Iranian regime muzzles media with grim death penalty warning
In a statement shared on social media Telegram earlier today the Revolutionary Guards cited articles 6, 7, 8, and 10 of the 'Law on Combating Hostile Actions of the Zionist Regime'.
'Any form of intelligence cooperation with the Mossad, interaction or exchange of information with official or unofficial individuals affiliated with the Zionist regime, as well as any cultural, media, or propaganda activity, or assistance that supports, promotes, or legitimizes the Zionist regime, is considered a criminal offence,' under these articles, according to the statement, which adds that any perpetrators will face 'the maximum punishment'.
Babak Kamiar, the head of Euronews' Persian desk, said that the impact of this will be to force local media into silence.
The maximum punishment indicated in the sentence is 'the death penalty for sure', according to Kamiar.
'From this point on, nothing will be published except praise for the regime — which, of course, was to be expected,' Kamiar said.
'This will also include international media outlets that have correspondents in Iran, making our work even more difficult, as most of our information relied on domestic sources,' Kamiar added.
Although state-run, semi-official, and IRGC-affiliated media had already maintained tight control over the flow of information, the situation is now expected to worsen, according to Euronews' Kamiar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Chinese envoy touts prospects for EU-China business on eve of summit
Prospects for pragmatic China-EU cooperation remain broad, China's head of EU mission has written in an exclusive op-ed for Euronews, published on the eve of a delicate summit of leaders taking place in Beijing on Thursday. 'European businesses are finding ample space to expand in the Chinese market,' according to Ambassador Cai Run, the head of the Chinese Mission to the EU, in an op-ed that lists a string of investment and cooperation relations. In the piece, Cai trumpets that 'brands such as BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen derive over 30% of their global sales from the Chinese market, with profits in China reaching up to 30 times those earned in their domestic markets.' He claims that European products account for more than 30% and in some cases over 50% of China's total imports in sectors such as chemicals, optics, aerospace and aviation. Meanwhile Chinese corporate investment in Europe is listed at length. Cai namechecks the Pelješac Bridge project in Croatia; the Hungary-Serbia Railway, 'China's first high-speed rail project in Europe', and Piraeus Port in Greece. Of Piraeus, Cai claims in the op-ed that the project has created 4,300 direct local jobs and generated €1.4 billion in economic output, 'accounting for approximately 1% of Greece's GDP'. Response to climate change is a unifying factor - Chinese envoy Cai also touts cooperation through the China-EU Climate Change Partnership, saying China's electric vehicle and new energy battery industries 'have become key drivers of a new wave of investment in Europe, further strengthening the bonds of cooperation and injecting strong momentum into China-EU collaboration in the green and low-carbon sector.' On research Cai says the Chinese government is prioritizing the EU as a key partner, and 'remains committed to an open and innovation-driven policy, expanding international scientific and technological cooperation'. He also hails the Geographic Indications (GI) Agreement as China's 'first comprehensive and high-level bilateral agreement on GI protection, marking a milestone in China-EU cooperation on intellectual property rights.' Since its entry into force, he says, Zhouzhi kiwifruit and French champagne 'have entered each other's markets, helping preserve cultural and natural heritage and injecting new momentum into deeper China-EU collaboration.' Despite the envoy's optimistic tone, however, expectations for the outcome of Thursday's summit are muted, despite its coinciding with the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the EU. Among the extensive list of friction points, two stand out: Beijing's "no-limits" partnership with Moscow and the trade imbalances caused by industrial overcapacity. In May, Chinese President Xi Jinping said the anniversary offered a chance to "properly handle frictions and differences, and open up a brighter future for China-EU relations". Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, and António Costa, the president of the European Council, played into the momentum and committed themselves to "deepening our partnership with China". But since then the tide has shifted. Beijing's decision to restrict the export of rare earths, the metallic elements that are crucial for manufacturing advanced technologies, caused widespread alarm across European industry and earned a rebuke from von der Leyen herself. "China is using this quasi-monopoly not only as a bargaining chip, but also weaponising it to undermine competitors in key industries," she said at the G7 summit in June. "We all witnessed the cost and consequences of China's coercion." Beijing immediately hit back against the Commission chief, calling her speech "baseless" and "biased", but offered an olive branch to build a "win-win" partnership.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Exclusive: Who are Syria's Druze and why are they under attack?
After violent clashes between Druze and Bedouin militias erupted in Syria's southern Suwayda region last week – killing over 1,000 people and displacing almost 130,000 others – the religious group has been cast into the global spotlight. Despite the violence, one of the three Druze religious leaders, Hekmat Al-Hijri, said in an interview with Euronews that the group was formed by 'peaceful people who have never attacked anyone in the past' on three foundational tenets. 'The use of reason, non-aggression, and truthfulness" is what Druze anchor themselves with, Al-Hijri explained. Yet, throughout their 1,000-year history, the Druze have been no strangers to conflict. Religion of unity Explaining the history of one of the Middle East's most complex religious groups is no easy feat, even for the insiders. As one Druze religious leader told Euronews, 'we'd have to go back to the time of the Prophets Shuayb and Moses.' Founded in Egypt in the early 11th century as an offshoot of Ismaili Islam — itself an offshoot of Shi'a Islam — Druze doctrine was reportedly first preached in Cairo in 1017, ending in riots in the Egyptian capital. Much of the foundational ideology was based around the personality of Fatimid leader Al-Hakim, dubbed pejoratively 'The Mad Caliph' by some while revered by others as a divinely chosen supreme leader. A controversial figure accused of persecuting Sunni Muslims, as well as Christians and Jews, Al-Hakim disappeared mysteriously in 1021. What followed for the newly founded Druze minority was marked by discrimination and persecution. They were largely driven out of Egypt by Al-Hakim's successors and settled in the mountainous regions of the Sham, which encompasses modern-day Syria, Lebanon and contested parts of Israel. Much of Druze dogma remains shrouded in secrecy, but a Druze resident of Suwayda who comes from a family of sheikhs but wanted to remain anonymous for reasons of safety told Euronews that the group 'follows the religion of Tawhid (unity), which is an intellectual and spiritual faith based on the idea that a person's relationship with God is a spiritual and intellectual one, not dependent on imposed religious rituals.' In short, 'it is a voluntary, not compulsory, faith' that is not part of any other religion, including Islam. In the Druze worldview, this means the group is "capable of harmonising with various sects, religions and ethnicities.' Since 1043, the Druze religion has been closed to new converts. Today's Druze population numbers just 1 million globally, over two-thirds of whom live in Syria. Struggling for freedom Throughout their millennium-long history, the Druze have frequently formed alliances with various broader powers. During the Crusades, Druze soldiers aided the Ayyubid and later Mamluk forces by resisting Crusader advances at the Lebanese coast. They also maintained a relatively high level of autonomy during centuries of Ottoman rule, even challenging their authority in the 1600s after forming a coalition with Maronite Christians. More recently, when the region was carved up by European powers into the modern nation states whose often porous borders remain indelibly inked onto maps today, Sheikh Al-Hijri notes that the Druze "were among those who helped found the state of Lebanon.' In Syria's neighbour, they remain a powerful political force headed by a dynasty of the Jumblatt family, generations of whom have run the Druze-majority Progressive Socialist Party. In Syria, it has been a different story, one stained by 'extreme marginalisation and repugnant sectarian treatment,' contends the sheikh. Not only was the community split when Israel annexed the Druze-majority Golan Heights in the 1967 Six-Day War, but four years later, the al-Assad-led Ba'ath party came to power in what Druze leaders and activists told Euronews was the start of five decades of discrimination. 'The al-Assad regime marginalised the Druze to such an extent that it was forbidden to dig a water well or build a factory, and they were barred from attaining senior military ranks,' Al-Hijri maintains. This said, not everyone paints the relationship between the Druze and Hafez Al-Assad and his recently deposed son, Bashar, as so difficult. Some see the old regime as quashing religious tensions in a country where some 20% of the 24-million population comes from religious minorities. There were even accusations of the al-Assads — who themselves derive from another Shi'a offshoot group, the Alawites — giving preferential treatment to non-Sunni groups. As a prominent member of the Druze community in Suwayda put it to Euronews: 'Druze personalities benefited from the last regime; they made deals with it, they supported the ideas and the actions of the regime.' However, Druze artist and activist Tamara Abu Alwan is adamant that many, if not most, members of the minority were fervently against al-Assad. 'Personally, I've been involved in the revolution for 14 years. My father also lost his job because he was an opponent of the regime. We were all in opposition. We were a family that supported each other and extended help to areas outside government control — even though it put our lives at risk.' When forces under the command of Ahmed Al-Sharaa, a former Islamist militia leader whose nom-de-guerre Al-Jolani derived from the Arabic name for the Golan Heights, Abu Alwan told Euronews, 'I was so happy. I believed that the 14 years with all the martyrs who shed blood were over.' 'But then it turned out to be only the beginning of something even worse.' The plot thickens The new authorities in Damascus have largely been met with a cautious sigh of relief by the international community. Al-Sharaa has met with leaders from Western powers, including the UK, the EU and the US. Donald Trump even called the new president 'handsome'. What followed was the lifting of many crippling sanctions that were imposed on the Assad regime for crimes against the Syrian people. Today, 90% of the population still lives below the poverty line, and the economy hangs by a thread. Although many have lauded al-Sharaa for providing stability to a country ravaged by over a decade of war, Syria has endured multiple eruptions of interethnic violence, notably in early March when Alawite communities were massacred in coastal regions. While al-Sharaa at the time called for calm and promised an independent investigation into claims that government-affiliated forces initiated what one commentator called the 'orgy of violence,' many believe the president was complicit. 'They asked (the Alawites) to hand over weapons,' the Suwayda resident said during their interview. 'When the weapons were handed over, and the Syrian coastal area became isolated ... they attacked and committed terrible massacres against humanity." "The entire villages were killed and exterminated. Houses and houses were burned.' Sheikh Hikmat agreed, adding, 'They use a local group to stir up strife, and then they carry out mass killings against their opponents.' The spiritual leader contends that he foresaw the recent violence months in advance. 'They spent seven months conducting a systematic media campaign,' Sheikh Hikmat recalled, which he said fomented ethnic tensions. 'There were even weeks when Suwayda occupied more than 25% of the Arab world's news reports, at a time when there were no overt disputes or clashes, clearly pointing to a premeditated plan against the Druze.' Trust in al-Sharaa eroded? In late April, tensions spilt over into violence, leading to almost 100 deaths amongst Druze fighters. More than 30 government fighters were also killed, and the Israeli Defence Forces launched airstrikes, including near the presidential palace. This turned out to be a prelude of what was to come. On 13 July, fighting again broke out in southern Syria, with both Bedouin and Druze militias accusing the other of committing war crimes, including wholesale massacres. The international community quickly condemned the violence, with the EU saying it was 'appalled,' without apportioning blame on one side or the other. However, Syria's newfound and tentative Western supporters 'welcomed' a ceasefire announced by al-Sharaa last Thursday, in which the Syrian leader said it was his 'priority' to protect the Druze. For Tamara Abu Alwan, his words ring hollow. 'He has lost respect for the Syrian people,' she told Euronews. 'I lost loved ones and friends for the sake of nothing, for the sake of those criminals taking over a regime that they don't deserve. So, I really do not think Ahmed Sharaa will last too long.' In his address to the nation, al-Sharaa also condemned Syria's neighbours in Israel for launching airstrikes and trying to 'entangle our people in a war that serves only to fragment our homeland and sow destruction.' There was little international support for Israel's latest attacks in the heart of Damascus. Yet, stating that '99%' of the Druze population were behind him, Al-Hijri leapt to Israel's defence. "Israel tried to establish relations with the Damascus regime and was one of the countries that gave it a chance. But when the regime attacked the Druze and ignored multiple warnings, they struck Damascus," Al-Hijri said. "We welcome this action, which could help stop the savage and barbaric campaigns against us.' Privately, some Druze whom Euronews spoke to were more reticent about Israel's actions. 'I heard about these attacks in the area of Damascus,' one person said. 'At the same time, we were just trying to escape from the massacres. We were trying to get out of this country.'
Euronews
5 hours ago
- Euronews
EU and Japan prepare delicate balancing act with US
The EU and Japan are set to underline the virtues of a rules-based economic order when they meet in Tokyo for summit on Wednesday, but the backdrop of tense trade relations with the US is hovering over the shoulders on both sides. The 30th EU–Japan summit comes at a delicate time, as both powers are entangled in tariff disputes with the US. Japan and the EU are already facing 50% US tariffs on their steel and aluminium exports, 25% on cars, and 10% on all other exports. "We share some fundamental principles, such as the need to maintain a predictable and free economic order," a senior EU official said ahead of the summit. During the summit, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba will compare notes on the US measures. The summit comes at a tricky moment for both as they are in the midst of negotiations with the US and are eager to avoid any escalation at all costs. Like the EU, Tokyo maintains a significant trade surplus with the US, $68.4 billion (€58,44 billion), while the EU's surplus with the US stands at €50 billion. If both fail to reach a deal with the Trump administration by 1 August, the US is threatening to raise tariffs to 25% on Japanese imports and up to 30% on those from the EU. 'The US is and will be the most important ally for Japan,' a Japanese official told Euronews. The EU and Japan don't share the same approach to negotiation with the US, however. While the EU is preparing countermeasures (two packages of €21 and €72 billion each), Japan is not planning any retaliation, even if the same Japanese official said that 'all option remains on the table'. 'Japan and the EU have different approaches because they have different market structures and different economies,' the official explained. However insiders from both sides agree that their businesses need predictability. 'The success of the summit will depend on whether the EU and Japan can demonstrate their firm alignment in pursuing the rule-based global trade system in the face of Trump administration policy,' Hibiki Kimura, from the Japanese law firm Nishimura & Asahi, told Euronews, adding: 'Both the EU and Japan need to provide businesses with predictability, but fluctuating tariff plans have introduced the risk of global value chain disruption.'
