logo
Early humans survived in a range of extreme environments before global migration, study says

Early humans survived in a range of extreme environments before global migration, study says

Arab News22-06-2025
WASHINGTON: Humans are the only animal that lives in virtually every possible environment, from rainforests to deserts to tundra.
This adaptability is a skill that long predates the modern age. According to a new study published Wednesday in Nature, ancient Homo sapiens developed the flexibility to survive by finding food and other resources in a wide variety of difficult habitats before they dispersed from Africa about 50,000 years ago.
'Our superpower is that we are ecosystem generalists,' said Eleanor Scerri, an evolutionary archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology in Jena, Germany.
Our species first evolved in Africa around 300,000 years ago. While prior fossil finds show some groups made early forays outside the continent, lasting human settlements in other parts of the world didn't happen until a series of migrations around 50,000 years ago.
'What was different about the circumstance of the migrations that succeeded — why were humans ready this time?' said study co-author Emily Hallett, an archaeologist at Loyola University Chicago.
Earlier theories held that Stone Age humans might have made a single important technological advance or developed a new way of sharing information, but researchers haven't found evidence to back that up.
This study took a different approach by looking at the trait of flexibility itself.
The scientists assembled a database of archaeological sites showing human presence across Africa from 120,000 to 14,000 years ago. For each site, researchers modeled what the local climate would have been like during the time periods that ancient humans lived there.
'There was a really sharp change in the range of habitats that humans were using starting around 70,000 years ago,' Hallett said. 'We saw a really clear signal that humans were living in more challenging and more extreme environments.'
While humans had long survived in savanna and forests, they shifted into everything from from dense rainforests to arid deserts in the period leading up to 50,000 years ago, developing what Hallett called an 'ecological flexibility that let them succeed.'
While this leap in abilities is impressive, it's important not to assume that only Homo sapiens did it, said University of Bordeaux archaeologist William Banks, who was not involved in the research.
Other groups of early human ancestors also left Africa and established long-term settlements elsewhere, including those that evolved into Europe's Neanderthals, he said.
The new research helps explain why humans were ready to expand across the world way back when, he said, but it doesn't answer the lasting question of why only our species remains today.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump suggest DOGE look at Musk subsidies to save money
Trump suggest DOGE look at Musk subsidies to save money

Al Arabiya

time11 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Trump suggest DOGE look at Musk subsidies to save money

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested his efficiency department should take a look at cutting the subsidies that Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies have received to save the federal government money. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!'

NOAA Delays the Cutoff of Key Satellite Data for Hurricane Forecasting
NOAA Delays the Cutoff of Key Satellite Data for Hurricane Forecasting

Al Arabiya

timea day ago

  • Al Arabiya

NOAA Delays the Cutoff of Key Satellite Data for Hurricane Forecasting

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday it is delaying by one month the planned cutoff of satellite data that helps forecasters track hurricanes. Meteorologists and scientists warned of severe consequences last week when NOAA said in the midst of this year's hurricane season that it would almost immediately discontinue key data collected by three weather satellites that the agency jointly runs with the Department of Defense. The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program's microwave data gives key information that can't be gleaned from conventional satellites. That includes three-dimensional details of a storm–what's going on inside of it and what it is doing in the overnight hours, experts say. The data was initially planned to be cut off on June 30 to mitigate a significant cybersecurity risk, NOAA's announcement said. The agency now says it's postponing that until July 31. Peak hurricane season is usually from mid-August to mid-October. Spokespeople from NOAA and the Navy did not immediately respond to a request for more details about the update. NOAA–which has been the subject of hefty Department of Government Efficiency cuts this year–said Friday the satellite program accounts for a single dataset in a robust suite of hurricane forecasting and modeling tools in the National Weather Service's portfolio. The agency's data sources are fully capable of providing a complete suite of cutting-edge data and models that ensure the gold-standard weather forecasting the American people deserve, a spokesperson said. But Union of Concerned Scientists science fellow Marc Alessi told The Associated Press on Friday that detecting the rapid intensification and more accurately predicting the likely path of storms is critical as climate change worsens the extreme weather experienced across the globe. 'Not only are we losing the ability to make better intensification forecasts, we are also losing the ability to predict accurately where a tropical cyclone could be going if it's in its development stages,' Alessi said. 'This data is essential.' 'On the seasonal forecasting front we would see the effects,' he added, 'but also on the long-term climate change front we now are losing an essential piece to monitoring global warming.'

Movie Review: 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Puts a Wobbly Franchise Back on Track With Superb Installment
Movie Review: 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Puts a Wobbly Franchise Back on Track With Superb Installment

Al Arabiya

timea day ago

  • Al Arabiya

Movie Review: 'Jurassic World Rebirth' Puts a Wobbly Franchise Back on Track With Superb Installment

If you've lately been feeling that the Jurassic Park franchise has jumped an even more ancient creature – the shark – hold off any thoughts of extinction. Judging from the latest entry, there's still life in this old dino series. Jurassic World Rebirth captures the awe and majesty of the overgrown lizards that's been lacking for so many of the movies, which became just an endless cat-and-mouse in the dark between scared humans against T. rexes or raptors. Jurassic World Rebirth lets in the daylight. Credit goes to screenwriter David Koepp, who penned the original Jurassic Park, and director Gareth Edwards, who knows a thing or two about giant reptiles as director of 2014's Godzilla. Together with director of photographer John Mathieson, they've returned the franchise to its winning roots. Jurassic World Rebirth has nods to the past even as it cuts a new future with new characters. It's a sort of heist movie with monsters that's set on the original decaying island research facility for the original abandoned Jurassic Park. Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali – both very unshowy and suggesting a sort of sibling chemistry – play security and extraction specialists – OK, mercenaries – hired to get what everyone wants from dinosaurs in these movies: DNA. In return, there's $10 million. The movie is set five years after Jurassic World Dominion and some three decades after dinosaurs were reanimated. They've lost their public fascination – a subtle nod perhaps to the films in the franchise – and have struggled with the climate, gathering at the equator. The Big Pharma company ParkerGenix has come up with a blockbuster idea: Take DNA from three colossal Cretaceous-period creatures – the flying Quetzalcoatlus, the aquatic Mosasaurus and the land-based Titanosaurus – to cure cardiac disease. Wait, how does that work? Don't ask us, something about hemoglobin. The trick is this: The dinos have to be alive when the DNA is extracted. Why? Because then there'd be no movie, silly. It would be a 10-minute sequence of a guy in a white coat and a syringe. This way we celebrate three kinds of dinosaurs in three separate chapters. It may seem a little far-fetched, but may we remind you about the last movie, which involved a biogenetic granddaughter, a global pharma conspiracy, the cast members from both trilogies, a Giganotosaurus, giant locusts on fire and had the ludicrous decision to have Chris Pratt make a promise to bring home a baby dino – to its mother. The three-part quest at the heart of Jurassic World Rebirth is interrupted by a family – a dad, his two daughters and a sketchy boyfriend – in a 45-foot sailboat that is capsized and need rescuing. They bring a dose of not-always-working humor and humanity to the extraction team, which also includes a too-easily-telegraphing baddie played by Rupert Friend ('I'm too smart to die') and a museum-based paleontologist played by Jonathan Bailey. The filmmakers include clever nods to other blockbusters – Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Jaws and E.T. – and thrillingly create a dinos-hunting-in-a-convenience-store sequence like a tribute to the original film's dinos-hunting-in-a-kitchen sequence. The shots overall are beautifully composed, from silhouettes on a boat in twilight to almost feeling the burn of the ropes as actors rappel down a 500-foot cliff face. The creatures here are made glorious – from a dozing T. rex along a river bed to the ones twisting in the sea, pure muscle and heft. A highlight is a pair of long-tailed Tyrannosauruses entwining their necks as John Williams' familiar score plays, two lovers with thick, knotted skin, utterly oblivious to the pesky humans who want some DNA. For some reason, candy is a touchstone throughout the movie, from the opening sequence in which a stray Snickers wrapper causes incalculable harm to licorice fed to a baby dino and one character's fondness for crunching Altoids. Edwards' pacing is perfect, allowing dread to build with just the rustling of trees and letting characters deepen between breathless, excellently filmed action sequences. The gorgeous landscape – Thailand's waterfalls, grassy plains, shoreline caves and mangrove swamps – should be used for a tourist campaign, well, as long as they remove the rapacious dinos. As if all this wasn't enough, there's a bonus bit at the end. The research facility that was abandoned years ago was cross-breeding dino species and making genetically altered freaks that still roam around. Some look like a turkey-bat-raptor hybrid – gross and scary – and one is a 20,000-pound T. rex with a misshapen head and a horrible roar. It's like getting a free monster movie. In many ways, the folks behind Jurassic World Rebirth are trying to do the same thing as their mercenaries: Going back to the source code to recapture the magic of Steven Spielberg's 1993 blockbuster original. They've thrillingly succeeded. Jurassic World Rebirth, a Universal Pictures release that opens in theaters Wednesday, is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence/action, bloody images, some suggestive references, language and a drug reference. Running time: 133 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store