Monday, Subramanian found that he failed to show sufficient evidence to counter arguments that he is a flight risk. Subramanian also found that Combs' argument that the squalor and danger of the Metropolitan Detention Center, where he is being held, did not warrant release. Combs argued that federal budget cuts this year made those conditions even worse. 'The public outcry concerning these conditions has come from all corners,' Subramanian wrote. 'But as Combs acknowledges, MDC staff has been able to keep him safe and attend to his needs, even during an incident of threatened violence from an inmate.' In the days before Combs' trial started, U.S. prosecutors said they were struggling to get in touch with 'Victim-3' and her attorney. She ultimately did not testify in the seven-week trial. The jurors heard testimony from two of Combs' other ex-girlfriends: R&B singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and a woman referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane.' The prosecution called more than 30 other witnesses, including former assistants. Ventura testified about the abuse she alleged she experienced during her 10-year on-and-off relationship with Combs. She accused him of physical and sexual assault, and jurors were shown hotel security video of Combs beating her in a hallway in 2016. Combs, who pleaded not guilty, faced five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by fraud or coercion and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Subramanian also denied a bail request by Combs the day the jury's verdict came in, saying it would be impossible for him to prove he does not pose a danger. Combs is scheduled to be sentenced Oct. 3. He faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
