&w=3840&q=100)
Gujarat HC extends Asaram's temporary bail in 2013 rape case till July 7
The Gujarat High Court on Friday extended the temporary bail granted to self-styled godman Asaram till July 7 in the 2013 rape case for which he is serving a life sentence.
The division bench of Justices Ilesh Vora and Sandeep Bhatt extended Asaram's temporary bail, granted on March 28 initially for three months, during the hearing of the plea.
Asaram (86) is on bail on medical grounds.
The extension was granted so that his lawyer could submit the necessary documents in his plea, and the matter has been kept for further hearing on July 2.
Notably, the temporary bail granted by Gujarat High Court on March 28 this year is set to expire on June 30.
In his submission, Asaram's lawyer sought an extension of a few days to submit documents, claiming that after the court granted temporary bail on March 28, 10 days were wasted due to the procedure to get orders from the Jodhpur High Court, and he was released on April 7.
"So I request for two days so that if the matter is kept on Monday, I can place the document on record, and even they (respondents) can verify. Then on Monday, in any case, I have to surrender, so lordships may give me one or two days till the matter is pending," he said.
The court, in its order, stated that considering "the peculiar facts of the present case, more particularly, the process of getting the certificate from NALSA (National Legal Services Authority), which according to submission is underway, we are inclined to extend the temporary bail till July 7".
The high court on March 28 granted temporary bail for three months to Asaram as the interim bail granted to him earlier by the Supreme Court was to expire on March 31.
A division bench of the high court then delivered a split verdict, after which a third judge, to whom the matter was referred, ruled in favour of granting him three-month temporary bail.
In January 2023, a court in Gandhinagar sentenced Asaram in a rape case to life imprisonment.
Asaram is also serving a life sentence in another case of raping a minor girl at his ashram in Rajasthan in 2013.
In the present case, he was convicted for raping a woman disciple, who hailed from Surat, on several occasions from 2001 to 2006 when she was living at his ashram at Motera near Ahmedabad.
He was convicted under Indian Penal Code sections 376 2 (C) (rape), 377 (unnatural offences), 342 (wrongful detention), 354 (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 357 (assault) and 506 (criminal intimidation).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Telangana HC quashes cheating case over broken marriage vow
HYDERABAD: Justice N Tukaramji of the Telangana high court has quashed criminal proceedings against a man accused of cheating a woman by allegedly backing out of a promise to marry her. Allowing the criminal petition filed by the accused, the judge held that the allegations did not meet the legal requirements to constitute offences under sections 417 and 420 of Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case originated from a 2019 complaint in which the woman alleged that the man had proposed marriage but later withdrew, citing objections from his parents. She claimed the broken promise caused her severe emotional distress, leading her to attempt suicide. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad A police case was subsequently registered, and a chargesheet was filed. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the matter involved, at most, a failed promise to marry-which by itself does not amount to cheating or dishonest inducement, essential elements under section 420 IPC. The continuation of criminal proceedings, the counsel contended, would amount to an abuse of the legal process. The prosecution, however, maintained that the complaint was supported by witness statements and warranted a full trial. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo After reviewing the facts and relevant legal precedents from the high courts of Andhra Pradesh , Telangana, and Karnataka, Justice Tukaramji ruled that the complaint did not establish any fraudulent or dishonest intent at the time the promise was made. The judge observed that there was no indication the petitioner had induced the complainant to deliver property or take any action she would not have otherwise taken but for the alleged deception-criteria required to establish cheating under section 415 IPC. "The complaint lacks the foundational elements necessary to constitute an offence of cheating. There is no prima facie material to proceed against the petitioner," the judge said. Accordingly, the high court quashed the criminal proceedings .


Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
Man awarded 10 yrs' jail, 50k fine for rape of 15-yr-old girl
Thane: A special court in Thane sentenced a 33-year-old man to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment for raping a 15-year-old girl in August 2019. Special judge Ruby U Malvankar noted the "serious and heinous" nature of the crime while balancing punishment with the convict's age for proportionate justice. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court also imposed a fine of Rs 50,000 on the convict, Ajaj @ Ejaj Imran Ismail Khan, who was found guilty under sections 376 (rape) and 377 (unnatural offences) of the Indian Penal Code. The court order was pronounced recently. During trial, special public prosecutor Adv Varsha R Chandane argued that the victim, initially a stranger to the accused, trusted him for shelter but was subjected to "immense sexual torture" and wrongful confinement. The court found the victim's testimony "fully trustworthy" and of "sterling quality," noting that minor inconsistencies should be overlooked when testimony inspires confidence overall.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
12 hours ago
- Business Standard
ED attaches Mahira Group assets worth ₹557 cr in money laundering case
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached assets worth approximately Rs 557.43 crore in connection with a money laundering case against the Mahira Infratech Pvt Ltd (formerly M/s Sai Aina Farms Pvt Ltd) M/s Mahira Buildtech Pvt Ltd, and M/s Czar Buildwell Pvt Ltd. According to an official release, the ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002 attached assets, including seven immovable properties, comprising around 35 acres of residential and commercial land, located in Gurugram's Sector 68, 63A, 103, 104, 92, 88B, and 95. Additionally, Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) amounting to around Rs 97 lakh, belonging to various companies, have also been attached. The ED initiated the probe based on FIRs filed by Gurugram Police against Sai Aaina Farms Pvt. Ltd. and others under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) related to cheating and forgery . As per the release, the companies allegedly submitted forged documents, including fake bank guarantees, to obtain licenses for internal and external development works connected to affordable housing projects in Sectors 68, 103, and 104 of Gurugram. Over Rs 616 crore was collected from nearly 3,700 homebuyers, but the promised homes were not delivered, and the funds were allegedly misappropriated. The ED investigation revealed that the company siphoned off funds by inflating construction costs through fake invoices issued by associated entities. The money was diverted for personal gains by the company's directors and promoters, and sums from home buyers were transferred as loans to other group entities, which remain unpaid for years. On February 15, 2024, and March 26, 2025, the ED had attached properties worth Rs 81.07 crore linked to M/s Sai Aaina Farms Pvt. Ltd., M/s Mahira Buildtech Pvt. Ltd., M/s D S Home Construction Pvt. Ltd., Sikandar Singh, Dharam Singh Chhoker (ex-MLA), Vikas Chhoker, and related companies involved in the case. Sikandar Singh, a promoter of the Mahira Group, was arrested on April 30, 2024. A prosecution complaint has been filed, and the Special Court in Gurugram has taken cognisance of the same. Another key accused, Dharam Singh Chhoker, who had evaded arrest for over a year despite six non-bailable warrants, was arrested on May 5. Vikas Chhoker remains absconding, and a proclamation has been issued against him by the Special Court in Gurugram. Further investigation is underway.