logo
How long will it take for Sizewell C power station to make energy bills lower?

How long will it take for Sizewell C power station to make energy bills lower?

Yahoo10-06-2025
Rachel Reeves has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant, in a bid to give the UK more control over its energy supplies and to tackle the climate crisis.
The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding for the new plant in Suffolk at the GMB Congress on Tuesday ahead of the Treasury's spending review on Wednesday.
It will mark the first nuclear power plant to be completed in more than half-a-century, with the site expected to produce enough power for six million homes when it opens.
Energy secretary Ed Miliband said the UK needs "new nuclear" to deliver "a golden age of clean energy abundance" to bring down energy bills and "tackle the climate crisis".
However, campaigners have warned that the final bill for the project will be far higher than expected, with one group describing it as "HS2 mark 2", and fear the plant may be "obsolete" by the time it is built.
So, will the Sizewell C nuclear plant lower our energy bills? And if so, how long will it take?
Sizewell C will be located near the small fishing village of Sizewell, on the Suffolk coast between Aldeburgh and Southwold.
It is being built next to Sizewell B, a pressurised water reactor nuclear power plant, which began operating in 1995 and is the last nuclear plant to be completed in the UK.
Some locals fear the environmental impact of Sizewell C. Jenny Kirtley of the Together Against Sizewell C group told ITV News: "You've only got to look around the area and see the devastation that's happened.
"There are a huge mountains of earth everywhere and of course the wildlife is suffering. The deer don't know where to go. They're rambling around everywhere. The birds are leaving their nests."
Also concerned about the impact on the local economy, Kirtley added: "We've got 6,000 people living around here so where are people going to live? We know rents are going sky-high so it's going to get worse."
Click below to see the latest East England headlines
The chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant.
Meanwhile Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash.
The government said its investment will go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships, and support thousands more jobs across the UK.
The company Sizewell C has already signed £330 million in contracts with local companies, with 70% of contracts predicted to go to 3,500 British suppliers.
Alison Downes of the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, said ministers have not "come clean" about the full cost of the project, which her group previously estimated could come to around £40 billion.
'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?," she said.
Miliband has denied suggestions that the project will be 'HS2 mark 2' – a reference to the high-speed rail project that ballooned in cost amid repeated delays.
'I don't agree with that," he told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, arguing that because the plant is a "replica" of the Hinkley Point C station, under construction in Somerset, "we can be confident it can be built cheaper and faster".
The plant is expected to be operational some time in the 2030s.
Pressed on how long the project will take, Miliband told the Today programme: 'Around a decade. That's what we believe is likely, mid-2030s is the date that we're putting on this.'
EDF Energy, which owns 16.5% of the project, said in 2023 that in a "best-case scenario", the "earliest that one of the two reactors could be operational would be the end of 2033".
Hereward Phillpot, a lawyer for the company, said the schedule for the project anticipates that both reactors will be operational by mid-2034.
In 2022, the previous Conservative government bought out China General Nuclear Power Group, meaning the state now owns 83.5% of the project, Sky News reported.
Environmental activist and founder of green energy company Ecotricity, Dale Vince, said nuclear projects are "never on time", pointing out that Hinkley Point C was originally meant to be switched-on in 2017 and is now expected to be operational from 2031.
Appearing on ITV's Good Morning Britain on 10 June, Miliband accepted that the completion of the plant will not immediately have an impact on people's energy bills.
"It isn't, but it's about the long-term," he said, suggesting more investment in nuclear will give Britain greater control and security over its energy supplies.
"My position is that we need all of these low-carbon alternatives. At the moment, we're stuck on the fossil fuel rollercoaster," the energy secretary said.
"There's gas markets internationally, which shape the price, controlled by petro-states and dictators. We're doing the short-term things, like solar and wind, and we're doing the long-term things – and it's good for jobs as well."
Sizewell C has said the project could deliver more than £1-1.5 billion of annual savings across the electricity system when it is up and running, but it is hard to tell how this will be passed down to ordinary household bills.
Vince argued that due to funding coming from people's household bills, "billpayers will be forced to subsidise Sizewell for years, no matter how much the costs balloon".
He said keeping the plant safe from an eroding Suffolk coastline "will cost billions more, and every upgrade will land on our energy bills".
Read more
Voices: Could 'going nuclear' finally end Ed Miliband's career? (The Independent)
Rolls-Royce to build Britain's first mini nuclear reactors (The Telegraph)
China banned from investing in Sizewell C, energy secretary Ed Miliband vows (The Independent)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Luxury automakers have a more aggressive tariff battle plan
Luxury automakers have a more aggressive tariff battle plan

Miami Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Luxury automakers have a more aggressive tariff battle plan

Small businesses get a lot of attention during campaign season. You don't have to search long for a soundbite of a politician calling small businesses the "backbone of our economy" or the "lifeblood of America" or some other metaphor. While some argue that the giant omnibus bill that was passed earlier this month provides relief to small businesses through tax breaks, evidence shows that tariffs, President Donald Trump's primary economic agenda, have done immeasurable harm to small businesses. Related: Another luxury car maker is taken down by US tariffs More than 97% of the companies that import goods are small businesses with fewer than 500 employees, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Nearly half of those small businesses had fewer than 50 employees. Those small businesses were responsible for a third of the total value of goods imported. Big businesses also import a lot of goods, but they often have more flexibility when it comes to shifting supply chain strategies. This is not the same for small businesses. "For many small business importers, even a small increase in tariffs can have a profound effect on their bottom line," the Chamber of Commerce report states. "These businesses typically operate with tight profit margins and limited financial flexibility." This dynamic is also being played out in the auto space, where luxury automakers have been more aggressive with their strategy to combat tariffs, while non-luxury automakers, like small businesses, are forced to be more cautious. Image source: Lucy/Getty Images President Trump has been very clear that he doesn't want automakers to raise prices due to his tariffs. General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis, the three domestic manufacturers, have all agreed to those terms, usually blaming regular seasonal price adjustments for any increases. Foreign companies with large manufacturing footprints in the U.S. have also acquiesced to the president's wishes, while also attributing the minimal price increases to seasonality. But luxury automakers don't seem to be toeing the same line. Aston Martin British luxury automaker Aston Martin (makers of the iconic James Bond car) plans to raise prices on some of its cars and limit shipments to the U.S. Ferrari Italian marque Ferrari says it will raise prices as much as 10% on most of its models, even models that have already been sold. Ferrari sales contracts allow the company to adjust pricing due to changing economic conditions, according to Reuters. Mercedes-Benz German luxury automaker Mercedes-Benz recently reported a 9% second-quarter sales decline that it blamed on tariffs. But Mercedes has a significant manufacturing presence in the U.S., and in response ,it plans to add production capacity at its Alabama plant. Jaguar Land Rover Jaguar Land Rover announced that it was pausing U.S. shipments from the UK in April before restarting them after the the U.S. and UK announced they had reached a deal on the framework for a tariff deal. BMW Group BMW Group, which includes BMW, Mini and Rolls-Royce, initially stated that it would absorb tariff costs, but it has since said that it will raise prices on the 2 Series that it builds in Mexico. Meanwhile Mini is delaying bringing its Chinese-built electric Aceman crossover and convertible Cooper to the U.S. due to the tariffs. Related: 1 in 5 new car shoppers are committing a big financial blunder The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Is BP p.l.c. (BP) a Good Option for Passive Income Investment?
Is BP p.l.c. (BP) a Good Option for Passive Income Investment?

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is BP p.l.c. (BP) a Good Option for Passive Income Investment?

BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) is included among the 12 Best Oil and Gas Dividend Stocks to Buy Now. An oil rig surrounded by the expanse of sea, the pumping operations in progress. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) expects the total of its dividends and share buybacks over time to be around 30% to 40% of operating cash flow. The company is targeting an increase of at least 4% per year in its ordinary dividend and announced a dividend of $0.08 per share in April. As of the writing of this piece, BP boasts an impressive annual dividend yield of 6.13%. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) also announced $750 million of share repurchases at the end of the first quarter of 2025, and the $1.75 billion share buyback program it announced with the fourth quarter results was completed on April 25, 2025. To help improve its profitability, BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) has revealed that it is working on a $4 billion – $5 billion cost reduction program. The company delivered $800 million of structural cost reductions and $300 million of absolute reductions last year. Moreover, it was already $500 million lower in terms of absolute cost base in Q1 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. BP p.l.c. (NYSE:BP) is a British multinational company recognized worldwide for quality gasoline, transport fuels, chemicals, and alternative sources of energy such as wind and biofuels. While we acknowledge the potential of BP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 Best Nuclear Energy Stocks to Buy Right Now and The 5 Energy Stocks Billionaires are Quietly Piling Into. Disclosure: None.

At least 1 killed, 9 injured as Russia, Ukraine trade aerial attacks
At least 1 killed, 9 injured as Russia, Ukraine trade aerial attacks

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

At least 1 killed, 9 injured as Russia, Ukraine trade aerial attacks

July 21 (UPI) -- At least one person was killed and nine were injured in Kyiv and flights were disrupted in Moscow after Ukraine and Russia traded drone and missile attacks overnight. Six districts of the Ukrainian capital were targeted, including Darnytskyi, where a kindergarten, a supermarket, warehouses and other non-residential buildings were set ablaze, and Shevchenkivskyi, where a multi-story residential building was damaged, said Kyiv City Military Administration head Timur Tkachenko. He said the blast wave and flying debris smashed windows and damaged apartments and the entrance to the Lukyanivska metro station. An administrative building was partially destroyed and warehouses were on fire in the Solomyanskyi district. The Holosiivskyi, Dniprovskyi and Svyatoshynskyi districts sustained minor damage from falling debris, Tkachenko said. The Ukrainian Air Force said 450 drones and missiles were sent into Ukraine by Russian forces, with Kharkiv and the western city of Ivano-Frankivsk and surrounding region also sustaining significant damage However, the air force claimed air defenses shot down all but 23. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the attack continued throughout the night with attack drones also intercepted over the Sumy, Khmelnytskyi, Kirovohrad, Mykolaiv, Poltava and Kherson regions. "Russian strikes are always an assault on humanity," he said in a post on X. Meanwhile, Ukraine launched its own attacks, striking deep into Russia with long-range drones for a fifth straight night, sparking "travel chaos" at Moscow's airports, two of which temporarily suspended flights. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said there had been no injuries or major damage but that air defenses had now shot down 49 drones between Friday evening and Monday morning, with the Russian Defense Ministry claiming many more downed over provinces bordering Ukraine, but also deeper inside Russia. The airborne offensive saw cancellations and flight delays at Moscow airports that forced thousands of travelers to wait in long lines or spend the night on terminal building floors. The latest round of attacks came as French Foreign Minister Jean Noel-Barrot arrived in Kyiv for a two-day visit for talks on further assistance for Ukraine with Zelensky, Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko and Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha. In a social media update Monday, Zelensky said he and Noel-Barrot discussed defense assistance, particularly the need for air defense systems, training and the outcomes of meetings with partners at Ramstein -- the 56-country Ukraine Contact Group set up in 2022 to provide military support. "We are ready to expand joint defense production. There are decisions by French companies to start manufacturing drones in Ukraine, which is highly valuable. We also talked about sanctions against Russia and negotiations regarding Ukraine's accession to the European Union," said Zelensky. British Defense Secretary John Healey and German counterpart Boris Pistorius were expected to urge a meeting of the contact group Monday -- which the pair are jointly chairing -- to back a "50-day push" to get as many weapons and ammunition as possible into Ukraine in order to force Russian President Vladimir Putin to negotiate. "Last week, President Trump announced a new plan for large-scale NATO weapons transfers and committed to getting these 'quickly distributed to the battlefield," Healey told the virtual meeting. "Alongside this, the US has started the clock on a 50-day deadline for Putin to agree to peace or face crippling economic sanctions. As members of the Ukraine Defence Contact Group, we need to step up in turn with a '50-day drive' to arm Ukraine on the battlefield and force Putin to the negotiating table," Healey said. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store