logo
The long wait for answers over the Lockerbie bombing grows longer

The long wait for answers over the Lockerbie bombing grows longer

Yahoo05-06-2025

Major television productions are bringing the story of the Lockerbie bombing to a new global audience, but the real life drama of the trial of a new Libyan suspect has been delayed once more.
Abu Agila Mohammed Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi, known as Masud, had been due to face a Washington jury last month, accused of making the bomb that destroyed Pan Am Flight 103 and killed 270 people.
The 12 May starting date was abandoned because of problems with his health and the complexity of the case, and the trial is now scheduled to start in April, 2026..
The date was set at the District of Columbia District Court, where Masud listened with the help of a translator and was expressionless throughout.
After the hearing, relatives of American victims of the bombing told BBC News of their disappointment that the trial is now scheduled to start 50 weeks later than originally planned.
Kara Weipz is the president of the US group Victims of Pan Am Flight 103 and lost her 20-year-old brother Richard Monetti on the plane.
"I'm just going to pray that it stays at 20 April," she said. "I was 15 when this happened, and I'm 52 now and among the relatives I'm considered young.
"A lot of our family members are in their seventies and eighties and unfortunately, we lose them weekly or monthly now.
"The travesty in all of this that they're not seeing the justice that they've worked 37 years to see.
"That's what concerns us the most, that this trial will come around and we'll have lost more family members."
Victoria Cummock's husband John was coming home from a business trip to Europe a day earlier than planned, to surprise his family.
The founder of the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie Legacy Foundation, Mrs Cummock said: "We've lived through 36 years of delays and postponements simply because this is an international case filled with politics.
"Thirty six years with seven different administrations in America have really collided with the families' search for accountability and justice.
"It's no surprise that our mission to hold them to account is being delayed."
Mrs Cummock added she was concerned that President Trump's ban on Libyan citizens travelling to the US could affect the trial.
She said: "It just seems like it's a very slow journey to getting this case started."
Masud has been in US custody since December 2022 and has pled not guilty to the charges.
The Tunisian-born Libyan is in his seventies and is understood to have diabetes and heart problems.
His family in Libya has already expressed concerns over the delays to the case, saying he's an innocent man.
The new trial date was fixed after a joint motion submitted by the prosecution and the defence, both of whom raised the international nature of the evidence and witnesses.
A series of crucial legal arguments will have to be resolved before the trial can go ahead, with the judge Dabney Friedrich describing the 20 April date as "tentative."
Those will include the admissibility of a confession Masud is alleged to have made while in custody in 2012, following the collapse of Colonel Gaddafi's regime.
Another complication is the fact that new information on the case is still emerging, almost four decades after the attack.
A book published in France revealed the existence of documents said to have been retrieved from the archives of the Libyan intelligence service, of which Masud is alleged to have been a member.
If proved genuine, those documents detail his involvement in preparations for the attack on Pan Am 103.
It's more than 24 years since the first Lockerbie trial, when three Scottish judges convicted Libyan intelligence agent Abdulbasset al-Megrahi of playing a key role in the plot.
Megrahi was jailed for life but released on compassionate grounds by the Scottish government in 2009 after he was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He died three years later at home in Tripoli.
His release infuriated many of the American relatives, which is why they have set so much store on the trial of Masud, the first suspect to face an American court over Lockerbie.
They believe it will deliver the justice they were denied by the Scottish legal system.
The bombing remains the worst terror attack in British history and claimed the lives of 43 UK citizens.
Some, but not all, of the British relatives have never accepted the verdict against Megrahi, including the Rev John Mosey, whose daughter Helga was on the plane.
"I think they're just waiting for people like me to pop our clogs and get out of the way," he said.
"I'm still pretty cynical about the whole thing. I would like to be proved wrong but I can't see it happening.
"As far as I'm concerned, who made the bomb and who put in on the plane are secondary as to who were the main criminals.
"They were the group of people who had all the warnings that this was going to happen and warned their own people but didn't warn the public."
The big budget television dramas may have pushed the Lockerbie bombing back into the public eye but it's clear that there's a very long way to go before a jury delivers its verdict on Masud.
Judge Friedrich warned that if things are not done in a timely manner, there's a risk the trial could "slip" into 2027.
As she reminded everyone in the court: "This isn't a normal criminal case."
Lockerbie bombing trial delayed until next year
New documents blame Libya for Lockerbie bombing
'My brother died in Lockerbie - our story changed how air disasters are handled'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump cancels U.S.-Canadian trade talks over tech taxes
Trump cancels U.S.-Canadian trade talks over tech taxes

UPI

time17 minutes ago

  • UPI

Trump cancels U.S.-Canadian trade talks over tech taxes

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6. Trump on Friday suspended trade talks due to Canada's new Digital Services Tax. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo June 28 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump cited potential Canadian taxes on U.S. tech companies as his reason for ending trade talks with Canada on Friday. The tech taxes on Amazon, Google, Meta and other U.S. tech firms are due on Monday, and Trump said it is a deal-breaker. "We have just been informed that Canada ... has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American technology companies," Trump said in a Truth Social post on Friday. He called the tax a "direct and blatant attack on our country" and accused Canada of "copying the European Union, which has done the same thing." "We are hereby terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said. His administration in the coming week will notify Canadian officials of the tariff that it will have to pay to do business in the United States, Trump added. Trump last week attended the G7 economic trade summit hosted by Canada and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and sought common ground on trade talks, The Washington Post reported. Officials at U.S. tech firms oppose the Canadian tax, the amount of which is based on the revenues generated by Canadians' use of e-commerce sites, social media and the sales of data. All tech companies that generate more than $14.59 million from such services would be subject to the new 3% Digital Services Tax. The tax is retroactive to 2022 and could cost U.S.-based tech firms up to $3 billion, NBC News reported. Upon learning of Trump halting trade talks, Canadian officials on Friday limited U.S. steel imports and placed a 50% surcharge on steel imports that surpass the quota. Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said the surcharge will help to protect Canadian steel against what he called "unjust U.S. tariffs." He said the Canadian government is prepared to take additional actions, if necessary.

Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax
Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax

An updated draft of the Senate's megabill text slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy – and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. The initial draft released by Senate Republicans earlier this month cut the credit for any wind and solar projects that did not 'begin construction' by certain dates, while the latest version bases incentives on when projects actually begin producing electricity — a much higher bar to clear. The first draft gave any project that began construction this year full credit, any project that began construction next year 60 percent credit and any project that began construction in 2027 20 percent of the credit, before they were phased out thereafter. The new legislation instead says that the credits will only apply to facilities that begin producing electricity before the end of 2027. In addition, it imposes a new tax on some wind and solar projects that are placed in service after 2027. The projects that will be taxed if a certain percentage of the value of their components come from China. The Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act included hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits for low-carbon energy sources, including renewable energy. These subsidies were expected to massively reduce the U.S.' planet warming emissions. The GOP's cuts to the credits are expected to severely curtail those gains. If they pass, the cuts represent a win for the party's right flank, which has pushed for major cuts to the credits, and a loss for it's more moderate wing which has called for a slower phaseout. The renewables lobby slammed the changes as hampering the sector. 'In what can only be described as 'midnight dumping,' the Senate has proposed a punitive tax hike targeting the fastest-growing sectors of our energy industry. It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households,' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said in a written statement. 'These new taxes will strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments, threaten energy security, and undermine growth in domestic manufacturing and land hardest on rural communities who would have been the greatest beneficiaries of clean energy investment,' he added.

John Bolton writes off US strikes in Iran as Trump ‘campaigning‘ for Nobel Peace Prize
John Bolton writes off US strikes in Iran as Trump ‘campaigning‘ for Nobel Peace Prize

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

John Bolton writes off US strikes in Iran as Trump ‘campaigning‘ for Nobel Peace Prize

Former U.S. national security adviser John Bolton sharply criticized President Trump's Iran strategy and expressed broad skepticism about the prospect of making peace with Tehran in a Friday appearance on the Financial Times podcast Swamp Notes. Bolton made clear that he supported the American airstrikes last week that targeted three Iranian nuclear facilities but also suggested that Trump had personal motivations. 'I think what he's doing is campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize, and he thought he'd get it in the Ukraine-Russia war. That didn't happen,' Bolton said in a response to a question about Trump's claims of victory in the aftermath of the strikes. 'But I think he's looking at the possibility that maybe he can get it here.' Several GOP lawmakers have made moves in recent days to nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. The government of Pakistan also nominated him last week. Trump griped last week before the strikes that he would never get a Nobel Peace Prize, arguing that he deserved one for American peace efforts in Ukraine, Rwanda and a number of other conflicts. Bolton, a noted Iran hawk, was sharply critical of Trump's proposed tactics toward achieving peace in the country, referencing a CNN report that the United States was exploring helping Tehran access as much as $30 billion in funding for a civilian nuclear program. Trump has denied such reports. 'This is madness,' the former national security advisor said. 'I don't expect this to go anywhere, because to be truly satisfied that a country the size of Iran was really only engaged in peaceful nuclear activity requires an intrusive presence, whether it's the IAEA or foreign intelligence services, that the ayatollahs simply will never permit.' After first maintaining that the strikes were a one-time, targeted measure to disable key Iranian nuclear sites and help negotiate a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, Trump's rhetoric on Iran has heated up in recent days. He said Friday that he would consider bombing the country again if concerns about its nuclear program mounted. Bolton, a longtime skeptic of peace efforts with Iran, including the Obama-era nuclear deal, questioned whether Trump could effectively negotiate with the regime. 'When you're dealing with that kind of ideology, it's not like a Manhattan real estate deal,' he said. Even prior to the onset of strikes between Israel and Iran earlier this month, Bolton insisted that planned nuclear talks with the United States were 'fruitless.' He repeated similar lines on the FT podcast Friday, calling the Iranian government 'a group of medieval religious fanatics.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store