logo
The little known car insurance that could save you £5,000 as payouts TREBLE

The little known car insurance that could save you £5,000 as payouts TREBLE

Daily Mail​17-06-2025
Motorists who claim on a little-known car insurance product are finding it more valuable than ever, as average payouts have trebled in four years.
The average payout from Guaranteed Asset Protection - better known as GAP insurance - has jumped from around £1,600 in 2021 to almost £5,000 this year, according to MotorEasy.
But the product, which is primarily used to cover a potential shortfall in a car's value compared to what must be repaid on a finance agreement, in case it is written off in an accident or stolen, has proved controversial in the past.
However, owners who have bought cars outright can also get cover for the difference between the price paid and what insurer deem the value at the point of a claim.
The Financial Conduct Authority launched a probe in 2023 after it was revealed that the average driver with GAP insurance claimed once every 300 years, raising doubts over whether the policy was worth having at all.
However, new data exclusively shared with This is Money suggests those who do need to make a claim are likely to see far more substantial payouts due to the current cocktail of financial risks faced by drivers who have borrowed to buy cars.
Rapid depreciation suffered by some cars - especially electric vehicles - combined with more insurance write-offs, linked to higher repair costs and parts shortages, as well as rising motor theft, have seen the cash value of GAP claims soar.
Experts say the increase in value of claims has shifted GAP insurance from a 'nice-to-have' policy to a 'vital financial safeguard' for those buying cars.
One of the reasons why GAP insurance has proved so controversial in the past is due to it often being sold by dealers alongside cars. This can lead to higher costs and those taking out the cover can often pick up considerably cheaper GAP insurance from a broker.
MotorEasy, the leading car ownership platform, which offers GAP Insurance, believes the increase in value of payouts 'underscores the growing financial risk faced by car owners' in 2025.
It says the combination of factors that has tripled average claim amounts can be traced back to the impact of Covid-19.
The pandemic brought about a period of unusual appreciation in used car values, but prices have since declined to levels seen before the outbreak.
However, for EV, value retention has dropped off a cliff edge, with battery cars now typically losing more than half of their value in just two years.
While used car prices have been falling, purchase costs for new, more technically advanced vehicles have risen, further increasing the gap between the purchase price and the current market value - thus pushing up GAP insurance payouts.
MotorEasy told This is Money it has seen claims exceed £20,000 for some luxury EV instances.
An ongoing supply chain issue for spare parts triggered by factory closures and the outbreak of conflict since the pandemic, coupled with the more complex nature of modern vehicles and costlier components, has also prompted an increase in insurance write-offs.
This has both triggered an increase in usual volumes of claims but also means owners face a larger financial shortfall if their relatively new car is deemed a total loss.
There have also been high payouts on theft-related claims, with significant financial losses accrued by some models that have been targeted by criminal gangs and suffered from lower residual values as a result.
MotorEasy said 41 per cent of GAP claims over £15,000 have been for stolen Range Rovers, which have been the focus of the recent motor crimewave and - for a period - caused values of some Range Rovers to tumble.
'Our latest data paints a clear picture; the financial risks associated with car ownership are escalating,' said Duncan McClure Fisher, CEO of MotorEasy's parent company, Intelligent Motoring.
'Making matters worse, economic pressures are leading drivers to delay maintenance and repairs, increasing the risk of mechanical failure and potential write-offs.
'In such cases, the depreciated value of a poorly maintained vehicle further widens the gap covered by GAP insurance.
'The combination of so many influential factors has created a 'perfect storm' where GAP insurance is no longer just a nice-to-have, but an increasingly vital financial safeguard.'
GAP insurance is typically sold as a standalone policy or as an add-on to other sorts of financial deals, like car insurance.
It is usually offered to new car buyers at the point of purchase along with a number of additional products, including additional bodywork protection and cover for interior damage.
However, with very few motorists using these policies - or even knowing they have one at all - and huge commissions made by sales staff selling them as add-ons, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2023 launched a probe into them.
Following the investigation, the watchdog raised concerns that the product is 'failing to provide fair value to some consumers,' which saw some 80 per cent of GAP insurance deals pulled from the market.
Car buyers are advised to compare GAP insurance prices through a third part, rather than simply taking out cover through a dealer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance
Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance

Finextra

time25 minutes ago

  • Finextra

Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance

Barclays has followed HSBC in withdrawing from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), claiming that the departure of a host of other global lenders means the organisation "no longer has the membership to support our transition". 1 Founded in 2021, the UN-convened NZBA requires members to commit to "transition the operational and attributable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to align with pathways to net-zero by 2050 or sooner". At its peak it had around 150 members, including most of the world's largest banks. However, that number has dwindled in the last few months. At the beginning of 2025, ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, a host of US banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, pulled out of the global climate-focused alliance. The American banks quit amid attacks from Republicans on "woke" capitalism, with the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Jim Jordan, claiming that financial environmental alliances have created "a climate cartel". Now, UK-headquartered HSBC and Barclays have joined their US counterparts. Barclays says it is committed to its "ambition" to be a net zero bank by 2050. Says a statement: "Our targets to mobilise $1 trillion of Sustainable and Transition Financing and for financed emissions remain unchanged. We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients." Earlier this week, the CEO of Standard Chartered, Bill Winters, hit out at banks that have rowed back on their climate commitments. 'People that said a lot of stuff, but [when] it was fashionable to say it, [and] who are saying either nothing or the opposite now: shame on them,' said Winters, according to the Guardian.

Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers
Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Drivers should be ‘very pessimistic' over car finance claims, say lawyers

Drivers should be 'very pessimistic' about getting any compensation for taking out a car loan after a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court, experts have warned. Industry analysts also said on Friday that banks will 'breathe a sigh of relief' after the Supreme Court ruled they are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes. Nevertheless, the financial watchdog has said it is still considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who potentially receive compensation. Lawyers have also indicated that some consumers should still consider pursuing their claims over 'unfair' treatment. Two lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, went to the UK's highest court to challenge a Court of Appeal ruling which found 'secret' commission payments paid by buyers to car dealers in agreements before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent were unlawful. The ruling last year found three motorists, who all bought their cars before 2021, should receive compensation. But in a decision on Friday, justices at the UK's highest court overturned the Court of Appeal, though some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). Lawyers for the lenders told the Supreme Court at a three-day hearing in April the decision was an 'egregious error', while the Financial Conduct Authority intervened in the case and claimed the ruling 'goes too far'. However, the judges upheld a claim brought by one driver under the CCA that his relationship with the finance company had been 'unfair', awarding him the commission amount of £1,650.95 plus interest. Lizzy Comley, chief operating officer of consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, said the ruling still reinforces the right of many consumers to pursue claims. She said: 'This landmark ruling is positive news for the millions of people who have lost money due to the car finance mis-selling. 'The court confirmed that for years, consumers have potentially been unfairly overcharged on car finance agreements, and this ruling reinforces their right to pursue justice and recover the compensation they deserve.' However, others have said that the ruling will make it harder for most claims. Nicola Pangbourne, partner at Kennedys law firm, said: 'If I was a driver, I would be very pessimistic about getting compensation. There's now quite a few hurdles they've got to get through.' Industry experts have suggested the ruling will be broadly seen as a success for lenders, who had been preparing for significant compensation payments. Caroline Wayman, global head of financial Services at PA Consulting, said: 'Lenders will breathe a sigh of relief at the ruling, but it should still be a wake-up call for firms to scrutinise any large, undisclosed commissions in their business. 'Firms should ask themselves whether it still feels justifiable or could be considered unfair, particularly if they haven't disclosed commercial ties to the broker and it won't be enough to expect customers to have read and understood the fine print.' On Friday, a spokesperson for the Financial Conduct Authority said after the ruling that it would confirm whether it will consult on any such scheme by 8am on Monday. They said: 'We want to bring greater certainty for consumers, firms and investors as quickly as possible.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store