logo
Cradock Four inquest: Brutal murders were ‘calculated and premeditated', court told

Cradock Four inquest: Brutal murders were ‘calculated and premeditated', court told

News2402-06-2025
Four anti-apartheid activists - Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkonto and Sicelo Mhlauli - were abducted and brutally murdered by apartheid security forces in June 1985.
The families of the victims still seek justice 40 years later despite two previous inquests identifying security forces as responsible for the killings of the Cradock Four.
The current inquest at the Eastern Cape High Court in Gqeberha will continue until 12 June, including site visits to the Goniwe family home, Cradock Four Monument, and the scene of abduction.
The murder of the Cradock Four by the apartheid regime's security forces was calculated and premeditated, the inquest into the deaths of the anti-apartheid activists heard on the first day of its reopening on Monday.
The inquest is being held at the Eastern Cape High Court in Gqeberha.
Matthew Goniwe, Fort Calata, Sparrow Mkonto and Sicelo Mhlauli, popularly known as the Cradock Four, were abducted and viciously murdered by the South African security police in June 1985.
This was after they were detained at a roadblock near Gqeberha.
The first inquest was opened in 1987 and concluded in February 1989 with no prosecution.
A second inquest in 1994 was presided by Judge Neville Zietsman who found security forces responsible for the murders and established that a case of suspicion had been made out against police officers and members of South African Defence Force (SADF).
Despite the findings, no action was taken against them.
On behalf of the families of the victims, Howard Varney from law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, said it was unfortunate that 40 years later, the families were still waiting for justice.
Varney said the victims were murdered as part of apartheid regime's ruthless campaign against those mobilising resistance against the oppression.
He added:
These were four young men who had so much to offer South Africa. They were visionaries and leaders. They were deeply loved and treasured by their families, friends and comrades.
'We intend to demonstrate that the deaths of the Cradock Four were brought about by a way of a calculated and premeditated decision by the apartheid regime. It was meticulously planned by the security branch in an official operation.'
Varney added that the Eastern Cape, Cradock in particular, was an epicentre of the fight back against apartheid.
'We believe that the role of the state security council in authorising or approving the elimination of the Cradock Four should be closely investigated by this inquest,' Varney added.
Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, SC, who represents some Goniwe family members and the Cradock community, said there was a possibility the 'full truth' could be told in the third inquest. 'There is also a possibility of closure from a perspective of psychological trauma,' he added.
The inquest, which is expected to continue until 12 June, will include an inspection in loco at the Goniwe family home in Nxuba (formerly Cradock), the Cradock Four Monument and the Olifantskop Pass - the scene of the abduction of the four, about 89km from Gqeberha.
Families of the victims, Eastern Cape Premier Oscar Mabuyane and Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi attended the proceedings on Monday.
Judge Nomathamsanqa Beshe said the purpose of an inquest was to establish whether the death of anyone who died of something other natural causes has been brought about by any act involving or amounting to an offence on the part of any person or persons.
'In the previously held inquests, the presiding officers concluded or held that the deaths of the Cradock Four were brought about by an unknown person or persons. I will be required to make a finding as to whether the deaths were brought about by an act or omission prima facie involving or amounting to an offence on the part of any person or persons.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crown stays murder charge for Edmonton man convicted of 1987 killing
Crown stays murder charge for Edmonton man convicted of 1987 killing

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Crown stays murder charge for Edmonton man convicted of 1987 killing

Alberta prosecutors have stayed a murder charge against a man who was imprisoned for more than three decades for the death of an Edmonton woman who disappeared in 1987. In a news release on Friday, Innocence Canada, a non-profit organization that advocates for wrongful convictions, said the Alberta Crown Prosecution Service (ACPS) has stayed the second-degree murder charge against Roy Sobotiak. In an email to CBC on Friday, ACPS confirmed "that the matter was stayed." Sobotiak, 61, spent more than 35 years behind bars after being convicted for the murder of 34-year-old mother Susan Kaminsky. Kaminsky vanished in February 1987 and her body was never found. Sobotiak, who was in his early 20s at the time, was the last known person to see Kaminsky alive. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility of parole for 16½ years in 1991. Since his conviction, he continued to insist his innocence and has never been granted parole. In May 1994, the Alberta Court of Appeal dismissed Sobotiak's appeal against his conviction, and his application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed in 2004. In February 2021, Sobotiak applied to the federal minister of justice for a review of his conviction. Under the Criminal Code, a person who has been convicted of an offence and who has exhausted all rights of appeal may apply to the federal minister of justice for a review of their conviction. Sobotiak was granted a new trial in February by the former federal justice minister Arif Virani, who concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe a "miscarriage of justice" had occurred in the case. A briefing note by Sobotiak's legal team stated that the ministerial review hinged on three key issues: the undercover police operation, undisclosed investigative details, and additional forensic evidence linked to the case, some of which was discovered after his conviction. In response, Alberta Attorney General Mickey Amery applied for a judicial review to contest the decision. With his previous murder conviction quashed, Sobotiak was considered legally innocent and was granted bail in May. Sobotiak was released into a sober living house in Fort McMurray and was subject to conditions including a curfew and electronic monitoring for three months. The release from Innocence Canada stated that Sobotiak was scheduled to appear in court in Edmonton on Friday morning to set a date for his new trial. However, Alberta prosecutors entered a stay of proceedings, effectively ending the case against Sobotiak. "Mr. Sobotiak is a free man with no restrictions on him for the first time since the day of his arrest in 1989," said the Innocence Canada release. "Roy Sobotiak spent more time in prison than any other wrongfully convicted person in Canada has to date," said James Lockyer, a founding director of Innocence Canada and one of Sobotiak's lawyers, in an interview with CBC News. In the news release, Innocence Canada said Sobotiak intends to keep staying at the sober living house for now.

Crown stays murder charge for Edmonton man convicted of 1987 killing
Crown stays murder charge for Edmonton man convicted of 1987 killing

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Crown stays murder charge for Edmonton man convicted of 1987 killing

Alberta prosecutors have stayed a murder charge against a man who was imprisoned for more than three decades for the death of an Edmonton woman who disappeared in 1987. In a news release on Friday, Innocence Canada, a non-profit organization that advocates for wrongful convictions, said the Alberta Crown Prosecution Service (ACPS) has stayed the second-degree murder charge against Roy Sobotiak. In an email to CBC on Friday, ACPS confirmed "that the matter was stayed." Sobotiak, 61, spent more than 35 years behind bars after being convicted for the murder of 34-year-old mother Susan Kaminsky. Kaminsky vanished in February 1987 and her body was never found. Sobotiak, who was in his early 20s at the time, was the last known person to see Kaminsky alive. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with no eligibility of parole for 16½ years in 1991. Since his conviction, he continued to insist his innocence and has never been granted parole. In May 1994, the Alberta Court of Appeal dismissed Sobotiak's appeal against his conviction, and his application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed in 2004. In February 2021, Sobotiak applied to the federal minister of justice for a review of his conviction. Under the Criminal Code, a person who has been convicted of an offence and who has exhausted all rights of appeal may apply to the federal minister of justice for a review of their conviction. Sobotiak was granted a new trial in February by the former federal justice minister Arif Virani, who concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe a "miscarriage of justice" had occurred in the case. A briefing note by Sobotiak's legal team stated that the ministerial review hinged on three key issues: the undercover police operation, undisclosed investigative details, and additional forensic evidence linked to the case, some of which was discovered after his conviction. In response, Alberta Attorney General Mickey Amery applied for a judicial review to contest the decision. With his previous murder conviction quashed, Sobotiak was considered legally innocent and was granted bail in May. Sobotiak was released into a sober living house in Fort McMurray and was subject to conditions including a curfew and electronic monitoring for three months. The release from Innocence Canada stated that Sobotiak was scheduled to appear in court in Edmonton on Friday morning to set a date for his new trial. However, Alberta prosecutors entered a stay of proceedings, effectively ending the case against Sobotiak. "Mr. Sobotiak is a free man with no restrictions on him for the first time since the day of his arrest in 1989," said the Innocence Canada release. "Roy Sobotiak spent more time in prison than any other wrongfully convicted person in Canada has to date," said James Lockyer, a founding director of Innocence Canada and one of Sobotiak's lawyers, in an interview with CBC News. In the news release, Innocence Canada said Sobotiak intends to keep staying at the sober living house for now.

Who are the winners and losers of Trump's tariffs?
Who are the winners and losers of Trump's tariffs?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Who are the winners and losers of Trump's tariffs?

The penguins have been offered some relief. The people of Switzerland, Laos and Syria, not so much. This is the unlikely jumble of winners and losers of President Donald Trump's finalized list of tariffs, which governments, markets and businesses across the globe were scrambling to make sense of Friday. Some countries, such as Canada and South Africa, reacted with grave disappointment, warning that Trump's executive order could prompt job losses globally and rising costs for Americans. For others, the damage was not as bad as expected, with some able to thrash out deals before his deadline, and others hopeful of striking one in the future. The president had already drawn confusion and alarm when first unveiling his tariff list in April. Many analysts questioned, for example, why he was imposing a 10% levy on Heard and McDonald — two Antarctic outposts populated solely by penguins — or slapping a colossal 50% rate on the impoverished southern African nation of Lesotho. This week's finalized list elicited reprieve but also dismay— often with little or no explanation. The harshest import taxes were slapped on Syria (41%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), three relatively poor nations with, at best, modest trading relationships with Washington. And Iraq, Serbia (both 35%) and Algeria (30%) also found themselves subject to Trump's executive pen. (Brazil faces its own separate 50% tariff as punishment for what Trump says is a "witch hunt" against its former president and his right-wing ally, Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of plotting a coup.) Elsewhere Thursday, Lesotho's 50% rate was slashed to 15% — but not before huge damage was already wrought. The initial tariff saw American buyers pausing orders, thousands of people losing their jobs and the government declaring a state of disaster. Meanwhile the Heard and McDonald Islands and its flightless bird inhabitants dodged the tariff Trump threatened to impose on Australia, which owns the islands, and remained at the 10% rate first announced in April. It is 'hard to tell if there is any logic' to deciphering why some countries have been hit so hard while others were spared, said David Henig, a trade expert at the European Center for International Political Economy, a think tank based in Brussels. Without a detailed explanation from the White House, Henig told NBC News, the calculations were most likely based on the previous formula Washington used that placed the biggest tariffs on the countries with the biggest trade surpluses. In announcing the tariffs Thursday, Trump said these surpluses 'constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.' (Many economists disagree that the U.S. trade deficit is inherently a bad thing, and his tariffs are the subject of an ongoing legal fight that is likely to end up at the Supreme Court.) While the international uproar over Lesotho meant it was given a reprieve, other nations may have seen their tariffs maintained or even increased because 'they weren't the most obviously unfairly treated developing countries,' Henig said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from NBC News on its rationale. It's not only developing or obscure places feeling the heat of Trump's taxes. Switzerland — one of the richest nations in terms of gross domestic product per capita — awoke Friday to find that it had been slapped with a colossal 39% rate, which its government noted with 'great regret.' This could spell trouble for Swiss chocolate and luxury watches, for which the U.S. is the largest market, with shares for Watches of Switzerland Group PLC tumbling 8.5% following the news Friday. India also caught the eye as an American ally hit with a large 25% tariff but dismissed any suggestion of a rift, with Goods Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal saying the world's most populous nation was 'confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' In Southeast Asia, meanwhile, where exports to the U.S. have been increasing as manufacturers shift production from China, the reaction was generally relief. Thailand and Cambodia, which just agreed to a ceasefire after a five-day border conflict that killed more than 40 people, welcomed their 19% rate as 'win-win' and 'great news,' while Malaysia described its own rate as a 'positive outcome.' Cambodia had been threatened with 49%. The consistency creates a level playing field for Southeast Asian governments — with Indonesia and the Philippines on the same rate, and 20% for Vietnam — after they had worried Trump's tariffs might favor some countries over others. Taiwan, a tech hub that has a large trade surplus with the U.S., was hit with a 20% rate, lower than the 32% threatened in April but higher than the 15% negotiated by Japan, South Korea and the European Union. President Lai Ching-te said Friday that the 20% rate was 'temporary' and that his government expected to negotiate a lower number. Still up in the air are the final tariff rates between the U.S. and China, the world's two largest economies, who rattled global markets this spring as they imposed spiraling tit-for-tat levies before both sides agreed to put most on pause until Aug. 12. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said after meeting with Chinese trade officials this week that a potential extension of that pause could not be confirmed until Trump signed off on it. 'China's position on tariffs is consistent and clear,' Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun told a daily press briefing Friday. 'There are no winners in tariff wars or trade wars.' Alexander Smith reported from London and Jennifer Jett reported from Hong Kong. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store