logo
Burn notice: Gen Z and the terrifying rise of extreme tanning

Burn notice: Gen Z and the terrifying rise of extreme tanning

The Guardian7 hours ago
Hannah Clark got her first spray tan for her school prom and has never looked back. 'I'm not proud of it, but I have used sunbeds,' says the 29-year-old graphic designer from Plymouth. Her goal is 'that glow you get when coming back from holiday. You know, when you walk around and people say: 'Oh, you look really healthy.' It's that feeling I'm chasing.'
Clark is far from alone. On TikTok and Instagram, posts with the hashtag 'sunbed' number more than 500,000. Last year, a survey from skin cancer charity Melanoma Focus found that 28% of UK adults use sunbeds, but this rose to 43% among those aged 18 to 25. This new generation of younger tanning obsessives will go to extreme lengths to darken their skin. Some track the UV index – the level of the sun's ultraviolet radiation – and deliberately sit in the sun at the most dangerous times of day. Others use unregulated nasal tanning sprays and injections, which rely on a chemical to darken the skin.
All the people under 30 I spoke to for this article know how dangerous tanning is. NHS guidance states that there is no safe or healthy way to get a tan and advises keeping out of the sun between 11am and 3pm, wearing sunscreen of at least factor 30, and covering up with clothing, hats and sunglasses. Dr Zoe Venables, a consultant dermatologist at Norfolk and Norwich University hospitals, with an interest in skin cancer epidemiology, says that when skin turns darker after UV exposure it 'suggests you're damaging those cells in your skin'.
Sunbeds are categorised by the World Health Organization (WHO) as 'dangerous' – with their cosmetic use increasing incidences of skin cancers and driving down the age at which skin cancer first appears. It says people who have used a sunbed at least once at any point in their lives have a 20% greater chance of developing melanoma – the deadliest of the three most common forms of skin cancer – than someone who hasn't. For someone who has used a tanning bed for the first time before the age of 35, there is a 59% greater chance of developing melanoma.
Despite this stark reality, having a tan is still presented to many young people as aspirational – whether it's faux tan-lines appearing on catwalks or bronzed influencers on holidays in Dubai. Many sunbed shop owners sell tanning as a form of 'self-care', while influencers post 'come for a sunbed with me' videos. Perhaps most perniciously, some sunbed shops even make light of the known risk associated with them. One meme shared on Instagram by a tanning salon overlays the text: 'When someone tells you sunbeds are bad for you' with a clip from the sitcom Benidorm, in which the character Madge Harvey says: 'I spy with my little eye something beginning with AB: absolute bollocks.'
Emily Harris, 23, from Leeds, uses sunbeds. Her parents both work for the NHS and have warned her about the risks. But she says that having spent most of her teenage years in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, followed by various global conflicts and the ever-looming presence of climate breakdown, the dangers of a sunbed seem small by comparison. 'You can die of anything – do you know what I mean?' she says.
While Harris, who works in sales, can't afford to use sunbeds all the time, she uses them whenever she has 'a bit of spare money', making use of the deals that salons offer. Before a recent holiday, she bought a package that gave her unlimited minutes, with a daily limit, for four weeks. 'I was going every day,' Harris says, which she admits 'is a bit silly', but adds: 'I was trying to make the most of the package.'
As well as using tanning beds, Harris is 'obsessed with tracking the UV', and has the index on the lock-screen of her phone. She and her colleagues plan their breaks around times when the UV index is highest, so they can maximise their exposure to the dangerous radiation. A number of her friends also use nasal tanning sprays, which were the subject of a Trading Standards warning issued earlier this year that stated: 'These products can cause nausea, vomiting, high blood pressure, and even changes in mole shape and size … studies have shown a potential link to melanoma, a type of skin cancer.' Harris tried one when her friend had a spare bottle, but 'didn't see a result' so hasn't used one again. Was she worried about what might have been in it? 'To be honest, not really. I know it's bad, but at the time, I was more bothered about getting a tan.'
Nasals, as they are known, usually contain a lab-made substance called melanotan II, a chemical that darkens skin pigmentation. Though it is illegal to sell medicinal products containing melanotan II in the UK, cosmetic products fall outside that remit and are easily available on social media. Dr Suraj Kukadia, a GP known to his 282,000 TikTok followers as 'Doctor Sooj', is concerned about the popularity of nasal sprays. He says melanotan II can also lead to 'painful and sustained erections in men, kidney damage, acne and muscle-wasting'.
Holly Feldman, 25, lives in Surrey and is the CEO of a swimwear boutique. She has more than 10,000 followers on Instagram and is often sent free tanning products such as nasal sprays and injections. 'I think that was why it was so addictive for me,' she says. Though she had no idea what was in these products, and the injections in particular made her feel unwell, she says: 'I was just trying to turn a blind eye to it because I was so obsessed with how it made me look.'
Feldman recently appeared on former Love Island contestant Olivia Attwood's ITV documentary series The Price of Perfection, in which Attwood explores the risks of various cosmetic treatments. Being on the show made Feldman realise how much potential damage she could be doing. She hasn't used a tanning injection for four months, and has reduced her use of a nasal spray to a couple of times over the past month, when previously it would have been four inhalations a day. 'I do still use sunbeds,' she says. 'But I have cut down. There was a time when I was going on them four, five, six times a week and now I only go on them once or twice.'
Data from the UK and Ireland's Sunbed Association suggests that tanning beds are most popular among 25- to 45-year-olds, and more women than men use them. But that's not to say gen Z men are free from the pressure to sport a tan.
Craig Hopkins, a 29-year-old dance teacher based in Harpenden, Hertfordshire, says he uses sunbeds to 'look like I've just come back from holiday'. He prefers the look of a 'real' tan to a fake tan, which ties in to existing social media trends such as 'looking expensive' and 'quiet luxury'.
'On Instagram especially, everyone is always on holiday, always super brown. So it's probably just trying to keep up,' Harris says. Like Harris, Hopkins also tried a nasal spray once, via a friend who used to sell them, but it made him 'feel really sick'.
Despite the known risks and side-effects, most of the young people I spoke to for this article were still willing to give nasal sprays a try. Megan Urbaniak, a 23-year-old nail technician from Rotherham, says: 'I feel as if I know a million people who use them and everyone seems to have been fine. It does kind of weird me out that they don't tell you what's in them, but I'm sure there's worse in the world.'
Urbaniak is a regular sunbed user – and has even encouraged friends to use them before going on holiday 'because it stops you from burning immediately when going in the sun'. Venables is quick to debunk claims such as this, saying that all it does is put your skin through even more 'excess UV exposure'. She points to another type of common skin cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, which is thought to be due to cumulative UV exposure.
While Urbaniak does not seem to be put off by any safety concerns, she is keen to stress that there is a 'cultural line that you probably shouldn't cross' when it comes to tanning as a white person. 'I don't think that my body is capable of going that colour, but if it was, I'd like to think someone would tell me to stop.'
That said, it isn't just white people who like to tan. Melissa Jones, 19, from Chester, says she has 'seen way more people of colour – including south-east Asian girls like me – getting into tanning. For me, it's not about being darker – it's about adding that warm, radiant glow and evening out my tone'.
Like Feldman, Jones uses the word 'addictive' in relation to her tanning habit, and thinks it helps her in her job as a content creator. Tanned skin 'looks amazing on camera and in content', she says. However, she has recently switched from using tanning beds to using only fake tan. 'I became more aware of the risks, like ageing, skin cancer, all of that.'
The WHO has urged countries to consider banning sunbeds: Australia banned all commercial sunbeds 10 years ago and Brazil banned them in 2009. Kukadia and Venables both say they would like them banned in the UK.
Jak Howell, a 26-year-old content creator from Swansea, has been urging his followers to stop using sunbeds since he was diagnosed with stage three advanced melanoma when he was 21, which his doctors were surprised to see in someone so young, and said was probably due to his use of sunbeds. Howell had been using sunbeds regularly since he was 15 (it has been illegal for under-18s to use tanning beds since 2010, but the ones Howell used weren't staffed. Customers bought tokens from a machine and slotted them into the beds). When a mole appeared on his back that 'kept bleeding and scabbing over but never healing', he sent a photograph of it to his GP and was immediately referred to hospital.
He underwent radiotherapy and surgeries to remove his lymph nodes, but these failed to remove the cancer. Eventually, after a year of immunotherapy, which 'completely knocks you for six', he went into remission. Howell now wants to see sunbeds banned. He tells young users: 'OK, it hasn't happened yet, but it could happen. And when it does happen, it is far, far worse than anything I could ever describe and you could ever imagine.'
For many young people, though, the allure of the sunbed's 'instant fix' is too great to resist. And it's not as if this is the first time young people have put themselves at risk. As Kukadia points out: 'If alcohol was discovered or invented now, it would be illegal.' But tanning does feel different from other classic rebellious pursuits such as binge drinking, cigarettes and drugs because people don't do it for fun, but to achieve a certain aesthetic – a symptom, perhaps, of our screen-filtered lives.
'If I wasn't on social media, I probably wouldn't use sunbeds,' Feldman admits, but because her job requires social media use, she can't see herself stopping.
A few years ago, Clark noticed a dark, 'pretty scary-looking' lesion on her leg, and was referred to a dermatologist. Though it didn't turn out to be skin cancer-related, she had to have it removed, and the experience has stopped her being so 'frivolous' with tanning beds.
Urbaniak can't see herself giving up either. 'If something were to go wrong, then maybe I'd reconsider,' she says. 'But I feel as if I'm in that generation where we all just live in denial until something happens.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors
Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Nationwide leads new calls for change to protect domestic abuse survivors

Nationwide Building Society has partnered with Refuge, the UK's largest domestic abuse charity, in a bid to both bring about change and help protect survivors of abuse. The partnership is aiming to extend existing support for victims, as well as remove barriers which can prevent survivors from taking back control of their lives. A key part of the reform being asked for is for the Individual Insolvency Register (IIR) to be made private, protecting survivors' details, while also removing the £308 fee currently due. 'Nationwide and Refuge have signed Money Wellness's campaign to get the g overnment to make the IIR private – protecting the addresses of survivors who have become insolvent through bankruptcy, for example,' a statement read. 'Domestic abuse survivors often struggle to pay for this protection order because abusers typically exercise full financial control, leaving survivors with little or no personal funds. This comes in addition to the increased risk survivors face when having to list their details on the register.' Earlier this year, Nationwide and Refuge partnered with The Independent on the Brick by Brick campaign, with a second safe haven built for women fleeing domestic abuse, completed in July. Office for National Statistics records show 2.3 million adults in England and Wales experienced domestic abuse across 2023-24, including 1.6 million women. Women are more than twice as likely to be affected. In addition, specialist support staff will be able to refer people to Refuge via telephone, while Nationwide – as well as other financial institutions– offer safe spaces within branches where at-risk individuals can call family or sort through financial issues. Staff are also trained to help spot signs of domestic abuse. Emma Pickering, head of technology-facilitated abuse at Refuge, said: 'One in four women will experience domestic abuse in their lifetime, and cases are continuing to grow in both quantity and complexity. Thanks to Nationwide Building Society, Refuge will be able to expand its support for survivors of abuse. 'Our partnership has never been more needed. With Nationwide's support, Refuge's expert team will empower survivors with practical advice and emotional support, helping them to rebuild their lives. No survivor should have to navigate domestic abuse alone, and Nationwide's commitment means we will be able to ensure even more survivors receive the support they deserve.' It's not too late to support Refuge and to help more survivors find their freedom. Donations will be spent on Refuge's lifesaving work housing survivors of domestic abuse.

Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public
Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Prince Harry and others criticised by charity watchdog for letting ‘damaging' Sentebale dispute play out in public

A watchdog has cleared Prince Harry of 'over-reach' at the charity he co-founded – but says a string of failures amounted to mismanagement in its administration. Regulator the Charity Commission, which investigated Sentebale for four months, has condemned 'all parties to the dispute for allowing it to play out publicly'. The commission also says the then trustees' failure to resolve disputes internally severely affected the charity's reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally. Pointing to 'a lack of clarity around role descriptions and internal policies' as the key cause for weaknesses in the management, the watchdog says the confusion inflamed tensions, which culminated in a row and mass resignations of trustees and both founding patrons, the commission found. In March, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, the co-founder, quit as patrons, saying the move was in support of the trustees – who also resigned – in a dispute with chairwoman Sophie Chandauka. 'It is devastating that the relationship between the charity's trustees and the chair of the board broke down beyond repair, creating an untenable situation,' the princes said at the time. Dr Chandauka said she had reported Sentebale's trustees to the Charity Commission and had taken legal steps to prevent her removal. She also made claims of misconduct. Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry founded the organisation in 2006 in honour of Harry's mother, Diana, to help young people and children in southern Africa, particularly those with HIV and Aids. The watchdog said the row began after 2023, when Sentebale's then trustees tried to implement a new fundraising strategy in the United States. A serious dispute then emerged between Dr Chandauka, some trustees and the Duke of Sussex. Members of the regulator said that after conducting interviews and reviewing evidence, they found the delegation of certain powers to the chair, including consideration of an executive chair role, was a 'confusing, convoluted and poorly governed' process, with a lack of clearly defined delegations. The watchdog said the then trustees failed to have proper processes and policies to investigate internal complaints. 'More generally, a lack of clear policies contributed to the failure to resolve disputes,' they concluded. And the commission said public statements made to the media and criticism made in television interviews, did not serve the charity's best interests. It found no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or racism, but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally'. Nor was there evidence of 'over-reach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex, it said. But the regulator concluded: 'The failure to clarify delegations within the charity to the chair, and the failure to have proper processes for internal complaints, both amount to mismanagement in the administration of the charity.' The commission has issued Sentebale with a regulatory action plan, saying the charity should have a clearly defined patron role set out in writing. The plan also includes improving complaints and whistleblowing procedures. The watchdog said all the charity's then trustees contributed to a missed opportunity to resolve issues that led to the dispute. Financial difficulties following the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to tensions, it added. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve.'

Zara published photos of models who appeared to be ‘unhealthily thin'
Zara published photos of models who appeared to be ‘unhealthily thin'

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Zara published photos of models who appeared to be ‘unhealthily thin'

Fashion giant Zara published 'socially irresponsible' photos of models who appeared to be unhealthily thin, the advertising watchdog has ruled. The two product listings on the Zara website in May featured an image of a model wearing an oversize pocket shirt and another of a model wearing a voluminous combined short dress. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received one complaint that the ads were irresponsible because the models appeared to be unhealthily thin. Zara said the models had worked for well-known and reputable fashion brands and confirmed that both models had medical certification which proved they were in good health. They said that none of the images had been modified, beyond very minor lighting and colouring edits. Zara confirmed that it had amended the product listings after receiving the complaint and removed the specific images. The ASA said the low-cut design of the shirt in the first ad drew attention to the model's upper chest area, creating a focal point around her collarbone, which was protruding. In addition, the positioning of her arms, while wearing a baggy shirt, created the impression that her arms, shoulders and chest were very slim. The ASA said: 'Overall, we considered that the pose of the model and the choice of clothing in the ad created the impression that the model was unhealthily thin.' The watchdog said the styling and lighting of the second image and the choice of clothing meant the ad created the impression that the model was unhealthily thin. The ASA said: 'For the above reasons, we concluded that the models… appeared unhealthily thin and that the ads were irresponsible.' A Zara UK spokesman said: 'We note the ASA's decision following an individual complaint regarding two images on our website which we removed when the ASA made us aware. 'We are committed to responsible content and follow stringent guidelines and controls in the selection and photographing of models, as well as in the selection of images.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store