Holding Sara Duterte trial isn't a choice, it's our constitutional duty, says senator
MANILA: Sen Sherwin Gatchalian (pic) reminded his colleagues in the Senate on Friday (June 6) that proceeding with the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte is not a matter of choice, but a constitutional mandate of the Senate.
'This is no longer our decision. It's not up to us whether to proceed or not — this is our constitutional duty,' he said in an interview over DZMM.
It has been four months since the House of Representatives transmitted the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte to the Senate on Feb 5.
Once transmitted to the upper chamber, Gatchalian said the Senate has no other choice but to proceed with the impeachment proceedings.
'This is very clear in our Constitution that once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted to the Senate, we no longer have a choice but to proceed with the impeachment court,' Gatchalian pointed out.
'In fact, the word 'forthwith' is even written there. It's no longer our decision; it's our duty to carry it out,' the senator repeated.
He made the remark when asked about the draft resolution initiated by Sen. Ronaldo 'Bato' Dela Rosa, seeking to declare the 'de facto dismissal' of the impeachment case against the vice president.
The resolution cited the 'inability' of the Senate to immediately act on it when the Constitution explicitly provides that the 'trial shall forthwith proceed' after the Articles of Impeachment were transmitted to the upper chamber.
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero originally set the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment by the House of Representatives panel of prosecutors for June 2 but later moved it to June 11, the last day of session before the 19th Congress adjourns sine die on June 13.
The Senate can only convene as an impeachment court after the reading of charges against the vice president.
'In my opinion, our senators should remember that this is no longer a personal decision or an individual choice. As senators, this is now our constitutional duty,' Gatchalian said.
'When we were sworn in as senators, we also swore an oath to uphold our Constitution — and it clearly states that once the Articles of Impeachment are transmitted to us, we are duty-bound to proceed,' the senator specified.
Once the impeachment court is convened, Gatchalian said the trial will continue until a decision is reached.
Although he acknowledged that the trial could not be finished within month or before the 19th Congress ends on June 30, the senator believes the Senate impeachment court can cross over to the next Congress.
'This will definitely carry over into the 20th Congress, and I see it as part of the Senate's mandate to continue the impeachment court hearings, as the Senate is a continuing body,' he pointed out. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Chief Justice retirement: Malaysian Bar calls for immediate announcement of replacement
PETALING JAYA: With Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's retirement due on Tuesday (July 1), the unknown status of her successor reflects a failure in institutional responsibility, says Malaysian Bar president Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab. He said the position of the Chief Justice is not merely symbolic but central to the integrity, independence and functioning of the entire judicial system. As such, he said a breakdown in governance risks damaging public confidence in the judiciary, leaving it exposed to speculation and unhealthy conjecture. Referring to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's comments earlier on Monday (June 30) on the alleged lobbying for an extension of Tengku Maimun's tenure and the importance of safeguarding the judiciary from politicisation, he said the Malaysian Bar fully supports the principle of judicial appointments remaining free from external influences. Mohamad Ezri said the Bar had refrained from advocating for or against the appointment or extension of any individual judge as it was not its place to so. "The Malaysian Bar respects and upholds this boundary. However, we must speak up when institutional silence threatens judicial independence. Our call for clarity on the impending transition is made in good faith and in line with our duty to uphold institutional continuity and public confidence in the administration of justice. "What we are witnessing now is not an issue of lobbying or preference but that of urgency, transparency and the proper functioning of a constitutional democracy. It is unprecedented. "This vacuum at the very apex of the Judiciary is as absurd as it is dangerous. "As such, the Bar calls on the relevant authorities to immediately announce the course of action – whether it be an extension or an appointment in accordance with the Constitution and the Judicial Appointments Commission process." he said in a statement. Tengku Maimun turns 66 on Tuesday, the mandatory retirement age for judges. However, it is not known whether her tenure will be extended or not. Earlier, Anwar said he does not interfere in judicial matters, including the appointment of judges or court decisions. He said all appointments and extensions of service, including for judges, must follow procedures as outlined in the Federal Constitution. COURTS CRIME
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Chief justice's retirement: Malaysian Bar fears 'dangerous vacuum' in judiciary
KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Bar has expressed deep concern over what it described as a "dangerous vacuum" and a "breakdown in governance" amid the lack of clarity surrounding the retirement of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, which is now just a day away. Malaysian Bar president Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab said the government's continued silence on whether Tengku Maimun's tenure would be extended or a successor would be named was "indefensible" and risked damaging public confidence in the judiciary. "As of today, there has been no formal announcement of a successor or whether an extension is to be granted. "The position of the chief justice is not symbolic — it is central to the integrity, independence and functioning of the entire judicial system. "Leaving the post in uncertainty so close to the retirement date reflects a failure in institutional responsibility. "A breakdown in governance risks damaging public confidence in the judiciary and opens the door to speculation and unhealthy conjecture," he said in a statement today. Ezri said while the Malaysian Bar did not take positions on specific appointments or judicial extensions, it could not remain silent when institutional indecision threatened judicial independence. "What we are witnessing now is not an issue of lobbying or preference; it is an issue of urgency, transparency and the proper functioning of a constitutional democracy. "What is unfolding now is unprecedented. With less than 48 hours to go before the sitting chief justice retires, there is still no official word from the relevant authorities. "This vacuum, at the very apex of the judiciary, is as absurd as it is dangerous," he said, adding that in the absence of clarity, the public would speculate. The Bar also took note of remarks by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today warning against lobbying for judicial appointments and calling for the judiciary to be protected from politicisation. Ezri said the Bar fully supported the principle that judicial appointments must remain free from lobbying and external influence, but warned against conflating legitimate institutional concern with political interference. "Our call for clarity on the impending transition is made in good faith and in line with our duty to uphold institutional continuity and public confidence in the administration of justice. "At this critical juncture, what is required is clear leadership and timely, decisive action. "The Malaysian Bar calls on the authorities responsible to immediately announce the course of action — whether it be an extension or an appointment — in accordance with the Constitution and the Judicial Appointments Commission process. "There is a meaningful distinction between supporting or objecting to a particular person and calling out a systemic failure that may erode confidence in the rule of law." Ezri said judicial independence must not only be praised in speeches, but upheld through actions and decisions that inspire public trust. Tengku Maimun, the first woman to serve as chief justice, is due to retire tomorrow upon turning 66 — the mandatory retirement age for judges under the Constitution.
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Musk fumes as Trump tax bill cuts electric vehicle credits
The Senate tax bill would bring a quicker end to a popular US$7,500 (RM31,627) consumer tax credit for electric vehicles. — AP Elon Musk slammed the US Senate's latest version of President Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar tax bill last Saturday, warning that the cuts to electric vehicle and other clean energy credits would be "incredibly destructive' to the country. Musk, the chief executive officer of Tesla Inc and SpaceX, posted on his social media platform X about the bill, which the Senate advanced in a contentious vote late Saturday. Musk recently left Trump's side after working for several months as the head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency. The bill would destroy millions of US jobs and give "handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future,' Musk said. The tech billionaire's latest criticism of the package threatens to reawaken his public rift with Trump that began after the world's richest man left his cost-cutting job in the administration. Trump was asked about Musk in an interview that was recorded on Friday before the billionaire's most recent posts. "I haven't spoken to him much, but I think Elon is a wonderful guy, and I know he's going to do well always,' Trump said on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, which aired Sunday. "But he got a little bit upset, and you know that wasn't appropriate.' The Senate tax bill would bring a quicker end to a popular US$7,500 (RM 31,627) consumer tax credit for electric vehicles. While the earlier proposal would have ended the incentive at the end of this year for most EV sales, the new version terminates the credit after Sept 30. Tax credits for the purchase of used and commercial electric vehicles would end at the same time. – Bloomberg
