logo
Lena Dunham on her new show Too Much, the allure of New York and TV's double standard

Lena Dunham on her new show Too Much, the allure of New York and TV's double standard

Globe and Mail2 days ago
I love Lena Dunham. She's generous with her candour, despite the vitriol of her haters. She wants to get to the bottom of what she notices, even if the bottom isn't the prettiest place to be. With her new Netflix series, Too Much (arriving July 10), she gives us a messy heroine at a messy moment in her life – messy meaning human – and invites us to ponder whether all those romantic comedies we've internalized are good for us or not.
Jessica, played by Megan Stalter (the overconfident nepo-baby agent on Hacks), is a fledgling producer at a New York commercial agency. She has a loving but chaotic family – grandmother (Rhea Perlman), mother (Rita Wilson), older sister (Dunham) – and a callous ex-boyfriend (Michael Zegen), who stopped loving her and then found countless ways to blame her for it.
She accepts a short-term assignment at the London office, where her co-workers, led by Richard E. Grant, dismiss her in new, British ways. And then she meets Felix (Will Sharpe), a musician whose own screwed-up-ness is disguised by his dreamboat exterior. Jessica's three-steps-forward, two-back progress is mirrored by the flashbacks Dunham employs to deepen her story, and Stalter is as physically and emotionally fearless as Dunham herself was on her previous series, the zeitgeist-grabbing Girls. Reader, she made me cry.
Yeah, yeah, parts of Too Much sound semi-autobiographical: Dunham made some blunders amplified by social media; moved from New York to London in 2021 (I recommend her New Yorker essay about breaking up with the city she grew up in, as the child of two artist parents); met and married a musician, Luis Felber, who co-created the series. But name a decent piece of art that isn't.
Here are highlights from a recent video interview with Dunham.
What questions were you asking yourself while writing Too Much?
I was trying to look at and deconstruct the influences that gave me my idea of what being an adult woman is supposed to look like. As a kid I was obsessed with The Mary Tyler Moore Show, That Girl, Gidget. That unflappable, 'She's always getting herself into a sticky situation and getting herself out of it.' In your 20s, you don't know what you're supposed to be like; that's what Girls was about. Once I hit 30, I started thinking about all these 'supposed-tos,' and the ways in which my life didn't look like that.
I remember calling my mother, really upset: 'I see all these women in the street, it's seven in the morning and they've already exercised and made their own coffee at home and the coffee is in a canister, and I cannot get out of bed before 9:30 if I'm not working, and that's on a good day.' I realized that Mary Richards, if she was around now, would definitely make herself a smoothie and put on exercise pants and a matching vest, because Mary was equipped and ready. I had this consistent feeling of being behind, being unprepared. Looking around the room, thinking, 'There's supposed to be an adult here' – oh god, it's me.
So I wanted to centre in a romantic comedy a woman who realistically struggles with the things I and many people I know struggle with. Minus the montage of her suddenly cleaning her apartment and blowing out her hair and she's ready for life.
There's a beautiful moment where Felix tells Jess he loves her body. How important was that to you?
It was important to me and to Meg that whatever Jess is beating herself up about, it's not about what her body looks like. We talked a lot about how to do it. I've dated people who said a version of this to me: 'I don't want you to worry, your body not being size zero is not a problem for me.' They may have said it lightly more elegantly than that, but only lightly. When I met my husband, 'Don't worry' was not a part of the dialogue. The compliments were never, 'Insert light neg, but.' He never said anything that made me feel like there was another reality in which I could look a different way. I didn't realize I'd been missing that until I had it. Because even the body positivity movement is saying, 'Don't worry, it's okay.' What if we just took all that out of the picture?
Did moving to London reawaken you creatively in the way you hoped it would?
Yes. Although I published that essay about leaving New York, then promptly headed back to shoot all over the city all summer. It was the most me thing ever. My timing has never been ideal.
I met my husband in London, that was obviously a big thing. I've found great collaborators here. But it also created some space for me to reimmerse myself in reading, watching films, painting. Girls was an amazing but all-encompassing experience. New York is such a productivity-based culture, it's easy to forget that you can't drive a car that's out of gas. I feel lucky in a way that my chronic health condition told me that I was burnt out.
Typically for you, you've been open about your Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, endometriosis and fibromyalgia.
It doesn't always feel like a luxury when you get sat on your butt by your own body turning against you. But it was a luxury to be able to pause.
Let's talk about this maddening phenomenon where women who write some version of their experience get dismissed as limited, while men who do the same are hailed as authentic.
I do get frustrated, not even on my own behalf, because I so often see women or queer people who are making things that are deeply developed pieces of work, which are being treated like they're attention-seeking tweets. It's hard for some people to believe that I got into this for reasons other than attention or fame. But truly, I don't even like compliments that much; they stress me out and make me turn red, and I immediately have to turn around and compliment the other person. I'm always like, 'Am I making enough of an appreciative face that they'll think I'm humble, but also like the compliment?' The reason I do any of this is the work.
Do the harsh comments bother you?
If I make you so angry, please go find something you enjoy. There's more content than there's ever been. I actually cannot relate to the way people act as if they're having their eyes held open and images forced into their brains like in Clockwork Orange. I wouldn't even click on a picture of Trump on Insta.
There's an Easter egg in the final episode of Too Much, where we hear your voice call 'cut.' You sound so happy.
It's a bit embarrassing, I sound like I'm a fourth-grader directing a school play. But my directing style is enthusiastic. I really get in there with actors, we're working it out, I'm gesticulating a lot. I'm super collaborative; I hire people I love and trust and try to give them a lot of agency. I can't help but notice that men are often treated like auteurs, whereas people will ask me stuff like, 'Were you in the editing room?' Of course I'm there. There's this assumption that the craft, the aesthetic, aren't yours, and my favourite part is the craft.
Tell me a craft-related story.
When I directed the film Catherine Called Birdy –
A fantastic film, starring Bella Ramsey. On Netflix.
On the first day, I showed up early to walk through the medieval village alone. I will never forget it as long as I live. It was my favourite book when I was 10, I wanted to make it for 25 years, and there I was, walking in a village we created. I cannot believe this is my job. I hope everyone who works on my sets feels that way: 'I can't believe that we get to do this together.'
This interview has been edited and condensed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'He's still collecting the cheque': Will the Diddy verdict have any consequences on the mogul?
'He's still collecting the cheque': Will the Diddy verdict have any consequences on the mogul?

CBC

time7 hours ago

  • CBC

'He's still collecting the cheque': Will the Diddy verdict have any consequences on the mogul?

Social Sharing WARNING: This story contains allegations of ​​​sexual violence and may affect those who have experienced​ it or know someone impacted by it. The split verdict for the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs came in yesterday. The jury found the hip-hop mogul guilty of two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution, and not guilty of three charges of sex trafficking and racketeering, which could have put him behind bars for life. But the online chatter around Diddy and his legacy have become just as big a conversation as the trial. Today on Commotion, guest host Rad Simonpillai is joined by Refinery29 Diddy trial reporter Taryn Finley and hip-hop broadcaster Jay Smooth to react to the news, the discourse around the case and what it all might mean for Diddy's pop legacy moving forward. We've included some highlights below, edited for length and clarity. For the full discussion, listen and follow Commotion with Elamin Abdelmahmoud on your favourite podcast player. WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube: Rad: Can you talk to me about the online discourse and what stood out to you about how people have been discussing this trial? Taryn: A lot of it has just been plain ugly. I want some of these folks to just say that they hate women with their chest and move on because that's really what they mean when they're using this victim-blaming language with Cassie [Ventura, Diddy's ex-girlfriend] and these other accusers saying, "Oh, they just want money" and "Oh, it wasn't a problem when XYZ." That, again, shows how deeply flawed and deeply ignorant a lot of people are to the pain and suffering that these victims have gone through. When you listen to what they're saying, even on a human level, it doesn't add up to me how a lot of comments can be so cruel and how folks can be outside of the courthouse post verdict, dousing themselves and each other in baby oil. Unfortunately, again, it's not surprising. We've seen this kind of rallying around Tory Lanez and R. Kelly and Bill Cosby and so many others. And the lack of empathy that is being extended for these victims is not only dark and dehumanizing, but we've become so desensitized to sexual assault and violence allegations in the worst way. And we have to do better. Jay: Yeah, it really was such a grotesque spectacle. And what was interesting to me is the vibe of some of those videos outside the courtroom. They reminded me of some of the clips we saw on Jan. 6 outside the Capitol, this similar sort of lunatic energy. And I don't think that's a coincidence. Because just like our politics are being poisoned by this whole right-wing, manosphere media ecosystem, on the cultural side, those people outside the courtroom are forming their worldview from a steady diet of these garbage drama channels and influencers whose whole business model is to peddle misinformation on a case like this that taps into your worst instincts and prejudices, just like we watched people make millions of dollars from demonizing Megan Thee Stallion for three years. Those people outside of the courtroom have had an appetite for this salacious dehumanization of these women, and of course we see them go out there and treat the whole situation like a farce. So I think it's a really telling sign of the times, in a lot of ways, for how unserious we are and how much of an appetite we have for hating women, like Taryn said. Rad: That is so depressing to hear all of that. I want to get into another aspect of it — setting aside the trial and everything — but just thinking about Diddy as someone who's had this undeniable impact on pop music, pop culture as we know it. How do you think the split verdict then impacts his legacy moving forward? Taryn: I think a lot of his fans and a lot of folks will also be split. It will be a split decision culturally, where some folks will continue to dance to his music and Diddy bop and do all of that, while others will boo the DJ and tell him to turn it off. But bigger than music, though, we also have to consider this is a businessman and he has been a businessman for decades. And even though he's sullied his name and sits in prison now, he's still collecting the cheque. And that won't end. He'll no longer be able to be the face of brands like DeLeón [tequila] and Revolt [media company] and be the head of these big media companies, but Diddy is savvy and well-connected. And many won't want to touch him publicly, not necessarily just because of the moral aspect, but because they're afraid of their reputation being hurt, which is a whole other conversation in itself. But there always will be someone who will. Jay: My personal feeling is I don't care what happens to Diddy's legacy. This is not like a Dr. Dre situation, where you have a genuinely great artist who made big contributions creatively and he also has an ugly history of abuse. That's not who Diddy is. Diddy, I guess, he ushered in the shiny suit era of vapid materialism into music — which is like, thanks a lot. Other than that, he's a megalomaniacal businessman who's really good at self-promotion and finagled his way into a lot of production credits he only halfway deserves. So as far as I'm concerned, throw that legacy away. Use AI to take him off the Biggie tracks and we can move on. The reality is, of course, he's going to be fine, for all the reasons Taryn said. And really, when I think about legacy, I look at all these women who stepped up to tell their story and I want to know: will they get to have a legacy? And that's going to be up to us with what we do to take what they did and make it count. At the risk of being cheesy, I think that's what I'm more concerned with in terms of legacy.

Phil Rosenthal might have never made Everybody Loves Raymond if he hadn't fallen asleep on a 300-year-old bed
Phil Rosenthal might have never made Everybody Loves Raymond if he hadn't fallen asleep on a 300-year-old bed

CBC

time9 hours ago

  • CBC

Phil Rosenthal might have never made Everybody Loves Raymond if he hadn't fallen asleep on a 300-year-old bed

Before he created his long-running sitcom Everybody Loves Raymond, Phil Rosenthal was a broke New York City theatre student who worked a number of odd jobs, like managing a deli and patrolling The Metropolitan Museum of Art as a security guard on the graveyard shift. Though he couldn't have known it at the time, his brief stint working at New York's largest art museum would have a significant impact on his future career as a TV writer — and it all has to do with how he got fired. "I thought I could stay up at night and have another job during the day, probably a theatre job that didn't pay anything," Rosenthal recalls in a live on-stage conversation with Q 's Tom Power at the Banff World Media Festival. "On the third day without sleep, I did not report back to my post after doing a route. I was asleep and they found me asleep in a period room, which was a replica of a 300-year-old room with [an antique] bed as part of the exhibit. And that's where they found me — on that bed." WATCH | Phil Rosenthal's full interview with Tom Power: In addition to losing three days of sleep, Rosenthal says he was also on cold medication that made him drowsy. When he saw the bed, he thought it'd be a good idea to lay down for a few minutes. But when he didn't return to his post after an hour and a half, museum staff started looking for him, concerned that maybe a crime was being committed (art thefts are often inside jobs). "I'm drooling on the pillow of this thing and I just remember looking up at this lady supervisor and thinking, 'How did she get in my room?'" he says. "The museum frowns on you touching the art, let alone sleeping on it. And so I was fired. It was the most humiliating thing that ever happened to me." Several years later, Rosenthal was living in Hollywood, trying to make it as an actor, but not having much luck. When his friend asked him if he'd like to collaborate on a spec script for the show Roseanne, he knew exactly what the story should be about. "John Goodman's character, the dad, they need extra money, and he gets a night job working as the night guard at the local museum and he falls asleep on a 300-year-old bed," Rosenthal explains. "We write this script. And people all over town read it and go, 'What an imagination!' And we got hired instantly on a sitcom." Today, Rosenthal's advice to emerging writers is simple. "Write as specifically as you can," he says. "Specificity is the key to being universal."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store