City of Ottawa fires lawyer accused of vandalizing Holocaust monument
The City of Ottawa has fired one of its lawyers after he was charged earlier this month with vandalizing the National Holocaust Monument, sources have confirmed to Radio-Canada.
On Friday afternoon, Ottawa police announced a 46-year-old man had been charged with mischief to a war memorial, mischief exceeding $5,000 and harassment by threatening conduct.
In a post Saturday on social media, Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said he was "very disturbed" to learn the man arrested was an on-leave city employee.
Neither police nor Sutcliffe named the man, but on Sunday Radio-Canada confirmed that he is Iain Aspenlieder, a lawyer who'd worked for the city.
In a statement to Radio-Canada, interim city solicitor Stuart Huxley wrote that the man charged "was on leave at the time of the incident and is no longer employed by the city."
"The recent act affecting the National Holocaust Monument was deplorable and is counter to the values we seek to uphold in our community," Huxley wrote.
"We extend our deepest sympathies to members of our community impacted by this disgraceful act."
Huxley's statement also did not identify the employee. The mayor's office did not identify him either but did tell Radio-Canada that he had been fired.
Vandalism was a 'vile thing'
The National Holocaust Monument was found defaced with red paint on the morning of June 9. The words "feed me" were painted in capital letters, alongside large paint splashes.
The slogan appeared to be a reference to Gaza, which the United Nations had described as the "hungriest place on Earth" the preceding Friday.
The news that the accused vandal was on the city payroll is alarming, said Richard Marceau, vice-president of external affairs and general counsel for the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs.
Marceau told Radio-Canada that he was informed of the employee's identity during a weekend phone call with Sutcliffe.
"To learn that it was an employee of the City of Ottawa who was charged with vandalizing the National Holocaust Monument was shocking," he told Radio-Canada.
"No one, and especially if you're working for the public, should be doing this type of vile thing."
None of the charges against Aspenlieder have been proven in court.
WATCH | Gaza population at 'critical risk' of famine, according to the UN
Suspended by law society
The Ontario Sunshine List describes Aspenlieder's position with the city as "legal counsel." He has appeared on the list, which documents public sector employees with salaries of over $100,000, every year since 2016.
According to the Law Society of Ontario website, a man named Iain David Aspenlieder has been "suspended administratively" and is not permitted to practice law.
The law society's website does not say when he was suspended.
Gilles LeVasseur, a business and law professor at the University of Ottawa, said the city can't control the actions of its employees outside of the workplace, but people expect the institution to take appropriate action.
"The city has to showcase that they did their due diligence. They actually did proceed properly as soon as they found out the issues and then they acted upon it," he said.
Numerous local and national officials have decried the vandalism as an act of antisemitism.
Ottawa Centre MP Yasir Naqvi said it was "disgraceful," while Iddo Moed, Israel's ambassador to Canada, called it "pure hate against Jews."
Coun. Ariel Troster, who is Jewish, wrote in a social media post that she was "devastated."
Lawrence Greenspon, a prominent Ottawa defence lawyer and co-chair of the National Holocaust Monument Committee, told CBC after the vandalism occurred that Hamas, not Israel, was at fault for the crisis in Gaza.
A solemn vigil was held at the monument one week after the vandalism.
Many in Ottawa's Jewish community attended, as well as Christian groups and a Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg elder.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lululemon sues Costco, alleging the discount retailer copied its designs
Lululemon is suing Costco, accusing the discount retailer of selling "confusingly similar" replicas of its jackets, sweatshirts and pants. In a lawsuit filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the athletic and lifestyle apparel company claims that certain Costco products imitate its own designs so closely that it constitutes "trade dress" infringement, which occurs when a product mimics another so closely that it confuses consumers. The apparel company claims that Costco's "knockoff" designs, or product "dupes," violate trademark law because "some customers incorrectly believe these infringing products are authentic Lululemon apparel." In other cases, "customers specifically purchase the infringing products because they are difficult to distinguish from authentic Lululemon products," the lawsuit alleges. "Indeed, one of the purposes of selling 'dupes' is to confuse consumers at the point-of-sale and/or observers post-sale into believing that the 'dupes' are Plaintiffs' authentic products when they are not," the lawsuit alleges. Lululemon refers to itself in the lawsuit as a "path-breaking" apparel company that has set a new standard for performance athletic wear, adding that its "construction techniques" and "strategic fits" help it stand out to consumers. Reached for comment, the Vancouver, Canada-based company said it fiercely defends its products. "As an innovation-led company that invests significantly in the research, development and design of our products, we take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary," a Lululemon company spokesperson told CBS MoneyWatch. Costco did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch's request for comment. While copycat products can be so poorly constructed and designed that they pose no threat to the originals, Costco's dupes have caused a stir for their verisimilitude to the authentic Lululemon goods. A January headline in The Washington Post read, "Is that hoodie Lululemon or a Costco dupe? No one has to know but you." On social media, users post images and videos of Costco athletic-wear products with the hashtag #luludupe or #lululemondupes. What items does Lululemon say Costco copies? The items at the center of the lawsuit include Lululemon's popular "Scuba" hoodies and sweatshirts, its "Define" jackets, and "ABC" stretch pants — that resemble khakis pants — for men. Lululemon's Scuba hoodie retails for $118, while its Define jacket sells for $128. The ABC pants cost $128. According to Lululemon, Costco's infringing products include: Danskin Ladies Half-Zip HoodieDanskin Half-Zip PulloverJockey Ladies Yoga JacketSpyder Women's Yoga JacketHi-Tec Men's Scuba Full ZipKirkland 5 Pocket Performance Pant Lululemon is seeking damages in the form of lost profits, and for Costco to cease the manufacturing and distribution of products Lululemon claims violate trade dress. Video shows Arizona police rescuing baby left alone for days Saving money vs. saving lives Colorado firebombing victim dies, suspect to be charged with 1st-degree murder


CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Lululemon sues Costco, alleging the retailer copied its designs
Lululemon is suing Costco, accusing the discount retailer of selling "confusingly similar" replicas of its jackets, sweatshirts and pants. In a lawsuit filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the athletic and lifestyle apparel company claims that certain Costco products imitate its own designs so closely that it constitutes "trade dress" infringement, which occurs when a product mimics another so closely that it confuses consumers. The apparel company claims that Costco's "knockoff" designs, or product "dupes," violate trademark law because "some customers incorrectly believe these infringing products are authentic Lululemon apparel." In other cases, "customers specifically purchase the infringing products because they are difficult to distinguish from authentic Lululemon products," the lawsuit alleges. "Indeed, one of the purposes of selling 'dupes' is to confuse consumers at the point-of-sale and/or observers post-sale into believing that the 'dupes' are Plaintiffs' authentic products when they are not," the lawsuit alleges. Lululemon refers to itself in the lawsuit as a "path-breaking" apparel company that has set a new standard for performance athletic wear, adding that its "construction techniques" and "strategic fits" help it stand out to consumers. Reached for comment, the Vancouver, Canada-based company said it fiercely defends its products. "As an innovation-led company that invests significantly in the research, development and design of our products, we take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary," a Lululemon company spokesperson told CBS MoneyWatch. Costco did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch's request for comment. While copycat products can be so poorly constructed and designed that they pose no threat to the originals, Costco's dupes have caused a stir for their verisimilitude to the authentic Lululemon goods. A January headline in The Washington Post read, "Is that hoodie Lululemon or a Costco dupe? No one has to know but you." On social media, users post images and videos of Costco athletic-wear products with the hashtag #luludupe or #lululemondupes. What items does Lululemon say Costco copies? The items at the center of the lawsuit include Lululemon's popular "Scuba" hoodies and sweatshirts, its "Define" jackets, and "ABC" stretch pants — that resemble khakis pants — for men. Lululemon's Scuba hoodie retails for $118, while its Define jacket sells for $128. The ABC pants cost $128. According to Lululemon, Costco's infringing products include: Danskin Ladies Half-Zip Hoodie Danskin Half-Zip Pullover Jockey Ladies Yoga Jacket Spyder Women's Yoga Jacket Hi-Tec Men's Scuba Full Zip Kirkland 5 Pocket Performance Pant Lululemon is seeking damages in the form of lost profits, and for Costco to cease the manufacturing and distribution of products Lululemon claims violate trade dress.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police searching for man thrown from Sea-Doo on Northern Peninsula
An underwater recovery team is searching for a man who fell off a Sea-Doo on the Northern Peninsula Sunday night. In a news release sent Monday, the RCMP said officers in St. Anthony received a call for help around 9:30 p.m. NT after a man and a woman fell off the watercraft while on Gull Pond, near St. Lunaire-Griquet. The release said neither one of them was wearing a life-jacket. The woman was able to swim to shore, but the RCMP said the man did not resurface. Crews searched for the man into Sunday evening, and the RCMP's underwater dive team was called in to continue the search on Monday. Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page