logo
Time to obliterate the off ramp for language's sake

Time to obliterate the off ramp for language's sake

The Advertiser4 hours ago

This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to theechidna.com.au
Truth might be the first casualty in war but language falls soon after.
For 12 long days we were assailed with an unfamiliar and ugly term, which spread faster than COVID's Omicron strain. As the world held its breath over the Israel-Iran missile exchange, "diplomatic off-ramp" became the jargon du jour.
It was trotted out by experts and repeated ad nauseam by journalists. For some reason, it made my teeth hurt every time I heard it. What was wrong with, say, "peaceful compromise", "diplomatic solution" or "exit strategy"? In the language of diplomacy, off-ramp means finding a way out without losing face.
"Obliterated" grabbed all the attention after the US dropped its big bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. When I first heard it uttered by Donald Trump, like many others I thought, "Hang on. How do you know?"
Curious, I poked my nose into the dictionary to see what the word actually meant. "To remove all signs of something, either by destroying or covering it completely," the Oxford Dictionary told me. Fordo was out of sight before it was bombed. What it looks like after the strike is anyone's guess. Yet here we were, days later, arguing the toss over President Trump's hyperbolic language.
Weekend Fox News anchor turned Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth didn't help matters when defending Trump's imprecise language by saying the facility at Fordo has been "decimated". That suggests its capacity had been reduced by 10 per cent, a far cry from "obliterated". Confusion in the hunt for a linguistic off-ramp for the President.
Of course, this isn't the first war in which language has suffered. During the Vietnam War, the term "collateral damage" came into military usage, deployed as a sanitised euphemism for "civilian casualties". "Collateral damage" became a popular buzzword during the 1991 Gulf War. And in 1999, it earned the dubious distinction of being named the German Un Word of the Year after it was used by NATO forces to describe civilian casualties in the Kosovo war.
And we shouldn't forget "extraordinary rendition", which entered the language after September 11. In a sane world it would mean a memorable performance of, say, a piano concerto. Somehow it became code for plucking terrorism suspects off foreign streets and flying them to black sites where the use of "enhanced interrogation" (torture) wasn't illegal.
There's a host of war-related crimes against the language. "Ethnic cleansing" - in vogue during the Balkans conflict of the 1990s - seeks to sanitise genocide. "Pacification", which in military terms means eliminating an enemy. "Strategic withdrawal", a polite way of saying retreat. "Peace with honour" - Richard Nixon's favourite, which really means defeat with the dishonourable distinction of abandoning your erstwhile ally.
The argument of whether or not Iran's nuclear ambitions were derailed is unlikely to last long. That's because it's only a matter of time before Donald Trump deploys another weapon of crass distraction, most likely in the dead of night from his Truth Social platform.
Meanwhile, can we please obliterate the off-ramp?
HAVE YOUR SAY: What are the buzz phrases and euphemisms which annoy you the most? Does military and diplomatic jargon hide ugly truths that ought to be out in the open? Are you irritated by the misuse of the word "decimated"? Email us: echidna@theechidna.com.au
SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:
- The head of a man allegedly murdered and dismembered by his reality TV contestant partner is missing and police are calling on the public to help give his family "a peaceful outcome".
- The online far-right extremist network Terrorgram has been listed as a terrorist organisation, with members facing decades in jail if convicted of an offence.
- Carn, spew, and goon are some of the colloquialisms added to the Australian edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
THEY SAID IT: "Euphemism is a euphemism for lying." - Bobbie Gentry
YOU SAID IT: Garry wants companies to sign up to his user agreement, rather than the other way around.
"Having spent close to 50 minutes waiting to see my doctor recently, I was presented with the account for payment on departure," writes Brian. "Not having been amused with the wait, I suggested that my hourly rate at the time was about equal to the presented bill, so how about we call it quits and I get to see the doctor for nothing. Needless to say, I was kindly reminded that I needed to pay for my consultation."
Deb writes: "Last year, after being on hold for two hours and 40 minutes trying to report an internet outage to Telstra, I decided to cancel my account. Although the recorded options list did not have a 'cancel' option, some helpful Google advice suggested just saying 'cancel' anyway, and it worked! I was put through to a human within 10 minutes. Funny how companies suddenly improve customer service when there's a threat of losing business."
"Wonderful words once again," writes Sue. "Except you have made one mistake: you are not 'The User'. You are 'The Used'."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Complete bulls***': War of words erupts between Victorian Premier and Queensland Treasurer over GST carve up
'Complete bulls***': War of words erupts between Victorian Premier and Queensland Treasurer over GST carve up

Sky News AU

time40 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

'Complete bulls***': War of words erupts between Victorian Premier and Queensland Treasurer over GST carve up

A war of words has erupted between two of Australia's largest states after Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki blamed the Victoria and New South Wales governments for the Queensland's $8.6 billion budget black hole. Mr Janetzki used a speech on Monday to claim Queenslanders are being forced to compensate Victoria and NSW for their 'policy failures' as a result of the latest carve-up of GST revenue, which will see the state deprived of $5.3 billion over the next three years. 'Queensland, with its own newly re-established Productivity Commission, is doing the heavy lifting on productivity; our gas is solving the southern states' energy crisis and our GST revenue is going to Victoria to keep their hospital lights on,' the LNP Treasurer said. Queensland's share of GST revenue and 'no worse off payments' is set to fall by $2.3 billion in 2025-26, while Victoria's share will increase by almost $4 billion. But Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan hit back at the Queensland Treasurer on Monday. 'Let me put it in language and in a way that the Queensland treasurer can understand. It's just bulls***,' Premier Allan told reporters. 'Because when you look at the history of the GST, Victoria has been a net contributor to the tune of $31 billion and the Queensland budget's black hole, their 8-billion-plus black hole, has got nothing to do with the circumstances here in Victoria.' The Commonwealth Grants Commision's calculations show the largest factor in their decision to recommend a drop in Queensland's GST revenues was a massive boost in the state's coal royalties. But Mr Janetzki took aim at other calculations used for the determination. 'We were stripped of $800m to reimburse New South Wales and Victoria for Covid-19 policy failures, five years after the fact,' the LNP Treasurer said. He also claimed Victoria had received 'twice as much funding for ferries as Brisbane' despite more than 4 million people using Brisbane's ferries and Melbourne only operating the barely-used Westgate Punt. But Premier Allan described this as 'nonsense'. 'What a load of nonsense. What a load of misinformed nonsense,' she said 'I think we've made an investment of something like $600,000 over two years into the Westgate Punt. This isn't the cause of Queensland's budget challenges - their $8.6 billion black hole. 'I think the Queensland treasurer would be better off focusing on the facts and focusing on what we need to all focus on as state governments, and that is working with the federal government, securing a fairer share of infrastructure funding, of GST allocation. 'These nonsensical pot shots across state borders are just that - complete nonsense.' The CGC's latest GST distribution shows Queensland will get back 85 cents for every $1 of GST revenue it contributes in 2025-26, down from 95 cents in 2024-25. This compares to Victoria's share, which is set to increase from 96 cents to just over $1 over the same period. However 2025-26 will be the first year Victoria has received back more GST revenue than it has contributed, whereas Queensland has received more revenue than it has contributed for 19 of the past 25 years.

Out of the rubble of Iran, renewed hopes for a Gaza ceasefire
Out of the rubble of Iran, renewed hopes for a Gaza ceasefire

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Out of the rubble of Iran, renewed hopes for a Gaza ceasefire

Without being too rosy-eyed, the possibility of a new ceasefire in Gaza looks the best it has since death took a brief holiday in January when US President Donald Trump was inaugurated. That ceasefire collapsed after just two months, and it was back to war as usual following the murderous Hamas raid of October 7, 2023, that saw some 1200 people killed and 251 taken as hostages. Horror has piled upon horror for most of the 20 months since, with kidnapped Israelis used as pawns and Israel killing nearly 100,000 Palestinians. Now basking in the glory of bringing an end to Israel's 12-day war with Iran, Trump has taken the opportunity to push again for Israel and Hamas to agree to a ceasefire. He has hinted at an agreement this week with an adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu due to arrive in Washington for ceasefire talks. There are also plans for Netanyahu to visit the US soon. Trump also appears to calm legal storms buffeting Netanyahu by linking US aid to Israel with the prime minister's corruption trial after a court rejected his request last week for a delay while he negotiated the fallout from the conflict with Iran. Netanyahu made a latter-day political career out of waging a war on Gaza that polarised many of his fellow Israelis and menaced his political career. But the US bombing strikes on Iranian nuclear sites have turned the Israeli leader into a good guy at home for many, and his improved poll ratings have certainly afforded him a better shot at re-election. Consequently, there are renewed hopes in some quarters that Netanyahu has won new flexibility on seeking a Gaza resolution. A ceasefire in Gaza is long overdue and much needed. The obscenity of the initial Hamas raid has been countered by remorseless Israeli attacks on innocent civilians and the more recent footage showing the aftermath of Palestinians killed or wounded by gunfire, tanks and airstrikes, some while desperately waiting at aid distribution points. Loading Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. And Israel is continuing air strikes on Gaza. But there is hope among families of hostages that Trump's involvement in securing the recent ceasefire between Israel and Iran might lead to more pressure for a deal in Gaza. Of course, as is often the case with Trump, he speaks with forked tongues, a habit that makes it difficult to place much faith in his multitudinous pronouncements, such as spruiking bleach to treat COVID-19, promising to end Middle East and Ukraine conflicts, and imposing tariffs.

War of words over GST carve-up as states butt heads
War of words over GST carve-up as states butt heads

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

War of words over GST carve-up as states butt heads

A war of words has erupted over the carve-up of GST as one state condemns accusations it was awarded more to reimburse failed COVID-19 policies. Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki accused his southern counterparts of receiving $800 million out of the Sunshine State's GST share to reimburse "COVID-19 failures, five years after the fact". "The GST distribution should not compensate states for any economic or financial mismanagement," he said in his maiden post-budget speech to a Committee for Economic Development of Australia event in Brisbane. "In practice, this doesn't always occur." Queensland's revenue has been hit hard by a $2.3 billion reduction of GST revenue in 2025/26 and more than $5.3 billion over the following three years. The share is 28 per cent higher than a decade ago but significantly lower than a 58 per cent jump for NSW, Victoria's 118 per cent rise and Western Australia's whopping 317 per cent. "Queensland's unprecedented GST reduction ... has punched a hole in revenue forecasts," Mr Janetzki said. The state budget revealed a record $205 billion debt blackhole by 2028/29 and an $8 billion deficit in the next financial year. Mr Janetzki also claimed Melbourne received twice as much funding for ferries as Brisbane, which was a reflection on the Commonwealth Grants Commission's "fundamental misunderstanding" of transport infrastructure in a decentralised state. "They effectively assume the cost of serving a resident in Ballarat, 113 kilometres from Melbourne, is the same as the cost of serving a resident in Mackay, 968 kilometres from Brisbane," he said. But Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan refuted Mr Janetzki's claims, using choice words to condemn the Queensland treasurer's allegations. "Perhaps, let me put it in language in a way that the Queensland treasurer can understand - it's just bullshit," she said. "Because when you look at the history of GST, Victoria has been a net contributor to the tune of $31 billion. "And the Queensland budget's blackhole, their $8 billion-plus black hole, has got nothing to do with the circumstances here in Victoria." Ms Allan said she does not want to quibble with another state over "nonsense" instead focusing on Victoria receiving its "fair share". But the quibble continued when Mr Janetzki rebuffed that "the facts speak for themselves". "The facts couldn't be any clearer," he told reporters. "Canberra's carver has sold Queensland down the river to keep Victoria afloat." It is not the first time a war of words has escalated over the GST carve-up after former Victorian Treasurer Tim Pallas called NSW Premier Chris Minns "mathematically challenged". "He might not be the sharpest tool in the shed but he is a tool," Mr Pallas said last year. It occurred over the 2024/25 distribution that saw NSW and Queensland's share fall while Victoria received a boost.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store