Probe contents of document in JAC minutes leak too, urges Ramkarpal
He said the focus should not merely be on identifying how the document was leaked but, more importantly, whether the claims contained within it were authentic and credible.
"Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail said that investigations are underway under Section 8 of the Official Secrets Act 1972, Section 203A of the Penal Code (disclosure of information obtained during the performance of one's duties), and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act (improper use of network facilities).
"However, his statement made no mention of the elephant in the room, namely whether the allegations of judicial interference in the said leaked minutes will be thoroughly investigated as well," Ramkarpal said in a statement.
He said that Khalid's response appears to confirm the authenticity of the leaked minutes , which in itself strengthens the need for a full investigation into the issues raised.
"The allegations are deeply troubling as they strike at the very foundation of judicial integrity. The public deserves to know if they are true."
Ramkarpal said the government could not afford to appear indifferent and must demonstrate a strong commitment to upholding the independence and credibility of the judiciary.
He also raised concerns over the impending appointments of several top judicial positions, which he said are made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the prime minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers, in line with Article 122B(1) of the Federal Constitution.
"In light of the serious allegations made against a judge mentioned in the leaked minutes, the prime minister should not consider the judge for any of the four key posts unless and until the allegations have been fully investigated and resolved."
He said if any wrongdoing was established, the judge's integrity would be severely compromised, making it inappropriate for him or her to be elevated.
"The position demands a thorough and transparent investigation, and anything less may result in a serious loss of confidence in the Madani government, which should be avoided."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Saifuddin: Respect constitution in CJ's appointment
PUTRAJAYA: All parties should respect the constitutional process in the appointment of the new chief justice and refrain from making premature accusations or assumptions, said Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. Saifuddin said the Federal Constitution clearly outlines the procedure under Article 122B, whereby the Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints the Chief Justice on the advice of the prime minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers. "In this context, the public's attention is now on the vacancy of the Chief Justice. "The process is clearly spelled out in the Constitution, so there is no need to prejudge or make baseless accusations, particularly those alleging executive interference," he said at a press conference after attending the Home Ministry's monthly assembly here today. Saifuddin said respect for the process is essential, and all parties must refrain from politicising or speculating on ongoing constitutional matters. "If there are allegations of leaks or other claims, let the police investigate. A statement has already been issued confirming that investigations will proceed." He also dismissed claims of executive interference in judicial matters, noting that Article 125 of the Constitution provides a clear mechanism for addressing issues involving judges, including ethical breaches. "If the Constitution is upheld and everyone understands their role, there is no need to involve the executive or blame the government. The monarchy is already carrying out its functions in accordance with the Constitution." Saifuddin warned against attempts to stir public sentiment or create false narratives, saying such efforts only provoke unnecessary reactions. "The prime minister, ministers, and the judiciary are all bound by the same constitutional framework. Let the process take its course." Earlier, it was reported that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim confirmed the Conference of Rulers is expected to decide and announce the appointment of the new Chief Justice today. He also confirmed having met with the Conference of Rulers on Tuesday morning. "I had a lengthy discussion with the Conference of Rulers, and it is best to let them decide. "God willing, there will be a clear announcement tomorrow (today) that will dispel all negative perceptions," he said during his keynote address at Malaysia's International Conference on Governance and Integrity 2025 yesterday. The prime minister also acknowledged public concern over the delay in appointing the Chief Justice and the negative perceptions surrounding the matter.
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Chief Judge Hasnah is acting Chief Justice
KUALA LUMPUR: Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim (pic) will assume the powers and responsibilities of the Chief Justice, including functions under the Constitution, until the post is filled. In a statement, the Office of the Chief Registrar said the decision was made under Article 131A of the Federal Constitution and the provisions of Sections 9(1)(b) and 9(3) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Act 91). 'The Malaysian judiciary remains steadfast in its role as the guardian of justice and will continue to serve the people and the nation with unwavering dedication,' read the statement, Bernama reported. Hasnah, who reached the mandatory retirement age of 66 on May 15, has had her tenure extended by six months until Nov 14. The post of Chief Justice became vacant following the mandatory retirement of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat on Wednesday. She was the first woman to hold the nation's highest judicial office. Tengku Maimun was appointed Chief Justice on May 2, 2019, succeeding Tan Sri Richard Malanjum.
Malaysian Reserve
9 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
'Turun Anwar' rally: No notice makes it difficult, but police will facilitate — Saifuddin
PUTRAJAYA — The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) will facilitate the Himpunan Turun Anwar rally, scheduled to take place in the capital on July 26. Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said this is to ensure the safety and orderliness of all participants, even though rally organisers are no longer required to submit prior notice to the police, following a Federal Court ruling that declared Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 unconstitutional. He acknowledged, however, that the court's ruling has made it a little difficult for PDRM to plan appropriate security measures. 'If organisers were still required to inform the police, we would at least know the venue and expected crowd size, allowing us to deploy personnel accordingly, not to obstruct, but to facilitate the gathering. 'But now, without prior notification, the police must fully mobilise all available resources to devise an appropriate strategy,' he told a press conference after the Home Ministry's monthly assembly today. Despite the challenges, Saifuddin gave assurance that PDRM will manage security professionally. He also reminded organisers and participants to abide by the existing provisions of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012. Organisers, he said, are responsible for ensuring that no dangerous weapons are brought to the rally, no speeches undermine the monarchy or religious harmony, and that children are not involved in the gathering. 'If police take action, don't claim your freedom has been violated because the relevant laws still apply. 'I just want to stress that if they want to proceed with the rally, it's their democratic choice because the government has never suppressed the people's freedom of expression,' he said. On July 1, the Federal Court ruled unanimously that penalising organisers for failing to notify police five days in advance of a peaceful assembly is unconstitutional. According to the five-judge panel, Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act, which imposes fines for failing to give prior notice, constitutes a form of prohibition, not a permissible restriction under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution. — BERNAMA
