Third man sentenced over abuse after Panorama probe
Nugent was also ordered to carry out 25 days of rehabilitation activity, along with 200 hours of unpaid work and was ordered to pay £200 compensation.An undercover Panorama reporter, Sasha Hinde was employed as a staff member at the school for around seven weeks, from March to May 2024.She covertly recorded several incidents at the school which resulted in the programme, Panorama: Cruelty in the Classroom, which was aired on 17 June 2024.The documentary triggered a police investigation and three people were arrested and charged.Elliot Millar, 22, from Liscard, Wallasey, pleaded guilty to five charges, including two charges of common assault, two charges of assault by beating and a charge of using threatening words, likely to cause alarm or distress, at Sefton Magistrates' Court on 18 November 2024. He was jailed for 12 weeks.The judge at the hearing described Millar's treatment of some of the pupils at the school as "cruel bullying", "gratuitous degradation" and an abuse of trust.Daniel McNulty-Doyle, 22, from Little Neston, Cheshire, was employed as a wellbeing coach at the school and had worked there since October 2022.He was found guilty after a trial at Sefton Magistrates' Court on 27 March 2024 of using threatening, abusive behaviour, likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress.He was convicted after a full trial on 27 March 2025. This offence is punishable by a fine only and he was fined £250, with £50 compensation to the victim.The defendants all claimed to have had a lack of training for their roles and claimed much of the alleged threatening behaviour as "banter".
'Exploited vulnerabilities'
Victims' personal statements to the court highlighted the impact of the offending on the pupils and their families.Senior Crown Prosecutor Matthew Dixon, of CPS Mersey Cheshire said: "Life School was offering educational provision for students with additional needs."That should have ensured high levels of care and support but instead, these three men, betrayed that trust. "They exploited the vulnerabilities of the pupils for their own entertainment."He said there was no doubt that, if this behaviour had not been caught on camera by the undercover reporter, this treatment of the pupils by these men would have continued."Thankfully, the footage captured by the reporter and the evidence gathered by Merseyside Police during the investigation helped us to bring all three men to justice," he said. Mr Dixon said the CPS wanted to thank the victims and their families for supporting the prosecution.
Additional reporting by Kelly Foran
Panorama - Undercover School : Cruelty In The ClassroomWatch the full investigation on BBC iPlayer.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
22-07-2025
- ITV News
Armagh All-Ireland winner Aidan Nugent ordered to stand trial facing eight charges of sexual assault
Armagh All-Ireland winner Aidan Nugent has been ordered to stand trial in the Crown Court, facing eight charges of sexual assault. Appearing in the dock of Armagh Magistrates Court, sitting in Newry, the 31-year-old confirmed he was aware of the charges against him, all of them alleged to have been committed 'in the United States of America,' on 17 November last year. Nugent, from the Cullyhanna Road in Newtownhamilton, faces seven charges of sexual assault and one of sexual assault involving penetration, alleged to have been committed against a single complainant. It is understood to be the Crown case that the offences were committed in America, when the Armagh GAA team travelled to Miami in Florida to celebrate the team's All-Ireland win - their first All-Ireland title in 22 years after they clinched victory over Galway at Croke Park in July. During a brief preliminary enquiry court on Tuesday, the legal step necessary for any case to be returned to the Crown Court, a prosecuting lawyer submitted there is a prima facie case against Nugent. Nugent's defence solicitor Patrick Higgins conceded the point but declared that Nugent 'strenuously denies the allegations.' The court clerk told Nugent he had the right to comment on the charges or to call evidence on his own behalf, but he declined. Returning the case to Newry Crown Court, District Judge Anne Marshall freed Nugent on £500 bail and ordered him to appear for his arraignment on October 2. Applying for legal aid to be extended in allow a senior barrister to be instructed, Mr Higgins told the judge that was on the basis that one of the charges carried a potential sentence of life imprisonment. He also contended that 'all of the people involved in this are in the public eye' and that if Nugent is convicted, there is not only a risk to his reputation 'but also a risk to his liberty and livelihood.' Judge Marshall told the solicitor she would rule on his application later on Tuesday.
BBC News
22-07-2025
- BBC News
Merseyside Police close Kensington house after crime complaints
A house at the centre of anti-social and criminal behaviour reports has been shut down, police have said. The property on Parton Street in the Kensington area of Liverpool will have to remain closed for three months following a hearing at South Sefton Magistrates' Police said the order had been made after neighbours suffered "alarm and distress"."We hope this closure order provides reassurance to the community that such behaviour will not be tolerated," said PC Ciaran Morrison, who added: "We hope that this also serves as a warning and deterrent to anyone who allows or partakes in activity at their address that damages the local community." Police said the order prevented anyone from entering or living in the property until 17 October. Those breaching the order face arrest and up to six months in prison and/or a fine of up to £5,000. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Telegraph
20-07-2025
- Telegraph
Half of all criminal convictions decided in secret
Nearly half of all convictions in England and Wales are being decided in secret by a single magistrate without the defendant appearing in court or having any legal representation, a new report has revealed. Out of a total of 1.5 million convictions handed down last year, some 772,580 were issued by magistrates behind closed doors under a system designed to speed up justice and clear the backlog of cases left by the pandemic. The number of such prosecutions has doubled since their introduction in 2015 under the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) where a volunteer magistrate sits alone with an on-call legal adviser to pass judgment on as many as a 100 cases a day. They now account for two thirds of all magistrates' cases. At least 110 different crimes can be prosecuted under the SJP system, from speeding and out-of-date MOTs to failing to get your child to attend school and littering. However, the majority (73 per cent) of those accused do not plea guilty or not guilty, double the rate of 38 per cent in open magistrates' hearings, according to an investigation by Transform Justice, a charity that campaigns for fair justice. Most defendants do not enter any plea partly because prosecution forms are sent by post with no proof of receipt required. This means they can end up at the wrong address, get lost or be dismissed as junk mail, according to the report. 'People are given three weeks to fill in the prosecution form and are not sent a reminder. Those who do not respond to the prosecution notice are nearly always judged as guilty and sentenced in their absence,' said Transform Justice. 'This means most people convicted under the SJP have not pleaded, and may not even know or understand they have been prosecuted. Many SJP cases are reopened by defendants who say they never received the prosecution notice, and only knew about it when they got a letter saying they had been convicted.' Most SJP offences are 'strict liability', which means prosecutors do not have to prove the defendant intended to commit the offence, nor whether the prosecution is in the public interest. ''I made a mistake' is not a valid legal defence,' said the report. As a result, people have been fined for minor errors. One person was prosecuted for selecting a 16-25 age railcard discount when they had a 26-30 railcard, even though the price for the tickets was the same. Transform Justice said that the way many of the prosecution forms were structured meant any mitigating factors a defendant might want to put forward, such as any disabilities, could be missed or ignored. 'The greatest injustice of the SJP is that it facilitates convicting people for mistakes, and for errors made due to illness or disability. We are prosecuting people at an industrial scale, often without any evidence they intended to commit a crime, with few safeguards,' said Penelope Gibbs, director of Transform Justice. 'There is nothing wrong with some crimes being strict liability (where no intention needs to be proved), but to do so using an inaccessible, untransparent system is surely unfair.' Organisations that can prosecute using SJP include police, DVLA, local councils, the BBC and train companies but unlike the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), there is no requirement to conduct a test of whether a prosecution is in the public interest. An investigation by the Office for Road and Rail (ORR) found four train operating companies (TOCs) had no formal test for deciding whether to prosecute in the public interest and it was 'unclear' if there was a test in other TOCs. It found some SJP prosecutors had no legal qualifications. The majority of TOCs 'appear not to require any formal qualifications or accreditation for their prosecution staff, relying instead on various combinations of on-the-job training and in-house or externally delivered training,' said the ORR. Some prosecutors had as little as five days' training. 'Where TOCs provided information on the length of internal training, this varied considerably – from five days to three months,' said the ORR. In one case, Sarah Hodgson, a rail passenger, challenged her fare evasion charge. Magistrates found the case so weak they asked why the rail company went ahead with the prosecution. Its legal representative said: 'I'm just representative of them and my instruction is to proceed. I'm not an expert in railways laws.' An SJP conviction is a criminal conviction but defendants can only avoid a criminal record if they pay the fine. The average SJP fine is £284 but can be as low as £40 or as high as £10,000 for the worst Covid offences. They can also be ramped up by prosecuting authorities adding on legal costs. The SJP procedure has been successfully challenged after a campaign led by Christian Waters, who won a landmark ruling that the SJP had been wrongly used for 74,000 prosecutions for alleged fare evasion, leading to the convictions being quashed. As a result of that case and campaigns by Transform Justice, the Government is considering how to improve scrutiny of prosecutors. Ms Gibbs said there needed to be 'more reform and fast' to end the 'systemic injustice'. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: 'The Government recently consulted on the Single Justice Procedure and regulation of private prosecutors to review what more can be done to support vulnerable defendants, and we will respond in due course. 'The decision to prosecute cases under the Single Justice Procedure is made by the prosecuting authority, and only uncontested and non-imprisonable offences are eligible.'
