Shares in lenders soar after motor finance court ruling
The decision – which was handed down after the market close on Friday – saw FTSE 100 listed Lloyds shares jump nearly 8%, while Close Brothers stock soared by as much as 34% at one stage in the FTSE 250.
Barclays and NatWest shares lifted 2% as the wider sector also received a shares boost.
Lloyds and Close Brothers are seen as the most exposed to the motor finance saga and have put by hefty provisions for possible compensation bills relating to the affair.
The UK's highest court ruled that lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes, finding that car dealers did not have a relationship with their customers that would require them to act only in the customers' interest.
The decision has been seen as a 'win' for lenders by significantly limiting the potential payouts in compensation, according to experts.
But the judgment left open the door for potential redress claims for very large commissions, which the Supreme Court said were unfair and therefore potentially unlawful.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said on Sunday that it would consult on an industry-wide compensation scheme, meaning millions of drivers could be owed a share of up to £18 billion – though most payouts are expected to be less than £950 each.
Close Brothers – which together with South Africa's FirstRand Bank had mounted the legal challenge against a Court of Appeal ruling that 'secret' commission payments on motor finance were unlawful – said over the weekend that it welcomed the Supreme Court judgment.
It had put by £165 million to cover potential redress, which sent it slumping to a £103.8 million half-year loss, and warned in March over a further £22 million hit to annual figures from legal and other costs linked to the motor finance case.
Close Brothers said there 'remains uncertainty as to the range of outcomes, and the financial impact to the group, including any impact on its provisioning assessment' until the outcome of the FCA's consultation is clear.
On Monday, it added: 'We look forward to engaging with the FCA in respect of the consultation.'
Lloyds said it believes any change to the group's cash set aside for motor finance compensation was 'unlikely to be material', following Friday's court ruling.
It has aside £1.2 billion to cover potential costs and compensation related to commission arrangements.
The group is exposed to the motor finance market through its Black Horse business.
But Lloyds said there continues to be a 'number of uncertainties' and will continue to review its provision.
Lloyds said: 'After initial assessment of the Supreme Court judgment – and pending resolution of the outstanding uncertainties, in particular the FCA redress scheme – the group currently believes that if there is any change to the provision it is unlikely to be material in the context of the group.'
Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said the court ruling was 'a win for UK lenders, bringing some much-needed legal certainty'.
'But it's not a home run as the FCA announced plans to explore a compensation scheme that could cost the industry £9 billion to £18 billion.'
He added that Lloyds investors should be 'relatively pleased with this outcome'.
'It's broadly aligned with existing expectations, helping to alleviate fears that the final bill could be significantly higher.'
The FCA said on Sunday that the consultation will be launched by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026.
It urged consumers who are concerned they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much to their motor finance lender to complain now.
They do not need to use a claims management company or law firm and doing so could cost them around 30% of any compensation paid, according to the FCA.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
An establishment stitch-up at the expense of consumers
The market reaction to the Supreme Court's intervention in the car finance mis-selling scandal tells you everything you need to know about this grubby saga. Shares in Lloyds Bank, the UK's biggest car finance provider through its Black Horse brand, jumped as much as 7.5pc when trading commenced on Monday morning, leaving it at the top of the FTSE 100 leaderboard. The share price of Close Brothers, a specialist lender that is disproportionately exposed to the car finance market, surged as much as 25pc having sunk to 30-year lows as the industry braced for PPI-sized payouts. Shares in Bank of Ireland and Barclays, both of which have car finance arms, rose 4.2pc and nearly 2pc respectively. Make no mistake about it, the Supreme Court's ruling is a serious let-off for the banks and other lenders that have a big presence in the car loans space. True, revised payout estimations of between £9bn and £18bn to customers who were mis-selling victims is not to be sniffed at. However, even the top end of the range is less than half the £44bn bill the sector was collectively thought to be facing before the Supreme Court decision. The lower end would be just a quarter. It is a massive result for an industry that fought this case tooth and nail. Anthony Coombs, a former Tory MP and now chairman of lender S&U, whose shares had tanked 33pc at one stage, described it as 'a victory for common sense'. I'm not so sure about that. I certainly share the concerns of many about the shameless ambulance-chasing law firms and claims management firms that have helped fuel Britain's compensation culture. Clearly, it means there is a high risk of people jumping on the bandwagon and lodging bogus claims that the banks then feel the need to recover through higher borrowing costs for all of us. But that's hardly a new phenomenon – there will always be a relatively small number of chancers looking to game the system wherever they can. I'm less inclined to celebrate what has the unmistakable feel of an establishment stitch-up at the expense of consumers. I have a natural aversion to the armies of highly-paid lobbyists who go into bat for big business, skewing what is already a massive power imbalance even further. Consumers already face a David-versus-Goliath battle to be treated fairly. In this case, the scare tactics employed were particularly shameless as industry campaigners sought to ensure the Supreme Court's ruling was as favourable as possible to the banking community. Even now, despite a significant legal climbdown, these same activists felt the need to take to the airwaves to issue fresh apocalyptic warnings. Stephen Haddrill, the director general of the Finance & Leasing Association, claimed the scheme could push up borrowing rates for car-buyers as if somehow large corporations have no choice but to always pass on any additional costs to their customers. The same arguments were rolled out after Covid when companies claimed they were lifting prices to offset their own cost increases and they were no more convincing back then – with research suggesting pandemic profiteering was rife among the biggest companies. As if that wasn't sufficiently disingenuous, John Phillipou, chairman of the Finance & Leasing Association, weighed in too, complaining that there was a risk of harm to Britain's 'investability'. Still, lobbying is what lobbyists do and at least they make no attempt to hide their true intentions. Moreover, Phillipou is only echoing our alarmist Chancellor, and it is surely far more outrageous that she sought to meddle in the outcome. Rachel Reeves has absolutely no business at all involving herself in such matters, while there is zero evidence to back up her suggestion that large-scale payouts represented a threat to growth. Yet, as with the wrong-headed ousting of the chairman of the competition watchdog, the Treasury will stop at nothing in its attempts to deflect blame for Britain's floundering economy from the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax raid. The reasons for the UK's lack of competitiveness are innumerable and too often they can be laid at the door of 11 Downing Street. Reeves's willingness to side with bank bosses instead of standing up for the little man is also disquieting. The job of the Supreme Court judges is to ignore the noise and correctly apply the law but ministers seem to have allowed themselves to be captured by the lobbying fraternity. Voters may see it as another betrayal from a party that has waged war on hard-working families with its tax blitz. As Liberal Democrat MP Bobby Dean rightly said, Government interventions like this set a bad precedent if the reason for intervening is that it might damage industry, 'because then almost every consumer redress case would fall'. Dean, who is a member of the powerful Treasury select committee that polices the City, regulators and the Treasury, points out that compensation schemes give consumers confidence to borrow and invest, 'if they know they will be protected when companies take advantage of them'. It is now down to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to restore the balance after it confirmed it will consult on a redress scheme for those still entitled to compensation. But that hardly inspires confidence. After all, this is the same FCA that was described in a damning report by MPs and Lords just last year, as 'incompetent at best, dishonest at worst'; its actions as 'slow and inadequate.' The chances of the watchdog suddenly showing some teeth seem slim.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
FCA considers £950 car finance compensation for motorists
The announcement was made as many motor finance firms were not complying with rules or the law by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans, the FCA said. It comes after Friday's (August 1) ruling by the Supreme Court on cases in which the FCA had intervened. While some motor finance customers will not get compensation because in many cases commission payments were legal, the court ruled that in certain circumstances the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful, the FCA added. Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. We'll publish the consultation by early October and finalise any scheme in time for people to start receiving compensation next — Financial Conduct Authority (@TheFCA) August 3, 2025 The UK's highest court ruled that car dealers did not have a relationship with their customers that would require them to act 'altruistically' in the customers' interest. FCA issues statement on car finance compensation scheme Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, commented: 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It's fair for their customers to be compensated. 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get. What can fail an MOT test? 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.' Recommended reading: The FCA currently estimates that most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. The final total cost of any compensation scheme is currently estimated to be between £9 billion and £18 billion, the FCA added. The consultation will launch by early October.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Full list of banks closing in Wales this summer
Full list of banks closing in Wales this summer How customers do their everyday banking continues to change, with more and more people being less reliant on high street banks A number of branches of Santander are closing in Wales (Image: PA) Nine bank branches will close down in Wales this summer as the big banks continue their retreat from the High Street. Analysis of official data shows that a total of 138 branches will be shut down between June and August across the whole of the UK, with Santander leading the way. 13 banks will close during August, all but one of them branches of Santander, after the banking giant announced it was shutting 95 banks earlier this year. It follows the loss of 84 banks in June and 41 in July. In Wales, the Santander in High Street, Holywell, will close its doors for the final time on Wednesday, August 13. It follows the closure of three banks in July, the Santander branches in Caernarfon and Colwyn Bay, and the Halifax in Pontypridd. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here . The remaining five banks all vanished in June. Branches of Santander closed in Blackwood, Aberdare and Brecon, and branches of Lloyds in Pembroke Dock, Pembrokeshire, and Tonypandy, Rhondda Cynon Taf. You can find out if any branches are due to close near you using our interactive map. This widget requires javascript to work. Search your postcode Search x Since a voluntary agreement saw the major banking groups commit to assessing the impact of every closure in February 2022, 1,879 bank branches have shut or announced their intention to close. That's an average of around 50 closures announced per month or 12 per week. The LINK initiative to assess the impact of closures - which was agreed by all the major banks including Barclays, HSBC, Natwest, Lloyds, and Halifax - was set up to ensure vulnerable customers and small businesses were not left behind in the switch to cashless payments and virtual banking. When closures leave communities without any local bank, banking hubs or free ATMs are set up to fill the gap. Below is a list of all the Welsh banks due to close this summer: Santander, 148 High Street, Blackwood, Wales Santander, 17 Victoria Square, Aberdare, Wales Santander, 18 High Street, Brecon, Wales Lloyds, 35 Dimond Street, Pembroke Dock, Wales Lloyds, 33 Dunraven Street, Tonypandy, Wales Santander, 1 Bridge Street, Caernarfon, Wales Santander, 16 Penrhyn Road, Colwyn Bay, Wales Halifax, 2/3 Mill Street, Pontypridd, Wales Santander, 69 High Street, Holywell, Wales In a statement made earlier this year, a spokesperson for Santander said: "Closing a branch is always a very difficult decision and we spend a great deal of time assessing where and when we do this and how to minimise the impact it may have on our customers." Article continues below
