logo
Trump administration asked San Francisco's election chief for sensitive voter data

Trump administration asked San Francisco's election chief for sensitive voter data

The Department of Justice has demanded private personal information about some people in the San Francisco Department of Election's system, a request the department has not yet complied with and said it is reviewing.
The request, dated July 9, asks the Department of Elections for five years' worth of records showing voters whose registration was canceled because the voter did not satisfy citizenship requirements. It also asks San Francisco's election chief to provide a trove of personal information about those people, including their voter registration application, voter registration record, voting history, date of birth, driver's license number and the last four digits of their Social Security number.
The same Department of Justice official, Maureen Riordan, demanded the same information from Orange County Registrar Bob Page in June. When Page refused to disclose what he said was personal information protected by state laws, the DOJ sued him.
John Arntz, the director of the Department of Elections, told Riordan on July 23 that he's reviewing the request and planned to respond no later than Aug. 29. He asked Riordan to detail 'the specific statutory authority for this request and whether records produced will be kept confidential within the Department of Justice.'
Election law experts previously told the Chronicle that the laws being cited by the DOJ in its demand to Orange County do not actually give the agency the authority to demand sensitive personal information from elections officials. The law cited by Riordan, the Help America Vote Act, requires local officials to coordinate with the state to maintain the voter rolls.
When Page offered to provide the data to the DOJ if officials there agreed to keep it confidential, the department instead filed a lawsuit.
The request for voters' personal information from San Francisco officials is just the latest such move from the Department of Justice, which has been seeking voter rolls and requesting to inspect voter equipment across the country, the Washington Post reported earlier this month. Such requests have alarmed officials in those jurisdictions because of the potential for federal interference with upcoming elections.The Trump administration's efforts to collect data on noncitizens comes amid the administration's aggressive mass deportation efforts. White House officials have promised to boost deportation numbers and demanded federal agents hit 3,000 immigration arrests per day.
The DOJ earlier this month requested information on noncitizens in custody in large California metros — something the San Francisco Sheriff's Office and the California Attorney General forcefully condemned.
Sheriff Paul Miyamoto said at the time his office would only respond to information requests 'consistent with local, state, and federal law' but that his priority was public safety and 'not politics.'
California Attorney General Rob Bonta responded angrily to the request, with his spokesperson adding Trump and the DOJ 'cannot bully our local law enforcement into breaking the law.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama admin review of 2016 election
Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama admin review of 2016 election

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama admin review of 2016 election

Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed DOJ prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election, a senior Trump administration official said. The move comes after the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, claimed in a White House press conference last month that top Obama administration officials carried out a 'treasonous conspiracy' against former President Trump. Gabbard said she was sending criminal referrals to the Justice Department. A former senior DOJ official condemned the move as 'a dangerous political stunt.' And a former senior national security official pointed out that multiple past reviews, including ones conducted by Republicans, found no such crimes. "There's no logical, rational basis for this," said the official, who asked not to be named. The senior Trump Administration official said there is no exact timetable for when the grand jury will meet and that it could take months for the proceeding to begin. The news of Bondi's letter was first reported by FOX News. The official said a letter signed by Bondi instructs an unnamed federal prosecutor to begin presenting evidence to a grand jury to secure potential federal indictments. But the letter did not say what the charges would be, who the grand jury will investigate, or where the grand jury will meet. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. Democratic lawmakers have accused the administration of seeking to distract attention from the Jeffrey Epstein case. Conservative media and influencers have criticized how the administration has handled the case and demand the release of more documents and information. President Trump, Attorney General Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have all been criticized by conservative media and influencers over their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and material related to it. The idea that there was a conspiracy by the Obama administration officials against Trump was contradicted by a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee review, which found significant evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Then Senator Marco Rubio, the acting chair of the committee at the time, signed off on the report. The plans for a grand jury investigation are the latest in a series of actions by the Trump administration designed to rewrite the history 2016 election and seek retribution against those the president accuses of trying to sabotage his first term in the White House. Democratic lawmakers and former senior officials say Trump and his deputies have used the tools of government authority to try to 'rewrite' the history of the 2016 election, seeking to reverse an eight-year-old assessment that Russia waged an information war to boost Trump's candidacy. Trump and his supporters have long claimed that intelligence and law enforcement officials sought to undermine his first term by allegedly overstating Russia's interference in the 2016 election and investigating Trump's aides over their possible contacts with Moscow. They have accused former FBI director James Comey and former CIA director John Brennan of using the probes as a way to undermine Trump. A lawyer for Comey did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Comey and Brennan, who is a paid contributor to NBC News and MSNBC, have both denied wrongdoing. The intelligence community's analysis of the 2016 election and subsequent government investigations failed to satisfy the far-right and far-left sides of the American political divide. A probe by special counsel Robert Mueller found that Russia intervened in 2016 to undercut Hillary Clinton. But it did not find evidence thay the Trump team colluded with the Kremlin, as some voices on the left had suggested. At the same time, the special counsel Trump appointed in his first term, John Durham, disappointed far-right activists with his three-year investigation. Durham found no criminal conspiracy among Obama administration officials to fabricate intelligence about Russia's actions in 2016. He also filed no charges against the intelligence officers who oversaw a 2017 assessment that found Russia had tried to skew the election outcome in Trump's favor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store